NR 512 Week 6 Discussion: HealthIT Topic of the Week and Impact on Practice
Chamberlain University NR 512 Week 6 Discussion: HealthIT Topic of the Week and Impact on Practice– Step-By-Step Guide
This guide will demonstrate how to complete the Chamberlain University NR 512 Week 6 Discussion: HealthIT Topic of the Week and Impact on Practice assignment based on general principles of academic writing. Here, we will show you the A, B, Cs of completing an academic paper, irrespective of the instructions. After guiding you through what to do, the guide will leave one or two sample essays at the end to highlight the various sections discussed below.
How to Research and Prepare for NR 512 Week 6 Discussion: HealthIT Topic of the Week and Impact on Practice
Whether one passes or fails an academic assignment such as the Chamberlain University NR 512 Week 6 Discussion: HealthIT Topic of the Week and Impact on Practice depends on the preparation done beforehand. The first thing to do once you receive an assignment is to quickly skim through the requirements. Once that is done, start going through the instructions one by one to clearly understand what the instructor wants. The most important thing here is to understand the required format—whether it is APA, MLA, Chicago, etc.
After understanding the requirements of the paper, the next phase is to gather relevant materials. The first place to start the research process is the weekly resources. Go through the resources provided in the instructions to determine which ones fit the assignment. After reviewing the provided resources, use the university library to search for additional resources. After gathering sufficient and necessary resources, you are now ready to start drafting your paper.
How to Write the Introduction for NR 512 Week 6 Discussion: HealthIT Topic of the Week and Impact on Practice
The introduction for the Chamberlain University NR 512 Week 6 Discussion: HealthIT Topic of the Week and Impact on Practice is where you tell the instructor what your paper will encompass. In three to four statements, highlight the important points that will form the basis of your paper. Here, you can include statistics to show the importance of the topic you will be discussing. At the end of the introduction, write a clear purpose statement outlining what exactly will be contained in the paper. This statement will start with “The purpose of this paper…” and then proceed to outline the various sections of the instructions.
Need a high-quality paper urgently?
We can deliver within hours.
How to Write the Body for NR 512 Week 6 Discussion: HealthIT Topic of the Week and Impact on Practice
After the introduction, move into the main part of the NR 512 Week 6 Discussion: HealthIT Topic of the Week and Impact on Practice assignment, which is the body. Given that the paper you will be writing is not experimental, the way you organize the headings and subheadings of your paper is critically important. In some cases, you might have to use more subheadings to properly organize the assignment. The organization will depend on the rubric provided. Carefully examine the rubric, as it will contain all the detailed requirements of the assignment. Sometimes, the rubric will have information that the normal instructions lack.
Another important factor to consider at this point is how to do citations. In-text citations are fundamental as they support the arguments and points you make in the paper. At this point, the resources gathered at the beginning will come in handy. Integrating the ideas of the authors with your own will ensure that you produce a comprehensive paper. Also, follow the given citation format. In most cases, APA 7 is the preferred format for nursing assignments.
How to Write the Conclusion for NR 512 Week 6 Discussion: HealthIT Topic of the Week and Impact on Practice
After completing the main sections, write the conclusion of your paper. The conclusion is a summary of the main points you made in your paper. However, you need to rewrite the points and not simply copy and paste them. By restating the points from each subheading, you will provide a nuanced overview of the assignment to the reader.
How to Format the References List for NR 512 Week 6 Discussion: HealthIT Topic of the Week and Impact on Practice
The very last part of your paper involves listing the sources used in your paper. These sources should be listed in alphabetical order and double-spaced. Additionally, use a hanging indent for each source that appears in this list. Lastly, only the sources cited within the body of the paper should appear here.
Stuck? Let Us Help You
Completing assignments can sometimes be overwhelming, especially with the multitude of academic and personal responsibilities you may have. If you find yourself stuck or unsure at any point in the process, don’t hesitate to reach out for professional assistance. Our assignment writing services are designed to help you achieve your academic goals with ease.
Our team of experienced writers is well-versed in academic writing and familiar with the specific requirements of the NR 512 Week 6 Discussion: HealthIT Topic of the Week and Impact on Practice assignment. We can provide you with personalized support, ensuring your assignment is well-researched, properly formatted, and thoroughly edited. Get a feel of the quality we guarantee – ORDER NOW.
Sample Answer for NR 512 Week 6 Discussion: HealthIT Topic of the Week and Impact on Practice
I selected the topic of the safety and security of EMR (electronic medical record). Since we are now required to use EMR’s in all healthcare industries and they hold such private and confidential information I consider the security of them to be very important and needed topic of discussion. We live in a technological society where we hear about security breaches from the IRS, major department stores, social media, etc. With all of the security breaches out there the thought of having EMR’s breaches is devastating. EMR’s are the future of the healthcare industry and have truly changed the way in which we operate. EMR’s offer us means of storage and retrieval of legible medical information from anywhere at any time. EMR’s have given us additional safety mechanisms for prescriptions, labs results, medications and vital signs as well as decision support software to offer suggestions. Electronic records allow for instant retrieval of history and physical, lab results, diagnostic results, and progress notes from anyone who has provided care to the patient. These records contain was has been referred to as “a life” (Ozair et al., 2015). What is being done to protect them? Is it enough? Computer hackers may look at breaching an EMR as a golden prize which contains personal, financial, medical, and physical information about any one person. Will we be able to protect this confidential information that we require from our patients from getting into the wrong hands? While EMR’s are now the norm for the future of healthcare the cyber-security mythologies should also be thoroughly understood before moving forward (Kruse et al., 2017). This affects me as a human who has a right to confidentiality as well as my future as a nurse practitioner and my patient’s right to confidentiality. When these breaches happen, they can shut down entire networks and make vitally needed information unobtainable and inaccessible. These breaches can ruin countless lives and create mistrust of the healthcare community, which can lead to people not seeking needed care.
Kruse, C. S., Smith, B., Vanderlinden, H., & Nealand, A. (2017). Security Techniques for the Electronic Health Records. Retrieved March 30, 2018, from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5522514/
Ozair, F. F., Jamshed, N., Sharma, A., & Aggarwal, P. (2015). Ethical issues in electronic health records: A general overview. Retrieved March 30, 2018, from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4394583/
ALSO READ:
NR 512 Week 7 Discussion Activities: Safeguarding Health Information and Systems
Sample Answer 2 for NR 512 Week 6 Discussion: HealthIT Topic of the Week and Impact on Practice
Within my practice setting, we have multiple resources and strategies to help secure patient health information. Currently, I am employed as a cardiac diagnostics nurse. Our department is detached from a large waiting area adjacent to the cardiologist’s office. One of the privacy strategies used is with the design of the department. This department only allows for patients who are undergoing cardiac diagnostic testing (e.g., no family or friends are allowed in the procedural waiting area). We have a room where patients are privately greeted, pertinent history is obtained, and their procedure expectations/concerns are discussed. The rest of the procedure process allows for privacy of each individual and they only discuss what they want to discuss with other individuals waiting on their procedures.
Additionally, the resources that we have available for protecting patient’s privacy include: computer privacy screens, safeguards to electronic medical records (EMRs), and a document destruction box for papers identifying patient information. The computer privacy screens make it challenging for onlookers to view patient information that is on the computer. While most computers are at a distance from where potential eyes may linger, this added protection assists with making it more difficult for others to see patient names, addresses, or diagnoses.
We have quite a few safeguards that are in place for our EMRs. In addition to the firewall and encryption systems, we have a secure login with a password that includes uppercase, lowercase, numerical, and special character values. Also, our passwords change every sixty days and a year must go by before you can reuse a password. Patients are listed based on the department/area that an employee works in. So, an employee is not able to view every patient in the physician’s office and/or hospital. Patients are listed by their names, date-of-birth, and medical record number. Employees cannot access patient health information without opening charts. The EMR has an audit tool built in so that each audit notes who accessed the chart, the date and time the chart was accessed, and what area of the chart was accessed and/or documented on. This helps patients feel secure in knowing that their health information should only be accessed by employees who have a “need to know” basis for viewing the information. Also, patients may request additional security and be listed as a private patient. When this happens, any employee must sign-in and “break the glass” to obtain patient information. This requires re-entering the login information and documenting why the chart is being accessed (e.g., chart audit, primary care, etc.).
We have document destruction boxes located in every department. Certain forms—such as consents for treatment, echocardiograms, and identification labels, are on paper until they are scanned into the charts. Once they are scanned into the charts, the papers that contain patient information are placed into the destruction box. Our facility has a contract with a company who securely empties the boxes and destroys the information within them.
Sample Answer 3 for NR 512 Week 6 Discussion: HealthIT Topic of the Week and Impact on Practice
What resources or strategies are entertained in your practice setting to secure patient health information (PHI)?
I currently work as an epic consultant; implementing “go live” projects throughout the states when my health permits and we have several strategies in place to secure patient information. Our company many times are assisting facilities to go from paper to computerized charting for the first time and PIH security is one of the major concerns during this implementation. One of the major secure strategies we have put in place is assisting all health care providers to creating a personal and secure login to the epic system. This secure login is personal to the user and should not be shared with anyone. Accessing a patient’s chart should be done on a need to know basis and login activity is frequently monitored to unsure patient safety and security. Nurses, providers, and ancillary staff are required to undergo epic training which includes HIPPA guidelines, safe and secure login/logouts, and policies and procedures related to facility’s guidelines to accessing a chart. We also have “hard stops” that require health care providers to indicate the role and reason for accessing a chart for patients we consider to be VIP: employees, individuals with very sensitive information in their chart, public figures, individuals in police custody, patient’s suspected of being abused, and psych patients. All access into these charts are closely monitored and unauthorized access can lead to immediate termination. Patient security of information is everyone responsibility and during “go lives” it takes a village to remind end users to login, logout, protect screens on WOWS from on lookers, and be mindful of surroundings. PHIs are shared among different systems and health care providers and this openness raises considerable concern about patient privacy owing to the possibility of unauthorized access or misuse owing to improper security implementation (Rezaeibagha, Than, and Susilo, 2015).
Reference:
Rezaeibagha, F., Khin Than, W., & Susilo, W. (2015). A systematic literature review on security
and privacy of electronic health record systems: technological perspectives: Health
Information Management Journal, 44(3), 23-38. Doi:10.12826/18333575.2015.0001.
Rezaeibagha.
Sample Answer 4 for NR 512 Week 6 Discussion: HealthIT Topic of the Week and Impact on Practice
What was the Health IT Topic you selected related to your specialty? Why did you select it? How will this impact your practice?
I chose the topic of Electronic Health Records (EHRs). I chose this topic due to the benefits it has had on direct patient care. As I am on the journey of obtaining an advanced practice degree with a specialty in family nurse practitioner patient care is dear to me as I see myself as a future primary care provider. According to King, Patel, Jamoom, & Furukawa, 75 percent of participants that use EHRs reported that they enhanced patient care overall (2014) the specific benefits resulted from using EHRs are improved clinical quality, patient safety, and efficiency (King et al., 2014). Increasing patient safety is a major health care concern currently. Ability to see an electronic copy of records that has labs, medications, procedures performed and notes from other providers contributes to reduced safety concerns. Nurses now can scan patients arm bands and medications and the system will alert you if medication is wrong, wrong dose or incorrect time. This reduced medication errors and builds trust with the patient.
Improved clinical quality results when patients can send request for prescription refills, request appointments and just contact your provider through online patient portals and their providers are able to handle request in a quick timely manner. Ability of the outpatient provider to navigate the hospital stay, procedures and medication changes completed by hospitalist allow for a more thorough and decreased wait for a hospital follow up appointment. No longer must health care providers wait for hospital records to be requested through medical records and the delay and receiving them through fax. This increased clinical quality care and patient safety. As I work in home health there are numerous times that my patients go in to the hospital and the hospitalist changes all their medications to something else not knowing the patients’ medical history and then the primary care provider is contacted and makes a lot of changes back. Ability to read hospital discharge summaries and hospital course notes electronically contributed to the efficacy of care and expedites it. As there are ways that EHRs are helpful there are still cons to the system and changes being made daily to better the health information technology aspect to better serve its consumers.
References
King, J., Patel, V., Jamoom, E. W., & Furukawa, M. F. (2014). Clinical Benefits of Electronic Health Record Use: National Findings. Health Services Research, 49(1pt2), 392-404. doi:10.1111/1475-6773.1213