PUB 540 Discuss the strengths and weaknesses of cross-sectional studies and provide examples of how they can be “descriptive” or “analytic” study designs
Grand Canyon University PUB 540 Discuss the strengths and weaknesses of cross-sectional studies and provide examples of how they can be “descriptive” or “analytic” study designs-Step-By-Step Guide
This guide will demonstrate how to complete the Grand Canyon University PUB 540 Discuss the strengths and weaknesses of cross-sectional studies and provide examples of how they can be “descriptive” or “analytic” study designs assignment based on general principles of academic writing. Here, we will show you the A, B, Cs of completing an academic paper, irrespective of the instructions. After guiding you through what to do, the guide will leave one or two sample essays at the end to highlight the various sections discussed below.
How to Research and Prepare for PUB 540 Discuss the strengths and weaknesses of cross-sectional studies and provide examples of how they can be “descriptive” or “analytic” study designs
Whether one passes or fails an academic assignment such as the Grand Canyon University PUB 540 Discuss the strengths and weaknesses of cross-sectional studies and provide examples of how they can be “descriptive” or “analytic” study designs depends on the preparation done beforehand. The first thing to do once you receive an assignment is to quickly skim through the requirements. Once that is done, start going through the instructions one by one to clearly understand what the instructor wants. The most important thing here is to understand the required format—whether it is APA, MLA, Chicago, etc.
After understanding the requirements of the paper, the next phase is to gather relevant materials. The first place to start the research process is the weekly resources. Go through the resources provided in the instructions to determine which ones fit the assignment. After reviewing the provided resources, use the university library to search for additional resources. After gathering sufficient and necessary resources, you are now ready to start drafting your paper.
How to Write the Introduction for PUB 540 Discuss the strengths and weaknesses of cross-sectional studies and provide examples of how they can be “descriptive” or “analytic” study designs
The introduction for the Grand Canyon University PUB 540 Discuss the strengths and weaknesses of cross-sectional studies and provide examples of how they can be “descriptive” or “analytic” study designs is where you tell the instructor what your paper will encompass. In three to four statements, highlight the important points that will form the basis of your paper. Here, you can include statistics to show the importance of the topic you will be discussing. At the end of the introduction, write a clear purpose statement outlining what exactly will be contained in the paper. This statement will start with “The purpose of this paper…” and then proceed to outline the various sections of the instructions.
Need a high-quality paper urgently?
We can deliver within hours.
How to Write the Body for PUB 540 Discuss the strengths and weaknesses of cross-sectional studies and provide examples of how they can be “descriptive” or “analytic” study designs
After the introduction, move into the main part of the PUB 540 Discuss the strengths and weaknesses of cross-sectional studies and provide examples of how they can be “descriptive” or “analytic” study designs assignment, which is the body. Given that the paper you will be writing is not experimental, the way you organize the headings and subheadings of your paper is critically important. In some cases, you might have to use more subheadings to properly organize the assignment. The organization will depend on the rubric provided. Carefully examine the rubric, as it will contain all the detailed requirements of the assignment. Sometimes, the rubric will have information that the normal instructions lack.
Another important factor to consider at this point is how to do citations. In-text citations are fundamental as they support the arguments and points you make in the paper. At this point, the resources gathered at the beginning will come in handy. Integrating the ideas of the authors with your own will ensure that you produce a comprehensive paper. Also, follow the given citation format. In most cases, APA 7 is the preferred format for nursing assignments.
How to Write the Conclusion for PUB 540 Discuss the strengths and weaknesses of cross-sectional studies and provide examples of how they can be “descriptive” or “analytic” study designs
After completing the main sections, write the conclusion of your paper. The conclusion is a summary of the main points you made in your paper. However, you need to rewrite the points and not simply copy and paste them. By restating the points from each subheading, you will provide a nuanced overview of the assignment to the reader.
How to Format the References List for PUB 540 Discuss the strengths and weaknesses of cross-sectional studies and provide examples of how they can be “descriptive” or “analytic” study designs
The very last part of your paper involves listing the sources used in your paper. These sources should be listed in alphabetical order and double-spaced. Additionally, use a hanging indent for each source that appears in this list. Lastly, only the sources cited within the body of the paper should appear here.
Stuck? Let Us Help You
Completing assignments can sometimes be overwhelming, especially with the multitude of academic and personal responsibilities you may have. If you find yourself stuck or unsure at any point in the process, don’t hesitate to reach out for professional assistance. Our assignment writing services are designed to help you achieve your academic goals with ease.
Our team of experienced writers is well-versed in academic writing and familiar with the specific requirements of the PUB 540 Discuss the strengths and weaknesses of cross-sectional studies and provide examples of how they can be “descriptive” or “analytic” study designs assignment. We can provide you with personalized support, ensuring your assignment is well-researched, properly formatted, and thoroughly edited. Get a feel of the quality we guarantee – ORDER NOW.
Sample Answer for PUB 540 Discuss the strengths and weaknesses of cross-sectional studies and provide examples of how they can be “descriptive” or “analytic” study designs
Re: Topic 6 DQ 2
Case-control studies can be classified as analytical and observational studies. Case-control studies are notorious to bias due to the backward approach (Aigner et al., 2018). A type of observational research that uses the measurement of outcome and exposure is known as a cross sectional study. Furthermore, a cross sectional study can be descriptive or observational (Setia, 2016). With any given study design there are strengths and weakness. Cross-sectional studies are inexpensive and can be conducted quicky. Cross sectional studies measure the outcome and exposure of participants at the same time. Also, cross-sectional studies can prove or disprove hypothesis in cases with multiple variables. However, a weakness lies in the difficulty or uncertainty that lies in determining if the exposure or outcome came first. Also, the use of questionaries does not reflect emotions and the responses tend to be fewer because of the length of completing.
Analytical:
The number of people in a population with diabetes who are obese and the number of people in a population with diabetes who are not obsessed (Cross Sectional Studies).
Descriptive:
Study conducted on men and women with a specific age range to reveal similarities and differences in spending trends related to gender.
References:
Aigner, A., Grittner, U., & Becher, H. (2018). Bias due to differential participation in case-control studies and review of available approaches for Adjustment. PLOS ONE, 13(1).
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0191327
Cross Sectional Studies – UNC gillings school of global public health. (n.d.). Retrieved June 2, 2022, from https://sph.unc.edu/wp-content/uploads/sites/112/2015/07/nciph_ERIC8.pdf
Setia M. S. (2016). Methodology Series Module 3: Cross-sectional Studies. Indian journal of dermatology, 61(3), 261–264. https://doi.org/10.4103/0019-5154.182410
Sample Answer 2 for PUB 540 Discuss the strengths and weaknesses of cross-sectional studies and provide examples of how they can be “descriptive” or “analytic” study designs
According to Setia (2016) cross-sectional studies are used for surveys directed at the population, primarily used to determine the prevalence of disease at the clinic level. Advantages of the cross-sectional study is that than can be conducted quickly and inexpensively. The selection process for this regarding participant is either for inclusion or exclusion of criteria while measuring for exposure and outcome at the same time. Another advantage is that the data can be used to figure out surveillance, planning for public health, and evaluation.
Cross-sectional studies can be both descriptive and analytical. An example is when it may be descriptive is, according to Kumar (n.d.) when the investigator just wants to know how many school-aged children from ages 12 to 14 have asthma. An example of how this study design can be analytical is when the investigator is trying to determine the association with a risk factor and an outcome. This type of study is easy to put together, it doesn’t cost much, and prevalence can be measured for more than just one thing. However, there are shortcomings such as whether the exposure happened before the exposure and vice versa. Incidence cannot be measured. Also, associations can be very hard to figure out between the outcome and exposure. An example would be trying to determine the amount of sun exposure for people that developed skin cancer at 30.
References
Setia, M. S. (2016). Methodology Series Module 3: Cross-sectional Studies. Indian journal of dermatology, 61(3), 261–264. https://doi.org/10.4103/0019-5154.182410
Kumar (n.d.) Introduction to Study Designs – Cross-sectional Studies. Health Knowledge Website. https://www.healthknowledge.org.uk/e-learning/epidemiology/practioners/introduction-study-design-ccs
Sample Answer 3 for PUB 540 Discuss the strengths and weaknesses of cross-sectional studies and provide examples of how they can be “descriptive” or “analytic” study designs
Case-control studies can be classified as analytical and observational studies. Case-control studies are notorious to bias due to the backward approach (Aigner et al., 2018). A type of observational research that uses the measurement of outcome and exposure is known as a cross sectional study. Furthermore, a cross sectional study can be descriptive or observational (Setia, 2016). With any given study design there are strengths and weakness. Cross-sectional studies are inexpensive and can be conducted quicky. Cross sectional studies measure the outcome and exposure of participants at the same time. Also, cross-sectional studies can prove or disprove hypothesis in cases with multiple variables. However, a weakness lies in the difficulty or uncertainty that lies in determining if the exposure or outcome came first. Also, the use of questionaries does not reflect emotions and the responses tend to be fewer because of the length of completing.
Analytical:
The number of people in a population with diabetes who are obese and the number of people in a population with diabetes who are not obsessed (Cross Sectional Studies).
Descriptive:
Study conducted on men and women with a specific age range to reveal similarities and differences in spending trends related to gender.
References:
Aigner, A., Grittner, U., & Becher, H. (2018). Bias due to differential participation in case-control studies and review of available approaches for Adjustment. PLOS ONE, 13(1).
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0191327
Cross Sectional Studies – UNC gillings school of global public health. (n.d.). Retrieved June 2, 2022, from https://sph.unc.edu/wp-content/uploads/sites/112/2015/07/nciph_ERIC8.pdf
Setia M. S. (2016). Methodology Series Module 3: Cross-sectional Studies. Indian journal of dermatology, 61(3), 261–264. https://doi.org/10.4103/0019-5154.182410