NURS 8210 Week 11: Evaluating Health Information Technology Systems

Walden University NURS 8210 Week 11: Evaluating Health Information Technology Systems-Step-By-Step Guide

This guide will demonstrate how to complete the Walden University NURS 8210 Week 11: Evaluating Health Information Technology Systems assignment based on general principles of academic writing. Here, we will show you the A, B, Cs of completing an academic paper, irrespective of the instructions. After guiding you through what to do, the guide will leave one or two sample essays at the end to highlight the various sections discussed below.

How to Research and Prepare for NURS 8210 Week 11: Evaluating Health Information Technology Systems                           

Whether one passes or fails an academic assignment such as the Walden University NURS 8210 Week 11: Evaluating Health Information Technology Systems depends on the preparation done beforehand. The first thing to do once you receive an assignment is to quickly skim through the requirements. Once that is done, start going through the instructions one by one to clearly understand what the instructor wants. The most important thing here is to understand the required format—whether it is APA, MLA, Chicago, etc.

After understanding the requirements of the paper, the next phase is to gather relevant materials. The first place to start the research process is the weekly resources. Go through the resources provided in the instructions to determine which ones fit the assignment. After reviewing the provided resources, use the university library to search for additional resources. After gathering sufficient and necessary resources, you are now ready to start drafting your paper.

How to Write the Introduction for NURS 8210 Week 11: Evaluating Health Information Technology Systems                         

The introduction for the Walden University NURS 8210 Week 11: Evaluating Health Information Technology Systems is where you tell the instructor what your paper will encompass. In three to four statements, highlight the important points that will form the basis of your paper. Here, you can include statistics to show the importance of the topic you will be discussing. At the end of the introduction, write a clear purpose statement outlining what exactly will be contained in the paper. This statement will start with “The purpose of this paper…” and then proceed to outline the various sections of the instructions.

How to Write the Body for NURS 8210 Week 11: Evaluating Health Information Technology Systems                         

After the introduction, move into the main part of the NURS 8210 Week 11: Evaluating Health Information Technology Systems assignment, which is the body. Given that the paper you will be writing is not experimental, the way you organize the headings and subheadings of your paper is critically important. In some cases, you might have to use more subheadings to properly organize the assignment. The organization will depend on the rubric provided. Carefully examine the rubric, as it will contain all the detailed requirements of the assignment. Sometimes, the rubric will have information that the normal instructions lack.

Another important factor to consider at this point is how to do citations. In-text citations are fundamental as they support the arguments and points you make in the paper. At this point, the resources gathered at the beginning will come in handy. Integrating the ideas of the authors with your own will ensure that you produce a comprehensive paper. Also, follow the given citation format. In most cases, APA 7 is the preferred format for nursing assignments.

How to Write the Conclusion for NURS 8210 Week 11: Evaluating Health Information Technology Systems                         

After completing the main sections, write the conclusion of your paper. The conclusion is a summary of the main points you made in your paper. However, you need to rewrite the points and not simply copy and paste them. By restating the points from each subheading, you will provide a nuanced overview of the assignment to the reader.

How to Format the References List for NURS 8210 Week 11: Evaluating Health Information Technology Systems                           

The very last part of your paper involves listing the sources used in your paper. These sources should be listed in alphabetical order and double-spaced. Additionally, use a hanging indent for each source that appears in this list. Lastly, only the sources cited within the body of the paper should appear here.

Stuck? Let Us Help You

Completing assignments can sometimes be overwhelming, especially with the multitude of academic and personal responsibilities you may have. If you find yourself stuck or unsure at any point in the process, don’t hesitate to reach out for professional assistance. Our assignment writing services are designed to help you achieve your academic goals with ease. 

Our team of experienced writers is well-versed in academic writing and familiar with the specific requirements of the NURS 8210 Week 11: Evaluating Health Information Technology Systems assignment. We can provide you with personalized support, ensuring your assignment is well-researched, properly formatted, and thoroughly edited. Get a feel of the quality we guarantee – ORDER NOW. 

Sample Answer for NURS 8210 Week 11: Evaluating Health Information Technology Systems

Evaluation Process

Health information technology (HIT) evaluation presents a framework for the assessment of designs, aims, procedures and data analysis skills of technologies used in healthcare. The most common approach used for HIT evaluation is the socio-technical approach which evaluates social practices within the organization as opposed to the technology itself. HIT evaluation therefore differs from other health evaluations as it targets other health systems to gain insights on its own. The American Nurses Association (2008) provides means by which an informatic nurse evaluates progress, which is to “conduct a systematic, ongoing, and criterion-based evaluation of the outcomes in relation to the structures and processes prescribed by the project plan and indicated timeline (p. 78)”.

Evaluation Strategies

Strategies involved in HIT evaluation are defined by three dimensions which include domain, mechanism and timing. Evaluation of the HIT interventions or outcomes of the interventions are defined by the domain dimension (Nguyen, Bellucci & Nguyen, 2014). Specific components of the system to be evaluated are determined by the mechanism while the timing dimension considers if the evaluation takes place before or after the implementation of the HIT systems. Based on the chosen dimensions thereafter study questions, data collection methods and analysis procedures become clear.

Factors Considered

HIT evaluation takes into account four major factors which include technology, social, human and timing. Technology is evaluated based on device function and performance through the analysis of software, hardware and functionality states. HIT addresses user needs and therefore the human factor is purposeful for summative evaluations in ensuring safety and effectiveness of the technology in serving users (Jones, Rudin, Perry & Shekelle, 2014). The social factor addresses the impact of HIT systems on organizations. The timing factor takes into account evolution of technology designs, developments and implementation over time.

Challenges

HIT evaluation is based on major factors that determine its complexity. They include evaluation scope, evaluation timing, and units of analysis and levels of analysis. Because the evaluation involves in depth analysis of various elements in the organization such as management, finance, and products and services, it is time consuming (Ammenwerth, Gräber, Herrmann, Bürkle & König, 2003). The various units analyzed also pertain to various areas of expertise increasing the complexity of the evaluation. The main challenges are therefore on the complexity of the evaluation based on time, scope and expertise.

References

American Nurses Association. (2008). Nursing informatics: Scope and standards of practice.

Silver Spring, MD: Author.

Ammenwerth, E., Gräber, S., Herrmann, G., Bürkle, T., & König, J. (2003). Evaluation of health

information systems—problems and challenges. International journal of medical

            informatics, 71(2-3), 125-135.

Jones, S. S., Rudin, R. S., Perry, T., & Shekelle, P. G. (2014). Health information technology: an

updated systematic review with a focus on meaningful use. Annals of internal

            medicine, 160(1), 48-54.

Nguyen, L., Bellucci, E., & Nguyen, L. T. (2014). Electronic health records implementation: an

evaluation of information system impact and contingency factors. International journal    of medical informatics, 83(11), 779-796.

Sample Answer 2 for NURS 8210 Week 11: Evaluating Health Information Technology Systems

Yes, the evaluation of Health information technology provides a framework which can be used to assess the aims, skills of data analysis and procedures to be used in healthcare. The common approach which can be used in the process of evaluating HIT is socio-technical approach. It evaluates the social practices in the organization as opposed to the technology. It is important to note that HIT evaluation focuses on health systems which are different to healthcare evaluation. Healthcare evaluation focuses on how to improve overall healthcare. The strategies of evaluating HIT can be viewed in three dimensions that is the mechanism, domain and timing (Jones, Rudin, Perry & Shekelle, 2014). HIT outcomes can be defined using the domain dimension. The timing factor is applicable in the time required to develop, design and implement the system. The main problem is the complexity in terms of evaluation scope and analysis levels.

References

Jones, S. S., Rudin, R. S., Perry, T., & Shekelle, P. G. (2014). Health information technology: an updated systematic review with a focus on meaningful use. Annals of internalmedicine, 160(1), 48-54.