HCA 205 PPACA and Your Take-Away
Grand Canyon University HCA 205 PPACA and Your Take-Away-Step-By-Step Guide
This guide will demonstrate how to complete the Grand Canyon University HCA 205 PPACA and Your Take-Away assignment based on general principles of academic writing. Here, we will show you the A, B, Cs of completing an academic paper, irrespective of the instructions. After guiding you through what to do, the guide will leave one or two sample essays at the end to highlight the various sections discussed below.
How to Research and Prepare for HCA 205 PPACA and Your Take-Away
Whether one passes or fails an academic assignment such as the Grand Canyon University HCA 205 PPACA and Your Take-Away depends on the preparation done beforehand. The first thing to do once you receive an assignment is to quickly skim through the requirements. Once that is done, start going through the instructions one by one to clearly understand what the instructor wants. The most important thing here is to understand the required format—whether it is APA, MLA, Chicago, etc.
After understanding the requirements of the paper, the next phase is to gather relevant materials. The first place to start the research process is the weekly resources. Go through the resources provided in the instructions to determine which ones fit the assignment. After reviewing the provided resources, use the university library to search for additional resources. After gathering sufficient and necessary resources, you are now ready to start drafting your paper.
How to Write the Introduction for HCA 205 PPACA and Your Take-Away
The introduction for the Grand Canyon University HCA 205 PPACA and Your Take-Away is where you tell the instructor what your paper will encompass. In three to four statements, highlight the important points that will form the basis of your paper. Here, you can include statistics to show the importance of the topic you will be discussing. At the end of the introduction, write a clear purpose statement outlining what exactly will be contained in the paper. This statement will start with “The purpose of this paper…” and then proceed to outline the various sections of the instructions.
Need a high-quality paper urgently?
We can deliver within hours.
How to Write the Body for HCA 205 PPACA and Your Take-Away
After the introduction, move into the main part of the HCA 205 PPACA and Your Take-Away assignment, which is the body. Given that the paper you will be writing is not experimental, the way you organize the headings and subheadings of your paper is critically important. In some cases, you might have to use more subheadings to properly organize the assignment. The organization will depend on the rubric provided. Carefully examine the rubric, as it will contain all the detailed requirements of the assignment. Sometimes, the rubric will have information that the normal instructions lack.
Another important factor to consider at this point is how to do citations. In-text citations are fundamental as they support the arguments and points you make in the paper. At this point, the resources gathered at the beginning will come in handy. Integrating the ideas of the authors with your own will ensure that you produce a comprehensive paper. Also, follow the given citation format. In most cases, APA 7 is the preferred format for nursing assignments.
How to Write the Conclusion for HCA 205 PPACA and Your Take-Away
After completing the main sections, write the conclusion of your paper. The conclusion is a summary of the main points you made in your paper. However, you need to rewrite the points and not simply copy and paste them. By restating the points from each subheading, you will provide a nuanced overview of the assignment to the reader.
How to Format the References List for HCA 205 PPACA and Your Take-Away
The very last part of your paper involves listing the sources used in your paper. These sources should be listed in alphabetical order and double-spaced. Additionally, use a hanging indent for each source that appears in this list. Lastly, only the sources cited within the body of the paper should appear here.
Stuck? Let Us Help You
Completing assignments can sometimes be overwhelming, especially with the multitude of academic and personal responsibilities you may have. If you find yourself stuck or unsure at any point in the process, don’t hesitate to reach out for professional assistance. Our assignment writing services are designed to help you achieve your academic goals with ease.
Our team of experienced writers is well-versed in academic writing and familiar with the specific requirements of the HCA 205 PPACA and Your Take-Away assignment. We can provide you with personalized support, ensuring your assignment is well-researched, properly formatted, and thoroughly edited. Get a feel of the quality we guarantee – ORDER NOW.
Sample Answer for HCA 205 PPACA and Your Take-Away
Re: Week 5 – Discussion
According to the article” Neatly 20 Million Have Gained Health Insurance Since 2010″, Nicholas Bakalar, the author, says that the goal of the PPACA was to make health insurance coverage accessible for the U.S. Citizens and protect them from expensive or restricted care imposed by insurance companies.
Part I:
The three keys elements of the act that I believe will be the most positive for the country are:
More people have health insurance
Many people can agree with me that when you are sick, you feel like your world is stopping because it becomes difficult for you to do things that you usually do without even thinking, like for example, walking or talking. I remember when I first moved to America, I worked with a company that did not offer health insurance unless you were a salaried employee. I met a gentleman from that company that suffered from a toothache for several months. I could tell his case was severe because he was not even enabled to eat regular food, and he had different types of over the counter medicines in his book bag, and also, his face gradually got deformed. I could tell that that gentleman was in constant pain because of the facial expression. None of the dentist offices that he contacted wanted to receive him because he had no insurance and those that accepted him requested at least two thousand dollars up front. One day, he passed out in his apartment, and one of his roommates called the ambulance. He woke up at the hospital with no memory of how he got there and his nurse told him that he had mouth surgery. My point here is that if the man had easy access to health insurance ( Physical, dental, vision), his situation would not have escalated to the point where he almost died. So I strongly believe that more people need to access health insurance so that everybody can get the chance to get minor health issues checked before they get out of hands.
People with pre-existing conditions can still get health insurance
According to the article “Don’t deny insurance to sick people. There are other ways to reduce health care costs.,” the authors say that before the ACA, about fifty million people had pre-existing health conditions that placed them at risk of losing health coverage. The authors use a cancer patient as an example of a person with a pre-existing condition and say that people in that situation were susceptible to get the payment of their medical expenses denied by their insurers before the ACA. They also say that those that change jobs had difficulties getting another coverage. So, my view here is that insurance companies should provide health coverage to everyone without any complications because people are sick and they need medical attention and any other type of support that will help them get through their situations.
Lower prescription drug costs
We did one simulation exercise where the patient, Trevor, could not refill his medication because he had no insurance and they were expensive. We can all agree that even though that was a simulation exercise, many people go through this every day. It is very frustrating and upsetting to know that someone got seen by his/her doctor, got a medical prescription, and cannot afford to buy his medicines. At some point, it seems like not seeing a doctor due to lack of money or insurance is not different from seeing a doctor and not having money to buy your medicines. So, the reason why I believe that medications should be affordable for patients is that patients have already spent a lot of money at the doctor’s office and some have only little left to buy medications.
The three keys elements of the act that I believe will be the most negative for the country are:
Constant changing
Even though the ACA is recently passed, it is going to change every year because some additional elements were delayed or suspended( Michael, Thomas, 2016). Getting additional elements or components very could mean anything from replacing a new regulation to an existing one or canceling a new regulation and replace it with nothing. So, every time that the ACA gets modified, your health insurance contract with change too. I believe that changing the ACA components every year is negative because it will make people live with a constant fear of an unexpected loss or cost augmentation of their health coverage.
You can get penalized if you do not have insurance
” If an individual goes without qualifying minimum essential coverage for more than a single period of up to three months in a year, he or she may owe a penalty under the Shared Responsibility payment.” (Michael, Thomas, 2016 ). The ACA is forcing people to get health insurance or making the situation look like not having health coverage is not different from breaking the law. I believe penalizing people for not having insurance is negative for the country because I know that we normally get penalized most of the time only when we do something stupid like driving above the speed limit, for example. I believe that everyone should be free to do what they think is best for them, and getting health coverage should be optional.
Many people are paying higher premiums
Because of the ACA, many people have been spending a lot of money out of pocket for medical expenses such as deductibles, copays, and coinsurance. Mr. Michael, Thomas says in his article that the out-of-pocket maximums coverage for an individual went from $6,600 in 2015 to $6,850 in 2016 and the family coverage went from $13,200 to $13,700 and this rate change were noticed in thirteen major cities in the U.S. After reading this article, I understand once again that no one wants to lose money, I realize that every single time that the ACA is going to get any type of modification someone’s pocket is going to suffer for it. I believe that making pay higher premiums is negative because it makes us spend more money out of our pockets.
Part II:
My definition of the U.S. healthcare system posted in week one.
I believe that the U.S. healthcare system is very capitalistic; money takes the first place, no matter what kind of disease the patient has. If someone gets “lucky” and gets treated first, he will be overwhelmed with medical bills later. About the medical care itself, I believe that the U.S. healthcare system is one of the best in the world. My new definition is not that different from the first, it is well known that the U.S. healthcare system is one of the best of the world, but the contrast is that many hospitals in this country practice patient dumping. Many hospitals in the U.S. choose to get rid of patients that have no income, or insurance because they are not making any money off those people. Many of those patients are undocumented immigrants, homeless, or mentally ill patients and they are sometimes dumped on the streets, homeless shelters, or other hospitals ( Tony, Abraham, 2018). This shows that the healthcare system in this country is all about money and nobody in this business chain (Doctor, Pharmacists, etc.) is ready to lose a dime. My first definition is broad, and I did not use an example to support my position. The second definition is more specific, and I used an example to show that the U.S. healthcare system is capitalistic and many of the people that run this system care more about the money than the people.
My vision of the U.S. healthcare system in the next 5 or 10 years.
There is no doubt that the technology is still going to be on point, but we will have more patients getting kicked out of hospitals because of the same reasons that I mentioned above. We can all agree that life is becoming much more expensive and many people are worrying more about feeding their families than getting them health coverage. That means we are going to have more uninsured people in the next five to ten years, more patient dumping because many people cannot afford to pay their medical bills. So the situation that we are living now will get worse because the healthcare system is capitalistic; meaning that you are useless if they cannot make a profit from you.
Any potential reforms, research, suggestions for improvements.
One suggestion that I have for the improvement of the health care system is that the government should reduce the cost of healthcare. I know this is not easy, but I strongly believe that nothing is impossible for the government because if they can find billions of dollars to send astronauts to the moon, then they can also find money to finance our health care system and make it affordable for everyone. Another suggestion I have is that this country needs to look around and study how countries like France, Canada, Australia and other developed countries manage their health care systems and come up with something that benefits everyone in this country.
References:
Sample Answer 2 for HCA 205 PPACA and Your Take-Away
Guy,m I believe that you have created a great post here. I must admit that I agree with you on the healthcare system being more about money than getting people well. I mean think about it. In this class, we learned about “Fee For Service”, which is a payment model where doctors are paid for each particular treatment. Therefore, doctors are paid more when they do something for a patient. With this service, doctors are doing things on patients that they do not have to do, all because the more they do, the more they get paid. To me, that is criminal. I have also been seeing and reading much about “Organ Harvesting” in the USA, which is the intentional killing of patients done by doctors in order to sell their organs for millions of dollars, and depending on who the client is, the organ may be sold for billions.There are literally hundreds of stories out there of doctors committing murders to harvest organs. Last week, my mom went to the hospital, and she told me how the doctor kept trying to perform things on her, such as tests, shots, and other things. Nevertheless, these tests have to be paid for. The first thing I thought of was “Fee For Service”. Furthermore, it is funny that you speak of your vision of the healthcare system, because I agree. As a matter of fact, in my post, I indicated that I see it getting worse, because if you take a look at it now, people are marching in the streets to keep their current healthcare, as the current administration is trying to eradicate it. We never know who the next president will be, and who will do what to healthcare, but it appears that it causes much uproar. In conclusion, reducing the cost of healthcare will definitely be an awesome thing, because people will simply be able to afford it. This is why the fight for “Obama Care” is so loud, because it helps people save money, and has helped Americans save millions of dollars each year on prescription drugs. People are indeed worried about feeding their families, and paying their bills more so than healthcare. This is sad. You spoke of billionaires. There are quite a few in the USA, such as “Bill Gates”, “Warren Buffet”,and others. There is no reason as to why there is no universal healthcare here.
Assessing a Healthcare Program Policy Evaluation FINAL
Assessing a Healthcare Program/Policy Evaluation
Healthcare programs or policies can be state-based, community-based, or at the organizational level. They are formulated to address specific health programs. Evaluation helps to determine healthcare programs’ effectiveness. In most cases, evaluation is progressive if the program or policy is continuous. It can also be done at different intervals depending on the objectives. The purpose of this program evaluation analysis is to examine the Racial and Ethnic Approaches to Community Health (REACH) program, whose main aim is to reduce racial and ethnic health disparities.
| Healthcare Program/Policy Evaluation | The Racial and Ethnic Approaches to Community Health (REACH) program evaluation |
| Description | The REACH program started in 1999 to reduce racial and ethnic health disparities (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2020). It is a national program administered by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Generally, the program’s recipients carry out extensive local and culturally appropriate programs to address a wide range of issues faced by racial and ethnic minorities such as African Americans, Hispanics, and American Indians. The primary objective is to promote health disparities related to chronic illnesses, mental health, preventive health, and overall health coverage (Carratala & Maxwell, 2020). The program also seeks to improve healthy behaviors. |
| How was the success of the program or policy measured?
| After a decade, the REACH had significant success as far as its targets are concerned. However, instead of evaluating the program generally, REACH uses data to evaluate the change in the health status of its target communities. For instance, it used data between 2014 and 2018 to assess the number of people it has helped access healthy foods, access to chronic health programs, and opportunities for physical activity. A progressive increase in the population it serves is the primary success indicator. |
| How many people were reached by the program or policy selected? How much of an impact was realized with the program or policy selected?
| The evaluation between 2014 and 2018 showed that millions of people have benefitted in various ways under the REACH program. According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2020), over 2.9 million people had better access to healthy foods and beverages, while over 322,000 people benefitted directly from tobacco-free interventions. CDC further reported that about 1.4 million people got opportunities for physical activity, as over 830,000 people got access to chronic disease programs (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2020). Using these reflection points, there is no denying that the impact of the REACH program cannot be underestimated. |
| At what point in program implementation was the program or policy evaluation conducted? | The REACH program is continuous, where evaluation is done at different implementation points. In most cases, evaluation happens after the completion of a project at the community level. As illustrated in the various CDC reports, evaluation can be after a decade or after some years, depending on the element being assessed. |
| What data was used to conduct the program or policy evaluation?
| Change in health behaviors was the reference data for the evaluation between 2001 and 2009. For instance, Hispanic taking medication for hypertension increased from less than half to more than two-thirds of the affected population. In the same period, vaccination rates for pneumonia increased from 50.5% to 60.5% in black communities (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2020). The other data is the impact across REACH communities through a 2009-2012 evaluation. The data examined reduction in smoking and obesity rates in REACH communities. |
| What specific information on unintended consequences was identified?
| The program’s impact is huge as far as disparities’ reduction is concerned. However, impact evaluation showed that ethnic gaps continue being affected by societies, culture, and the environment (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2021). As a result, REACH must use many strategies to address health gaps to ensure that health performance in ethnic and racial minorities reaches the desired state. |
| What stakeholders were identified in the evaluation of the program or policy? Who would benefit most from the results and reporting of the program or policy evaluation? Be specific and provide examples. | REACH partners with local health departments, community-based organizations, universities, and tribes. Respective partners were consulted during program evaluation to determine success and areas of improvement. On who would benefit from results and reporting of the program evaluation, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention would be the primary beneficiary. CDC would use the report to examine the health performance in the minority groups as the basis of improving outcomes or using other interventions to supplement outcomes.
|
| Did the program or policy meet the original intent and objectives? Why or why not?
| To a huge extent, REACH achieved the original intent using the data from the different evaluations. CDC reports reveal significant community successes, including reducing chronic illnesses and unhealthy behaviors such as smoking as access to healthy food and beverages and physical health activities increases. |
| Would you recommend implementing this program or policy in your place of work? Why or why not?
| I would recommend the program in my place of work. Firstly, health care organizations should partners with national and community-based organizations to reduce health disparities. Carratala and Maxwell (2020) reported that ethnic and racial minorities continue to be burdened by chronic illnesses and mental health problems. Since such illness burden at the communities has a domino effect in health care organizations, it is crucial to implement the REACH program to improve health outcomes in underserved populations.
|
| Identify at least two ways that you, as a nurse advocate, could become involved in evaluating a program or policy after one year of implementation.
| One way I could be involved in evaluating a program after one year of implementation is by being part of the evaluation committee. Here, I can share my knowledge on the reference points to consider when determining whether a program was a success or not. The other way is to avail information concerning the program by performing individual research. My information would guide on how to conduct a summative evaluation of the program. |
| General Notes/Comments | Evaluation reliably indicates whether a program achieved the desired outcomes. Healthcare programs can be at the state, community, or organizational levels, and their evaluation can be yearly, terminal, or progressive, as considered appropriate. Nurses should advocate for program evaluation to determine their success and provide the basis for continuous improvement. |
References
Carratala, S., & Maxwell, C. (2020, May 7). Health disparities by race and ethnicity. Center for American Progress. https://www.americanprogress.org/issues/race/reports/2020/05/07/484742/health-disparities-race-ethnicity/
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2020, Mar 10).REACH program impact. https://www.cdc.gov/nccdphp/dnpao/state-local-programs/reach/program_impact/index.htm
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2021, Jul 15). Racial and ethnic approaches to community health. https://www.cdc.gov/nccdphp/dnpao/state-local-programs/reach/index.htm