NRS 465 Week 10 Benchmark – Capstone Project Change Proposal Dissemination and Reflection
Grand Canyon University NRS 465 Week 10 Benchmark – Capstone Project Change Proposal Dissemination and Reflection –Step-By-Step Guide
This guide will demonstrate how to complete the Grand Canyon University NRS 465 Week 10 Benchmark – Capstone Project Change Proposal Dissemination and Reflection assignment based on general principles of academic writing. Here, we will show you the A, B, Cs of completing an academic paper, irrespective of the instructions. After guiding you through what to do, the guide will leave one or two sample essays at the end to highlight the various sections discussed below.
How to Research and Prepare for NRS 465 Week 10 Benchmark – Capstone Project Change Proposal Dissemination and Reflection
Whether one passes or fails an academic assignment such as the Grand Canyon University NRS 465 Week 10 Benchmark – Capstone Project Change Proposal Dissemination and Reflection depends on the preparation done beforehand. The first thing to do once you receive an assignment is to quickly skim through the requirements. Once that is done, start going through the instructions one by one to clearly understand what the instructor wants. The most important thing here is to understand the required format—whether it is APA, MLA, Chicago, etc.
After understanding the requirements of the paper, the next phase is to gather relevant materials. The first place to start the research process is the weekly resources. Go through the resources provided in the instructions to determine which ones fit the assignment. After reviewing the provided resources, use the university library to search for additional resources. After gathering sufficient and necessary resources, you are now ready to start drafting your paper.
How to Write the Introduction for NRS 465 Week 10 Benchmark – Capstone Project Change Proposal Dissemination and Reflection
The introduction for the Grand Canyon University NRS 465 Week 10 Benchmark – Capstone Project Change Proposal Dissemination and Reflection is where you tell the instructor what your paper will encompass. In three to four statements, highlight the important points that will form the basis of your paper. Here, you can include statistics to show the importance of the topic you will be discussing. At the end of the introduction, write a clear purpose statement outlining what exactly will be contained in the paper. This statement will start with “The purpose of this paper…” and then proceed to outline the various sections of the instructions.
Need a high-quality paper urgently?
We can deliver within hours.
How to Write the Body for NRS 465 Week 10 Benchmark – Capstone Project Change Proposal Dissemination and Reflection
After the introduction, move into the main part of the NRS 465 Week 10 Benchmark – Capstone Project Change Proposal Dissemination and Reflection assignment, which is the body. Given that the paper you will be writing is not experimental, the way you organize the headings and subheadings of your paper is critically important. In some cases, you might have to use more subheadings to properly organize the assignment. The organization will depend on the rubric provided. Carefully examine the rubric, as it will contain all the detailed requirements of the assignment. Sometimes, the rubric will have information that the normal instructions lack.
Another important factor to consider at this point is how to do citations. In-text citations are fundamental as they support the arguments and points you make in the paper. At this point, the resources gathered at the beginning will come in handy. Integrating the ideas of the authors with your own will ensure that you produce a comprehensive paper. Also, follow the given citation format. In most cases, APA 7 is the preferred format for nursing assignments.
How to Write the Conclusion for NRS 465 Week 10 Benchmark – Capstone Project Change Proposal Dissemination and Reflection
After completing the main sections, write the conclusion of your paper. The conclusion is a summary of the main points you made in your paper. However, you need to rewrite the points and not simply copy and paste them. By restating the points from each subheading, you will provide a nuanced overview of the assignment to the reader.
How to Format the References List for NRS 465 Week 10 Benchmark – Capstone Project Change Proposal Dissemination and Reflection
The very last part of your paper involves listing the sources used in your paper. These sources should be listed in alphabetical order and double-spaced. Additionally, use a hanging indent for each source that appears in this list. Lastly, only the sources cited within the body of the paper should appear here.
Stuck? Let Us Help You
Completing assignments can sometimes be overwhelming, especially with the multitude of academic and personal responsibilities you may have. If you find yourself stuck or unsure at any point in the process, don’t hesitate to reach out for professional assistance. Our assignment writing services are designed to help you achieve your academic goals with ease.
Our team of experienced writers is well-versed in academic writing and familiar with the specific requirements of the NRS 465 Week 10 Benchmark – Capstone Project Change Proposal Dissemination and Reflection assignment. We can provide you with personalized support, ensuring your assignment is well-researched, properly formatted, and thoroughly edited. Get a feel of the quality we guarantee – ORDER NOW.
Sample Answer for NRS 465 Week 10 Benchmark – Capstone Project Change Proposal Dissemination and Reflection
My presentation attracted the attention of nursing staff, physicians, administrators, and patient safety officers at my practicum site. According to the proposal, nursing staff were responsible for implementing the rounding protocol (Considine et al., 2023). On the other hand, physicians were obligated to provide medical oversight and motivation to the nursing staff. In addition, administrators oversaw the allocation and integration of essential resources while patient safety officers monitored and assessed the program’s efficacy.
I kept my language professional and straightforward during my presentation so the audience could comprehend. The three main components of my presentation were the clinical problem statement, proposal objective, and implementation strategy (López-Soto et al., 2023). This framework ensured that the audience could follow along comfortably and helped to disseminate key points from the proposal.
The audience responded well to the proposal, with some individuals even appreciating the effort put into it, given its detailing and importance. However, some questions were noted concerning the pragmatism of the implementation plan, majorly around questions like when precisely the personnel training is and what resources are to be involved in enforcement. Some concerns noted were the need to assess and use the results of the pilot to try and improve the process before its adoption (Hakvoort et al., 2021). The audience’s awareness of falls and their preconceived notions about the impact of hourly rounding could have influenced the presentation.
My professional practice will be significantly influenced by this experience of working in interdisciplinary teams. Presenting to a diverse group of healthcare professionals emphasized the value of fluent, cross-disciplinary communication. Hakvoort et al. (2021) emphasize the significance of evidence-based practice and the need to ensure that clinical decisions are supported by rigorous research. Thanks to this experience, I now have a much better understanding of the mindset and goals of stakeholders. These insights will guide my future healthcare endeavors, highlighting the significance of teamwork and collaboration in achieving positive outcomes.
References
Considine, J., Berry, D., Mullen, M., Edmore Chisango, Melinda Webb-St Mart, Michell, P., Peteris Darzins, & Boyd, L. (2023). Nurses’ experiences of using falls alarms in subacute care: A qualitative study. Plos One, 18(6), e0287537–e0287537. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0287537
Hakvoort, L., Dikken, J., van der Wel, M., Derks, C., & Schuurmans, M. (2021). Minimizing the knowledge-to-action gap; identifying interventions to change nurses’ behavior regarding fall prevention, a mixed method study. BMC Nursing, 20(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-021-00598-z
López-Soto, P. J., Rodríguez-Cortés, F. J., María, R., Medina-Valverde, M. J., Rocío Segura-Ruiz, Hidalgo-Lopezosa, P., Manfredini, R., María Aurora Rodríguez-Borrego, María Ángeles Ramírez-Pérez, Maria, Francisco Javier Márquez-Cuenca, María Dolores Garrido-Ramiro, Vicente-Fenoy, C., & Juan. (2023). CHRONOFALLS: A multicentre nurse-led intervention in the chronoprevention of in-hospital falls in adults. 22(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-023-01322-9