NRS 451 Compare two leadership theories

Grand Canyon University NRS 451 Compare two leadership theories-Step-By-Step Guide

This guide will demonstrate how to complete the Grand Canyon University NRS 451 Compare two leadership theories assignment based on general principles of academic writing. Here, we will show you the A, B, Cs of completing an academic paper, irrespective of the instructions. After guiding you through what to do, the guide will leave one or two sample essays at the end to highlight the various sections discussed below.

How to Research and Prepare for NRS 451 Compare two leadership theories                            

Whether one passes or fails an academic assignment such as the Grand Canyon University NRS 451 Compare two leadership theories  depends on the preparation done beforehand. The first thing to do once you receive an assignment is to quickly skim through the requirements. Once that is done, start going through the instructions one by one to clearly understand what the instructor wants. The most important thing here is to understand the required format—whether it is APA, MLA, Chicago, etc.

After understanding the requirements of the paper, the next phase is to gather relevant materials. The first place to start the research process is the weekly resources. Go through the resources provided in the instructions to determine which ones fit the assignment. After reviewing the provided resources, use the university library to search for additional resources. After gathering sufficient and necessary resources, you are now ready to start drafting your paper.

How to Write the Introduction for NRS 451 Compare two leadership theories                          

The introduction for the Grand Canyon University NRS 451 Compare two leadership theories  is where you tell the instructor what your paper will encompass. In three to four statements, highlight the important points that will form the basis of your paper. Here, you can include statistics to show the importance of the topic you will be discussing. At the end of the introduction, write a clear purpose statement outlining what exactly will be contained in the paper. This statement will start with “The purpose of this paper…” and then proceed to outline the various sections of the instructions.

How to Write the Body for NRS 451 Compare two leadership theories                          

After the introduction, move into the main part of the NRS 451 Compare two leadership theories  assignment, which is the body. Given that the paper you will be writing is not experimental, the way you organize the headings and subheadings of your paper is critically important. In some cases, you might have to use more subheadings to properly organize the assignment. The organization will depend on the rubric provided. Carefully examine the rubric, as it will contain all the detailed requirements of the assignment. Sometimes, the rubric will have information that the normal instructions lack.

Another important factor to consider at this point is how to do citations. In-text citations are fundamental as they support the arguments and points you make in the paper. At this point, the resources gathered at the beginning will come in handy. Integrating the ideas of the authors with your own will ensure that you produce a comprehensive paper. Also, follow the given citation format. In most cases, APA 7 is the preferred format for nursing assignments.

How to Write the Conclusion for NRS 451 Compare two leadership theories                          

After completing the main sections, write the conclusion of your paper. The conclusion is a summary of the main points you made in your paper. However, you need to rewrite the points and not simply copy and paste them. By restating the points from each subheading, you will provide a nuanced overview of the assignment to the reader.

How to Format the References List for NRS 451 Compare two leadership theories                            

The very last part of your paper involves listing the sources used in your paper. These sources should be listed in alphabetical order and double-spaced. Additionally, use a hanging indent for each source that appears in this list. Lastly, only the sources cited within the body of the paper should appear here.

Stuck? Let Us Help You

Completing assignments can sometimes be overwhelming, especially with the multitude of academic and personal responsibilities you may have. If you find yourself stuck or unsure at any point in the process, don’t hesitate to reach out for professional assistance. Our assignment writing services are designed to help you achieve your academic goals with ease. 

Our team of experienced writers is well-versed in academic writing and familiar with the specific requirements of the NRS 451 Compare two leadership theories assignment. We can provide you with personalized support, ensuring your assignment is well-researched, properly formatted, and thoroughly edited. Get a feel of the quality we guarantee – ORDER NOW. 

Sample Answer for NRS 451 Compare two leadership theories

Re: Topic 1 DQ 2

There are numerous schools of thought that attempt to explain leadership and describe what it takes to succeed in a position of power (Williams, 2017). Leadership and the characteristics that enable some people to reach the peak of success while others remain followers are hotly debated topics. Even when defining how leaders grow and what is required to assist them to achieve their goals in broad terms, researchers do not always agree. The multiple sub-theories that have arisen from the contingency theory of leadership indicate this.

Transformational Leadership Theory is one of the most prominent styles of leadership. Leaders work with their teams to achieve a common goal and process change. These leaders can inspire, motivate and provide direction that can be beneficial for all involved (Whitney, 2018). This style of leadership can contribute to increased performance and maximization of the team’s potential. The disadvantages of this leadership style are the team can feel obligated to go beyond what they are asked to do, such as working longer hours to accomplish tasks, to achieve the expected goals of their leader (Indeed Editorial Team, 2021). This can lead to dissatisfaction as they may feel like they are being taken advantage of.  In a healthcare setting a leader may have only selected a few nurses to work on a quality improvement process This can be problematic because not all the needs of the team members are met since priority might be given only to those preferred individuals.

The contingency leadership theory approach is dynamic, it changes according to the situation at hand. These leaders can assess the situation and based on that assessment decide what is the best approach (Indeed Editorial Team, 2022). This leadership style can help in assisting the leader to enhance decision-making skills and allow options for the team to work with. The contingency leadership style is reactive and can cause difficulties for the leader to make appropriate decisions as they need to adapt their response to the situation.

References

Indeed Editorial Team. (2022, June 1). Contingency theory of leadership: Definition and Models. Contingency Theory of Leadership: Definition and Models. Retrieved from https://www.indeed.com/career-advice/career-development/contingency-theory-of-leadership 

Indeed Editorial Team. (2021, October 5). What is transformational leadership theory? | indeed.com. What Is Transformational Leadership Theory?  Retrieved from https://www.indeed.com/career-advice/career-development/transformational-leadership-theory 

Whitney, S. (2018). Theories and Concepts in Leadership and Management. Nursing Leadership & Management: Leading and serving. Retrieved from https://lc.gcumedia.com/nrs451vn/nursing-leadership-and-management-leading-and-serving/v2.1/#/chapter/1

Williams, E. (2017, November 21). Leadership styles in nursing management. Work. Retrieved from https://work.chron.com/leadership-styles-nursing-management-16070.html 

Sample Answer 2 for NRS 451 Compare two leadership theories

Some people are just natural born leaders. Leading and managing in nursing impact not only other staff members but also potentially every patient under the staff’s care (Whitney, 2018). Two great theories that support this impact are Situational and Contingency. These theories have very similar foundations that they are built on in regards to the situation. The difference is how management approaches this situation. Situational theory is based more around a relationship oriented foundation and not so much task oriented. The Contingency theory is based more on external factor influence on leadership. In a system undergoing constant change, nursing leaders must be prepared to adjust and be flexible (Whitney, 2018). This is why both theories are good but just in slightly different ways. In relation to nursing the Situational theory is strong in regards to patient satisfaction in a facility by using Paul and Kens application of using a leadership style that conforms to each individual situation. It takes that maturity that they describe for the leader to adapt. Leadership and Management need to adjust how things are done throughout the facility in affiliation to the overall patient experience. From a Contingency theory standpoint in nursing, Leadership and Management would adjust and adapt based on outside issues and concerns. Fred Fielder assumes that management adapt as situations change and there is no specific style that best suits this theory. It’s an ongoing cause an effect from the outside that changes how leadership performs. Both theories are a good form for Leadership and Management to use in nursing just in different ways. They can definitely create a good teamwork environment being that they are situational based. I think in nursing it’s important to utilize everyone views in the workplace so to make the environment an overall good and functional place. This starts with having a strong set of leaders that are open to listen and change what isn’t working. Just as health care environments require new and creative methods of health care delivery, the same is true regarding approaches to leadership (Sullivan, 2012).

References

Sullivan, E. (2012). Effective leadership and management in nursing (8th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.

Whitney, S. (2018). Theories and Concepts in Leadership and Management. Nursing Leadership & Management: Leading and serving. Retrieved from https://lc.gcumedia.com/nrs451vn/nursing-leadership-and-management-leading-and-serving/v2.1/#/chapter/1