HCA 699 Define “methodology” and explain how your research problem can be studied

Grand Canyon University HCA 699 Define “methodology” and explain how your research problem can be studied-Step-By-Step Guide

This guide will demonstrate how to complete the Grand Canyon University HCA 699 Define “methodology” and explain how your research problem can be studied assignment based on general principles of academic writing. Here, we will show you the A, B, Cs of completing an academic paper, irrespective of the instructions. After guiding you through what to do, the guide will leave one or two sample essays at the end to highlight the various sections discussed below.

How to Research and Prepare for HCA 699 Define “methodology” and explain how your research problem can be studied                            

Whether one passes or fails an academic assignment such as the Grand Canyon University HCA 699 Define “methodology” and explain how your research problem can be studied  depends on the preparation done beforehand. The first thing to do once you receive an assignment is to quickly skim through the requirements. Once that is done, start going through the instructions one by one to clearly understand what the instructor wants. The most important thing here is to understand the required format—whether it is APA, MLA, Chicago, etc.

After understanding the requirements of the paper, the next phase is to gather relevant materials. The first place to start the research process is the weekly resources. Go through the resources provided in the instructions to determine which ones fit the assignment. After reviewing the provided resources, use the university library to search for additional resources. After gathering sufficient and necessary resources, you are now ready to start drafting your paper.

How to Write the Introduction for HCA 699 Define “methodology” and explain how your research problem can be studied                          

The introduction for the Grand Canyon University HCA 699 Define “methodology” and explain how your research problem can be studied  is where you tell the instructor what your paper will encompass. In three to four statements, highlight the important points that will form the basis of your paper. Here, you can include statistics to show the importance of the topic you will be discussing. At the end of the introduction, write a clear purpose statement outlining what exactly will be contained in the paper. This statement will start with “The purpose of this paper…” and then proceed to outline the various sections of the instructions.

How to Write the Body for HCA 699 Define “methodology” and explain how your research problem can be studied                          

After the introduction, move into the main part of the HCA 699 Define “methodology” and explain how your research problem can be studied  assignment, which is the body. Given that the paper you will be writing is not experimental, the way you organize the headings and subheadings of your paper is critically important. In some cases, you might have to use more subheadings to properly organize the assignment. The organization will depend on the rubric provided. Carefully examine the rubric, as it will contain all the detailed requirements of the assignment. Sometimes, the rubric will have information that the normal instructions lack.

Another important factor to consider at this point is how to do citations. In-text citations are fundamental as they support the arguments and points you make in the paper. At this point, the resources gathered at the beginning will come in handy. Integrating the ideas of the authors with your own will ensure that you produce a comprehensive paper. Also, follow the given citation format. In most cases, APA 7 is the preferred format for nursing assignments.

How to Write the Conclusion for HCA 699 Define “methodology” and explain how your research problem can be studied                          

After completing the main sections, write the conclusion of your paper. The conclusion is a summary of the main points you made in your paper. However, you need to rewrite the points and not simply copy and paste them. By restating the points from each subheading, you will provide a nuanced overview of the assignment to the reader.

How to Format the References List for HCA 699 Define “methodology” and explain how your research problem can be studied                            

The very last part of your paper involves listing the sources used in your paper. These sources should be listed in alphabetical order and double-spaced. Additionally, use a hanging indent for each source that appears in this list. Lastly, only the sources cited within the body of the paper should appear here.

Stuck? Let Us Help You

Completing assignments can sometimes be overwhelming, especially with the multitude of academic and personal responsibilities you may have. If you find yourself stuck or unsure at any point in the process, don’t hesitate to reach out for professional assistance. Our assignment writing services are designed to help you achieve your academic goals with ease. 

Our team of experienced writers is well-versed in academic writing and familiar with the specific requirements of the HCA 699 Define “methodology” and explain how your research problem can be studied assignment. We can provide you with personalized support, ensuring your assignment is well-researched, properly formatted, and thoroughly edited. Get a feel of the quality we guarantee – ORDER NOW. 

Sample Answer for HCA 699 Define “methodology” and explain how your research problem can be studied

Re: Topic 4 DQ 1

Methodology is amongst the most significant sections of a capstone project. Research methodology entails a specific techniques or procedures that are adopted in the identification, selection, processing and analysis of information regarding a topic (Kumar, 2019). The methodology section is fundamental as it allows a reader to determine the validity and reliability of a paper after a critical evaluation.

The project will adopt a quantitative approach as its methodology. The rationale for choosing this method entails the fact that a comparison will be made at the end of the study to compare the before and after effects of the intervention. As such, administrative data on patient falls will be acquired from administrative database concerning the rates of patient falls at the facility’s medical-surgical unit.  The introduction of hourly nursing rounds and call lights at some of the rooms at the unit will then occur. After the introduction of the two interventions, The Tracking Record for Improving Patient Safety will be used to track the rates of patient falls for each intervention (AHRQ, n.d). The collected data will then undergo a statistical analysis using SPSS package. The comparison of the two data sets vis-à-vis the initial fall rates will reveal the more effective approach to reducing patient falls in the medical-surgical unit at the facility.

References

Chapter 3. Data collection and analysis using trips – AHRQ. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://www.ahrq.gov/patient-safety/settings/long-term-care/resource/injuries/fallspx/man3.html

Kumar, R. (2019). Research methodology: A step-by-step guide for beginners. Sage Publications Limited.

Sample Answer 2 for HCA 699 Define “methodology” and explain how your research problem can be studied

The methodology is essentially the section of your research paper that explains what you researched, how you researched it, and what tools were used to analyze the data (McCombes, 2020). It is a very important section to have as it allows your readers to draw conclusions on the reliability and validity of your findings (McCombes, 2020). My research problem is identifying whether people that have access to reliable information about health inspection results and food recalls will be able to make better-informed decisions that reduces the risk of being exposed to a foodborne illness compared to those that do not. Much of the research I obtained doing my literature reviews contained quantitative research via the use of surveys. It was about 7 observational studies, 10 experimental designs, 1 meta-analysis, 2 cross-sectional, 1 quasi-experimental, 1 qualitative research study, and 2 correlational studies. The methodology is essentially how was the question that was posed, best answered (Melnyk & Fineout-Overholt, 2019).

My research question is best to be studied a quantitative approach through observational studies and questionnaires. The data that I required was how consumers react to health inspection results if they are willing to use them, and how they understand them. Coupled with does having such information available to the public facilitate decreasing the rates of foodborne illness when compared to its baseline of not presenting the information. Quantitative methods such as through surveys are really great at “measuring, ranking, categorizing, identifying patterns and making generalizations” (McCombes, 2020, para.2). It is also important that my methodology be quantitative in nature because I am making comparisons with before the application of health inspection results to after and its effects that it exerts on foodborne illness rates.

So, I would be observing how many people would use such an app (database) and the information that is presented to their decision-making about where to go to eat and why. Then I would observe how over time the restaurants adjusted their food safety standards to stay competitive with consumers frequenting their establishments. As evidenced by their improving health inspection result scores. This would be thoroughly analyzed with data being provided by the state’s health department. One of the best ways for researchers to understand how people act under specific circumstances the best way to get this information is to simply observe them under said circumstances (SkillsYouNeed, 2011). I would then submit questionnaires to the public in a format that they would be paid for their participation. To elicit their thoughts and feelings on using such a service and how it influenced their decision making.

Melnyk, B., & Fineout-Overholt, E. (2019). Evidence-based practice in nursing & healthcare a guide to best practice 4th edition [Ebook Version]. Retrieved from https://www.gcumedia.com/digital-resources/wolters-kluwer/2018/evidence-based-practice-in-nursing-and-healthcare_a-guide-to-best-practice_4e.php

SkillsYouNeed. (2011). Writing your dissertation: Methodology. Retrieved from https://www.skillsyouneed.com/learn/dissertation-methodology.html

McCombes, S. (2020). How to write a research methodology. Retrieved from https://www.scribbr.com/dissertation/methodology/

HCA 699 Topic 4 DQ 2 Sample Answer

Evidence-based practice is important in improving the overall quality of patient care. Hourly nursing rounds is an EBP used to reduce patient falls at a medical-surgical unit (Flowers et al., 2016). However, implementing the evidence-based practice (EBP) is associated with many challenges acting as barriers (Patel, 2019). Lack of support from the stakeholders such as leaders and nurses, which could enhance the implementation of the project is a major barrier. Nurses have not taken hourly rounds with the seriousness it deserves. Sometimes staff perceives hourly rounds as an option or extra work imposed on them rather than as a daily care activity (Flowers et al., 2016). Staff should change their perception and beliefs regarding hourly rounds to ensure its effectiveness in preventing falls. 

In addition, hospital leadership lack support for the hourly rounds. For instance, some leaders view hourly rounds as luxury and encourage it only when the staff has time and not short-staffed (Toole, Meluskey, & Hall, 2016). Furthermore, leaders do not recognize staff members who excel with hourly rounding. Also, leaders in most cases are not involved in the rounding. They should change their perception and hold the mirror for themselves. It is unfair for leaders to expect staff to round every hour when they themselves do not. Nurse participation in organizational activities and quality improvement measures is very important. According to Toole, Meluskey and Hall (2016), nurses are the most significant agents of change in a healthcare setting. However, they cannot succeed without leadership support. These two groups of stakeholders need to work in collaboration to support hourly rounds to reduce falls in the surgical unit.  

References 

Flowers, K., Wright, K., Langdon, R., McIlwrath, M., Wainwright, C., & Johnson, M. (2016). Intentional rounding: Facilitators, benefits and barriers. Journal of clinical nursing, 25(9-10), 1346-1355. doi: 10.1111/jocn.13217 

Patel, N. (2019). Breaking barriers: Implementing evidence‐based practice. Oral Surgery, 12(4), 286-292. https://doi.org/10.1111/ors.12435 

Toole, N., Meluskey, T., & Hall, N. (2016). A systematic review: Barriers to hourly rounding. Journal of nursing management, 24(3), 283-290. doi: 10.1111/jonm.12332.