NR 506 Week 4: Challenges in Lobbying Strategies Discussion

Chamberlain University NR 506 Week 4: Challenges in Lobbying Strategies Discussion– Step-By-Step Guide

This guide will demonstrate how to complete the Chamberlain University NR 506 Week 4: Challenges in Lobbying Strategies Discussion   assignment based on general principles of academic writing. Here, we will show you the A, B, Cs of completing an academic paper, irrespective of the instructions. After guiding you through what to do, the guide will leave one or two sample essays at the end to highlight the various sections discussed below.

How to Research and Prepare for NR 506 Week 4: Challenges in Lobbying Strategies Discussion              

Whether one passes or fails an academic assignment such as the Chamberlain University NR 506 Week 4: Challenges in Lobbying Strategies Discussion  depends on the preparation done beforehand. The first thing to do once you receive an assignment is to quickly skim through the requirements. Once that is done, start going through the instructions one by one to clearly understand what the instructor wants. The most important thing here is to understand the required format—whether it is APA, MLA, Chicago, etc.

After understanding the requirements of the paper, the next phase is to gather relevant materials. The first place to start the research process is the weekly resources. Go through the resources provided in the instructions to determine which ones fit the assignment. After reviewing the provided resources, use the university library to search for additional resources. After gathering sufficient and necessary resources, you are now ready to start drafting your paper.

How to Write the Introduction for NR 506 Week 4: Challenges in Lobbying Strategies Discussion              

The introduction for the Chamberlain University NR 506 Week 4: Challenges in Lobbying Strategies Discussion  is where you tell the instructor what your paper will encompass. In three to four statements, highlight the important points that will form the basis of your paper. Here, you can include statistics to show the importance of the topic you will be discussing. At the end of the introduction, write a clear purpose statement outlining what exactly will be contained in the paper. This statement will start with “The purpose of this paper…” and then proceed to outline the various sections of the instructions.

How to Write the Body for NR 506 Week 4: Challenges in Lobbying Strategies Discussion              

After the introduction, move into the main part of the NR 506 Week 4: Challenges in Lobbying Strategies Discussion assignment, which is the body. Given that the paper you will be writing is not experimental, the way you organize the headings and subheadings of your paper is critically important. In some cases, you might have to use more subheadings to properly organize the assignment. The organization will depend on the rubric provided. Carefully examine the rubric, as it will contain all the detailed requirements of the assignment. Sometimes, the rubric will have information that the normal instructions lack.

Another important factor to consider at this point is how to do citations. In-text citations are fundamental as they support the arguments and points you make in the paper. At this point, the resources gathered at the beginning will come in handy. Integrating the ideas of the authors with your own will ensure that you produce a comprehensive paper. Also, follow the given citation format. In most cases, APA 7 is the preferred format for nursing assignments.

How to Write the Conclusion for NR 506 Week 4: Challenges in Lobbying Strategies Discussion              

After completing the main sections, write the conclusion of your paper. The conclusion is a summary of the main points you made in your paper. However, you need to rewrite the points and not simply copy and paste them. By restating the points from each subheading, you will provide a nuanced overview of the assignment to the reader.

How to Format the References List for NR 506 Week 4: Challenges in Lobbying Strategies Discussion              

The very last part of your paper involves listing the sources used in your paper. These sources should be listed in alphabetical order and double-spaced. Additionally, use a hanging indent for each source that appears in this list. Lastly, only the sources cited within the body of the paper should appear here.

Stuck? Let Us Help You

Completing assignments can sometimes be overwhelming, especially with the multitude of academic and personal responsibilities you may have. If you find yourself stuck or unsure at any point in the process, don’t hesitate to reach out for professional assistance. Our assignment writing services are designed to help you achieve your academic goals with ease. 

Our team of experienced writers is well-versed in academic writing and familiar with the specific requirements of the NR 506 Week 4: Challenges in Lobbying Strategies Discussion  assignment. We can provide you with personalized support, ensuring your assignment is well-researched, properly formatted, and thoroughly edited. Get a feel of the quality we guarantee – ORDER NOW. 

Sample Answer for NR 506 Week 4: Challenges in Lobbying Strategies Discussion

As far as meeting with local legislators or policymakers, I am sure that the best approach would be trying to find a time to meet face to face with them.  However, due to the current circumstances, I think a telephone call or e-mail may work best. Illinois State Representative, Norine Hammond, is running for re-election this year and the Primary election starts on Tuesday.  I feel that she has much more important things to do for her own success than to take time to meet with me.  Of course, I have never met her, so she could be willing to take the time to sit down and talk, but I will understand if she would rather not due to the timing.  Timing could also be a factor as I am due to have another baby at any time in the next 2 ½ weeks. I would hate to schedule a time to meet with her and then have to back out due to being in the hospital or trying to recover at home.  As I mentioned, if she would meet with me, I would make sure she was aware of my circumstances in case I had to cancel at the last minute.

I think e-mail is less personal of course, but I also think it is much easier for people who have a busy schedule, because it then allows them to respond at their convenience.  With the Primary election beginning this week, Ms. Hammond will definitely be busy.  However, it is said that someone would need to ask six people in person to have the same power of an email with 200 recipients (Bohns, 2017).  For that reason, I would prefer a phone call conversation over an email conversation.  I also think that conversations over email or text can easily be misinterpreted and I think there is great significance in immediate responses as well as changes in voice.  I know for me personally, it is much easier to say “no” in an email than it is on the phone or in person. It is also easier for me to argue my case in person rather than in text form.

Because Ms. Hammond will be helping me out with my class, I will be appreciative of whatever she has to offer.

Reference:

Bohns, V. (2017). A face-to-face request is 34 times more successful than an email. Harvard Business Review. Retrieved from: https://hbr.org/2017/04/a-face-to-face-request-is-34-times-more-successful-than-an-email

ALSO READ:

NR 506 Week 5: Drivers of High Performance Healthcare Systems

NR 506 Week 5 Assignment 1: Key Communication Strategies for Policy Advocacy

NR 506 Week 5: Ethical and Legal Implications

NR 506NP Week 6: Scope of Practice and Patient’s Healthcare Accessibility

NR 506 Week 6: Using the Media Discussion

NR 506 Week 7: RN as Healthcare Policy Leader Discussion

NR 506 Week 7: APNs as Healthcare Policy Leaders

NR 506 Week 8: Global Policy Reform Discussion

Sample Answer 2 for NR 506 Week 4: Challenges in Lobbying Strategies Discussion

Communicating with Legislators

Before approaching a policymaker, it is wise to know the background of the person you will be interviewing (Kachel, 2014). You should know what their stance is on the issues you will be discussing (Kachel, 2014). Since my husband works in the Jacksonville North Pulaski School District, I have been able to ask both him and his coworkers about Daniel Gray, the President of the Jacksonville North Pulaski School Board. Mr. Gray is involved in the district’s athletic department, so I feel children and physical activity are important to him. I surmised he would be a good person to speak with since he shares a similar interest in children’s health. By knowing your subject’s background, you will know the best way to explain your policy that will peak interest in your audience (Kachel, 2014). It is important when speaking about your policy that you can show some personal connection to the issue (Kachel, 2014). By showing how this issue affects you, the policymaker will be able to understand your passion and realize the importance of the issue (Kachel, 2014). On the other hand, if someone is presenting a policy and acts as if they have no investment in the issue or could basically care less, why would the policy maker care? Working in an orthopedic unit has allowed me to see what long-term effects childhood obesity can have on adults. Eating habits and physical activity are created as children. If schools implement avenues to address the obesity issue, they can prevent many people from developing medical conditions and even an early death. I feel my current jobsite then provides me with topics I can personally discuss with Mr. Gray. Like any conversation, presenting a policy is going to come across best if it can be done in person (Kachel, 2014); this approach adds a face to the issue. Discussions done by electronic communication can sometimes cause information to get lost in translation or come across differently than the presenter is intending. I plan to contact Mr. Gray via email to set up a meeting time that is convenient for him. Ideally, I would like to be able to speak with him in person, but a phone call might be the only option. Before the initial meeting, it is helpful to send information on the topic you will be presenting (Kachel, 2014). This step will enable your policy maker to list questions and concerns for the discussion. Sending information before the meeting provides time for the other person to perform his own research on the issue. Likewise, being prepared for the presentation hopefully demonstrates the importance of your issue to your policy maker; it emphasizes the need for supporting your viewpoint. Researching the background on the issue is the first step. To hit a homerun, you must convey the importance of the problem by being well prepared for your presentation.

 References

KACHEL, D. E. (2014). Communicating with Legislators. School Library Monthly, 30(5), 8-10.

Sample Answer 3 for NR 506 Week 4: Challenges in Lobbying Strategies Discussion

I definitely agree with you that e-mail allows for quick conversations with people. Ninety-five percent of Americans have cell phones, with 77% of those people owning a smart phone (Pew Research Center, 2018). Email and text can almost be instant anymore, not to mention, if someone does not have a smart phone, they likely use a computer for work especially at the Senator’s office.  When I am at work, my email comes directly to my desktop, which allows me to be reached almost immediately if I am in the office. My cell phone is almost always in my possession, so I can be reached by email there as well.  If your senator has a scheduler, I would hope that she would have quick access to the schedule and would respond to you quickly.

I definitely understand why you may be skeptical to use the “contact the senator” link as there is no true way to follow up and as you mentioned, you do not know where the message will go.

I think emailing the Illinois State Senator first would be my best option as well. That allows them to be prepared for the meeting request instead of a phone call that could catch them off guard.

One thing I did find interesting though, was an article published in Harvard Business Review stated that a” face-to-face request is 34 times more successful than an e-mail” Bohns, 2017). That is pretty amazing to me.  I do think that I can argue my point much stronger in person than over an email, and email can often be misinterpreted due to the lack of nonverbal language.

Good luck with your email. I hope you get good feedback.

References:

Pew Research Center. (2018). Mobile Fact Sheet. Retrieved from:   http://www.pewinternet.org/fact-sheet/mobile/ (Links to an external site.)

Bohns, V. (2017). A face-to-face request is 34 times more successful than an email. Harvard Business Review. Retrieved from: https://hbr.org/2017/04/a-face-to-face-request-is-34-times-more-successful-than-an-email

Sample Answer 4 for NR 506 Week 4: Challenges in Lobbying Strategies Discussion

I enjoyed reading your post, especially your beginning statement about nurses selling themselves short. Too many times I have heard nurses say, “I’m JUST the nurse”, and I cannot express how much I dislike that statement. Being “just” the nurse does not show the properly represent the various hats we wear. This class has shown me as well how powerful we are not only as individuals but as a group. Just as you mentioned, we are at the frontlines of healthcare and have the ability to positively impact healthcare as well as our daily practice. You are right, there are many factors that influence reasons why nurses do not participate in changing policies and this class has allowed me to see the importance of making time to create an impact on healthcare policies. I myself felt creating policy changes and getting in contact with legislators was not something me as a nurse could do, but all we need is motivation and determination.

I believe your plan is effective in order to get your message across to your elected official. I like the idea of creating a fact sheet with important information for them to have during your conversation or read before meeting with you. I also feel a follow up email is just as important as the meeting. This shows professionalism and also helps to make your contact person feel appreciated. In my opinion you have a great plan and I look forward to hearing about your progress.