HLT 362 Describe the difference between research and quality improvement

Grand Canyon University HLT 362 Describe the difference between research and quality improvement-Step-By-Step Guide

This guide will demonstrate how to complete the Grand Canyon University HLT 362 Describe the difference between research and quality improvement assignment based on general principles of academic writing. Here, we will show you the A, B, Cs of completing an academic paper, irrespective of the instructions. After guiding you through what to do, the guide will leave one or two sample essays at the end to highlight the various sections discussed below.

How to Research and Prepare for HLT 362 Describe the difference between research and quality improvement                            

Whether one passes or fails an academic assignment such as the Grand Canyon University HLT 362 Describe the difference between research and quality improvement  depends on the preparation done beforehand. The first thing to do once you receive an assignment is to quickly skim through the requirements. Once that is done, start going through the instructions one by one to clearly understand what the instructor wants. The most important thing here is to understand the required format—whether it is APA, MLA, Chicago, etc.

After understanding the requirements of the paper, the next phase is to gather relevant materials. The first place to start the research process is the weekly resources. Go through the resources provided in the instructions to determine which ones fit the assignment. After reviewing the provided resources, use the university library to search for additional resources. After gathering sufficient and necessary resources, you are now ready to start drafting your paper.

How to Write the Introduction for HLT 362 Describe the difference between research and quality improvement                          

The introduction for the Grand Canyon University HLT 362 Describe the difference between research and quality improvement  is where you tell the instructor what your paper will encompass. In three to four statements, highlight the important points that will form the basis of your paper. Here, you can include statistics to show the importance of the topic you will be discussing. At the end of the introduction, write a clear purpose statement outlining what exactly will be contained in the paper. This statement will start with “The purpose of this paper…” and then proceed to outline the various sections of the instructions.

How to Write the Body for HLT 362 Describe the difference between research and quality improvement                          

After the introduction, move into the main part of the HLT 362 Describe the difference between research and quality improvement  assignment, which is the body. Given that the paper you will be writing is not experimental, the way you organize the headings and subheadings of your paper is critically important. In some cases, you might have to use more subheadings to properly organize the assignment. The organization will depend on the rubric provided. Carefully examine the rubric, as it will contain all the detailed requirements of the assignment. Sometimes, the rubric will have information that the normal instructions lack.

Another important factor to consider at this point is how to do citations. In-text citations are fundamental as they support the arguments and points you make in the paper. At this point, the resources gathered at the beginning will come in handy. Integrating the ideas of the authors with your own will ensure that you produce a comprehensive paper. Also, follow the given citation format. In most cases, APA 7 is the preferred format for nursing assignments.

How to Write the Conclusion for HLT 362 Describe the difference between research and quality improvement                          

After completing the main sections, write the conclusion of your paper. The conclusion is a summary of the main points you made in your paper. However, you need to rewrite the points and not simply copy and paste them. By restating the points from each subheading, you will provide a nuanced overview of the assignment to the reader.

How to Format the References List for HLT 362 Describe the difference between research and quality improvement                            

The very last part of your paper involves listing the sources used in your paper. These sources should be listed in alphabetical order and double-spaced. Additionally, use a hanging indent for each source that appears in this list. Lastly, only the sources cited within the body of the paper should appear here.

Stuck? Let Us Help You

Completing assignments can sometimes be overwhelming, especially with the multitude of academic and personal responsibilities you may have. If you find yourself stuck or unsure at any point in the process, don’t hesitate to reach out for professional assistance. Our assignment writing services are designed to help you achieve your academic goals with ease. 

Our team of experienced writers is well-versed in academic writing and familiar with the specific requirements of the HLT 362 Describe the difference between research and quality improvement assignment. We can provide you with personalized support, ensuring your assignment is well-researched, properly formatted, and thoroughly edited. Get a feel of the quality we guarantee – ORDER NOW. 

Sample Answer for HLT 362 Describe the difference between research and quality improvement

Re: Topic 4 DQ 2

Research and quality improvement (QI) serve different purposes. “Research is a systematic investigation of phenomena for the purposes of generalizing findings to a population” (Admin, 2023). While research is aimed at generating new knowledge or validating existing knowledge, QI focuses on implementing best practices to enhance outcomes in specific settings. “The purpose of QI is to test a new process using the plan, do, study, act process” (Admin, 2023). In my ICU, we conducted focus groups to understand nurses’ experiences and challenges with a new ventilator system. The insights gained were used to develop training modules. Quantitative research was conducted to collect data on ventilator-associated pneumonia rates before and after training. By utilizing both qualitative and quantitative methods, we were able to identify areas for improvement and measure the impact of our interventions, ultimately resulting in better patient care.

References:

Admin. (2023). Is this quality improvement or research? American Nurse. https://www.myamericannurse.com/quality-improvement-research/

Sample Answer 2 for HLT 362 Describe the difference between research and quality improvement

When research is done, its purpose is to obtain new knowledge about the effect of a medication, procedure, or treatment. Data is collected for research purposes. Data collection is done to meet certain requirements of mandatory reporting by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. Data will also be collected for quality improvement. If date is collected for the purpose of research, certain procedures will be required. In health care, data that is collected for quality can be done without getting approval which is required for research studies. Health care providers will use research to give evidence-based care that brings about quality health outcomes for all. Quality improvement (QI) is driven by data and done to usually improve the quality of care given to patients. QI is defied by the Department of Health and Human Services and consists of “systematic and continuous actions that lead to measurable improvement in health services and health status of targeted patient groups”. A QI project will most likely occur at the facility where a problem occurs. The differences in QI and research can be based on intent. Research helps general knowledge, but a QI project may only improve what is already set in place (Helbig, 2018).

Quantitative research is done by evaluating numbers and numeric variables that are gathered in the form of data. Qualitative research is done by evaluating variables that are not numeric. The data is collected through characteristics that are descriptive and cannot be measured with numbers. It is measured through observation, open-ended questions, or an interview (Helbig, 2018).

One example of quantitative research on the unit I work on is the research performed on fall risk assessment. Much of the research is measured with numbers of falls that occur, and on numeric values each patient is given as a fall risk. I am a preceptor on my unit. I know that my hospital has done quantitative research for improving the preceptor course and training so that the new graduate students are prepared for the job.

One form of research my unit performs that is qualitative is with the surveys that the patients receive asking them about their care at the hospital. This gives us a good idea of ways we can improve our work and things we are doing well on.

Reference:

Helbig. (2018). Applied Statistics for Health Care. Retrieved from https://bibliu.com/app/#/view/books/1000000000581/epub/Chapter4.html#page_

Strickland, Jessica. “Preceptor Training: A Quantitative Study to Determine the Effectiveness of a Formal Preceptor Training Program for Medical-Surgical Nurse Preceptors.” Theses and Dissertations from 2020, 1 Dec. 2020, orc.library.atu.edu/etds_2020/13/.

Sample Answer 3 for HLT 362 Describe the difference between research and quality improvement

Quality improvement is improvement achieved through monitoring and testing of product quality. It is mostly data-driven and follows a systemic problem where efforts are combined by individuals to improve specific indicators. Quality improvement begins by identifying a problem or performance gap through data analysis. Successfully implemented services result in efficient services. The method in QI does not involve control of extraneous variables. It’s cost-effective, requiring fewer resources and funding which could be easily achieved internally. Quality improvement is dependent on theory, there is multiple weakness in the methodology which limits its reliability and sustainability in practice. QI outcomes provide grounds for research. Individuals can  be trained on certain QI methodologies such as the Plan Do Study Act, (Sheila, 2011)

In comparison, research is scientific and uses various methodologies to improve or refine already existing knowledge through the generation of new ideas. Problem-solving in research is systematic, the process requires large funding that is either generated internally or externally. Research-based studies inform evidence-based practices and are not only reliant on theory. The process undergoes strict data controls,  protocols as well and compliance laws by the state or federal. The time to complete research is often no longer than that used during QI.  Additionally,  research takes a lot of planning and requires different resources at each stage. The process is systematic and achieved through various designs and methodologies. Research outcomes are often used to make a generalized public opinion, (Sheila, 2011).

Qualitative study has been used to improve care, through clinical task force meetings, and providers have the opportunity to discuss factors surrounding care for particular situations. With Quantitative research, organizations can keep track of epidemiological cases, studying how often, who and when.

Reference

F.A.C.H.E., Hauck, Sheila L et.al, (2011) Showcasing Differences Between Quality Improvement, Evidence-Based Practice, and Research. The Journal of Continuing Education in Nursing, 42(2), 57-68; quiz 69-70. https://doi.org/10.3928/00220124-20100701-01

HLT 362 TOPIC 5 DQ 1 Sample Answer

The wellbeing of people depend on several distinct variables. Epidemiology is an area that plays a vital role in the classification of health status, the detection of risk factors and the study of health relationships with multiple dangerous substances. Epidemiology is the study of how frequently and why illnesses in multiple classes of individuals exist. Epidemiological knowledge is used to prepare and assess disease control measures and as a guide for the treatment of patients who have already acquired disease. Epidemiological data is important for targeting and enforcing evidence-based control mechanisms to protect the health and welfare of the population. An evidence is nowhere more relevant than in the field of epidemiological investigation to determine the source of an acute public health issue requiring emergency attention (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2018). 

Epidemiological evidence analysis enables to make decisions and improvements in healthcare practices by identifying connection between any activities and their performance and providing room for progress where possible. 

A good example of epidemiological analysis is data on maternal mortality rate as an indicator of health among women of reproductive age. Data reveals most common causes of female mortality in a given population, commonly affected ages, past management methods, biographical details, and influences of the health system (Merrill, 2019). Critical decision making at all stages of treatment can be guided by this kind of data. Further efforts will be taken to eliminate sickness and improve the health of the public involved. It is also possible to include local, state and national levels in formulating effective policies that would act in favor of the welfare of the recognized population. In the medical profession, epidemiological evidence can influence education, practice, and research by challenging traditional treatment practices and initiating more reliable clinical methods. 

References 

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2018, December 13). Collecting Data. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. https://www.cdc.gov/eis/field-epi-manual/chapters/collecting-data.html.  

Merrill, R. M. (2019). General Health and Population Indicators. In Introduction to epidemiology [7th ed],132–132). Jones & Bartlett Learning.