HCA 699 Why should patient values and clinical judgment be included in applying the evidence in clinical decision making for an individual patient?

Grand Canyon University HCA 699 Why should patient values and clinical judgment be included in applying the evidence in clinical decision making for an individual patient?-Step-By-Step Guide

This guide will demonstrate how to complete the Grand Canyon University HCA 699 Why should patient values and clinical judgment be included in applying the evidence in clinical decision making for an individual patient? assignment based on general principles of academic writing. Here, we will show you the A, B, Cs of completing an academic paper, irrespective of the instructions. After guiding you through what to do, the guide will leave one or two sample essays at the end to highlight the various sections discussed below.

How to Research and Prepare for HCA 699 Why should patient values and clinical judgment be included in applying the evidence in clinical decision making for an individual patient?                            

Whether one passes or fails an academic assignment such as the Grand Canyon University HCA 699 Why should patient values and clinical judgment be included in applying the evidence in clinical decision making for an individual patient?  depends on the preparation done beforehand. The first thing to do once you receive an assignment is to quickly skim through the requirements. Once that is done, start going through the instructions one by one to clearly understand what the instructor wants. The most important thing here is to understand the required format—whether it is APA, MLA, Chicago, etc.

After understanding the requirements of the paper, the next phase is to gather relevant materials. The first place to start the research process is the weekly resources. Go through the resources provided in the instructions to determine which ones fit the assignment. After reviewing the provided resources, use the university library to search for additional resources. After gathering sufficient and necessary resources, you are now ready to start drafting your paper.

How to Write the Introduction for HCA 699 Why should patient values and clinical judgment be included in applying the evidence in clinical decision making for an individual patient?                          

The introduction for the Grand Canyon University HCA 699 Why should patient values and clinical judgment be included in applying the evidence in clinical decision making for an individual patient?  is where you tell the instructor what your paper will encompass. In three to four statements, highlight the important points that will form the basis of your paper. Here, you can include statistics to show the importance of the topic you will be discussing. At the end of the introduction, write a clear purpose statement outlining what exactly will be contained in the paper. This statement will start with “The purpose of this paper…” and then proceed to outline the various sections of the instructions.

How to Write the Body for HCA 699 Why should patient values and clinical judgment be included in applying the evidence in clinical decision making for an individual patient?                          

After the introduction, move into the main part of the HCA 699 Why should patient values and clinical judgment be included in applying the evidence in clinical decision making for an individual patient?  assignment, which is the body. Given that the paper you will be writing is not experimental, the way you organize the headings and subheadings of your paper is critically important. In some cases, you might have to use more subheadings to properly organize the assignment. The organization will depend on the rubric provided. Carefully examine the rubric, as it will contain all the detailed requirements of the assignment. Sometimes, the rubric will have information that the normal instructions lack.

Another important factor to consider at this point is how to do citations. In-text citations are fundamental as they support the arguments and points you make in the paper. At this point, the resources gathered at the beginning will come in handy. Integrating the ideas of the authors with your own will ensure that you produce a comprehensive paper. Also, follow the given citation format. In most cases, APA 7 is the preferred format for nursing assignments.

How to Write the Conclusion for HCA 699 Why should patient values and clinical judgment be included in applying the evidence in clinical decision making for an individual patient?                          

After completing the main sections, write the conclusion of your paper. The conclusion is a summary of the main points you made in your paper. However, you need to rewrite the points and not simply copy and paste them. By restating the points from each subheading, you will provide a nuanced overview of the assignment to the reader.

How to Format the References List for HCA 699 Why should patient values and clinical judgment be included in applying the evidence in clinical decision making for an individual patient?                            

The very last part of your paper involves listing the sources used in your paper. These sources should be listed in alphabetical order and double-spaced. Additionally, use a hanging indent for each source that appears in this list. Lastly, only the sources cited within the body of the paper should appear here.

Stuck? Let Us Help You

Completing assignments can sometimes be overwhelming, especially with the multitude of academic and personal responsibilities you may have. If you find yourself stuck or unsure at any point in the process, don’t hesitate to reach out for professional assistance. Our assignment writing services are designed to help you achieve your academic goals with ease. 

Our team of experienced writers is well-versed in academic writing and familiar with the specific requirements of the HCA 699 Why should patient values and clinical judgment be included in applying the evidence in clinical decision making for an individual patient? assignment. We can provide you with personalized support, ensuring your assignment is well-researched, properly formatted, and thoroughly edited. Get a feel of the quality we guarantee – ORDER NOW. 

Sample Answer for HCA 699 Why should patient values and clinical judgment be included in applying the evidence in clinical decision making for an individual patient?

Re: Topic 4 DQ 2

Evidence-based practice is important in improving the overall quality of patient care. Hourly nursing rounds is an EBP used to reduce patient falls at a medical-surgical unit (Flowers et al., 2016). However, implementing the evidence-based practice (EBP) is associated with many challenges acting as barriers (Patel, 2019). Lack of support from the stakeholders such as leaders and nurses, which could enhance the implementation of the project is a major barrier. Nurses have not taken hourly rounds with the seriousness it deserves. Sometimes staff perceives hourly rounds as an option or extra work imposed on them rather than as a daily care activity (Flowers et al., 2016). Staff should change their perception and beliefs regarding hourly rounds to ensure its effectiveness in preventing falls.

In addition, hospital leadership lack support for the hourly rounds. For instance, some leaders view hourly rounds as luxury and encourage it only when the staff has time and not short-staffed (Toole, Meluskey, & Hall, 2016). Furthermore, leaders do not recognize staff members who excel with hourly rounding. Also, leaders in most cases are not involved in the rounding. They should change their perception and hold the mirror for themselves. It is unfair for leaders to expect staff to round every hour when they themselves do not. Nurse participation in organizational activities and quality improvement measures is very important. According to Toole, Meluskey and Hall (2016), nurses are the most significant agents of change in a healthcare setting. However, they cannot succeed without leadership support. These two groups of stakeholders need to work in collaboration to support hourly rounds to reduce falls in the surgical unit.

References

Flowers, K., Wright, K., Langdon, R., McIlwrath, M., Wainwright, C., & Johnson, M. (2016). Intentional rounding: Facilitators, benefits and barriers. Journal of clinical nursing, 25(9-10), 1346-1355. doi: 10.1111/jocn.13217

Patel, N. (2019). Breaking barriers: Implementing evidence‐based practice. Oral Surgery, 12(4), 286-292. https://doi.org/10.1111/ors.12435

Toole, N., Meluskey, T., & Hall, N. (2016). A systematic review: Barriers to hourly rounding. Journal of nursing management, 24(3), 283-290. doi: 10.1111/jonm.12332.

Sample Answer 2 for HCA 699 Why should patient values and clinical judgment be included in applying the evidence in clinical decision making for an individual patient?

The patient values and judgement are critical in the treatment processes. With the modern practices in healthcare systems, medical professionals need to respect the values of the patients; this may enhance the treatment processes as well as the recovery of the patients (Nielsen, Lasater, & Stock, 2016). Before engaging patients in the treatment processes, it is necessary to consider their what they believe in and the medical processes that they are likely to prefer. Therefore, patient’s values and clinical judgement need to be included while applying the evidence in the clinical decision making. Applying evidence is essential in knowing the treatment preference of the patients and the kinds of medications that they are likely to react well to. When it comes to the evidence-based practices, all the advanced practices need to incorporate patient values and the clinical judgement.

References

Nielsen, A., Lasater, K., & Stock, M. (2016). A framework to support preceptors’ evaluation and development of new nurses’ clinical judgment. Nurse education in practice, 19, 84-90.

HCA 699 Week 5 DQ 1 Sample Answer

Reliability and Validity are important factors in all research, with qualities that are similar but also independent of each other. The purpose of research is to understand then prove or disprove a theory. In order to do that, data that is reliable and valid must be found. The literature review performed to answer my question for this project contained both quantitative and qualitative data analysis and methods. There were different assessment instruments used as they all provided keen information into the problem and proposed solution. 

Observation is one instrument that is useful when setting a baseline for the data and the outcomes that will be measured for validity and reliability. There were two types of observation studies included in the research and will be used to set the baseline for answering the question if training staff on infection control will reduce the risk of elderly residents contracting an infection in long-term facilities. Observation studies can be both quantitative and qualitative approaches to data (Makris, A., Morgan, L., Gaber, D.J., Richter, A. & Rubino, J.R, 2004). 

Randomization Controlled Trials is the second assessment instrument used for the purpose of this project study. The findings from the two controlled trials are quantitative and will provide the basis for understanding reliability and validity in repeating the steps both internally and externally in other environments (Temime, L., Cohen, N., Ait-Bouziad, K., Denormandie, P., Dab, W. & Mounia, H., 2017). 

Surveys are another instrument used in this research and were key in understanding the beliefs of staff and other personnel on the importance of hand hygiene for infection control. Surveys can be both quantitative and qualitative, if the survey questions are designed to get valid information on the phenomena of attitudes, and the number of participants who believe in the same methods or things (Kaur, J., Stone, P. W., Travers, J. L., Cohen, C. C., & Herzig, C. T. A., 2017). 

References: 

Kaur, J., Stone, P. W., Travers, J. L., Cohen, C. C., & Herzig, C. T. A. (2017, June 16). Influence of staff infection control training on infection-related quality measures in US nursing homes. Retrieved from https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0196655317306314 

Makris, A. T., Morgan, L., Gaber, D. J., Richter, A., & Rubino, J. R. (2004, January 23). Effect of a comprehensive infection control program on the incidence of infections in long-term care facilities. Retrieved from https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S019665530090004X 

 Temime, L., Cohen, N., Ait-Bouziad, K., Denormandie, P., Dab, W., & Hocine, M. N. (2017, October 5). Impact of a multicomponent hand hygiene–related intervention on the infectious risk in nursing homes: A cluster randomized trial. Retrieved from https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0196655317310106