NRS 450 Benchmark - Clinical Decision-Making Tools and Health Equity

Grand Canyon University NRS 450 Benchmark – Clinical Decision-Making Tools and Health Equity– Step-By-Step Guide

This guide will demonstrate how to complete the Grand Canyon University NRS 450 Benchmark – Clinical Decision-Making Tools and Health Equity assignment based on general principles of academic writing. Here, we will show you the A, B, Cs of completing an academic paper, irrespective of the instructions. After guiding you through what to do, the guide will leave one or two sample essays at the end to highlight the various sections discussed below.

How to Research and Prepare for NRS 450 Benchmark – Clinical Decision-Making Tools and Health Equity

Whether one passes or fails an academic assignment such as the Grand Canyon University NRS 450 Benchmark – Clinical Decision-Making Tools and Health Equity depends on the preparation done beforehand. The first thing to do once you receive an assignment is to quickly skim through the requirements. Once that is done, start going through the instructions one by one to clearly understand what the instructor wants. The most important thing here is to understand the required format—whether it is APA, MLA, Chicago, etc.

After understanding the requirements of the paper, the next phase is to gather relevant materials. The first place to start the research process is the weekly resources. Go through the resources provided in the instructions to determine which ones fit the assignment. After reviewing the provided resources, use the university library to search for additional resources. After gathering sufficient and necessary resources, you are now ready to start drafting your paper.

How to Write the Introduction for NRS 450 Benchmark – Clinical Decision-Making Tools and Health Equity

The introduction for the Grand Canyon University NRS 450 Benchmark – Clinical Decision-Making Tools and Health Equity is where you tell the instructor what your paper will encompass. In three to four statements, highlight the important points that will form the basis of your paper. Here, you can include statistics to show the importance of the topic you will be discussing. At the end of the introduction, write a clear purpose statement outlining what exactly will be contained in the paper. This statement will start with “The purpose of this paper…” and then proceed to outline the various sections of the instructions.

Need a high-quality paper urgently?

We can deliver within hours.

PLACE AN ORDER

How to Write the Body for NRS 450 Benchmark – Clinical Decision-Making Tools and Health Equity

After the introduction, move into the main part of the NRS 450 Benchmark – Clinical Decision-Making Tools and Health Equity assignment, which is the body. Given that the paper you will be writing is not experimental, the way you organize the headings and subheadings of your paper is critically important. In some cases, you might have to use more subheadings to properly organize the assignment. The organization will depend on the rubric provided. Carefully examine the rubric, as it will contain all the detailed requirements of the assignment. Sometimes, the rubric will have information that the normal instructions lack.

Another important factor to consider at this point is how to do citations. In-text citations are fundamental as they support the arguments and points you make in the paper. At this point, the resources gathered at the beginning will come in handy. Integrating the ideas of the authors with your own will ensure that you produce a comprehensive paper. Also, follow the given citation format. In most cases, APA 7 is the preferred format for nursing assignments.

How to Write the Conclusion for NRS 450 Benchmark – Clinical Decision-Making Tools and Health Equity

After completing the main sections, write the conclusion of your paper. The conclusion is a summary of the main points you made in your paper. However, you need to rewrite the points and not simply copy and paste them. By restating the points from each subheading, you will provide a nuanced overview of the assignment to the reader.

How to Format the References List for NRS 450 Benchmark – Clinical Decision-Making Tools and Health Equity

The very last part of your paper involves listing the sources used in your paper. These sources should be listed in alphabetical order and double-spaced. Additionally, use a hanging indent for each source that appears in this list. Lastly, only the sources cited within the body of the paper should appear here.

Stuck? Let Us Help You

Completing assignments can sometimes be overwhelming, especially with the multitude of academic and personal responsibilities you may have. If you find yourself stuck or unsure at any point in the process, don’t hesitate to reach out for professional assistance. Our assignment writing services are designed to help you achieve your academic goals with ease.

Our team of experienced writers is well-versed in academic writing and familiar with the specific requirements of the NRS 450 Benchmark – Clinical Decision-Making Tools and Health Equity assignment. We can provide you with personalized support, ensuring your assignment is well-researched, properly formatted, and thoroughly edited. Get a feel of the quality we guarantee – ORDER NOW.

Sample Answer for NRS 450 Benchmark – Clinical Decision-Making Tools and Health Equity

Introduction

Clinical decision support systems (CDSSs) are becoming more often incorporated into healthcare environments to increase patient outcomes, minimize medical mistakes, and boost clinical efficiency via evidence-based suggestions for clinicians throughout patient care.
Yet, implementing and improving these systems continues to be complicated.
This presentation will analyze several CDSS technologies to assess their use in promoting health equality for all patients in our healthcare organization.

Reason for the Project

The primary goal of CDSS is to provide prompt information to physicians, patients, and others to guide healthcare choices.
CDSS tools consist of order sets tailored for specific ailments or patient types, suggestions, patient-specific information databases, preventative care reminders, and alarms for hazardous circumstances.
CDSS can save expenses, enhance productivity, and minimize patient disruption.
CDSS may simultaneously handle many areas, such as notifying physicians of potential duplicate tests a patient is scheduled to have.

CDSS and Health Equity

To provide genuine support for guideline-driven and equity-driven care, the creators of the algorithms and the CDSS systems must work toward eliminating prejudice.
By adopting this method, CDSS may effectively fulfill the commitment to promoting both guideline-based and equity-based care that enhances results and the general health of all individuals.

Task Force Selection

Nurse informaticist
The American Medical Informatics Association defines informatics as the comprehensive knowledge and advancement of organizing, analyzing, managing, and using the information in healthcare
Informatics can enhance efficiency in healthcare operations and can improve patient outcomes.
End-users such as physicians, nurses, laboratory technologists, pharmacists, and patients.
Sales and marketing teams
CDSS product development and maintenance teams, including system administrators, system developers, system architects, project managers, and system maintenance staff.

Research

Epic Systems’ tool
A study by Musen et al. (2021) showed that this software has had a beneficial impact on patient care by enhancing diversity, equality, and inclusion initiatives in healthcare delivery.
Subica & Brown (2020) state that Epic is globally acknowledged as the most frequently used Electronic Health Record (EHR).
Organizations may use the system’s many features, including pooled data, module integration, and the development of decision assistance tools.

Also Read

NRS 450 Summary of Current Course Content Knowledge

NRS 450 Informatics Education Plan

NRS 450 Benchmark – Culture of Patient Safety Case Studies

NRS 450 Benchmark – Health Information Standards and Regulations

NRS 450 Benchmark – Information and Communication Technologies in Nursing

Basic Concepts of Systems

The application of information and communication technologies in the healthcare industry is predicated on the creation of digital technologies, databases, and other applications that aim to improve healthcare for individuals and communities, as well as to address the prevention of illness, the treatment of diseases, and the management of chronic illnesses.
Web portals, sensors, electronic records, video communication, online games, and mobile applications are all examples of applications or devices that are developed using information and communication technologies that have the potential to bring about positive changes in the healthcare industry.

Telehealth and CDSS

Telemedicine and CDSSs are prevalent information and communication technologies implemented together to facilitate equitable access to high-quality care and simplify patient management.
Utilizing home healthcare diagnostics platforms and telemedicine has played a pivotal role in expanding access to high-quality healthcare, particularly for underserved and marginalized populations in rural and small-town regions.

Crucial Functionality

Epic Systems provides evidence-based recommendations and alerts to healthcare organizations directly at the point of treatment.
The Epic charting system comprises medical templates, patient information, and referrals to enhance healthcare personnel’s ability to offer optimal patient care.
The Epic EHR database system includes patient information, reporting, and analytics features.
It is equipped to manage the daily activities of a medical practice, such as maintaining patient medical information.
The Affordable Care Act established new rules for exchanging clinical and administrative data, as outlined by the USCDI.
This new standard requires suppliers to ensure that health applications are more accessible and interoperable and comply with regulations when using APIs.
Epic is an electronic health records management tool designed to assist medical professionals, hospitals, and healthcare providers in managing their patient’s medical data by allowing them to add, view, edit, and save information.
Patients, physicians, and researchers have improved interoperability within their infrastructure by integrating Epic with existing corporate systems.

Task Force Communication

Email
Mobile phones
Telemedicine
Telecare systems

Conclusion

CDSS may help diagnose, treat, and manage care by using patient data, evidence-based recommendations, and best practices.
CDSS has shown enhanced patient outcomes by optimizing clinical processes, lowering mortality rates, and supporting evidence-based decision-making.
CDSS solutions like Epic software have the opportunity and obligation to enhance patient care by promoting diversity, equality, and inclusion in healthcare delivery.

References

Butzner, M., & Cuffee, Y. (2021). Telehealth interventions and outcomes across rural communities in the United States: Narrative review. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 23(8), e29575. https://doi.org/10.2196/29575
Hartasanchez, S. A., Heen, A. F., Kunneman, M., García-Bautista, A., Hargraves, I., Prokop, L. J., May, C., & Montori, V. M. (2022). Remote shared decision making through telemedicine: A systematic review of the literature. Patient Education and Counseling, 105(2), 356–365. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2021.06.012
Lathrop, B. (2020). Moving toward health equity by addressing social determinants of health. Nursing for Women’s Health, 24(1), 36–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nwh.2019.11.003
Lyles, C. R., Wachter, R. M., & Sarkar, U. (2021). Focusing on digital health equity. JAMA, 326(18), 1795. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2021.18459
Musen, M. A., Middleton, B., & Greenes, R. A. (2021). Clinical Decision-Support Systems. In Springer eBooks (pp. 795–840). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-58721-5_24
Rodriguez, J. A., Clark, C. R., & Bates, D. W. (2020). Digital Health equity is a necessity in the 21st Century Cures Act era. JAMA, 323(23), 2381. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2020.7858
Subica, A. M., & Brown, B. (2020). Addressing health disparities through deliberative methods: Citizens’ Panels for Health Equity. American Journal of Public Health, 110(2), 166–173. https://doi.org/10.2105/ajph.2019.305450
Sutton, R. T., Pincock, D., Baumgart, D. C., Sadowski, D. C., Fedorak, R. N., & Kroeker, K. I. (2020). An overview of clinical decision support systems: benefits, risks, and strategies for success. Npj Digital Medicine, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-020-0221-y