NR 505 Week 7: Exploring Research Results
Chamberlain University NR 505 Week 7: Exploring Research Results– Step-By-Step Guide
This guide will demonstrate how to complete the Chamberlain University NR 505 Week 7: Exploring Research Results assignment based on general principles of academic writing. Here, we will show you the A, B, Cs of completing an academic paper, irrespective of the instructions. After guiding you through what to do, the guide will leave one or two sample essays at the end to highlight the various sections discussed below.
How to Research and Prepare for NR 505 Week 7: Exploring Research Results
Whether one passes or fails an academic assignment such as the Chamberlain University NR 505 Week 7: Exploring Research Results depends on the preparation done beforehand. The first thing to do once you receive an assignment is to quickly skim through the requirements. Once that is done, start going through the instructions one by one to clearly understand what the instructor wants. The most important thing here is to understand the required format—whether it is APA, MLA, Chicago, etc.
After understanding the requirements of the paper, the next phase is to gather relevant materials. The first place to start the research process is the weekly resources. Go through the resources provided in the instructions to determine which ones fit the assignment. After reviewing the provided resources, use the university library to search for additional resources. After gathering sufficient and necessary resources, you are now ready to start drafting your paper.
How to Write the Introduction for NR 505 Week 7: Exploring Research Results
The introduction for the Chamberlain University NR 505 Week 7: Exploring Research Results is where you tell the instructor what your paper will encompass. In three to four statements, highlight the important points that will form the basis of your paper. Here, you can include statistics to show the importance of the topic you will be discussing. At the end of the introduction, write a clear purpose statement outlining what exactly will be contained in the paper. This statement will start with “The purpose of this paper…” and then proceed to outline the various sections of the instructions.
Need a high-quality paper urgently?
We can deliver within hours.
How to Write the Body for NR 505 Week 7: Exploring Research Results
After the introduction, move into the main part of the NR 505 Week 7: Exploring Research Results assignment, which is the body. Given that the paper you will be writing is not experimental, the way you organize the headings and subheadings of your paper is critically important. In some cases, you might have to use more subheadings to properly organize the assignment. The organization will depend on the rubric provided. Carefully examine the rubric, as it will contain all the detailed requirements of the assignment. Sometimes, the rubric will have information that the normal instructions lack.
Another important factor to consider at this point is how to do citations. In-text citations are fundamental as they support the arguments and points you make in the paper. At this point, the resources gathered at the beginning will come in handy. Integrating the ideas of the authors with your own will ensure that you produce a comprehensive paper. Also, follow the given citation format. In most cases, APA 7 is the preferred format for nursing assignments.
How to Write the Conclusion for NR 505 Week 7: Exploring Research Results
After completing the main sections, write the conclusion of your paper. The conclusion is a summary of the main points you made in your paper. However, you need to rewrite the points and not simply copy and paste them. By restating the points from each subheading, you will provide a nuanced overview of the assignment to the reader.
How to Format the References List for NR 505 Week 7: Exploring Research Results
The very last part of your paper involves listing the sources used in your paper. These sources should be listed in alphabetical order and double-spaced. Additionally, use a hanging indent for each source that appears in this list. Lastly, only the sources cited within the body of the paper should appear here.
Stuck? Let Us Help You
Completing assignments can sometimes be overwhelming, especially with the multitude of academic and personal responsibilities you may have. If you find yourself stuck or unsure at any point in the process, don’t hesitate to reach out for professional assistance. Our assignment writing services are designed to help you achieve your academic goals with ease.
Our team of experienced writers is well-versed in academic writing and familiar with the specific requirements of the NR 505 Week 7: Exploring Research Results assignment. We can provide you with personalized support, ensuring your assignment is well-researched, properly formatted, and thoroughly edited. Get a feel of the quality we guarantee – ORDER NOW.
Sample Answer for NR 505 Week 7: Exploring Research Results
PICo questions: How do nurses in an inpatient setting perceive the value of bedside shift report?
Completing last week’s research, it is apparent that bedside shift report adds a layer of safety for the patients. A qualitative study in an inner-city, acute care teaching hospital, was done to gain insight on what experiences nurses had with BSR. Jeffs et al. (2013) interviewed 43 female nurses from various clinical specialties. The participants were asked to list the positive and the negatives about BSR. Topics that were covered included describing the positives and negatives of face to face interactions with nursing colleagues; the negative outcomes associated with the interactions and involvement of patients in care planning; and if they felt that the care was more patient-centered and safer. Over six months, the nurses took in observations and found that they could identify, intercept and correct potential errors. In addition, they could clarify the care plan and patient needs. The nurses were also able to prioritize care with a quick assessment. The results may be affected by the limitation of the study only taking place in one hospital. The study was well rounded to include nurses from different units.
My plan in implementing a change to bedside shift report is to improve patient safety by improving nurse to nurse communication and reducing hospital events including patient falls. I would gather the baseline quality data for the hospital units involved in the study. Once the plan is discussed with all members involved and the education on how to conduct the BSR is provided to the nurses involved in the implementation the next step is to do. Set the date and start monitoring and evaluating the new process of BSR. Conducting interviews with nurses at the beginning and several weeks later to understand barriers and successes from the new process. The length of time to conduct interviews can be difficult to determine in a qualitative study. In this process change scenario, I would continue to conduct interviews until I started to receive redundant responses to questions multiple times. Next, I will study the data obtained through the interviews and the quality data collected over that same time period. I should be able to determine if I reached the outcome I predicted and if the implementation went as I planned. This is a good time to evaluate any barriers or challenges encountered during the implementation. The step in the PDSA is act. Taking the information learned during the implementation and ensuring that the solutions remain sustainable.
Jeffs, L., Acott, A., Simpson, E., Campbell, H., Irwin, T., Lo, J., Beswick, S., & Cardoso, R. (2013). The value of bedside shift reporting: Enhancing nurse surveillance, accountability, and patient safety. Journal of Nursing Care Quality, 28(3), 226-232. doi:10.1097/NCQ.0b013e3182852f46
ALSO READ:
NR 505 Week 8: Future Use of Evidence-Based Practice
Sample Answer 2 for NR 505 Week 7: Exploring Research Results
Your post regarding bedside shift report (BSR) is quite interesting. I believe there is a need for more data supporting the efficacy and benefits associated with bedside shift report. I have worked in facilities where the staff was transitioned to bedside shift report. For the most part, staff was extremely resistant to the idea for a myriad of reasons that varied from BSR extends the length of time it takes to report off to concerns regarding the risk of breaks in patient confidentiality to the staff just simply did not see a need to do so. Roslan and Lim (2016) conducted an interpretive, descriptive, qualitative study using focus group interviews with semi-structured questions. Twenty nurses were asked about their perception of bedside clinical handover. Results of this study concluded that the nurses found bedside clinical handover to be a possible cause of breaks in patient confidentiality, a source of interruption and distraction by patients and family members. On the other hand, research subjects also found bedside clinical handover to be a foundation for communication between patients and nurses. As an acute care nurse, I know and understand the angst caused from bedside report. Despite this fact, I remain a staunch supporter of bedside shift report. When I was a manager, I cannot recall the number of times I received complaints from staff who complained because the patient in room 301 had an infiltrated IV at the start of the shift or the patient in room 345 was dirty at the beginning of the shift or the patient in room 320 was complaining because they have been asking for pain meds for over an hour. Each of the issues would have been known and could have been addressed during shift report. Most nurses do not intentionally leave work undone but there is the occasional unicorn who leaves work undone on a consistent basis. Although healthcare is a 24-hour rotation, no nurse wants to follow someone who consistently leaves a mess for the next shift. BSR hinders the possibility of this becoming a persistent issue.
I look forward to your continued research on this matter.
LaKrishia
Roslan, S. & Lim, M. (2016). Nurses’ perceptions of bedside clinical handover in a medical-surgical unit: An interpretive descriptive study. Retrieved from: http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/2010105816678423
Sample Answer 3 for NR 505 Week 7: Exploring Research Results
PICo question: Are post war veterans at an elevated risk for suicide as they reintegrate into society?
Research on my PICo question showed post war veterans were at an elevated risk for suicide within the first three months of returning state-side. Many issues can arise as veterans reintegrate into society following deployment and can experience feelings of burdensomeness, loss of belonging, and combat guilt among other factors that can negatively affect their mental health. Lusk et.al. (2015) completed a qualitative study on post war veterans and results showed the first month of return to be the highest risk for suicide especially among veterans who reported burdensomeness and combat guilt. Lusk (2015) discussed the success of acceptance and forgiveness-based interventions through cognitive behavioral therapy as a way to re-define traditional roles and encourage the outflow of emotional response as a therapeutic outlet.
As a potential family nurse practitioner (FNP), within a rural community, the integration of cognitive behavior therapy specializing in acceptance and forgiveness-based interventions for post war veterans would fit the demographic area, be feasible under the benefits of Tricare, and be appropriate for the patient population. Utilizing a Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) the first action would be to narrow the focus on the problem and formulate an interdisciplinary team that will accomplish tasks and complete the details of the agenda. The goal would be to improve access to mental health treatments such as cognitive behavior therapy via telehealth within a veterans’ home. Gros, Lancaster, Acierno, and Lopez (2018), found many governing bodies and insurance companies willing to cover telehealth as a preventive measure in treatment of PTSD and received funding from grants authorized from Veterans Affairs to hire master’s level counselors and provide telemonitoring devices to patients within their homes.
Members from the local armory, military chaplains, licensed therapist, community leaders, and physicians could advocate on the importance the importance of improved mental health among local combat veterans. A brief semi-structured questionnaire could be completed upon the veterans’ initial return to the community and the physician or FNP could determine whether the veteran should be enrolled in the telehealth service that provides weekly access to a licensed mental health provider specializing in combat veterans and PTSD. The mental health counselor would establish a baseline utilizing the patient’s response to questions and then repeat the same questionnaire after approximately three months of weekly sessions to determine if the veteran likes the use of telehealth and has felt improvement within their overall mental outlook. The repeat questionnaire would help determine if individuals liked the overall delivery of services, if improvement in mental health had been made, or if they preferred a different method of receiving psychiatric care.
Financial resources could be obtained through the form of grants and communication with local business owners. Securing funding would be the biggest obstacle along with raising awareness to the risks veterans experience during the first few months post-deployment and establishing a trust factor where local veterans would be willing to participate. A few telemonitors and licensed therapists or counselors would be needed to provide the interviews and implement interventions through the telehealth program. A licensed physician would need to oversee the program because the state of Alabama requires FNP to operate under supervision.
A future research study that could extend knowledge on post war veterans would be improved mental health screenings pre-deployment as well as improved methods to manage mental health needs throughout deployment as a way to possible identify soldiers at risk and meet their emotional needs. I feel more research is needed on ways to assist veterans throughout deployment with mental and emotional needs. Further research is needed to ensure post war veterans have the coping skills needed to reintegrate into society and function appropriately and in a healthy productive manner.
Gros, D. F., Lancaster, C. L., Acierno, R., & Lopez, C. M. (2018). Treatment satisfaction of home-based telehealth versus in-person delivery of prolonged exposure for combat-related PTSD in veterans. Journal of Telemedicine And Telecare, 24(1), 51-55.
Lusk, J., Brenner, L. A., Betthauser, L. M., Terrio, H., Scher, A. I., Schwab, K., & Poczwardowski, A. (2015). A qualitative study of potential suicide risk factors among Operation Iraqi Freedom/Operation Enduring Freedom soldiers returning to the continental United States (CONUS). Journal of Clinical Psychology, 71(9), 843-855. doi:10.1002/jclp.22164
Sample Answer 4 for NR 505 Week 7: Exploring Research Results
My research focuses on chronic pain managements and how effective a combination of nonpharmacological and pharmacological interventions can be compared to a patient solely using pharmacological interventions. For this week’s post, I have chosen an article that focuses on nonpharmacological interventions used in reducing chronic cancer pain. The research results indicated that based on the empirical evidence, nonpharmacological interventions can be used for the management of chronic cancer pain, whether it is alone or an addition to pharmacological interventions (Eaton, Brant & Yeh, 2017). In my practice setting, these findings can make it possible for PCPs to use nonpharmacological interventions more confidently and incorporate nonpharmacological interventions into the first line of treatment for patients with chronic pain due to cancer or other debilitating illnesses.
Using the PDSA change model I will outline an action plan. The first step is to plan. In this stage I am targeting patients with chronic pain, the abuse of pharmacological interventions such as opiates and patients’ dissatisfaction with the management of their pain. The second step is Do, this is where I would implement my suggestion or intervention as well as measure my results (Donnelly & Kirk, 2015). I would gather patients from a local clinic with history of chronic pain who are currently using analgesics daily for the management of their pain. Over a 2-month trial, we can incorporate other nonpharmacological interventions such as massage, physical therapy and acupuncture, depending on the affected area. I can measure the effectiveness by rating patients pain levels weekly, having a chart in that displays the frequency of analgesics being used and how often if any, the patients visited the emergency room for flare-ups. In the third step study, I will analyze if what I predicted was true and patients reduced their analgesic intake, had no visits to the ER and reported pain being controlled appropriately. The final step is act, in this step I will consider what is already in place and what I need to do in order to incorporate my findings into practice (Donnelly & Kirk, 2015). If my findings are what I expect, I believe the path will not be clear. Although there is current research supporting the use of nonpharmacological interventions for chronic pain management, I expect there will be some resistance given it is easier to prescribe medication than to monitor the effectiveness of nonpharmacological interventions.
A future research project that will be useful at extending the knowledge of chronic pain management is studying how much these patients know about analgesics and nonpharmacological interventions. I feel that if patients are well educated, they are more likely to make better choices. However, depending on the culture, I feel individuals perceive pain differently. Studies need to research selfcare techniques that are already known by these patients, areas that lack knowledge and the impact that their culture has on how they select interventions.
Donnelly, P., & Kirk, P. (2015). Use the PDSA model for effective change management. Education for Primary Care, 26(4), 279-281.
Eaton, L., Brant, J., McLeod, K. & Yeh, C., (2017). Nonpharmacologic pain interventions a review of evidence-based practices for reducing chronic cancer pain. Clinical Journal of Oncology Nursing, 21(3), 54-70. doi:10.1188/17.CJON.S3.54-70
Sample Answer 5 for NR 505 Week 7: Exploring Research Results
As I have researched early delivery of aspirin for chest pain patients presenting to the emergency department I have come across many studies. The study I will be using this week discusses how delivery of aspirin to chest pain patients can be delayed based on age, sex, or gender. While this topic differs slightly from my original PICOT question I can still use this study to help treat chest pain patients within my practice. I could easily see how this study could be beneficial to my practice. Chest pain should be treated regardless of age, race or gender. This study showed that patients of non-white race and female gender were undertreated with regards of aspirin delivery (Takakuwa, Shofer, & Hollander, 2010). We as health care providers need to focus on ways to break barriers such as race and gender. Using the Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) we could implement the use of a hard stop within the electronic medical record that would alert staff to deliver aspirin sooner to patients that present with chest pain. It would not base the delivery on race or sex but would be based on chief complaint of chest pain. Of course allergy to aspirin would need to be identified before actual administration, but with the help of the hard stop within the triage process it would allow for more consistent delivery of aspirin sooner. In order to implement this plan you would need to work with IT to add the additional hard stop into the triage process. In addition you would also need to train staff on the new process and new charting requirements. In order to see if the new process was successful you would have to monitor the administration time of aspirin in chest pain patients to see if the time was reduced evenly across all races and gender. In the future it would be helpful to review patient’s charts to see the impact that early delivery of aspirin had on their outcome. The study would help to validate the reason for change and help others to understand the importance of early delivery of aspirin and hopefully join in the change and make the same changes within their own practice.
References:
Takakuwa, K. M., Shofer, F. S., & Hollander, J. E. (2010). Aspirin administration in ED patients who presented with undifferentiated chest pain: age, race, and sex effects. The American Journal Of Emergency Medicine, 28(3), 318-324. doi:10.1016/j.ajem.2008.12.021
https://chamberlainuniversity.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=mdc&AN=20223389&site=eds-live&scope=site