NRNP 6675 Week 7 Controversy Associated with Personality and Paraphilic Disorder
Walden University NRNP 6675 Week 7 Controversy Associated with Personality and Paraphilic Disorder-Step-By-Step Guide
This guide will demonstrate how to complete the Walden University NRNP 6675 Week 7 Controversy Associated with Personality and Paraphilic Disorder assignment based on general principles of academic writing. Here, we will show you the A, B, Cs of completing an academic paper, irrespective of the instructions. After guiding you through what to do, the guide will leave one or two sample essays at the end to highlight the various sections discussed below.
How to Research and Prepare for NRNP 6675 Week 7 Controversy Associated with Personality and Paraphilic Disorder
Whether one passes or fails an academic assignment such as the Walden University NRNP 6675 Week 7 Controversy Associated with Personality and Paraphilic Disorder depends on the preparation done beforehand. The first thing to do once you receive an assignment is to quickly skim through the requirements. Once that is done, start going through the instructions one by one to clearly understand what the instructor wants. The most important thing here is to understand the required format—whether it is APA, MLA, Chicago, etc.
After understanding the requirements of the paper, the next phase is to gather relevant materials. The first place to start the research process is the weekly resources. Go through the resources provided in the instructions to determine which ones fit the assignment. After reviewing the provided resources, use the university library to search for additional resources. After gathering sufficient and necessary resources, you are now ready to start drafting your paper.
How to Write the Introduction for NRNP 6675 Week 7 Controversy Associated with Personality and Paraphilic Disorder
The introduction for the Walden University NRNP 6675 Week 7 Controversy Associated with Personality and Paraphilic Disorder is where you tell the instructor what your paper will encompass. In three to four statements, highlight the important points that will form the basis of your paper. Here, you can include statistics to show the importance of the topic you will be discussing. At the end of the introduction, write a clear purpose statement outlining what exactly will be contained in the paper. This statement will start with “The purpose of this paper…” and then proceed to outline the various sections of the instructions.
Need a high-quality paper urgently?
We can deliver within hours.
How to Write the Body for NRNP 6675 Week 7 Controversy Associated with Personality and Paraphilic Disorder
After the introduction, move into the main part of the NRNP 6675 Week 7 Controversy Associated with Personality and Paraphilic Disorder assignment, which is the body. Given that the paper you will be writing is not experimental, the way you organize the headings and subheadings of your paper is critically important. In some cases, you might have to use more subheadings to properly organize the assignment. The organization will depend on the rubric provided. Carefully examine the rubric, as it will contain all the detailed requirements of the assignment. Sometimes, the rubric will have information that the normal instructions lack.
Another important factor to consider at this point is how to do citations. In-text citations are fundamental as they support the arguments and points you make in the paper. At this point, the resources gathered at the beginning will come in handy. Integrating the ideas of the authors with your own will ensure that you produce a comprehensive paper. Also, follow the given citation format. In most cases, APA 7 is the preferred format for nursing assignments.
How to Write the Conclusion for NRNP 6675 Week 7 Controversy Associated with Personality and Paraphilic Disorder
After completing the main sections, write the conclusion of your paper. The conclusion is a summary of the main points you made in your paper. However, you need to rewrite the points and not simply copy and paste them. By restating the points from each subheading, you will provide a nuanced overview of the assignment to the reader.
How to Format the References List for NRNP 6675 Week 7 Controversy Associated with Personality and Paraphilic Disorder
The very last part of your paper involves listing the sources used in your paper. These sources should be listed in alphabetical order and double-spaced. Additionally, use a hanging indent for each source that appears in this list. Lastly, only the sources cited within the body of the paper should appear here.
Stuck? Let Us Help You
Completing assignments can sometimes be overwhelming, especially with the multitude of academic and personal responsibilities you may have. If you find yourself stuck or unsure at any point in the process, don’t hesitate to reach out for professional assistance. Our assignment writing services are designed to help you achieve your academic goals with ease.
Our team of experienced writers is well-versed in academic writing and familiar with the specific requirements of the NRNP 6675 Week 7 Controversy Associated with Personality and Paraphilic Disorder assignment. We can provide you with personalized support, ensuring your assignment is well-researched, properly formatted, and thoroughly edited. Get a feel of the quality we guarantee – ORDER NOW.
Sample Answer for NRNP 6675 Week 7 Controversy Associated with Personality and Paraphilic Disorder
A personality disorder is a mental condition marked by unconventional thought processes and behaviors, resulting in challenges in comprehension and interpersonal relationships. There are ten personality disorders, three of which are particularly prevalent in the criminal justice sector. Paraphilic illnesses, including pedophilia, include sexual attraction to prepubescent children, often recognized after a sexual offense (Münch et al., 2020). Treatment techniques are customized according to the individual’s sexual orientation. This paper examines the dispute over pedophilic disorder, professional perspectives, therapeutic interaction tactics, ethical and legal issues, and the need to uphold ethical and legal standards.
Controversy
The DSM-5 categorizes pedophilic disorder as a mental condition marked by persistent, strong sexual thoughts, impulses, or behaviors directed toward prepubescent children (Seto, 2022). The dispute often stems from the diagnostic criteria, the difference between possessing pedophilic inclinations and acting upon them, and the ramifications of categorizing an individual with this condition. The discourse around pedophilic disease has substantial moral and legal implications since any sexual engagement with minors is unlawful and seen as ethically abhorrent. This conflicts between comprehending the condition from a clinical standpoint and addressing related activities’ legal and ethical ramifications. The research and comprehension of pedophilic conditions are always developing, given the intricate aspects that contribute to the ongoing disagreement (Idrees, 2024). Reconciling the rights of those with pedophilic disorder with the need to safeguard children presents a considerable ethical dilemma, often emphasizing the necessity of public safety while upholding the human rights of those affected by the condition.
Professional Beliefs
My professional convictions about pedophilic disorder underscore the need to recognize it as a mental health disorder that demands meticulous diagnosis and treatment, as delineated by the DSM-5 criteria (Seto, 2022). It is essential to differentiate between those with the condition and those who commit illegal acts since not all individuals with pedophilic inclinations act upon them. Effective therapeutic modalities, including psychotherapy and pharmaceutical therapies, may assist in managing these impulses and mitigating the risk of damage (Landgren et al., 2022).
Ethical and legal issues are crucial in therapy, requiring a balance between confidentiality and safeguarding possible victims (Bayram et al., 2021). Furthermore, confronting the stigma associated with the condition is essential to motivating patients to seek assistance in a nurturing setting. Continued study is crucial to enhancing our comprehension of the condition and refining preventative and treatment methodologies, consistently prioritizing the safety of future victims while delivering suitable care for those impacted (Münch et al., 2020).
Therapeutic Relationship
Fostering a therapeutic connection with a patient diagnosed with Pedophilic Disorder requires compassion, professionalism, and strict compliance with ethical standards. Mental health practitioners must cultivate trust and safety by fostering a non-judgmental atmosphere, delineating explicit limits, and addressing confidentiality. Evidence-based therapies, including cognitive-behavioral therapy and relapse prevention methods, need to be used to assist the patient in developing coping skills (Landgren et al., 2022). Consistent assessments and modifications to treatment strategies are essential for managing co-occurring mental health issues. Supervision and help are requested to address complex instances and guarantee compliance with ethical norms. Educating and empowering the patient is crucial, and being abreast of the newest research and optimal techniques in treating pedophilic disorder is vital. Formulating ways to regulate emotional reactions to challenging sessions is crucial for providing effective assistance.
Ethical and Legal Considerations
Practitioners must comply with ethical and legal standards in clinical or therapeutic contexts addressing pedophilic disorders. This includes upholding patient confidentiality, alerting and safeguarding prospective victims, delivering non-discriminatory care, guaranteeing informed consent, and adhering to mandated reporting statutes (Bayram et al., 2021). Ethical issues include preserving client confidentiality, alerting and safeguarding possible victims, delivering equitable and impartial therapy devoid of prejudice, and comprehending the treatment procedure alongside legal responsibilities.
Legal issues include obligatory reporting of suspected child abuse or neglect, risk evaluation and management, precise documentation, and professional competency. Practitioners must understand local legislation about obligatory reporting and guarantee adherence when there is suspicion or proof of abuse (Kiper et al., 2020). Risk assessment and management are vital to avert injury, and precise documentation is necessary for legal protection and continuity of care. Professional competence entails knowledge of contemporary research, therapeutic approaches, and legal obligations.
Conclusion
Pedophilic disorder is a mental condition defined by excessive sexual thoughts or behaviors directed towards prepubescent youngsters. The illness is contentious because of its diagnostic criteria, the difference between pedophilic desires and criminal conduct, and the legal ramifications of categorizing persons with it. Reconciling the rights of persons with pedophilic disorder with the need to safeguard children presents a substantial ethical dilemma. Professional convictions underscore the need to comprehend the problem as a mental health issue, foster a therapeutic alliance, and comply with ethical and legal standards.
References
Bayram, G., McMahan, A., Juth, N., & Rahm, C. (2021). Health care professionals’ view on pedophilic disorder: a qualitative study. Sexual & Relationship Therapy, 38(4), 684–695. https://doi.org/10.1080/14681994.2021.1900560
Idrees, F. (2024). Pedophilic Disorder: defense of mental illness in criminal cases. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4807213
Kiper, V., Gary, A., & Geist, R. (2020). The facts about pedophilic disorder. Nursing Made Incredibly Easy!, 19(1), 42–47. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.nme.0000723384.14908.d4
Landgren, V., Savard, J., Dhejne, C., Jokinen, J., Arver, S., Seto, M. C., & Rahm, C. (2022). Pharmacological Treatment for Pedophilic Disorder and Compulsive Sexual Behavior Disorder: A review. Drugs, 82(6), 663–681. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40265-022-01696-1
Münch, R., Walter, H., & Müller, S. (2020). Should behavior harmful to others be a sufficient criterion for mental disorders? Conceptual problems of the diagnoses of antisocial personality disorder and pedophilic disorder. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2020.558655
Seto, M. C. (2022). Clinical and Conceptual problems with pedophilic Disorder in the DSM-5-TR. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 51(4), 1833–1837. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-022-02336-1