DNP 830 Discuss how your project aligns with the SQUIRE 2.0 guidelines
Grand Canyon University DNP 830 Discuss how your project aligns with the SQUIRE 2.0 guidelines-Step-By-Step Guide
This guide will demonstrate how to complete the Grand Canyon University DNP 830 Discuss how your project aligns with the SQUIRE 2.0 guidelines assignment based on general principles of academic writing. Here, we will show you the A, B, Cs of completing an academic paper, irrespective of the instructions. After guiding you through what to do, the guide will leave one or two sample essays at the end to highlight the various sections discussed below.
How to Research and Prepare for DNP 830 Discuss how your project aligns with the SQUIRE 2.0 guidelines
Whether one passes or fails an academic assignment such as the Grand Canyon University DNP 830 Discuss how your project aligns with the SQUIRE 2.0 guidelines depends on the preparation done beforehand. The first thing to do once you receive an assignment is to quickly skim through the requirements. Once that is done, start going through the instructions one by one to clearly understand what the instructor wants. The most important thing here is to understand the required format—whether it is APA, MLA, Chicago, etc.
After understanding the requirements of the paper, the next phase is to gather relevant materials. The first place to start the research process is the weekly resources. Go through the resources provided in the instructions to determine which ones fit the assignment. After reviewing the provided resources, use the university library to search for additional resources. After gathering sufficient and necessary resources, you are now ready to start drafting your paper.
How to Write the Introduction for DNP 830 Discuss how your project aligns with the SQUIRE 2.0 guidelines
The introduction for the Grand Canyon University DNP 830 Discuss how your project aligns with the SQUIRE 2.0 guidelines is where you tell the instructor what your paper will encompass. In three to four statements, highlight the important points that will form the basis of your paper. Here, you can include statistics to show the importance of the topic you will be discussing. At the end of the introduction, write a clear purpose statement outlining what exactly will be contained in the paper. This statement will start with “The purpose of this paper…” and then proceed to outline the various sections of the instructions.
Need a high-quality paper urgently?
We can deliver within hours.
How to Write the Body for DNP 830 Discuss how your project aligns with the SQUIRE 2.0 guidelines
After the introduction, move into the main part of the DNP 830 Discuss how your project aligns with the SQUIRE 2.0 guidelines assignment, which is the body. Given that the paper you will be writing is not experimental, the way you organize the headings and subheadings of your paper is critically important. In some cases, you might have to use more subheadings to properly organize the assignment. The organization will depend on the rubric provided. Carefully examine the rubric, as it will contain all the detailed requirements of the assignment. Sometimes, the rubric will have information that the normal instructions lack.
Another important factor to consider at this point is how to do citations. In-text citations are fundamental as they support the arguments and points you make in the paper. At this point, the resources gathered at the beginning will come in handy. Integrating the ideas of the authors with your own will ensure that you produce a comprehensive paper. Also, follow the given citation format. In most cases, APA 7 is the preferred format for nursing assignments.
How to Write the Conclusion for DNP 830 Discuss how your project aligns with the SQUIRE 2.0 guidelines
After completing the main sections, write the conclusion of your paper. The conclusion is a summary of the main points you made in your paper. However, you need to rewrite the points and not simply copy and paste them. By restating the points from each subheading, you will provide a nuanced overview of the assignment to the reader.
How to Format the References List for DNP 830 Discuss how your project aligns with the SQUIRE 2.0 guidelines
The very last part of your paper involves listing the sources used in your paper. These sources should be listed in alphabetical order and double-spaced. Additionally, use a hanging indent for each source that appears in this list. Lastly, only the sources cited within the body of the paper should appear here.
Stuck? Let Us Help You
Completing assignments can sometimes be overwhelming, especially with the multitude of academic and personal responsibilities you may have. If you find yourself stuck or unsure at any point in the process, don’t hesitate to reach out for professional assistance. Our assignment writing services are designed to help you achieve your academic goals with ease.
Our team of experienced writers is well-versed in academic writing and familiar with the specific requirements of the DNP 830 Discuss how your project aligns with the SQUIRE 2.0 guidelines assignment. We can provide you with personalized support, ensuring your assignment is well-researched, properly formatted, and thoroughly edited. Get a feel of the quality we guarantee – ORDER NOW.
Sample Answer for DNP 830 Discuss how your project aligns with the SQUIRE 2.0 guidelines
DNP 830 Topic 8 DQ 1
The Revised Standards for Quality Improvement Reporting Excellence: SQUIRE 2.0 plays a key role in offering guidelines for quality improvement and quality improvement project. It emphasizes the reporting of three major components of the systematic efforts to improve the safety, value, and quality of healthcare (Peden, 2023). The three components of the systematic efforts include using informal and formal theory in planning, implementing, and evaluating improvement work, the context in which the work is accomplished, and the study of the interventions. These guidelines are also used in manuscript preparation and grant proposal preparation. My project aligns with the SQUIRE 2.0 guidelines. For example, my project has the major components listed in the guidelines. The title of the project is Implementation of DSMES with telehealth messages to improve HbA1c among T2D patients. The project also has an introduction that describes the problem, available knowledge rationale, and specific aims. The project also describes methods, including context, intervention, and measures. The project will also report the results as well as discussion.
The DPI project is a quality improvement and not a research project. This is because the DPI project focuses on improving outcomes at a specific healthcare facility. It will also use a data-driven approach to help execute the delivery of patient services related to diabetes outcomes in the facility. Indeed, the DPI project will focus on translating and already performed research to help improve the outcomes (Nelson et al., 2021). The project cannot be classified as research since research entails a scientific investigation with the major aim of improving and increasing scientific knowledge. The DPI project also has a specific aim as opposed to the cases of research, which may or may not have an aim to achieve specific outcomes. Therefore, the DPI qualifies as a quality improvement and not a research project.
References
Backhouse, A., & Ogunlayi, F. (2020). Quality improvement into practice. BMJ, 368. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.m865
Nelson, L. A., Greevy, R. A., Spieker, A., Wallston, K. A., Elasy, T. A., Kripalani, S., … & Mayberry, L. S. (2021). Effects of a tailored text messaging intervention among diverse adults with type 2 diabetes: evidence from the 15-month REACH randomized controlled trial. Diabetes Care, 44(1), 26–34. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc20-0961
Peden, C. J. (2023). The SQUIRE 2.0 (Standards for Quality Improvement Reporting Excellence) Guidelines: A Framework for Designing and Reporting Quality Improvement Studies, Application in Perioperative Care. In Perioperative Quality Improvement (pp. 89–94). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-83399-8.00016-8
Willmington, C., Belardi, P., Murante, A. M., & Vainieri, M. (2022). The contribution of benchmarking to quality improvement in healthcare. A systematic literature review. BMC Health Services Research, 22(1), 1–20. Doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-07467-8