NURS 8310 Week 11 Discussion 1: Applied Epidemiology

Walden University NURS 8310 Week 11 Discussion 1: Applied Epidemiology-Step-By-Step Guide

This guide will demonstrate how to complete the Walden University NURS 8310 Week 11 Discussion 1: Applied Epidemiology assignment based on general principles of academic writing. Here, we will show you the A, B, Cs of completing an academic paper, irrespective of the instructions. After guiding you through what to do, the guide will leave one or two sample essays at the end to highlight the various sections discussed below.

How to Research and Prepare for NURS 8310 Week 11 Discussion 1: Applied Epidemiology                           

Whether one passes or fails an academic assignment such as the Walden University NURS 8310 Week 11 Discussion 1: Applied Epidemiology depends on the preparation done beforehand. The first thing to do once you receive an assignment is to quickly skim through the requirements. Once that is done, start going through the instructions one by one to clearly understand what the instructor wants. The most important thing here is to understand the required format—whether it is APA, MLA, Chicago, etc.

After understanding the requirements of the paper, the next phase is to gather relevant materials. The first place to start the research process is the weekly resources. Go through the resources provided in the instructions to determine which ones fit the assignment. After reviewing the provided resources, use the university library to search for additional resources. After gathering sufficient and necessary resources, you are now ready to start drafting your paper.

How to Write the Introduction for NURS 8310 Week 11 Discussion 1: Applied Epidemiology                         

The introduction for the Walden University NURS 8310 Week 11 Discussion 1: Applied Epidemiology is where you tell the instructor what your paper will encompass. In three to four statements, highlight the important points that will form the basis of your paper. Here, you can include statistics to show the importance of the topic you will be discussing. At the end of the introduction, write a clear purpose statement outlining what exactly will be contained in the paper. This statement will start with “The purpose of this paper…” and then proceed to outline the various sections of the instructions.

How to Write the Body for NURS 8310 Week 11 Discussion 1: Applied Epidemiology                         

After the introduction, move into the main part of the NURS 8310 Week 11 Discussion 1: Applied Epidemiology assignment, which is the body. Given that the paper you will be writing is not experimental, the way you organize the headings and subheadings of your paper is critically important. In some cases, you might have to use more subheadings to properly organize the assignment. The organization will depend on the rubric provided. Carefully examine the rubric, as it will contain all the detailed requirements of the assignment. Sometimes, the rubric will have information that the normal instructions lack.

Another important factor to consider at this point is how to do citations. In-text citations are fundamental as they support the arguments and points you make in the paper. At this point, the resources gathered at the beginning will come in handy. Integrating the ideas of the authors with your own will ensure that you produce a comprehensive paper. Also, follow the given citation format. In most cases, APA 7 is the preferred format for nursing assignments.

How to Write the Conclusion for NURS 8310 Week 11 Discussion 1: Applied Epidemiology                         

After completing the main sections, write the conclusion of your paper. The conclusion is a summary of the main points you made in your paper. However, you need to rewrite the points and not simply copy and paste them. By restating the points from each subheading, you will provide a nuanced overview of the assignment to the reader.

How to Format the References List for NURS 8310 Week 11 Discussion 1: Applied Epidemiology                           

The very last part of your paper involves listing the sources used in your paper. These sources should be listed in alphabetical order and double-spaced. Additionally, use a hanging indent for each source that appears in this list. Lastly, only the sources cited within the body of the paper should appear here.

Stuck? Let Us Help You

Completing assignments can sometimes be overwhelming, especially with the multitude of academic and personal responsibilities you may have. If you find yourself stuck or unsure at any point in the process, don’t hesitate to reach out for professional assistance. Our assignment writing services are designed to help you achieve your academic goals with ease. 

Our team of experienced writers is well-versed in academic writing and familiar with the specific requirements of the NURS 8310 Week 11 Discussion 1: Applied Epidemiology assignment. We can provide you with personalized support, ensuring your assignment is well-researched, properly formatted, and thoroughly edited. Get a feel of the quality we guarantee – ORDER NOW. 

Sample Answer for NURS 8310 Week 11 Discussion 1: Applied Epidemiology

Natural and manmade disaster is a source of harm and destruction to human health and, therefore, should effectively be managed to minimize potential damage. Applied epidemiology in a disaster setting offers a source of valuable and actionable information for stakeholders and decision-makers during the disaster management period (Bartolucci et al., 2019). One of the recent disasters that led to a population health issue is the USA 2021 Dec Tornado. In early and mid-December 2021, dozens of tornadoes resulted in destruction across several states in the USA, resulting in a population health issue.

The 2021 USA tornado resulted in various epidemiological considerations. In the wake of the disaster, various stakeholders moved in to secure lives and conduct various rescue operations. Disaster epidemiologists focused on reducing the number of injuries, illnesses, and death resulting from the tornado, offering accurate and timely health information for decision-makers, and improving mitigation and prevention strategies for future disasters (Nash et al., 2021). Preparation for future disasters entails collecting relevant information to enhance response preparation. The injured individuals were admitted to various hospitals, with emergency response teams offering relief supplies (Smith, 2021). In addition, mortality and morbidity surveillance was used to determine the scope and extent of the health impacts on the affected population. These efforts are consistent with epidemiological considerations of assessing the human health effects of a disaster and studying potential problems connected to prevention and planning.

The community responded to the tornado. However, various factors made the efforts ineffective to an extent. For example, there were interruptions in the power supply and clean water supply hence making the response more challenging (Smith, 2021). In addition, there were also transport hurdles which did not make it any easier to take the injured to the hospital.

References

Bartolucci, A., Jafar, A. J., Sloan, D., & Whitworth, J. (2019). Defining the roles of data manager and epidemiologist in emergency medical teams. Prehospital and disaster medicine, 34(6), 668-674. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049023X19004965

Nash, D. B., Skoufalos, A., Fabius, R. J. & Oglesby, W. H.  (2021). On the path to health equity. In Population health: Creating a culture of wellness (3rd ed.). Jones & Bartlett Learning.

Smith N. (2021). Multi-State Tornado Response Continues as Essential Medications Depart https://www.directrelief.org/2021/12/multi-state-tornado-response-continues-as-essential-medications-depart/

Sample Answer 2 for NURS 8310 Week 11 Discussion 1: Applied Epidemiology

Applied Epidemiology, Deepwater Horizon Oil Spill

During the Spring of 2010, a manmade disaster, an oil rig explosion which came to be known as the Deepwater Horizon oil spill (DWH), caused serious loss of human and marine life and shocked the Gulf Coast community. This disaster led to population health issues including impaired lung function, headaches and other pains, dizziness, and depression and other mental/behavioral health challenges for victims, victims’ families, and cleanup crews (Kirkland et al., 2017). Oil spill impacts are easily apparent in terms of respiratory health concerns, marine life problems, or local tourism or seafood economy downturns; however, such a disaster has had more subtle and hidden impacts on the mental health of nearby communities.

Fan et al. (2015) noted the collective knowledge added to the mental health care field after the Exxon Valdez oil spill in 1989, and how this learning experience may have contributed to awareness of psychological vulnerabilities of directly impacted victims (witnesses) of the DWH explosion. Authors described an assessment called Community Assessment for Public Health Emergency Response (CASPER) which demonstrated that depression and anxiety prevalence did decrease at one year post disaster compared with immediately following the disaster (Fan et al., 2015). They concluded that, though “persons who are most directly affected through direct exposure should be the primary focus for any public health intervention effort,” indirect victims (such as those involved in disaster mitigation or cleanup efforts) may constitute a larger prevalence and therefore require a differently focused effort for behavioral health support (Fan et al., 2015, p. 39).

By some measures, the area was prepared with somewhat of a framework for an environmental and occupational health disaster, in that it had an established referral process for occupational hazard injury by which victims could seek assessment, diagnosis, and treatment recommendations (Kirkland et al., 2017). It can be argued that further community preparation for future disasters occurred after the DWH disaster, since CME/CE credit modules were dispersed to primary care providers through online platforms after this event (Kirkland et al., 2017). A similar event-driven interest arose among members of the community, and community outreach with education about environmental exposures and hazards increased in the years after the DWH spill (Kirkland et al., 2017). Therefore, though perhaps community preparation was not thorough or complete, it is possible that primary care providers, community members, and other networked organizations now have a layer of experience with population health risks after manmade environmental disasters they would not have had otherwise. The authors soberly note the “general need to train both EOH [environmental and occupational health] specialists and PCPs in environmental medicine” (Kirkland et al., 2017, p. S77); I wholeheartedly agree, since disaster victims can hardly hope to obtain triage and treatment if their local healthcare providers do not know how to recognize exposure concerns and prescribe appropriate care across a variety of disaster-related diagnoses.

References

Fan, A. Z., Prescott, M. R., Zhao, G., Gotway, C. A., &Galea, S. (2015). Individual and community-level determinants of mental and physical health after the deepwater horizon oil spill: findings from the gulf States population survey. Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research, 42(1), 23–41. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11414-014-9418-7

Kirkland, K., Sherman, M., Covert, H., Barlet, G., &Lichtveld, M. (2017). A Framework for Integrating Environmental and Occupational Health and Primary Care in a Postdisaster Context. Journal of Public Health Management & Practice, 23, S71-S77. https://doi.org/10.1097/PHH.0000000000000656