DNP 820 Find a research article that supports the intervention of your project

Grand Canyon University DNP 820 Find a research article that supports the intervention of your project-Step-By-Step Guide

This guide will demonstrate how to complete the Grand Canyon University DNP 820 Find a research article that supports the intervention of your project assignment based on general principles of academic writing. Here, we will show you the A, B, Cs of completing an academic paper, irrespective of the instructions. After guiding you through what to do, the guide will leave one or two sample essays at the end to highlight the various sections discussed below.

How to Research and Prepare for DNP 820 Find a research article that supports the intervention of your project                           

Whether one passes or fails an academic assignment such as the Grand Canyon University DNP 820 Find a research article that supports the intervention of your project depends on the preparation done beforehand. The first thing to do once you receive an assignment is to quickly skim through the requirements. Once that is done, start going through the instructions one by one to clearly understand what the instructor wants. The most important thing here is to understand the required format—whether it is APA, MLA, Chicago, etc.

After understanding the requirements of the paper, the next phase is to gather relevant materials. The first place to start the research process is the weekly resources. Go through the resources provided in the instructions to determine which ones fit the assignment. After reviewing the provided resources, use the university library to search for additional resources. After gathering sufficient and necessary resources, you are now ready to start drafting your paper.

How to Write the Introduction for DNP 820 Find a research article that supports the intervention of your project                         

The introduction for the Grand Canyon University DNP 820 Find a research article that supports the intervention of your project is where you tell the instructor what your paper will encompass. In three to four statements, highlight the important points that will form the basis of your paper. Here, you can include statistics to show the importance of the topic you will be discussing. At the end of the introduction, write a clear purpose statement outlining what exactly will be contained in the paper. This statement will start with “The purpose of this paper…” and then proceed to outline the various sections of the instructions.

How to Write the Body for DNP 820 Find a research article that supports the intervention of your project                         

After the introduction, move into the main part of the DNP 820 Find a research article that supports the intervention of your project assignment, which is the body. Given that the paper you will be writing is not experimental, the way you organize the headings and subheadings of your paper is critically important. In some cases, you might have to use more subheadings to properly organize the assignment. The organization will depend on the rubric provided. Carefully examine the rubric, as it will contain all the detailed requirements of the assignment. Sometimes, the rubric will have information that the normal instructions lack.

Another important factor to consider at this point is how to do citations. In-text citations are fundamental as they support the arguments and points you make in the paper. At this point, the resources gathered at the beginning will come in handy. Integrating the ideas of the authors with your own will ensure that you produce a comprehensive paper. Also, follow the given citation format. In most cases, APA 7 is the preferred format for nursing assignments.

How to Write the Conclusion for DNP 820 Find a research article that supports the intervention of your project                         

After completing the main sections, write the conclusion of your paper. The conclusion is a summary of the main points you made in your paper. However, you need to rewrite the points and not simply copy and paste them. By restating the points from each subheading, you will provide a nuanced overview of the assignment to the reader.

How to Format the References List for DNP 820 Find a research article that supports the intervention of your project                           

The very last part of your paper involves listing the sources used in your paper. These sources should be listed in alphabetical order and double-spaced. Additionally, use a hanging indent for each source that appears in this list. Lastly, only the sources cited within the body of the paper should appear here.

Stuck? Let Us Help You

Completing assignments can sometimes be overwhelming, especially with the multitude of academic and personal responsibilities you may have. If you find yourself stuck or unsure at any point in the process, don’t hesitate to reach out for professional assistance. Our assignment writing services are designed to help you achieve your academic goals with ease. 

Our team of experienced writers is well-versed in academic writing and familiar with the specific requirements of the DNP 820 Find a research article that supports the intervention of your project assignment. We can provide you with personalized support, ensuring your assignment is well-researched, properly formatted, and thoroughly edited. Get a feel of the quality we guarantee – ORDER NOW.

Sample Answer for DNP 820 Find a research article that supports the intervention of your project

Re: Topic 2 DQ 1

What type of research was conducted?

The research article identified that supports the intervention of my DNP project was written by Wada, et al., (2020). It is a peer-reviewed article and scholarly publication written by one or more people/authors with similar competencies for the work.

 Where does it fall on the hierarchy of research designs? (Refer to Figure 1 in “Translating Research for Evidence-Based Practice”). Explain. 

According to Bowen, & Forrest, (2017) in translating Research for Evidence-Based Practice (levels of evidence in research), the research article I picked for my DPI project can be appraised to fall on the level 2 hierarchy of research designs

Level 2: Quasi-experimental study, a systematic review of quasi-experimental studies +/− RCTs, +/− meta-analysis: This is a primary, experimental study perspective, and tests treatment. To formulate a specific PICO question, the learner needs to ask a good clinical question to identify why the study was conducted, the research question(s) the researcher examined, if a clear statement of purpose was present and if objectives were stated at the beginning of the article. A PICO question identifies the (P) patient or population problem, (I) intervention, (C) comparison, (O) outcome(s), and sometimes (T) time frame is important.

My PICOT Question

(P) Among adult patients in a home health care setting, (I) does the implementation of the American Association of Clinical Endocrinology Clinical Practice Guideline on the use of continuous glucose monitoring (C) compared to current practices (O) impact hemoglobin A1C (T) over 12 weeks?

According to my PICO Question and Wada, et al., (2020) research studies;

–The intervention identifies and used was, flash glucose monitoring helps achieve better glycemic control than conventional self-monitoring of blood glucose in non-insulin-treated type 2 diabetes.

– It is a randomized controlled trial (1:1), multicenter, open-label, parallel-group and was compared using analysis of covariance model that included baseline values and the group as covariates with forty-eight participants. It falls in level 2- Quasi-experimental study, a systematic review of quasi-experimental studies +/− RCTs, +/− meta-analysis, it’s an original research study, done by two or more authors/research with similar interest and qualification, and within the five years allowed by GCU.

The research article for my project shows the significance of the study, which includes what is already known about the subject

-Flash glucose monitoring (FGM) has been shown to reduce hypo/hyperglycemia and improve glycated hemoglobin (HBAIC). it was compared with self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG), and the conventional finger-pricking method in patients with type 1 and type 2 diabetes treated with insulin.

What are the new findings?

– As measured by Wada, et al., (2020) in Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire score in patients with non-insulin treated type 2 diabetes, compared with SMBG, FGM significantly improved mean glucose levels, glucose variability indices, time in hypo/hyperglycemia treatment, and patient’s satisfaction. Intervention with FGM preserved good glycemic control even after the cessation of glucose monitoring.

Possible sources of bias that are present in the study and how these might result to change the focus of research or clinical practice are;

-For future research studies it is imperative to clarify whether the intervention with FGM leads to lifestyle improvement in patients with type 2 diabetes during or even after glucose monitoring.

Reference

Bowen, D. M. & Forrest, J. (2017). Translating Research for Evidence-Based Practice. 10-14.

Wada, E., Onoue, T., Kobayashi, T., Handa, T., Hayase, A., Ito, M., Furukawa, M., Okuji, T.,

Okada, N., Iwama, S., Sugiyama, M., Tsunekawa, T., Takagi, H., Hagiwara, D., Ito, Y., Suga, H., Banno, R., Kuwatsuka, Y., Ando, M., & Goto, M. Hiroshi Arima. (2020). Flash glucose monitoring helps achieve better glycemic control than conventional self-monitoring of blood glucose in non-insulin-treated type 2 diabetes: a randomized controlled trial. Retrieved from https://drc.bmj.com/content/bmjdrc/8/1/e001115.full.pdf

Sample Answer 2 for DNP 820 Find a research article that supports the intervention of your project

Patients who are critically ill are vulnerable and susceptible to worsening illness, long-term disability or even death. This group of patients is experiencing a serious illness or injury and this predisposes them to sequelae of consequences when admitted into an intensive care unit. Healthcare continues to improve, and people do survive. However, according to Detsky et al. (2017), only one-third of those who survived their intensive care stay returned to their baseline after six months. In order to help people not only survive their critical illness but also thrive, there is an ABCDEF bundle to help optimize outcomes and reduce delirium and disability associated with an ICU stay (Marra et a., 2018). The ‘E’ part of this bundle stands for early mobilization for critically ill patients. This is what my DPI project will focus on.

Wang et al. (2022) conducted a study examining the impact of early mobility which reduced ICU-acquired weakness for critical care patients. This study was published in Disease Markers journal. This is a peer-reviewed journal published by Hindawi publishing. This journal entry had a panel of scientific experts review the article prior to publishing. By using a peer-reviewed journal article, the manuscript has been rigorously reviewed and deemed to be quality research and accurate data (Bowen & Forrest, 2017).

This study was a randomized trial with a sample size of 95. There is a control group and an intervention group. Due to the randomization of this experiment, it is the top tier in the hierarchy of research. It is a primary research study as the authors of this study conducted this study. There are different types of bias that is possible. While 95 participants were involved in this study, there could have been a larger sample size. A larger sample size is more representative of the population and can reduce bias. Further, this study was only located in one hospital and was overseas. There could be a selection bias based on this fact. There may be cultural bias built in as this particular study was conducted in China. Lastly, there were patients excluded, which may skew the results of the experiment.

References

Bowen, D. M., & Forrest, J. L. (2017). Translating research for evidence-based practice. Access, 10-14. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Denise-Bowen/publication/313297984_Translating_research_for_evidence_based_practice/links/5899e9344585158bf6f8a44c/Translating-research-for-evidence-based-practice.pdf?origin=publication_detail

Detsky, M. E., Harhay, M. O., Bayard, D. F., Delman, A. M., Buehler, A. E., Kent, S. A., Ciuffetelli, I. V., Cooney, E., Gabler, N. B., Ratcliffe, S. J., Mikkelsen, M. E. & Halpern, S. D. (2017). Six-month morbidity and mortality among intensive care unit patients receiving life-sustaining therapy. A prospective cohort study.  Annals of the American Thoracic Society, 14(10), 1562-1570.

Marra, A., Ely, E. W., Pandharipande, P. P., Pstel, M. B. (2018). The ABCDEF bundle in critical care. Critical Care Clinician, 33 (2), 225-243. Doi: 10.106/j.ccc.2016.12.005.

Wang, J., Ren, D., Liu, Y., Wang, Y., Zhang, B., & Xiao, Q. (2022). Effects of early mobilization on the prognosis of critically ill patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 110. https://doi-org.lopes.idm.oclc.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2020.103708. Permalink: https://lopes.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=psyh&AN=2020-76430-001&site=eds-live&scope=site&custid=s8333196&groupid=main&profile=eds1.

DNP 820 Topic 2 DQ 2 Sample Answer

Personal beliefs and bias are idealism based upon past experiences, limited information, or preexisting perspectives. Evaluation of biases are important as it decreases the probability of skewing data to achieve the hypothesis. For example, although, scienctific data shows that lower socioeconomic populations are more likely to experience health care disparities assuming that the outcome of HbA1Cs are related to diet due to the food deserts and poor choices in the area may not be accurate. As clinicians, we assumed that the gaps in compliance can be changed with Diabetic Education and Managment interventions may help, if out premise is not support by primary research our PICOT may not be reasonable. 

1. Bias in data collection: “study a phenomenon of interest in a representative sample. By doing this, we hope that what we have learned from a sample can be generalized to the entire population (2). To be able to do so, a sample needs to be representative of the population. If this is not the case, conclusions will not be generalizable, i.e. the study will not have the external validity” should our populatiion include patients that we believe are more likely to represent the outcome a bias in data collection occures 

1. Misclassification Bias: is a kind of sampling bias which occurs when a disease of interest is poorly defined, when there is no gold standard for diagnosis of the disease or when a disease might not be easy detectable. This way some subjects are falsely classified as cases or controls whereas they should have been in another group. An example of this may look like enrolling patients presenting to the clinic with a blood sugar of 125 without supporting the data with an HbA1C. 

1. Bias in data Analysis: reporting non-existing data from experiments which were never done (data fabrication), eliminating data which do not support your hypothesis (outliers, or even whole subgroups); using inappropriate statistical tests to test your data;performing multiple testing (“fishing for P”) by pair-wise comparisons (4), testing multiple endpoints and performing secondary or subgroup analyses, which were not part of the original plan in order “to find” statistically significant difference regardless to hypothesis 

1. Publication Bias: scientific journals are much more likely to accept for publication a study which reports some positive than a study with negative findings 

Understanding of how and why these biases may occur should assist with DPI credibility. 

Availability bias, source Bias, and publication bias in meta-analysis. (2015). Methods of Meta-Analysis: Correcting Error and Bias in Research Findings, 513-551. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781483398105.n13