NRS 465 Week 7 Capstone Change Project Evaluation Plan
Grand Canyon University NRS 465 Week 7 Capstone Change Project Evaluation Plan-Step-By-Step Guide
This guide will demonstrate how to complete the Grand Canyon University NRS 465 Week 7 Capstone Change Project Evaluation Plan assignment based on general principles of academic writing. Here, we will show you the A, B, Cs of completing an academic paper, irrespective of the instructions. After guiding you through what to do, the guide will leave one or two sample essays at the end to highlight the various sections discussed below.
How to Research and Prepare for NRS 465 Week 7 Capstone Change Project Evaluation Plan
Whether one passes or fails an academic assignment such as the Grand Canyon University NRS 465 Week 7 Capstone Change Project Evaluation Plan depends on the preparation done beforehand. The first thing to do once you receive an assignment is to quickly skim through the requirements. Once that is done, start going through the instructions one by one to clearly understand what the instructor wants. The most important thing here is to understand the required format—whether it is APA, MLA, Chicago, etc.
After understanding the requirements of the paper, the next phase is to gather relevant materials. The first place to start the research process is the weekly resources. Go through the resources provided in the instructions to determine which ones fit the assignment. After reviewing the provided resources, use the university library to search for additional resources. After gathering sufficient and necessary resources, you are now ready to start drafting your paper.
How to Write the Introduction for NRS 465 Week 7 Capstone Change Project Evaluation Plan
The introduction for the Grand Canyon University NRS 465 Week 7 Capstone Change Project Evaluation Plan is where you tell the instructor what your paper will encompass. In three to four statements, highlight the important points that will form the basis of your paper. Here, you can include statistics to show the importance of the topic you will be discussing. At the end of the introduction, write a clear purpose statement outlining what exactly will be contained in the paper. This statement will start with “The purpose of this paper…” and then proceed to outline the various sections of the instructions.
Need a high-quality paper urgently?
We can deliver within hours.
How to Write the Body for NRS 465 Week 7 Capstone Change Project Evaluation Plan
After the introduction, move into the main part of the NRS 465 Week 7 Capstone Change Project Evaluation Plan assignment, which is the body. Given that the paper you will be writing is not experimental, the way you organize the headings and subheadings of your paper is critically important. In some cases, you might have to use more subheadings to properly organize the assignment. The organization will depend on the rubric provided. Carefully examine the rubric, as it will contain all the detailed requirements of the assignment. Sometimes, the rubric will have information that the normal instructions lack.
Another important factor to consider at this point is how to do citations. In-text citations are fundamental as they support the arguments and points you make in the paper. At this point, the resources gathered at the beginning will come in handy. Integrating the ideas of the authors with your own will ensure that you produce a comprehensive paper. Also, follow the given citation format. In most cases, APA 7 is the preferred format for nursing assignments.
How to Write the Conclusion for NRS 465 Week 7 Capstone Change Project Evaluation Plan
After completing the main sections, write the conclusion of your paper. The conclusion is a summary of the main points you made in your paper. However, you need to rewrite the points and not simply copy and paste them. By restating the points from each subheading, you will provide a nuanced overview of the assignment to the reader.
How to Format the References List for NRS 465 Week 7 Capstone Change Project Evaluation Plan
The very last part of your paper involves listing the sources used in your paper. These sources should be listed in alphabetical order and double-spaced. Additionally, use a hanging indent for each source that appears in this list. Lastly, only the sources cited within the body of the paper should appear here.
Stuck? Let Us Help You
Completing assignments can sometimes be overwhelming, especially with the multitude of academic and personal responsibilities you may have. If you find yourself stuck or unsure at any point in the process, don’t hesitate to reach out for professional assistance. Our assignment writing services are designed to help you achieve your academic goals with ease.
Our team of experienced writers is well-versed in academic writing and familiar with the specific requirements of the NRS 465 Week 7 Capstone Change Project Evaluation Plan assignment. We can provide you with personalized support, ensuring your assignment is well-researched, properly formatted, and thoroughly edited. Get a feel of the quality we guarantee – ORDER NOW.
Sample Answer for NRS 465 Week 7 Capstone Change Project Evaluation Plan
Capstone change projects require an effective evaluation plan to determine the effects of proposed interventions. Complete implementation of a project implores the manager or team to evaluate if it attained the set objectives by focusing on the outcomes, data collected to measure the outcome, and appropriate tools (Melnyk et al., 2023). The purpose of this paper is to provide the project evaluation plan for the proposed capstone change project on reducing falls among geriatric patients.
Part I: Evaluation Plan
| Project Objective (Goal) The overall goal of this project is to enhance patient safety and quality care outcomes for geriatric patients by reducing and preventing falls. The project aims at reducing the falls by 40% within three months as captured in the PICOT question. | Measurable Project Outcome
The following outcomes are the tangible results expected if the outlined objectives are satisfied. | What data will be collected to measure this outcome?
| What tool will be used to collect the data? | Who will be responsible for collecting data? |
| 1. To reduce patient falls in the geriatric unit and improve patient outcomes | Within three months, the facility will record a decline in patient falls of at least 40%. | The facility will collect data before and after implementation to determine the outcomes (Sims et al., 2022). The team will use a survey to collect data on the number of falls after the implementation. | The implementation team will use surveys and questionnaires to collect data. Besides, the pre-and-post implementation plan will entail having data before and after the proposed project’s execution to determine its effectiveness (Roberts et al., 2020). | The nurse manager will collect data in collaboration with each shift nurse. This implies that on every shift, the nurse in charge should collect data by decoding it once they have done the hourly rounding on each patient (Ryan et al., 2022). The nurse fills the patient chart with data based on what they observed and also self-reports from patients. |
| 2. To enhance patient care experience and interactions with providers | Improved quality care to get better reimbursement from CMS. | The team will also incorporate patient satisfaction questionnaires to determine the level of satisfaction by patients and their caregivers about the interventions. | ||
| 3. To improve fall management and quality of care for reimbursement | Increased job satisfaction among nurses and other providers to enhance quality of care. | The team will ensure that patient falls reduce by expected levels of 40% through deliberate intervention, purposeful hourly rounding in the targeted unit or ward (Anu, 2021). | ||
| 4. To improve inter-professional collaboration and multidisciplinary approach to patient issues | Emphasis on organizational inter-professional collaboration among nurses and other providers in the facility to attain expected outcomes. |
Part II: Communication Plan
How will the data collected be communicated to the team?
|
| Communication is a core part of effective implementation of capstone change projects. Through communication, all stakeholders know the level of interventions and the expected outcomes. Communication enhances the attainment of set goals since each stakeholders knows their expected roles and responsibilities to attain the set goals and objective. In this project, the team will collect data using relevant tools; surveys, questionnaires, and self-reports by patients at every respective round (Leamy et al., 2023). As such, the team will collect appropriate data that will be transmitted to the organization’s management for effective change to integrate the suggested interventions. The team will receive the collected data through reports and patient charts to show a decline or no changes in the number of falls a patient experiences in the facility. Nurses will document the collected data using the selected tools and transmit it daily, weekly, and monthly during the implementation of the proposed project (Allari et al., 2023). The collected data will then form a core part of the report on daily, weekly, and monthly-basis to determine the efficacy of the selected intervention to reduce patient falls. The project manager will work with the nurse manager to collect the data and communicate as fast as possible for effective documentation. Having a communication plan will be critical in determining the efficacy of the proposed intervention. |
Conclusion
Project evaluation is essential as it determines the effectiveness of the suggested intervention. In this case, the proposed intervention is purposeful hourly rounding to reduce patient falls in geriatric settings/units in healthcare facilities. The evaluation plan focuses on the attainment of set objectives and goals to reduce and prevent falls while also enhancing inter-professional collaboration among the different stakeholders in the facility. As illustrated, the evaluation will entail using appropriate tools to collect data for analysis in determining the effects of the suggested intervention.
References
Allari, R. S., & Hamdan, K. (2023). Caring Behavior and Hourly Rounding: Nurses’ Perception. The open nursing journal, 17(1).
http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/18744346-v17-e230210-2022-118
Anu, J. A. (2021). Hourly Rounding and fall prevention among the elderly in long-term care: a change process. Journal of geriatric
medicine, 3(1): 1-5. DOI:https://doi.org/10.30564/jgm.v3i1.2614
Leamy, M., Sims, S., Levenson, R., Davies, N., Brearley, S., Gourlay, S., … & Harris, R. (2023). Intentional rounding: a realist
evaluation using case studies in acute and care of older people hospital wards. BMC health services research, 23(1):1341.
DOI:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-023-10358-1
Melnyk, B. M., & Fineout-Overholt, E. (2022). Evidence-based practice in nursing & healthcare: A guide to best practice. Lippincott
Williams & Wilkins.
Roberts, B., Holloway-Kew, K., Pretorius, T., Hosking, S., Kennedy, A., & Armstrong, K. (2020). Does 20-min rounding reduce falls
in an aged-care setting? A pilot intervention study. Geriatric nursing, 41(5): 579-584. DOI: 10.1016/j.gerinurse.2020.03.003.
Ryan, L., Jackson, D., East, L., Woods, C., & Usher, K. (2022). Mixed Methods Study Integration: Nursing student experiences and
opinions of intentional rounding. Journal of advanced nursing, 78(6): 1787-1797. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.15197
Sims, S., Leamy, M., Levenson, R., Brearley, S., Ross, F., & Harris, R. (2020). The delivery of compassionate nursing care in a tick-
box culture: qualitative perspectives from a realist evaluation of intentional rounding. International journal of nursing studies, 107, 103580. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2020.103580