PHI-413V Benchmark - Patient's Spiritual Needs Case Analysis

Grand Canyon University PHI-413V Benchmark – Patient’s Spiritual Needs Case Analysis – Step-By-Step Guide

This guide will demonstrate how to complete the Grand Canyon University PHI-413V Benchmark – Patient’s Spiritual Needs Case Analysis assignment based on general principles of academic writing. Here, we will show you the A, B, Cs of completing an academic paper, irrespective of the instructions. After guiding you through what to do, the guide will leave one or two sample essays at the end to highlight the various sections discussed below.

How to Research and Prepare for PHI-413V Benchmark – Patient’s Spiritual Needs Case Analysis

Whether one passes or fails an academic assignment such as the Grand Canyon University PHI-413V Benchmark – Patient’s Spiritual Needs Case Analysis depends on the preparation done beforehand. The first thing to do once you receive an assignment is to quickly skim through the requirements. Once that is done, start going through the instructions one by one to clearly understand what the instructor wants. The most important thing here is to understand the required format—whether it is APA, MLA, Chicago, etc.

After understanding the requirements of the paper, the next phase is to gather relevant materials. The first place to start the research process is the weekly resources. Go through the resources provided in the instructions to determine which ones fit the assignment. After reviewing the provided resources, use the university library to search for additional resources. After gathering sufficient and necessary resources, you are now ready to start drafting your paper.

How to Write the Introduction for PHI-413V Benchmark – Patient’s Spiritual Needs Case Analysis

The introduction for the Grand Canyon University PHI-413V Benchmark – Patient’s Spiritual Needs Case Analysis is where you tell the instructor what your paper will encompass. In three to four statements, highlight the important points that will form the basis of your paper. Here, you can include statistics to show the importance of the topic you will be discussing. At the end of the introduction, write a clear purpose statement outlining what exactly will be contained in the paper. This statement will start with “The purpose of this paper…” and then proceed to outline the various sections of the instructions.

Need a high-quality paper urgently?

We can deliver within hours.

PLACE AN ORDER

How to Write the Body for PHI-413V Benchmark – Patient’s Spiritual Needs Case Analysis

After the introduction, move into the main part of the PHI-413V Benchmark – Patient’s Spiritual Needs Case Analysis assignment, which is the body. Given that the paper you will be writing is not experimental, the way you organize the headings and subheadings of your paper is critically important. In some cases, you might have to use more subheadings to properly organize the assignment. The organization will depend on the rubric provided. Carefully examine the rubric, as it will contain all the detailed requirements of the assignment. Sometimes, the rubric will have information that the normal instructions lack.

Another important factor to consider at this point is how to do citations. In-text citations are fundamental as they support the arguments and points you make in the paper. At this point, the resources gathered at the beginning will come in handy. Integrating the ideas of the authors with your own will ensure that you produce a comprehensive paper. Also, follow the given citation format. In most cases, APA 7 is the preferred format for nursing assignments.

How to Write the Conclusion for PHI-413V Benchmark – Patient’s Spiritual Needs Case Analysis

After completing the main sections, write the conclusion of your paper. The conclusion is a summary of the main points you made in your paper. However, you need to rewrite the points and not simply copy and paste them. By restating the points from each subheading, you will provide a nuanced overview of the assignment to the reader.

How to Format the References List for PHI-413V Benchmark – Patient’s Spiritual Needs Case Analysis

The very last part of your paper involves listing the sources used in your paper. These sources should be listed in alphabetical order and double-spaced. Additionally, use a hanging indent for each source that appears in this list. Lastly, only the sources cited within the body of the paper should appear here.

Stuck? Let Us Help You

Completing assignments can sometimes be overwhelming, especially with the multitude of academic and personal responsibilities you may have. If you find yourself stuck or unsure at any point in the process, don’t hesitate to reach out for professional assistance. Our assignment writing services are designed to help you achieve your academic goals with ease.

Our team of experienced writers is well-versed in academic writing and familiar with the specific requirements of the PHI-413V Benchmark – Patient’s Spiritual Needs Case Analysis assignment. We can provide you with personalized support, ensuring your assignment is well-researched, properly formatted, and thoroughly edited. Get a feel of the quality we guarantee – ORDER NOW.

Sample Answer for PHI-413V Benchmark – Patient’s Spiritual Needs Case Analysis

Religion and spirituality are essential factors for most people seeking medical care and interventions. Unfortunately, health care providers and professionals do not consider the religious beliefs and spiritual needs of patients when dealing with complex medical decisions. As professional service providers and experts, health professionals must consider patients’ spiritual needs as such will enable them to develop responsive interventions to deal with any ethical dilemmas (Isaac, Hay, & Lubetkin, 2016). This paper explores the need for a spiritual needs analysis by health care providers based on a case study analysis that involves parental postponement of medically required intervention based on religious beliefs in prayers and miracles.

Allowing Mike to Continue Making Decisions

The physician is a professional guided by professional ethics and biomedical ethical principles that include beneficence, autonomy, non-maleficence, and justice. Imperatively, the physician has a responsibility to confer benefits to a patient through better life-saving interventions (Katz & Webb, 2016). Therefore, he should not allow Mike to make decisions that look irrational and detrimental to his son’s health. Although health care professionals should respect parental decisions based on the autonomy principle as they exercise this because James is a minor, the doctor has a legal and ethical responsibility to intervene in the situation that seems harmful to the child (Isaac et al., 2016). Mike is declining and postponing James medically required therapy or intervention because of his faith and religious beliefs. Mike believes that James will be healed through a miracle, as witnessed by one of his church members. Postponing James’ treatment is detrimental to his health and overall quality of life. Mike’s irrational decisions have led to the deterioration of James’ health to the point of having permanent dialysis and need for a kidney transplant.

Health professionals and providers have a responsibility to protect vulnerable children from potential medical negligence. When health providers encounter minors who face increasing health risks that can be detrimental to their life due to their parent’s inaction or poor decision, they are obligated by law and professional standards to intervene in such situations (Katz & Webb, 2016). again, health care professionals have an ethical responsibility to implement life-saving interventions over parental objection, especially when the minor’s life is in danger. Pediatricians have legal and ethical obligations to make sound decisions and offer care beneficial to pediatric patients.

Also Read

PHI 413V Applying the Four Principles: Case Study

PHI-413V Healing and Autonomy Case Study

PHI-413V Worldview Analysis and Personal Inventory

Christian Perspective on Health & Sickness, Medical Interventions and What Mike Should Do

Healing is a core influence on individuals’ health care behaviors and beliefs because of the perceived role of religion and spirituality in health. Christianity is composed of different denominations, and it is challenging to have a common approach to the perception of health and sickness and medical interventions. However, the general perception is that good health is a gift and blessing from God for good deeds and having faith and trust in Him (Isaac et al., 2016). Christians are supposed to live in good health without sickness because the illness signifies the devil taking control of God’s people. Illness or sickness is a reprisal form for sinning or doing bad things that do not please God. Further, Christians perceive sickness as a form of temptation or trials that they encounter to strengthen their faith and increase their belief in God and the healing power that He possesses. For instance, Mike wonders if his faith is not sufficient or if God is punishing him because of his son’s deteriorating condition.

It is common for religious people to question their faith when faced with sickness and why it occurs. Faith leads to good health, and sickness is a lack of devotion to one’s faith. Christians advance that when one is dedicated to their faith and believe in God, they are healed from illnesses and diseases that may impair their ability to practice their faith (Isaac et al., 2016). For instance, Mike considers his inability to demonstrate faith as the reason his son cannot be healed through prayers.

Medical intervention is a core aspect of the vocation of those called to care for others. Christians believe that medical interventions are miracles from God through physicians and other health care providers whose vocation is to treat and care for others. Christians should view medical interventions as a way of respecting God’s command for people to seek medical treatment and not a lack of faith. For instance, Jesus in Mathew 9:12 talks about those who are sick seeking medical treatment by looking for a physician as opposed to the healthy who do not need medical care. The implication is that God does not command Christians to keep away from medicine or refuse surgical interventions or procedures. Medical knowledge is a gift from God for people’s benefits. Therefore, Christians should seek medical care and view medical interventions as biblical and a way of honoring God with their bodies and respecting them as God’s dwelling (1 Corinthians 6:19-20).

As a Christian, Mike needs to allow James to undergo the prescribed medical intervention to believe that God will use the health care professionals to heal his son. By permitting his son to undertake medical treatment, it will imply that God will not heal James by prayers but means that He can and, at times, selects to cure the sick through medical interventions.

In honoring the beneficence principle, Mike needs to reflect on his son’s condition and understand that a kidney transplant will save his life. Mike should view beneficence as the physician’s conventional purpose as the good Samaritan who comes to help the sick and relives their pain and suffering. Secondly, Mike should honor the principle of non-maleficence by accepting a kidney transplant for his son with the aim of not harming him but healing (Brown, 2019). He needs to uphold his trust in God through the medical procedures, and James will get healed.

Importance of a Spiritual Needs Assessment

A spiritual needs assessment or analysis is a critical aspect of effective care delivery. A spiritual assessment allows health care providers to collect information or data on the patient’s wishes and how they base their decisions. Secondly, the assessment will enable the physician and other providers to understand the connection between the treatment interventions and what Mike believes about these approaches to cure his son (Isaac et al., 2016). When a spiritual assessment is done compassionately and culturally sensitively, it can help relieve patients’ suffering.

In this case, the assessment would help the physician help Mike determine suitable interventions for his son and his family members and others involved in the James’ care by identifying the spiritual needs concerning the medical care. The physician will also know the type of interventions that would be responsive and respectful to the family based on their spiritual beliefs (Evans & Devlin, 2016). A spiritual assessment provides a context for those involved to discuss patient experiences and their families to help them cope with diseases and beliefs that may contradict medical decisions.

The parameters needed for spiritual assessment of patients or clients include supporting spiritual beliefs, organizational resources, and spiritual activities (Meilaender, 2013). However, the physician can only use a spiritual assessment to identify the spiritual needs, but their role is not to offer spiritual guidance. A physician can refer the patient to a facility’s chaplain or the patient’s religious minister to help them develop an effective spiritual perceptive and address the underlying spiritual needs.

Conclusion

James’s case study demonstrates the need for nurse practitioners and other health care providers to develop effective mechanisms that will allow them to seek health care interventions and avoid detrimental outcomes, as evidenced in the case of Mike and his son James. Christians should perceive sickness and health as all-important and require medical interventions. Sickness may have negative connotations but also important in helping one seek medical care.

References

Brown, C. G. (2019). Theologies of medicine and miracles. Society, 56(2), 141-146.

Evans, S., & Devlin, G. (2016). Client-led spiritual interventions: Faith-integrated

professionalism in the context of a Christian faith-based organization. Australian Social Work, 69(3), 360-372.

Isaac, K., Hay, J., & Lubetkin, E. (2016). Incorporating spirituality in primary care. Journal of

Religion and Health, 55(3), 1065-1077.

Katz, A. & Webb, S. (2016). Informed consent in decision-making in pediatric practice.

Pediatrics, 138(2), e20161485.

Meilaender, G. (2013). Bioethics: A Primer for Christians (3rd ed.). Grand Rapids.

PHI-413V-RS-T3 Applying Four Principles Sample Answer

Applying the Four Principles: Case Study

Part 1: Chart (60 points)

Medical Indications

Beneficence and Nonmaleficence

Patient Preferences

Autonomy

Medical indications include the clinical evidence that guides the health provider in making a diagnosis. They also help establish the severity of severity associated with an underlying health disorder (Haddad & Geiger, 2019).

Medical indications thus guide in identifying the treatment options.

Beneficence is an ethical principle that refers to the duty to do good, prevent harm, and maximize benefits to enhance a patient’s wellbeing (Haddad & Geiger, 2019).

Nonmaleficence is an ethical principle that means the obligation to cause no harm either in physiological, psychological, social, or spiritual ways (Torry, 2017). It refers to the duty of a health provider to cause no harm to the patient and minimize potential harm.

In the case study, the attending physician demonstrates the principles of Beneficence and Nonmaleficence by recommending immediate dialysis to relieve the fluid buildup and stop further deterioration of James’ condition.

Although James’s parents opted not to have their son undergo dialysis at first, they demonstrate beneficence and nonmaleficence when they bring their son back when his condition deteriorates.

Mike is also worried if he should allow Samuel to donate a kidney with a concern that it might cause harm to him.

Patient preferences refer to a person’s evaluation of dimensions of health outcomes and significantly influence patients’ health care choices (Haddad & Geiger, 2019).

Patient preferences often result from a consideration of specific health elements such as expected treatments or health outcomes.

Autonomy is an ethical principle that refers to the duty to respect a patient’s right to self-governance. This is demonstrated by offering a patient the ability to choose and act on that decision (Torry, 2017).

In the case study, the principle of Autonomy is upheld by the attending physician when he discussed with James’ parents on the treatment options for James.

The attending also allows James’ parents to provide consent for treatment since James is a minor.

The attending physician respects Mike’s decision to forego the decision to have immediate dialysis instead of attending faith healing services.

The nephrologist also informs Mike of the treatment options for a kidney transplant and allows him to decide whether to present Samuel for kidney donation.

Quality of Life

Beneficence, Nonmaleficence, Autonomy

Contextual Features

Justice and Fairness

Quality of life refers to the general wellbeing of persons and societies.

The WHO defines quality of life as an individual’s perception of his or her position in life as per the culture and value systems in which they live and in perspective to their goals, expectations, standards, and concerns (WHO, 2018).

The attending physician recommended immediate dialysis to promote James’ quality of life, which demonstrates upholding beneficence and nonmaleficence.

James’ health condition had worsened, but with regular dialysis sessions, he became stable.

The nephrologist recommended a kidney transplant to improve James’ quality of life since he could not be kept on dialysis for a lifetime.

The nephrologist also upholds beneficence by suggesting to James’s parents an ideal donor match, James’ brother, after several people offered to donate but were not compatible.

Mike also has his sons’ best interest at heart, although he is in a dilemma if he should allow James’ brother to donate a kidney in the fear that it could harm him.

Contextual features address how professional, family, financial, religious, legal, and institutional factors influence clinical decisions (Torry, 2017). These factors include the circumstances in which the clinical case occurs.

The ethical principle of Justice and fairness refers to the duty to treat all patients fairly and equitably (Haddad & Geiger, 2019).

Justice and fairness were upheld in the case study when the attending physician takes back James when he returns in a critical condition.

Mike and Joanne believe that faith healing services would better James’ conditions, and Mike is even considering waiting for God’s miracle to heal James.