NRS 465 Compare and contrast two change and/or nursing theories
Grand Canyon University NRS 465 Compare and contrast two change and/or nursing theories-Step-By-Step Guide
This guide will demonstrate how to complete the Grand Canyon University NRS 465 Compare and contrast two change and/or nursing theories assignment based on general principles of academic writing. Here, we will show you the A, B, Cs of completing an academic paper, irrespective of the instructions. After guiding you through what to do, the guide will leave one or two sample essays at the end to highlight the various sections discussed below.
How to Research and Prepare for NRS 465 Compare and contrast two change and/or nursing theories
Whether one passes or fails an academic assignment such as the Grand Canyon University NRS 465 Compare and contrast two change and/or nursing theories depends on the preparation done beforehand. The first thing to do once you receive an assignment is to quickly skim through the requirements. Once that is done, start going through the instructions one by one to clearly understand what the instructor wants. The most important thing here is to understand the required format—whether it is APA, MLA, Chicago, etc.
After understanding the requirements of the paper, the next phase is to gather relevant materials. The first place to start the research process is the weekly resources. Go through the resources provided in the instructions to determine which ones fit the assignment. After reviewing the provided resources, use the university library to search for additional resources. After gathering sufficient and necessary resources, you are now ready to start drafting your paper.
How to Write the Introduction for NRS 465 Compare and contrast two change and/or nursing theories
The introduction for the Grand Canyon University NRS 465 Compare and contrast two change and/or nursing theories is where you tell the instructor what your paper will encompass. In three to four statements, highlight the important points that will form the basis of your paper. Here, you can include statistics to show the importance of the topic you will be discussing. At the end of the introduction, write a clear purpose statement outlining what exactly will be contained in the paper. This statement will start with “The purpose of this paper…” and then proceed to outline the various sections of the instructions.
Need a high-quality paper urgently?
We can deliver within hours.
How to Write the Body for NRS 465 Compare and contrast two change and/or nursing theories
After the introduction, move into the main part of the NRS 465 Compare and contrast two change and/or nursing theories assignment, which is the body. Given that the paper you will be writing is not experimental, the way you organize the headings and subheadings of your paper is critically important. In some cases, you might have to use more subheadings to properly organize the assignment. The organization will depend on the rubric provided. Carefully examine the rubric, as it will contain all the detailed requirements of the assignment. Sometimes, the rubric will have information that the normal instructions lack.
Another important factor to consider at this point is how to do citations. In-text citations are fundamental as they support the arguments and points you make in the paper. At this point, the resources gathered at the beginning will come in handy. Integrating the ideas of the authors with your own will ensure that you produce a comprehensive paper. Also, follow the given citation format. In most cases, APA 7 is the preferred format for nursing assignments.
How to Write the Conclusion for NRS 465 Compare and contrast two change and/or nursing theories
After completing the main sections, write the conclusion of your paper. The conclusion is a summary of the main points you made in your paper. However, you need to rewrite the points and not simply copy and paste them. By restating the points from each subheading, you will provide a nuanced overview of the assignment to the reader.
How to Format the References List for NRS 465 Compare and contrast two change and/or nursing theories
The very last part of your paper involves listing the sources used in your paper. These sources should be listed in alphabetical order and double-spaced. Additionally, use a hanging indent for each source that appears in this list. Lastly, only the sources cited within the body of the paper should appear here.
Stuck? Let Us Help You
Completing assignments can sometimes be overwhelming, especially with the multitude of academic and personal responsibilities you may have. If you find yourself stuck or unsure at any point in the process, don’t hesitate to reach out for professional assistance. Our assignment writing services are designed to help you achieve your academic goals with ease.
Our team of experienced writers is well-versed in academic writing and familiar with the specific requirements of the NRS 465 Compare and contrast two change and/or nursing theories assignment. We can provide you with personalized support, ensuring your assignment is well-researched, properly formatted, and thoroughly edited. Get a feel of the quality we guarantee – ORDER NOW.
Sample Answer for NRS 465 Compare and contrast two change and/or nursing theories
Topic 4 DQ 2
Change models and nursing theories are essential in implementing evidence-based practice (EBP) interventions in clinical settings and organizations. Nursing theories offer guidelines on implementing suggested interventions while change models provide steps for the EBP team to execute the proposed changes to the organization or nursing processes. The two change models are Lewin’s change theory and Rogers’ diffusion of innovations theory. Lewin’s change model is a three-step process to implement change in organizational settings. These steps include unfreezing, changing, and refreezing. In the unfreezing stage, organizations and stakeholders identify the need for change and develop or propose plans for its implementation (Adelman-Mullally et al., 2023). The change stage entails implementing the proposed intervention while the refreezing integrates the new ways of doing things as part of the organizational culture.
Rogers’ diffusion of innovations theory explains how people can implement new ideas or innovations in organizations and society. The change theory entails five stages that include the knowledge or awareness stage, persuasion or interest stage, decision or evaluation level, implementation or trial stage, and confirmation or adoption stage. As such, the two theories share similarities and also differ. Firstly, they all focus on implementing new innovative ideas or interventions (Afraz et al., 2020). Secondly, they involve stages as they consider implementing such ideas based on a systematic approach. Thirdly, they all emphasize adherence to processes and stages for effectively implementing suggested interventions or new ideas.
Conversely, the two theories differ in certain aspects. First, the focus of Lewin’s change model is the change process. However, Rogers’ change theory is general and focuses on the adoption and diffusion of innovations. Second, Lewin’s change process has three stages whereas Rogers’ model comprises five stages. Third, the application of the two models differs as Lewin’s change theory is applicable to small-scale changes at the organizational level while Rogers’s diffusion theory is effective for large-scale changes and the adoption of new innovative ideas.
The theory that would best support the implementation of the selected EBP proposed project in this case would be Rogers’ theory. The theory is relevant in healthcare where the adoption of new practices and technologies is necessary to improve patient care. The rationale is that Rogers’ theory offers a comprehensive framework to understand new ideas and practice and their adoption in organizations or groups (Dehghan et al., 2021). Secondly, the theory comprises stages of adoption which are necessary for a systematic application of the intervention. Lastly, it also considers the characteristics of innovation that can impact its adoption like complexity, relative advantages, and compatibility.
My preceptor agreed with the selected theory as she observed that her experience in introducing new practices or technologies in healthcare settings requires such approaches since it is a process based on stages as guided by Rogers’ model. The preceptor was also categorical that based on the nature of the EBP intervention, the model was the most suitable.
References
Adelman-Mullally, T., Nielsen, S., & Chung, S. Y. (2023). Planned change in modern
hierarchical organizations: A three-step model. Journal of Professional Nursing, 46, 1-6. DOI: 10.1016/j.profnurs.2023.02.002.
Afraz, F. C., Vogel, A., Dreher, C., & Berghöfer, A. (2021). Promoting integrated care through a
Global Treatment Budget: A qualitative study in German mental health care using Rogers’ diffusion of innovation theory. International journal of integrated care, 21(4). DOI: 10.5334/ijic.5940
Dehghan Salmasi, N., Kazerani, M., Shekofteh, M., & Jambarsang, S. (2021). Acceptance of
evidence-based nursing databases by educational nurses using Rogers’ model. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, 53(2), 321-327. DOI:10.1177/0961000620948569