NU 661 Week 9 Assignment 1: Case Study
Regis University NU 661 Week 9 Assignment 1: Case Study-Step-By-Step Guide
This guide will demonstrate how to complete the Regis University NU 661 Week 9 Assignment 1: Case Study assignment based on general principles of academic writing. Here, we will show you the A, B, Cs of completing an academic paper, irrespective of the instructions. After guiding you through what to do, the guide will leave one or two sample essays at the end to highlight the various sections discussed below.
How to Research and Prepare for NU 661 Week 9 Assignment 1: Case Study
Whether one passes or fails an academic assignment such as the Regis University NU 661 Week 9 Assignment 1: Case Study depends on the preparation done beforehand. The first thing to do once you receive an assignment is to quickly skim through the requirements. Once that is done, start going through the instructions one by one to clearly understand what the instructor wants. The most important thing here is to understand the required format—whether it is APA, MLA, Chicago, etc.
After understanding the requirements of the paper, the next phase is to gather relevant materials. The first place to start the research process is the weekly resources. Go through the resources provided in the instructions to determine which ones fit the assignment. After reviewing the provided resources, use the university library to search for additional resources. After gathering sufficient and necessary resources, you are now ready to start drafting your paper.
How to Write the Introduction for NU 661 Week 9 Assignment 1: Case Study
The introduction for the Regis University NU 661 Week 9 Assignment 1: Case Study is where you tell the instructor what your paper will encompass. In three to four statements, highlight the important points that will form the basis of your paper. Here, you can include statistics to show the importance of the topic you will be discussing. At the end of the introduction, write a clear purpose statement outlining what exactly will be contained in the paper. This statement will start with “The purpose of this paper…” and then proceed to outline the various sections of the instructions.
Need a high-quality paper urgently?
We can deliver within hours.
How to Write the Body for NU 661 Week 9 Assignment 1: Case Study
After the introduction, move into the main part of the NU 661 Week 9 Assignment 1: Case Study assignment, which is the body. Given that the paper you will be writing is not experimental, the way you organize the headings and subheadings of your paper is critically important. In some cases, you might have to use more subheadings to properly organize the assignment. The organization will depend on the rubric provided. Carefully examine the rubric, as it will contain all the detailed requirements of the assignment. Sometimes, the rubric will have information that the normal instructions lack.
Another important factor to consider at this point is how to do citations. In-text citations are fundamental as they support the arguments and points you make in the paper. At this point, the resources gathered at the beginning will come in handy. Integrating the ideas of the authors with your own will ensure that you produce a comprehensive paper. Also, follow the given citation format. In most cases, APA 7 is the preferred format for nursing assignments.
How to Write the Conclusion for NU 661 Week 9 Assignment 1: Case Study
After completing the main sections, write the conclusion of your paper. The conclusion is a summary of the main points you made in your paper. However, you need to rewrite the points and not simply copy and paste them. By restating the points from each subheading, you will provide a nuanced overview of the assignment to the reader.
How to Format the References List for NU 661 Week 9 Assignment 1: Case Study
The very last part of your paper involves listing the sources used in your paper. These sources should be listed in alphabetical order and double-spaced. Additionally, use a hanging indent for each source that appears in this list. Lastly, only the sources cited within the body of the paper should appear here.
Stuck? Let Us Help You
Completing assignments can sometimes be overwhelming, especially with the multitude of academic and personal responsibilities you may have. If you find yourself stuck or unsure at any point in the process, don’t hesitate to reach out for professional assistance. Our assignment writing services are designed to help you achieve your academic goals with ease.
Our team of experienced writers is well-versed in academic writing and familiar with the specific requirements of the NU 661 Week 9 Assignment 1: Case Study assignment. We can provide you with personalized support, ensuring your assignment is well-researched, properly formatted, and thoroughly edited. Get a feel of the quality we guarantee – ORDER NOW.
Sample Answer for NU 661 Week 9 Assignment 1: Case Study
Valencia Week 24 Prenatal Visit: Bleeding
Subjective Information
Based on the provided case study, the 34-year-old African American female patient by the name of Valenciapresents to the clinic during her 24-week prenatal visit with a chief complaint of cramping, moderate vaginal bleeding, and yellow discharge. She however denies itching, irritations, dysuria, urinary frequency, or vaginal odor. She has a history of two pregnancies and one birth (gravida 2 para 1). She also reports being in a monogamous relationship with the same boyfriend through all her pregnancies.
Additional subjective data is however needed for further assessment of the patient’s pregnancy and presenting chief complaints. For instance, the patient needs to explain the characteristics of the cramping such as sharp or dull, constant and comes in intervals, and whether it’s sudden or excruciating (Al‐Memar et al., 2019). The patients also need to specify the severity of the associated symptoms such as vaginal bleeding. Other relevant subjective information needed include the patient history of substance use, past surgical history, and past medical history. The patient should also be able to explain whether she has been using medication such as antibiotics, which are associated with vaginal bleeding during pregnancy.
Objective Information
From the objective portion of the patient history, her blood pressure is 128/88, which indicates prehypertension or high normal. The patient also has a BMI of 29.29 increased from the initially recorded BMI of 21.12, which is slightly above the normal weight gain during pregnancy(Klahr et al., 2019). Her fetal heart rate is also elevated, 155 bpm, but within the normal range (120-160 bpm) recommended by most international clinical guidelines. Upon conducting a further examination, it was noted that the patient’s fundal height is 26 cm. Urine tests show negative results for nitrates, glucose, and proteins.
Additionally, it is necessary to palpate the patient’s abdomen for further evaluation of the location and severity of the patient’s cramping and determine her uterine size. Ultrasonography results are also needed to confirm normal placenta and vessel location (Vandana, 2019). Speculum examination may also be necessary. If the ultrasound displays normal results, then digital examination can be introduced to determine cervical dilation and effacement.
Assessment
The patient presents with vaginal bleeding during her 24th-week prenatal visit, which may indicate abruptio placentae, placenta previa, and vasa previa. However, she also reports cramping and yellow discharge which may suggest the possibility of a sexually transmitted infection(Klahr et al., 2019). She however denies vaginal odor and irritations which are common signs of infection. As such, the most possible differential diagnoses include:
- Abruptio placentae-occurs when the placenta detaches from the uterus sooner than expected, normally after the 20th week of pregnancy (El Miski et al., 2021). Clinical presentations normally include uterine pain, vaginal bleeding, and haemorrhagic shock among others. The patient in the provided case study displayed symptoms of cramping and vaginal bleeding during her 24th-week prenatal visit, which support this diagnosis. Consequently, she is also prehypertensive which is associated with increased risks of abruptio placentae. she is however negative for disseminated intravascular coagulation and hemorrhagic shock, hence ultrasonography is needed to confirm the diagnosis.
- Placenta previa-occurs in case of abnormal implantation of the placenta near or over the internal cervical os. Patients will normally display painless vaginal bleeding bright red after the 20th week of pregnancy(Jain et al., 2020). It is common among patients who are older to present with a history of complications of pregnancy like Jackie. Some patients may present with uterine contractions in addition to the bleeding. However, for the case of Jackie, her vaginal bleeding is associated with cramping and yellow discharge, which disqualifies this diagnosis.
- Vasa Previa-occurs when the membrane containing the fatal blood vessels that connect the umbilical cord and placenta overlie are within 2cm from the internal cervical os. It is associated with painless vaginal bleeding, fetal bradycardia, and rupture of membranes. Transvaginal ultrasound is needed to confirm this diagnosis (Wahane et al., 2020). However, the patient in the provided case study only presented with vaginal bleeding associated with cramping and yellow discharge, which disqualifies this diagnosis.
Plan
Further assessment and/or diagnostic tests: Tests that should be ordered include complete blood count (CBC), type and screen, ultrasonography, and possibly Kleihauer-Betke testing (Klahr et al., 2019). If the bleeding is severe, then disseminated intravascular coagulation tests should also be ordered. Additional tests include a test for infections such as UTI, chlamydia, and gonorrhea.
Treatments: IV fluid resuscitation, starting with normal saline solution 20mL/kg. Blood transfusion should be considered if the patient does not respond to 2l normal saline solution, continue bleeding or display abnormal vital signs or lab tests (Jain et al., 2020).
Education:The patient should be educated on the importance of being hospitalized so that her fetus can be monitored and treated as needed(El Miski et al., 2021).
Referrals: An Obstetrician-Gynecologist (Ob-Gyn) should be called upon for further assessment of the patient’s condition, to determine the actual course of her symptoms(Wahane et al., 2020).
Follow-up: The patient’s symptoms should be closely monitored to avoid complications associated with the pregnancy (Klahr et al., 2019).
References
Al‐Memar, M., Vaulet, T., Fourie, H., Nikolic, G., Bobdiwala, S., Saso, S., … & Bourne, T. (2019). Early‐pregnancy events and subsequent antenatal, delivery and neonatal outcomes: prospective cohort study. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology, 54(4), 530-537. https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.20262
El Miski, F., Benjelloun, A. T., Bouab, M., Lamrissi, A., Fichtali, K., & Bouhya, S. (2021). Spontaneous uterine rupture during the first trimester of a partial molar pregnancy in a scar uterus: A rare case report. International Journal of Surgery Case Reports, 85, 106229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijscr.2021.106229
Jain, V., Bos, H., & Bujold, E. (2020). Guideline No. 402: diagnosis and management of placenta previa. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada, 42(7), 906-917. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jogc.2019.07.019
Klahr, R., Fox, N. S., Zafman, K., Hill, M. B., Connolly, C. T., & Rebarber, A. (2019). Frequency of spontaneous resolution of vasa previa with advancing gestational age. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 221(6), 646-e1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2019.06.040
Vandana, J. (2019). Need of Sonography in Vaginal Bleeding in Early Pregnancy; As a Primary Investigation. Journal of Medical Science and Clinical Research, 7(12). https://doi.org/10.18535/jmscr/v7i12.52
Wahane, A., Zele, M., & Patil, B. (2020). A study of maternal and fetal outcomes in cases of abruptio placentae. Parity, 37(4), 2-70.DOI:10.33545/gynae.2020.v4.i4b.624