ENGL 147NWeek 6 Discussion 2: Deceptive Arguments

Chamberlain University ENGL 147NWeek 6 Discussion 2: Deceptive Arguments– Step-By-Step Guide

This guide will demonstrate how to complete the Chamberlain University ENGL 147NWeek 6 Discussion 2: Deceptive Arguments   assignment based on general principles of academic writing. Here, we will show you the A, B, Cs of completing an academic paper, irrespective of the instructions. After guiding you through what to do, the guide will leave one or two sample essays at the end to highlight the various sections discussed below.

How to Research and Prepare for ENGL 147NWeek 6 Discussion 2: Deceptive Arguments              

Whether one passes or fails an academic assignment such as the Chamberlain University ENGL 147NWeek 6 Discussion 2: Deceptive Arguments  depends on the preparation done beforehand. The first thing to do once you receive an assignment is to quickly skim through the requirements. Once that is done, start going through the instructions one by one to clearly understand what the instructor wants. The most important thing here is to understand the required format—whether it is APA, MLA, Chicago, etc.

After understanding the requirements of the paper, the next phase is to gather relevant materials. The first place to start the research process is the weekly resources. Go through the resources provided in the instructions to determine which ones fit the assignment. After reviewing the provided resources, use the university library to search for additional resources. After gathering sufficient and necessary resources, you are now ready to start drafting your paper.

How to Write the Introduction for ENGL 147NWeek 6 Discussion 2: Deceptive Arguments              

The introduction for the Chamberlain University ENGL 147NWeek 6 Discussion 2: Deceptive Arguments  is where you tell the instructor what your paper will encompass. In three to four statements, highlight the important points that will form the basis of your paper. Here, you can include statistics to show the importance of the topic you will be discussing. At the end of the introduction, write a clear purpose statement outlining what exactly will be contained in the paper. This statement will start with “The purpose of this paper…” and then proceed to outline the various sections of the instructions.

How to Write the Body for ENGL 147NWeek 6 Discussion 2: Deceptive Arguments              

After the introduction, move into the main part of the ENGL 147NWeek 6 Discussion 2: Deceptive Arguments assignment, which is the body. Given that the paper you will be writing is not experimental, the way you organize the headings and subheadings of your paper is critically important. In some cases, you might have to use more subheadings to properly organize the assignment. The organization will depend on the rubric provided. Carefully examine the rubric, as it will contain all the detailed requirements of the assignment. Sometimes, the rubric will have information that the normal instructions lack.

Another important factor to consider at this point is how to do citations. In-text citations are fundamental as they support the arguments and points you make in the paper. At this point, the resources gathered at the beginning will come in handy. Integrating the ideas of the authors with your own will ensure that you produce a comprehensive paper. Also, follow the given citation format. In most cases, APA 7 is the preferred format for nursing assignments.

How to Write the Conclusion for ENGL 147NWeek 6 Discussion 2: Deceptive Arguments              

After completing the main sections, write the conclusion of your paper. The conclusion is a summary of the main points you made in your paper. However, you need to rewrite the points and not simply copy and paste them. By restating the points from each subheading, you will provide a nuanced overview of the assignment to the reader.

How to Format the References List for ENGL 147NWeek 6 Discussion 2: Deceptive Arguments              

The very last part of your paper involves listing the sources used in your paper. These sources should be listed in alphabetical order and double-spaced. Additionally, use a hanging indent for each source that appears in this list. Lastly, only the sources cited within the body of the paper should appear here.

Stuck? Let Us Help You

Completing assignments can sometimes be overwhelming, especially with the multitude of academic and personal responsibilities you may have. If you find yourself stuck or unsure at any point in the process, don’t hesitate to reach out for professional assistance. Our assignment writing services are designed to help you achieve your academic goals with ease. 

Our team of experienced writers is well-versed in academic writing and familiar with the specific requirements of the ENGL 147NWeek 6 Discussion 2: Deceptive Arguments  assignment. We can provide you with personalized support, ensuring your assignment is well-researched, properly formatted, and thoroughly edited. Get a feel of the quality we guarantee – ORDER NOW. 

Sample Answer for ENGL 147NWeek 6 Discussion 2: Deceptive Arguments

In the first article, Fear advertisements: influencing consumers to make better health decisions, Krishen and Bui (2015) analyze whether people are more prone to make healthier choices through fear or hope. They analyze previously recorded research and build upon it. They conclude that people respond more to fear than hope. People will choose healthier foods if they feel fear from an advertisement rather than hope.  I think if the participants were made aware of the manipulation tactic being used, they would distrust the advertisement entirely and would continue with their current choices. Using fear-inducing tactics has limitations because there also has to be a positive goal associated. Furthermore, the participant must have a goal they want to obtain in order to take the fear tactic into consideration and therefore change their behaviors or choices. 

In the second article, Fear appeals in social marketing: The case of anti-speeding video advertisement “Mistakes”, Giachino et al. (2017) analyzed 20 young Italian students. The research is to see if they drove within the speed limit after watching the anti-speeding video. It appears that the students were aware of the purpose of the study and the results may be biased due to that (GIachino et al., Spring 2017). I believe knowing they were being manipulated made them immune to the effects of this research. In the 10 females analyzed, some females actually increased their speeding after the video. Giachino et al. (2017) believe this may be due to them feeling like their freedom was infringed upon. The limitations of this research are that the results are short term and do not show the long term effects of the fear tactics used. According to Giachino et al. (2017), the more one is exposed to the fear tactic the less effective it is. (Giachino et al., 2017) Another limitation is that they used a small group of young Italian students. In order to have a better understanding of the results of the fear appeal, they would have to increase the number of people analyzed as well as a more diverse audience. 

I think if I were a subject in one of these studies I would probably be induced to give the results they were looking for. For instance, I would drive within the speed limits while I was being watched but once the research was over, I probably would go back to my bad habits. I feel like normally I stay within the speed limit but in roads such as the parkway, where the normal is 10 miles above the speed limit, I tend to follow the crowd. I also noticed that personally, fear tactics have a short term effect on me. I tend to make changes but with time go back to what I used to do. I believe it’s because, like Krishen and Bui state, you must have a personal goal for making the choice in order for the fear strategy to work (Krishen and Bui, 2015). I have seen many documentaries on Netflix that use fear tactics to manipulate the audience. There are documentaries on how bad sugar is for you, how bad meat is for, and other types of documentaries. I think a lot of the documentaries use fear appeal when manipulating their audience. Even the music used and the images are all to bring about fear to the viewer. I don’t think any of them worked long term on me or my family. Nonetheless, I have seen others make life changes after seeing the same documentaries. 

Vera

Reference

Giachino, C., Stupino, M., Petrarulo, G., & Bertoldi, B. (2017, Spring). Fear appeals in social marketing: The case of anti-speeding video advertisement “Mistakes”. https://eds-b-ebscohost-com.chamberlainuniversity.idm.oclc.org/eds/detail/detail?vid=0&sid=3e711d84-309d-441c-b43c-119c2ebc4d96%40pdc-v-sessmgr02&bdata=JnNpdGU9ZWRzLWxpdmUmc2NvcGU9c2l0ZQ%3D%3D#AN=124409330&db=bth

Krishen, A. S., & Bui, M. (2015). Fear advertisements: Influencing consumers to make better health decisions. https://eds-b-ebscohost-com.chamberlainuniversity.idm.oclc.org/eds/detail/detail?vid=0&sid=c26a72fd-b85b-479c-9f98-1bc31f3e6fdf%40pdc-v-sessmgr05&bdata=JnNpdGU9ZWRzLWxpdmUmc2NvcGU9c2l0ZQ%3D%3D#db=edswss&AN=000369954900008

Sample Answer 2 for ENGL 147NWeek 6 Discussion 2: Deceptive Arguments

I could really relate to what you said about the effectiveness of those documentaries. I remember watching Supersize Me years ago. I was disgusted. I swore off the fast food industry, but that was short-lived.

When I think of fear tactics, I automatically think of those anti-smoking commercials. They definitely use fear tactics. Seeing someone who has had part of their face removed due to cancer caused by smoking is pretty terrifying! I also believe that social media is a big place for the use of fear advertisements. Social media has really changed how we react to things. We see multiple people post. We see multiple people have certain reactions. It really does influence how we view issues. 

I do believe fear-based tactics work – to a degree. The issue is with getting people to not turn away when they realize it’s something that might frighten them into making better choices. 🙁 I know that when it comes to health, fear can make an impact. I know this from personal experience. For instance, I have an aunt who has been overweight and had bad knees for years. She had put off getting knee replacements and had avoided eating right and exercise. In recent years her doctors began telling her that she may end up in a wheelchair if she didn’t have the surgeries and that it would be a much better recovery if she were strong and weighed less. For the past year, she did water aerobics and walked the pool. She ate better and lost weight. She has had one knee replacement and has the other scheduled. Sometimes, it takes fear to sort of force a person into making some hard decisions. In this example, it took years before she changed her habits. 

I think health-related fear tactics have always made an impact on me. I know that the advertisements that scared me are the ones I’ve always remembered: the ones about smoking, the ones about STDs and condoms, the ones about texting and driving.

I think it’s about knowing one’s audience. Even if I know the goal is to scare me into action, if it’s something that could really hurt me, I might just be scared into action!

Sample Answer 3 for ENGL 147NWeek 6 Discussion 2: Deceptive Arguments

The first article is explaining if advertisements use fear, they can get people to want their product and if it is goal oriented people are more willing to participate. I do not think people are immune to these effects even if they are aware of the manipulation techniques because even though they may be manipulating people they use facts to make people fear what being unhealthy will do to a person. Knowing they are trying to make you fear these things can still make you fear the possibility of what they are scaring you with. Everyday people make goals for themselves and I think people still want to reach that goal they make even if it is manipulation. The limitations have to also have a positive goal to work towards. If it is only using fear, they have no motivation factor. I think If I was a subject in the first study, I would definitely fall for the subject trying to be sold. I am a very goal-oriented person and love reaching those goals. I think it would be motivating for me.

The second article is about using fear to reach an emotional aspect for 20 students to stop them from speeding. Some of the students actually went over the speed limit after watching the video using fear. The article explains sometimes when using fear if it is too intense it has little effect on people which I thought was very interesting. I also think the fact they are young and when you are young you may think you are invincible. Using these two articles we can know using fear to get people to want to reach a goal or using fear to reach an emotional aspect of a person can get people thinking a certain way when used appropriately. I have seen these fear tactics in multiple advertisements on tv and online. There are lots of smoking advertisements trying to scare young adults and try to prevent them from starting the habit. Another example is all the gym advertisements showing you could be a couch potato and get obese or start working out at their gym.

Reference:

Giachino, C. Stupino, M., Petratulo, G., &Bertoldi, B. (2017). Fear appeals in social marketing: The case of anti-speeding video advertisement “Mistakes”. https://eds-a-ebscohostcom.chamberlainuniversity.idm.oclc.org/eds/detail/detail?vid=0&sid=4f254a52-b3ae4668b70b35df2475aaf2%40sdcsessmgr01&bdata=JnNpdGU9ZWRzLWxpdmUmc2NvcGU9c2l0ZQ%3d%3d#AN=124409330&db=bth

Krishen, Anjala, S. (2015). Fear Advertisements: influencing consumers to make better health decisions. https://eds-bebscohostcom.chamberlainuniversity.idm.oclc.org/eds/detail/detail?vid=0&sid=7247b371-e9394445946e3c8910ce%40pdcsessmgr03&bdata=JnNpdGU9ZWRzLWxpdmUmc2NvcGU9c2l0ZQ%3d%3d#AN=000369954900008&db=edswss

Sample Answer 4 for ENGL 147NWeek 6 Discussion 2: Deceptive Arguments

I completely agree with you. All the information is very overwhelming and it seems to be changing every day.

It’s also really difficult to be an essential worker because every week there was a new rule we had to follow, and it’s hard to keep up. I work at a local business in downtown Columbus as a server. When all this happened we obviously shut down our dining room, but stayed open for carryout. At first I was actually pretty worried about it because a lot of customers didn’t care and would stand super close to me. I have a lot of regulars that love to talk, so they would lean over the counter right where the computer is and hold a conversation. I actually had one lady come in and when she came in I was on the phone taking an order, and the other girl was too. I assume she got mad because of her body language then proceeded to cough all over us and run out the door. Those are the people that ruin it for everyone. I got so mad after that, but then again we have an amazing owner and I don’t want him to lose business and have to struggle to get by. 

That is very interesting about the pictures, I don’t think I’ve ever thought about it that way. Now that you say that it makes sense. As morbid as it sounds, I think seeing pictures would make it more real for people, even me. This is a very interesting topic with many different views and conspiracy theories. I’m wondering if the world will ever go back to normal.