DNP 820 Compare and contrast qualitative, quantitative, and mixed-method research

Grand Canyon University DNP 820 Compare and contrast qualitative, quantitative, and mixed-method research-Step-By-Step Guide

This guide will demonstrate how to complete the Grand Canyon University DNP 820 Compare and contrast qualitative, quantitative, and mixed-method research assignment based on general principles of academic writing. Here, we will show you the A, B, Cs of completing an academic paper, irrespective of the instructions. After guiding you through what to do, the guide will leave one or two sample essays at the end to highlight the various sections discussed below.

How to Research and Prepare for DNP 820 Compare and contrast qualitative, quantitative, and mixed-method research                           

Whether one passes or fails an academic assignment such as the Grand Canyon University DNP 820 Compare and contrast qualitative, quantitative, and mixed-method research depends on the preparation done beforehand. The first thing to do once you receive an assignment is to quickly skim through the requirements. Once that is done, start going through the instructions one by one to clearly understand what the instructor wants. The most important thing here is to understand the required format—whether it is APA, MLA, Chicago, etc.

After understanding the requirements of the paper, the next phase is to gather relevant materials. The first place to start the research process is the weekly resources. Go through the resources provided in the instructions to determine which ones fit the assignment. After reviewing the provided resources, use the university library to search for additional resources. After gathering sufficient and necessary resources, you are now ready to start drafting your paper.

How to Write the Introduction for DNP 820 Compare and contrast qualitative, quantitative, and mixed-method research                         

The introduction for the Grand Canyon University DNP 820 Compare and contrast qualitative, quantitative, and mixed-method research is where you tell the instructor what your paper will encompass. In three to four statements, highlight the important points that will form the basis of your paper. Here, you can include statistics to show the importance of the topic you will be discussing. At the end of the introduction, write a clear purpose statement outlining what exactly will be contained in the paper. This statement will start with “The purpose of this paper…” and then proceed to outline the various sections of the instructions.

How to Write the Body for DNP 820 Compare and contrast qualitative, quantitative, and mixed-method research                         

After the introduction, move into the main part of the DNP 820 Compare and contrast qualitative, quantitative, and mixed-method research assignment, which is the body. Given that the paper you will be writing is not experimental, the way you organize the headings and subheadings of your paper is critically important. In some cases, you might have to use more subheadings to properly organize the assignment. The organization will depend on the rubric provided. Carefully examine the rubric, as it will contain all the detailed requirements of the assignment. Sometimes, the rubric will have information that the normal instructions lack.

Another important factor to consider at this point is how to do citations. In-text citations are fundamental as they support the arguments and points you make in the paper. At this point, the resources gathered at the beginning will come in handy. Integrating the ideas of the authors with your own will ensure that you produce a comprehensive paper. Also, follow the given citation format. In most cases, APA 7 is the preferred format for nursing assignments.

How to Write the Conclusion for DNP 820 Compare and contrast qualitative, quantitative, and mixed-method research                         

After completing the main sections, write the conclusion of your paper. The conclusion is a summary of the main points you made in your paper. However, you need to rewrite the points and not simply copy and paste them. By restating the points from each subheading, you will provide a nuanced overview of the assignment to the reader.

How to Format the References List for DNP 820 Compare and contrast qualitative, quantitative, and mixed-method research                           

The very last part of your paper involves listing the sources used in your paper. These sources should be listed in alphabetical order and double-spaced. Additionally, use a hanging indent for each source that appears in this list. Lastly, only the sources cited within the body of the paper should appear here.

Stuck? Let Us Help You

Completing assignments can sometimes be overwhelming, especially with the multitude of academic and personal responsibilities you may have. If you find yourself stuck or unsure at any point in the process, don’t hesitate to reach out for professional assistance. Our assignment writing services are designed to help you achieve your academic goals with ease. 

Our team of experienced writers is well-versed in academic writing and familiar with the specific requirements of the DNP 820 Compare and contrast qualitative, quantitative, and mixed-method research assignment. We can provide you with personalized support, ensuring your assignment is well-researched, properly formatted, and thoroughly edited. Get a feel of the quality we guarantee – ORDER NOW. 

Sample Answer for DNP 820 Compare and contrast qualitative, quantitative, and mixed-method research

Re: Topic 4 DQ 2

The approaches in research are plans and procedures spanning the steps from broad assumptions to detailed methods of collecting data, analysis, and interpretation involving several decisions based on the nature of research problems and audience for the study (Creswell & Creswell, 2018). Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods are the three approaches to research.

Qualitative research involves emerging questions and procedures, data analysis, and interpretation of the meaning of data by a researcher. It is an approach to understanding and exploring the meaning of a problem. On the other hand, quantitative research is testing objective theories by checking the relationship amongst variables that can be measured, and the numbered data using statistical procedures can be analyzed. The final written report has a structured set consisting of an introduction, theory and literature, methods, results, and discussion. Mixed methods research is an inquiry involving quantitative and qualitative data collection, integrating the two forms of data and using designs involving philosophical assumptions and theoretical frameworks.

When choosing primary research, systematic reviews of randomized controlled trials are the strongest level of evidence to guide interventions in clinical practice (Melnyk, 2016). In order to support my DPI project interventions, it is important to locate evidence relevant to guide nursing practice and improve patient care outcomes and quality care, as well as know the importance of how to critically appraise and synthesize to determine whether the studies are reliable, valid and applicable to the PICOT question. Reliable study results indicate that the influence on patient outcomes is sufficient.

References

Creswell, J. W. & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods approaches. SAGE Publications, Inc.

Research Design – Google Books

Melnyk, B. M. (2016). Level of evidence plus critical appraisal of its quality yields confidence to implement evidence-based practice changes. Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing, 13(5), 337–339.

https://doi-org.lopes.idm.oclc.org/10.1111/wvn.12181

Sample Answer 2 for DNP 820 Compare and contrast qualitative, quantitative, and mixed-method research

Quantitative research is a type of research method that demonstrates measurement and accuracy while making use of a rigorous and controlled design to examine phenomena. The series of applications of quantitative research may be observed in clinical trials for new treatments and medications to surveying nursing staff and patients. The design type is further designs include experimental, quasi-experimental, and non-experimental. While Qualitative research centers on lived experiences and human perceptions using multiple ways to collect data. The qualitative method of research is categorized as ethnography, phenomenology, grounded theory, historical research, and case studies. The mixed research method allows for inferences of data from both quantitative and qualitative research by analyzing data and integrating the findings (Rutberg and Bouikidis, 2018). While both quantitative and qualitative approaches are important quantitative research is most recommended for the DPI project for statistical validity.

Based upon the hierarchical strength in the level of evidence pyramid, translating evidence into practice with evidence from the higher ranked level is crucial. Melnyk  (2016) describe systematic reviews of randomized controlled trials as the strongest level of evidence to guide interventions in clinical practice but added that randomized controlled trial could substitute for the former in their absence in order of strength in supporting level of evidence. The formation of a PICOT question is a pivotal guide in locating the most appropriate data and evidence to support the translation of evidence into improved practice. This level of evidence applies to my DPI project as it is geared toward the best treatment approach for asymptomatic urinary tract infections. Using critically appraised results from a systematic review of randomized controlled trials or randomized clinical trials establishes the best-proven evidence that can be applied to improve clinical practice. It is important to note that the article’s validity, reliability, and applicability are vital in influencing the change of practice (Melnyk, 2016).

Reference

Melnyk, B. M. (2016). Level of Evidence Plus Critical Appraisal of Its Quality Yields Confidence to Implement Evidence-Based Practice Changes. Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing, 13(5), 337–339. https://doi-org.lopes.idm.oclc.org/10.1111/wvn.12181

Rutberg, S., & Bouikidis, C. D. (2018). Exploring the Evidence Quantitative and Qualitative Research Focusing on the Fundamentals: A Simplistic Differentiation Between Qualitative and Quantitative Research. Nephrol. Nurs. J, 45(2).

DNP-820 Topic 5 DQ 1 Sample Answer

Evidence of how things really are and how to improve the safety and quality of care provided to patients comes from relevant research. Reality to a researcher can either be objective or subjective (Smith, 2021); however, evidence to support a DPI project is quantitative with randomized controlled trial design. For this reason, searching the literature for evidence to support PICOT questions in a quality improvement project is very important in clinical practice. It is important to stress that statistical significance is not the same as clinical significance; however, the two can find usefulness in a DPI project. Following that the evidence required to support DPI project falls into quantitative methodology, with randomized control design, statistical and clinical significance become inevitable. 

Clinical significance is the relevance of a particular treatment that does not necessarily take into consideration statistical significance. The relevance of statistical significance in nursing practice takes into consideration confidence intervals (Ranganathan, Pramesh, & Buyse, 2015). For this reason, the importance and relevance of a calculation and measure of statistical significance to mark out threat to validity of a quantitative study, such as the randomized controlled trial, cannot be overemphasized. Statistical significance allows researchers to rule out the fact that results are due to chance rather than differences in the population sampled. Testing a hypothesis using P-values is an example of where statistical significance found usefulness in research, while clinical significance could be used in a DPI quality improvement project. Clinical significance reinvigorates the results and findings of an existing practice-treatment effect.  

References 

Ranganathan, P., Pramesh, C. S., & Buyse, M. (2015). Common pitfalls in statistical analysis: Clinical versus statistical significance. Perspectives in clinical research, 6(3), 169–170. https://doi.org/10.4103/2229-3485.159943 

Smith, T. (2021). Qualitative and quantitative research. Salem Press Encyclopedia.