NURS 6050 AGENDA COMPARISON GRID AND FACT SHEET

Walden University NURS 6050 AGENDA COMPARISON GRID AND FACT SHEET – Step-By-Step Guide

This guide will demonstrate how to complete the Walden University NURS 6050 AGENDA COMPARISON GRID AND FACT SHEET assignment based on general principles of academic writing. Here, we will show you the A, B, Cs of completing an academic paper, irrespective of the instructions. After guiding you through what to do, the guide will leave one or two sample essays at the end to highlight the various sections discussed below.

How to Research and Prepare for NURS 6050 AGENDA COMPARISON GRID AND FACT SHEET

Whether one passes or fails an academic assignment such as the Walden University NURS 6050 AGENDA COMPARISON GRID AND FACT SHEET depends on the preparation done beforehand. The first thing to do once you receive an assignment is to quickly skim through the requirements. Once that is done, start going through the instructions one by one to clearly understand what the instructor wants. The most important thing here is to understand the required format—whether it is APA, MLA, Chicago, etc.

After understanding the requirements of the paper, the next phase is to gather relevant materials. The first place to start the research process is the weekly resources. Go through the resources provided in the instructions to determine which ones fit the assignment. After reviewing the provided resources, use the university library to search for additional resources. After gathering sufficient and necessary resources, you are now ready to start drafting your paper.

How to Write the Introduction for NURS 6050 AGENDA COMPARISON GRID AND FACT SHEET

The introduction for the Walden University NURS 6050 AGENDA COMPARISON GRID AND FACT SHEET is where you tell the instructor what your paper will encompass. In three to four statements, highlight the important points that will form the basis of your paper. Here, you can include statistics to show the importance of the topic you will be discussing. At the end of the introduction, write a clear purpose statement outlining what exactly will be contained in the paper. This statement will start with “The purpose of this paper…” and then proceed to outline the various sections of the instructions.

How to Write the Body for NURS 6050 AGENDA COMPARISON GRID AND FACT SHEET

After the introduction, move into the main part of the NURS 6050 AGENDA COMPARISON GRID AND FACT SHEET assignment, which is the body. Given that the paper you will be writing is not experimental, the way you organize the headings and subheadings of your paper is critically important. In some cases, you might have to use more subheadings to properly organize the assignment. The organization will depend on the rubric provided. Carefully examine the rubric, as it will contain all the detailed requirements of the assignment. Sometimes, the rubric will have information that the normal instructions lack.

Another important factor to consider at this point is how to do citations. In-text citations are fundamental as they support the arguments and points you make in the paper. At this point, the resources gathered at the beginning will come in handy. Integrating the ideas of the authors with your own will ensure that you produce a comprehensive paper. Also, follow the given citation format. In most cases, APA 7 is the preferred format for nursing assignments.

How to Write the Conclusion for NURS 6050 AGENDA COMPARISON GRID AND FACT SHEET

After completing the main sections, write the conclusion of your paper. The conclusion is a summary of the main points you made in your paper. However, you need to rewrite the points and not simply copy and paste them. By restating the points from each subheading, you will provide a nuanced overview of the assignment to the reader.

How to Format the References List for NURS 6050 AGENDA COMPARISON GRID AND FACT SHEET

The very last part of your paper involves listing the sources used in your paper. These sources should be listed in alphabetical order and double-spaced. Additionally, use a hanging indent for each source that appears in this list. Lastly, only the sources cited within the body of the paper should appear here.

Stuck? Let Us Help You

Completing assignments can sometimes be overwhelming, especially with the multitude of academic and personal responsibilities you may have. If you find yourself stuck or unsure at any point in the process, don’t hesitate to reach out for professional assistance. Our assignment writing services are designed to help you achieve your academic goals with ease. 

Our team of experienced writers is well-versed in academic writing and familiar with the specific requirements of the NURS 6050 AGENDA COMPARISON GRID AND FACT SHEET assignment. We can provide you with personalized support, ensuring your assignment is well-researched, properly formatted, and thoroughly edited. Get a feel of the quality we guarantee – ORDER NOW. 

Sample Answer for NURS 6050 AGENDA COMPARISON GRID AND FACT SHEET

Part 1: Agenda Comparison Grid

 In the United States, mental health disorders are among the most prevalent health issues. An estimated fifty percent or more of the population will suffer from a mental health diagnosis at some point in their lives. In any given year, 1 in 5 U.S. citizens will suffer from a mental disorder (CDC, 2021). The impact of mental diseases on public health is severe. By the year 2030, the World Health Organization predicts that major depression will be the single most important contributor to the worldwide burden of disease. Emotional, psychological, and social well-being all contribute to one’s overall mental health, which in turn affects one’s ability to think clearly, feel emotionally stable, and act responsibly in social situations. It also impacts how a person handles stress, interpersonal interactions, and making decisions. Mental health involves, among other factors, subjective well-being, perceived self-efficacy, autonomy, competence, intergenerational dependency, and self-actualization of one’s intellectual and emotional potential. Therefore, it is essential for the government to effectively put measure in place to help individuals with mental health challenges. 

How each of the Presidential Administrations Approached the Issue

During his president, Donald Trump signed an executive order emphasizing mental health, behavioral health, and suicide prevention. In addition, he allocated $425 million for the mental health crises and other necessities that were in unprecedented demand. His objective was to distribute cash and give better therapies, more research, and evidence-based practice and treatments for drug misuse sufferers. He also broadened the use of tele-health throughout the world to help hospitals and other acute care facilities better triage patients based on their needs. Additionally, it would allow patients to be seen in the comfort of their own homes and assist those who are unable to travel to the facility for appointments. Donald Trump assembled a cabinet with experts in assessing and addressing the needs of the mentally ill, the elderly, those with disabilities, military veterans, and drug abusers.

President Biden presented his proposal to solve the national mental health epidemic on March 1, 2022. His strategy for FY23 would require an investment of $700 million. A portion of these monies would be allocated for mental health diseases, treatments, and research. The funding would be used to fund fellowship programs for underrepresented minorities in the workforce and academic institutions, with the goal of helping people with mental health and drug misuse issues by providing them with financial aid in the form of scholarships and loan forgiveness. Community health professionals and other healthcare personnel who play a significant role in resolving mental health difficulties and crises will get $225 million. In addition, he is aiming to make the service accessible and inexpensive 24 hours per day, seven days per week. A portion of the remaining monies will be allocated to research and evidence-based practice, crisis hotlines that might potentially improve communities, and burnout-stricken frontline worker care.

The health of senior citizens in the U.S. has become a critical national policy issue and hot topic in presidential debates in the past decades. As the population of older adults rises dramatically, there are few indicators that adequate resources will be available to meet the challenge of meeting their health care needs to promote a good quality of life (Tkatch et al., 2016). Besides, it is projected that the demand for health services among older adults aged 65 years and above will rise considerably in the coming decades. Due to the growing number of older adults in the U.S., an increasing number of older adults will be living with illness and disability (Tkatch et al., 2016). Consequently, more care providers and resources are required to meet their needs for health care services. This paper seeks to compare President Trump, Obama, and Bush’s administrative agendas regarding healthcare for older adults and how each president approached the issue. 

Part 1: Agenda Comparison Grid  

Also Read:

POLITICS AND THE PATIENT PROTECTION AND AFFORDABLE CARE ACT

LEGISLATION GRID AND TESTIMONY/ADVOCACY STATEMENT

Professional Nursing and State-Level Regulations

REGULATION FOR NURSING PRACTICE STAFF DEVELOPMENT MEETING

EVIDENCE BASE IN DESIGN

THE ROLE OF THE RN/APRN IN POLICY-MAKING

ADVOCATING FOR THE NURSING ROLE IN PROGRAM DESIGN AND IMPLEMENTATION

THE ROLE OF THE RN/APRN IN POLICY EVALUATION

ASSESSING A HEALTHCARE PROGRAM/POLICY EVALUATION

GLOBAL HEALTHCARE COMPARISON MATRIX AND NARRATIVE STATEMENT

Part 2: Agenda Comparison Grid Analysis  

Using the information you recorded in Part 1: Agenda Comparison Grid, complete the following to document information about the population health/healthcare issue your selected 

Part 3 Narrative 

Healthcare for older adults is an important issue that should be included in the national agenda for legislation because of the increasing population of senior citizens. The topic of healthcare for older adults is an increasing concern because most seniors have one or more geriatric syndromes. Geriatric syndromes are common conditions among community-dwelling older adults and significantly affect their quality of life (Tkatch et al., 2016). Although Medicare insures health services for older adults, it does not cover some vital services such as, as long-term care, dental care, and foot care. Expanding the coverage Medicare should be part of the healthcare agenda for legislation to increase access to health services to the most vulnerable population and reduce morbidity and mortality rates associated with geriatric syndromes (Tkatch et al., 2016). Laws can be passed to increase Medicare’s federal funding and expand services provided to older adults. Besides, a policy can be passed to modernize Medicare’s benefits package and the copayment structure and gradually increase Medicare Part B premiums from 25 to 35% of the total program cost. 

Nurses are essential in developing and implementing healthcare policy and should be leading the way in redesigning the healthcare system to address prevailing healthcare issues. The nurse’s role in agenda-setting for healthcare issues includes identifying issues faced in delivering and accessing care and working with decision and policymakers to advance health care policies (Williams, Phillips & Koyama, 2018). The nurse also has a role in identifying innovative ways to address healthcare delivery issues and present the ideas to policymakers for legislation (Williams et al., 2018). Besides, nurses have a role of advocating for health policies to protect patient safety, increase the quality of care, and facilitate patients’ access to the required health resources. 

Conclusion 

It is projected that the demand for health services will rise drastically in the coming decades due to the increasing population of older adults. The U.S has a federal health insurance program, Medicare, which covers adults from the age of 65. The current and former presidents have taken various actions to improve the quality and quantity of services that older adults can access through the Medicare program. Each of the presidents aimed at making quality healthcare more accessible and affordable for older adults.  

References 

Blumenthal, D., Davis, K., & Guterman, S. (2015). Medicare at 50—origins and evolution. N Engl J Med, 372(5), 479-486. 

National Council on Aging. (2021). About the national council on aging. NCOA. https://www.ncoa.org/about-ncoa/ 

Obama, B. (2016). The United States health care reform: progress to date and next steps Special communication. J Amer Med Assoc. Epub, 7(11). https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2016.9797 

Saltzman, E., & Eibner, C. (2016). Donald Trump’s health care reform proposals: Anticipated effects on insurance coverage, out-of-pocket costs, and the federal deficit. The Commonwealth Fund, 32, 1-14. 

Tkatch, R., Musich, S., MacLeod, S., Alsgaard, K., Hawkins, K., & Yeh, C. S. (2016). Population health management for older adults: review of interventions for promoting successful aging across the health continuum. Gerontology and geriatric medicine, 2, 2333721416667877. https://doi.org/10.1177/2333721416667877 

Williams, S. D., Phillips, J. M., & Koyama, K. (2018). Nurse advocacy: Adopting a health in all policies approach. Online Journal of Issues in Nursing, 23(3). DOI: 10.3912/OJIN.Vol23No03Man01

Mental health and substance abuse receive presidential attention as they profoundly affect the overall health of the nation.  Although various social determinants affect mental health, socioeconomic status can have grave effects on this population.  Lower income, lack of education and resources, as well as reduced access to healthcare are all part of the significant determinants that affect mental health.  “Research shows that mental illnesses are common in the United States, affecting tens of millions of people each year. Estimates suggest that only half of the people with mental illnesses receive treatment” (National Institute of Mental Health [NIMH], 2021).  Alongside mental health, the crisis of opioids has been brought to the forefront on the presidential level. “Opioid misuse and abuse in the USA has evolved into an epidemic of tragic pain and suffering, resulting in the estimated death of over 64,000 people in 2016. Governmental regulation has escalated alongside growing awareness of the epidemic’s severity, both on the state and federal levels” (Jones, 2018).

During Barak Obama’s presidency 2009-2017 he focused on mental health as part of his broader healthcare reform efforts.  This was demonstrated by The Affordable Care Act (ACA), which was signed into law in 2010.  The Affordable Care Act (ACA), was created to expand mental health coverage by requiring insurance plans to cover mental health services.  Donald Trump, on the other hand, focused on Veterans’ mental health, through Executive Order 13861. PREVENTS, which was signed on March 5, 2019, was created to implement an “all of nation” approach to prevent suicide, and his efforts were also seen when he addressed the opioid crisis, also known to have significant effects on overall mental health.  While they both had a unique way of approaching mental health, they both targeted limited access to mental health which contributes to disparities within this population.  One thing I would do differently is to address the affordability.  The Affordable Care Act has made healthcare coverage more accessible, however many families still can’t afford the high costs of premiums. One possible way to counteract the high costs is by promoting competition among issuers to keep the costs down.  In order to address the continuous issue of healthcare disparities, a combination of changes needs to occur, such as public opinion, legislative processes along the priorities of policymakers. 

Jones, M. R., Novitch, M. B., Sarrafpour, S., Ehrhardt, K. P., Scott, B. B., Orhurhu, V., … & Simopoulos, T. T. (2019). Government legislation in response to the opioid epidemic. Current Pain and Headache Reports, 23, 1-7.

National Institute of Mental Health. (2021). Mental Health Information: Statistics. https://www.nimh.nih.gov/health/statistics/index.shtmlLinks to an external site.

Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, Pub. L. No. 111-148, 124 Stat. 119 (2010). https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/PLAW-111publ148/pdf/PLAW-111publ148.pdfLinks to an external site.

NURS 6050 Week 1 Presidential Agendas

Initial Discussion Post 

            The opioid epidemic has caused many deaths over the years. According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) (n.d.), there have been three waves of opioid overdoses from the 1990s to 2021, resulting in nearly 645,000 deaths. The first overdose wave started in the 1990s with prescription opioids and has increased since 1999. The second wave of overdoses was in 2010 with heroin, followed by the third wave in 2013 with synthetic opioids containing fentanyl (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, n.d.). In 2021 alone, over 75% of the 107,000 overdose deaths were from opioids (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, n.d.). 

            Throughout history, opioid overdoses have been more common in males than females. As the years pass by, there has been an increase in opioid overdoses in the female population. In their journal article, Jennifer Lyden and Ingrid Binswanger (2019, April) state that opioid-related hospital admissions for women exceeded that of men by 2014. There was a noticeable increase in opioid use disorder (OUD) in pregnant women and neonatal abstinence syndrome (NAS), which is commonly known as neonatal opioid withdrawal (Lyden & Binswanger, 2019, April). The vast increase influenced the search for drug treatment during pregnancy. 

Presidential Involvement in Opioid Epidemic 

           Former president Donald Trump made efforts to end the opioid epidemic. According to Wen & Sadeghi (2020), in October 2017, Trump declared the opioid crisis a public health emergency. Although he wanted to repeal the Affordable Care Act to roll back Medicaid expansion, in 2018, his administration got six billion dollars to address opioid use disorder through the Initiative to Stop Opioid Abuse for two years (Wen & Sadeghi, 2020). President Trump addressed his plan by endorsing policies to secure ports and borders, increasing criminal penalties for opioid dealing and trafficking by instituting the death penalty for drug traffickers. 

           In contrast, President Joe Biden and his administration had a different approach to ending the opioid crisis by introducing harm reduction and increasing access to naloxone. On February 7, 2023, The White House stated that the Biden-Harris Administration wanted to improve naloxone access in communities suffering from fentanyl and ensure adequate treatment for substance use disorders in jails. They also want to make medications for OUD more accessible and educate individuals on fentanyl, its associated dangers, and the benefits of naloxone treatment (The White House, 2023, February 7). On March 9, 2023, The White House published that Biden wanted to increase finances to expand access to care for those in need and to go after drug traffickers. Per Dr. Gupta, for six consecutive months, fentanyl overdose deaths decreased steadily due to initiatives from the Biden-Harris Administration (The White House, 2023, March 9). 

          Both presidents had a plan in mind to put an end to the opioid crisis. Their initiatives differ as Trump focused on reducing illicit drug supply by trying to limit the influx of opioids coming into the U.S. and punishments, while Biden is focusing on reduction through overprescribing of opioids and treatment initiatives. The effects of COVID-19 exacerbated deaths related to the opioid crisis and caused some hiccups in the efforts of both parties. 

What I Would Do Differently 

            The effects of opioids, especially fentanyl, on our communities are devastating. As humans, our decisions and actions are driven by “why .”To help those struggling with opioid use disorders (OUD) and overdose attempts, we, as future healthcare providers, will need to figure out the why. Lyden and Binswanger (2019, April) state that reducing the stigma, improving prescribing practices, utilizing medication to treat OUD, and reducing fatal overdoses will help confront the opioid epidemic. If I were to address the opioid epidemic, I would want to see the root causes behind opioid use disorders and the overdoses resulting in increased mortality rates. To do this, I would try to notice signs of someone struggling, build a report with them to identify the cause and assist them in finding resources. I would want to ensure individuals not only have access to education on the signs and symptoms of an opioid overdose but also how to use naloxone to treat it safely and effectively. 

References: 

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (n.d.). Understanding the opioid epidemic. Retrieved August 29, 2023, from https://www.cdc.gov/opioids/basics/epidemic.htmlLinks to an external site. 

Lyden, J., & Binswanger I. A. (2019, April). The united states opioid epidemic. Seminars in Perinatology. 43(3), 123-131. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.semperi.2019.01.001Links to an external site. 

The White House. (2023, February 7). Fact sheet: In state of the union, president Biden to outline vision to advance progress on unity agenda in year ahead. Retrieved August 29, 2023, from https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/statements-releases/2023/02/07/fact-sheet-in-state-of-the-union-president-biden-to-outline-vision-to-advance-progress-on-unity-agenda-in-year-ahead/Links to an external site. 

The White House. (2023, March 9). President Biden calls for historic funding to beat the overdose epidemic being driven by fentanyl. Retrieved August 29, 2023, from https://www.whitehouse.gov/ondcp/briefing-room/2023/03/09/president-biden-calls-for-historic-funding-to-beat-the-overdose-epidemic-being-driven-by-fentanyl/Links to an external site. 

Wen, L. S., & Sadeghi, N. B. (2020). The opioid crisis and the 202 US election: crossroads for a national epidemic. Lancet. 396(10259), 1316-1318. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(20)32113-9Links to an external site.