NURS FPX 4010 Assessment 4: Stakeholder Presentation

Capella University NURS FPX 4010 Assessment 4: Stakeholder Presentation– Step-By-Step Guide

This guide will demonstrate how to complete the Capella University NURS FPX 4010 Assessment 4: Stakeholder Presentation assignment based on general principles of academic writing. Here, we will show you the A, B, Cs of completing an academic paper, irrespective of the instructions. After guiding you through what to do, the guide will leave one or two sample essays at the end to highlight the various sections discussed below.

How to Research and Prepare for NURS FPX 4010 Assessment 4: Stakeholder Presentation

Whether one passes or fails an academic assignment such as the Capella University NURS FPX 4010 Assessment 4: Stakeholder Presentation depends on the preparation done beforehand. The first thing to do once you receive an assignment is to quickly skim through the requirements. Once that is done, start going through the instructions one by one to clearly understand what the instructor wants. The most important thing here is to understand the required format—whether it is APA, MLA, Chicago, etc.

After understanding the requirements of the paper, the next phase is to gather relevant materials. The first place to start the research process is the weekly resources. Go through the resources provided in the instructions to determine which ones fit the assignment. After reviewing the provided resources, use the university library to search for additional resources. After gathering sufficient and necessary resources, you are now ready to start drafting your paper.

How to Write the Introduction for NURS FPX 4010 Assessment 4: Stakeholder Presentation

The introduction for the Capella University NURS FPX 4010 Assessment 4: Stakeholder Presentation is where you tell the instructor what your paper will encompass. In three to four statements, highlight the important points that will form the basis of your paper. Here, you can include statistics to show the importance of the topic you will be discussing. At the end of the introduction, write a clear purpose statement outlining what exactly will be contained in the paper. This statement will start with “The purpose of this paper…” and then proceed to outline the various sections of the instructions.

How to Write the Body for NURS FPX 4010 Assessment 4: Stakeholder Presentation

After the introduction, move into the main part of the NURS FPX 4010 Assessment 4: Stakeholder Presentation assignment, which is the body. Given that the paper you will be writing is not experimental, the way you organize the headings and subheadings of your paper is critically important. In some cases, you might have to use more subheadings to properly organize the assignment. The organization will depend on the rubric provided. Carefully examine the rubric, as it will contain all the detailed requirements of the assignment. Sometimes, the rubric will have information that the normal instructions lack.

Another important factor to consider at this point is how to do citations. In-text citations are fundamental as they support the arguments and points you make in the paper. At this point, the resources gathered at the beginning will come in handy. Integrating the ideas of the authors with your own will ensure that you produce a comprehensive paper. Also, follow the given citation format. In most cases, APA 7 is the preferred format for nursing assignments.

How to Write the Conclusion for NURS FPX 4010 Assessment 4: Stakeholder Presentation

After completing the main sections, write the conclusion of your paper. The conclusion is a summary of the main points you made in your paper. However, you need to rewrite the points and not simply copy and paste them. By restating the points from each subheading, you will provide a nuanced overview of the assignment to the reader.

How to Format the References List for NURS FPX 4010 Assessment 4: Stakeholder Presentation

The very last part of your paper involves listing the sources used in your paper. These sources should be listed in alphabetical order and double-spaced. Additionally, use a hanging indent for each source that appears in this list. Lastly, only the sources cited within the body of the paper should appear here.

Stuck? Let Us Help You

Completing assignments can sometimes be overwhelming, especially with the multitude of academic and personal responsibilities you may have. If you find yourself stuck or unsure at any point in the process, don’t hesitate to reach out for professional assistance. Our assignment writing services are designed to help you achieve your academic goals with ease. 

Our team of experienced writers is well-versed in academic writing and familiar with the specific requirements of the NURS FPX 4010 Assessment 4: Stakeholder Presentation assignment. We can provide you with personalized support, ensuring your assignment is well-researched, properly formatted, and thoroughly edited. Get a feel of the quality we guarantee – ORDER NOW. 

Sample Answer for NURS FPX 4010 Assessment 4: Stakeholder Presentation

Introduction

The success of healthcare organizations in the modern world depend largely on the effectiveness of their change initiatives. Often, organizations implement change initiatives with the aim of improving their systems and processes. Change also enables them to respond effectively to unforeseen events in their markets. Healthcare providers play a crucial role in facilitating the successful implementation of change for outcomes such as safety, quality, and efficiency. Nurses embrace interdisciplinary collaboration for optimum change outcomes in their practice. The collaboration helps them to learn from others’ perspectives and adapt to different approaches to undertaking assigned roles. Evidence-based strategies should be utilized in implementing change for optimum outcomes (Ellis, 2022) . Therefore, this presentation focuses on an interdisciplinary plan to address the rising rates of catheter-associated urinary tract infections in the medical and surgical floors in my practice site.

Organizational Issue 

The selected organizational issue is catheter-associated urinary tract infections. An interview performed with a nurse manager of a medical ward revealed that the rate of catheter-associated urinary tract infections have been rising over the last quarter in both the medical and surgical floors. The recent statistics showed that the rate was higher than the benchmark data for the hospital. Catheter-associated urinary tract infections are part of hospital acquired infections that threaten the safety, quality, and efficiency of patient care. Therefore, unlike other problems identified from the interview, catheter-associated urinary tract infections have the potentials of causing unintended harms to the patients. In addition, nurses and other healthcare providers should implement interventions to prevent it, since it is associated with hospital interventions, hence, its selection for the project.

Significance of the Organizational Issue 

Catheter-associated urinary tract infections are significant to the practice site because of several factors. First, catheter-associated urinary tract infections threaten the safety, quality, and efficiency of care that the organization offers to its patients. A further rise in rates is likely to affect the reimbursement the hospital receives since catheter-associated urinary tract infections are safety and quality indicators that influence reimbursement for hospitals. The rates of catheter-associated urinary tract infections have also risen, translating into the need for a responsive intervention. The rate of catheter-associated urinary tract infections is also high in the USA. Accordingly, statistics shows that they contribute up to 1 million cases annually in the USA. In addition, the costs that the country incurs in treating catheter-associated urinary tract infections ranges between $115 million and $1.82 billion annually. Catheter-associated urinary tract infections also contribute to increased hospital costs and stays for the patients. The increase in costs is attributed to the additional care needed to treat and prevent its associated complications (Letica-Kriegel et al., 2019). The hospital stays arises from the fact that patients may develop complications such as septicemia, which demand complex management. Prolonged hospitalization also decreases patients’ productivity and quality of life. For example, complications such as septicemia may cause additional organ damage, leading a decline in one’s quality of life and increased disease burden (Atkins et al., 2020). Therefore, interventions to prevent, minimize, and prevent catheter-associated urinary tract infections are essential.

ALSO READ:

NURS FPX 4010 Assessment 2 Interview and Interdisciplinary Issue Identification, Assessment 3 Interdisciplinary Plan Proposal

Evidence-Based Interdisciplinary Plan

The proposed evidence-based interdisciplinary plan entails providing nurses and other healthcare providers training on the translation of evidence-based data into practice. This will be followed by them collaborating to identify an evidence-based practice intervention that can be used to improve catheter-associated urinary tract infections rate in the hospital. The selected intervention will be implemented collaboratively with the aim of identifying success factors and eliminating potential weaknesses that will affect the project. Part of the plan initiatives are the provision of coaching and mentorship and equipping staff with knowledge and skills of selecting and translating evidence into practice. Emphasis will be placed on incorporating best practices into the existing organizational culture (Melnyk & Fineout-Overhold, 2022).

Interdisciplinary Team Members

The interdisciplinary team members will be varied. They will include registered nurses, licensed practice nurses, and unlicensed assistive personnel. This groups of nurses provide direct patient care to patients with indwelling urinary catheters. They also urinary catheters for the hospitalized patients. Therefore, they should be trained and be involved in the implementation of best practices. Physicians will also be involved since they prescribe urinary catheters, treatments, and assess patients for risks of catheter-associated urinary tract infections.

Why Interdisciplinary Collaboration Approach

An interdisciplinary collaboration approach is the most preferred for the proposed plan. This is attributed to the benefits that an interdisciplinary collaboration has in the care process. First, interdisciplinary collaboration approach minimizes errors in the provision of patient care. The involvement of different healthcare providers in assessing, planning, implementing, monitoring, and evaluating care eliminates any potential sources or errors in the care process. Interdisciplinary collaboration approach also improves patient and care outcomes. There is an increased focus on the development of care plans that are specific to the patient needs. As a result, patient-centered care that promotes outcomes such as patient satisfaction and empowerment is offered (Ellis, 2022). Interdisciplinary collaboration also contributes to efficient care coordination. Different healthcare providers participate in making decisions that aim at optimizing the patient and care outcomes. Lastly, interdisciplinary collaboration promotes efficient resource utilization in healthcare. The prevention of adverse events such as errors in the care process eliminates unintended expenditures in treating complications and lawsuits by health organizations. Similarly, patients benefit from reduced hospital stay and costs (Cashion & Pickler, 2018).

Goals of the Plan

The goals of the proposed plan at three-fold. First, the plan aims at reducing and preventing catheter-associated urinary tract infections through the use of evidence-based interventions. The second goal is to reduce costs and hospital stays for hospitalized patients due to catheter-associated urinary tract infections. The last goal is to equip staff with competencies needed in translating evidence-based data into practice.

Implementing the Interdisciplinary Plan

As noted initially, the implementation of the plan will be collaborative. Staff in the medical and surgical floors will work as a team in implementing the agreed strategies to prevent and reduce catheter-associated urinary tract infections. Collaboration will ensure collectivism in the outcomes achieved from the implementation of the plan. The other approach to implementation will be staff training on plan implementation. Training will aim at ensuring that the staff are competent to implement the project and report any outcomes that require attention of the interdisciplinary team. Part of the implementation process will be regular assessment. Regular assessment will be done to identify any issues that should be addressed for enhanced project outcomes (Melnyk & Fineout-Overhold, 2022). Lastly, coaching and mentorship will be offered. This will be important to sustain the outcomes of the plan.

Managing Human and Financial Resources

Some strategies will be adopted to ensure effective and efficient management of human and financial resources. One of them will be developing a budget for the plan. The budget will guide the use of human and financial resources in the project. The other strategy will be ensuring transparency and accountability in all the project activities. In this case, evidence for any resource utilization will be provided to ensure efficiency in the implementation of the plan. The team will also explore evidence-based strategies for human and financial resources management. For example, tools such as Gant chart may be used to track project processes and resource utilization to avoid any forms of wastages. The last strategy to ensure effective and efficient human and financial resources management will be eliminating any duplication or roles or activities. Duplication will lead to unintended ineffective use of resources in the implementation of the plan (Hewett et al., 2018).

Project Evaluation Plan

The project evaluation plan will focus on outcome, process, and structural measures. Outcome measures will evaluate if the project objectives were achieved or not. This will focus on aspects such as changes in catheter-associated urinary tract infection rates, healthcare costs, and hospital stays for hospitalized patients. Process measures will also be used in the project. Process measures will assess the effectiveness of the approaches that were adopted in assessment, planning, implementation, monitoring, and evaluation. It will focus on aspects such as the perception of the staff on the effectiveness of training, their involvement in the project, resource utilization, and communication approaches utilized by the team. The last measure will be structural measures (Sandbank et al., 2021). This will focus on any changes in the organization due to the project. It will examine issues such as changes in the organization’s policy, procedures, standards, and regulations that pertain to safety, quality, and efficiency of patient care.

Disseminating Evaluation Results

Disseminating evaluation results is important for the staff that were involved in the project and other healthcare providers. One of the strategies for disseminating evaluation results will be through a boardroom meeting with the staff. This will be used to communicate the project process, results, and recommendations. The other approach will be presenting results in conferences. Conferences will be used to reach to a wider population and increase awareness about the adopted strategy to prevent and minimize catheter-associated urinary tract infections. The last strategy will be publishing an article about the project for future reference by other scholars, policymakers, and healthcare providers (Estabrooks et al., 2018).

References

Atkins, L., Sallis, A., Chadborn, T., Shaw, K., Schneider, A., Hopkins, S., Bunten, A., Michie, S., & Lorencatto, F. (2020). Reducing catheter-associated urinary tract infections: A systematic review of barriers and facilitators and strategic behavioural analysis of interventions. Implementation Science, 15(1), 44. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-020-01001-2

Cashion, A., & Pickler, R. H. (2018). What Will I Bring: Nurse Scientists’ Contributions to Interdisciplinary Collaboration. Nursing Research, 67(5), 347–348. https://doi.org/10.1097/NNR.0000000000000299

Ellis, P. (2022). Evidence-based Practice in Nursing. SAGE.

Estabrooks, P. A., Brownson, R. C., & Pronk, N. P. (2018). Dissemination and Implementation Science for Public Health Professionals: An Overview and Call to Action. Preventing Chronic Disease, 15, E162. https://doi.org/10.5888/pcd15.180525

Hewett, R., Shantz, A., Mundy, J., & Alfes, K. (2018). Attribution theories in Human Resource Management research: A review and research agenda. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 29(1), 87–126. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2017.1380062

Letica-Kriegel, A. S., Salmasian, H., Vawdrey, D. K., Youngerman, B. E., Green, R. A., Furuya, E. Y., Calfee, D. P., & Perotte, R. (2019). Identifying the risk factors for catheter-associated urinary tract infections: A large cross-sectional study of six hospitals. BMJ Open, 9(2), e022137. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-022137

Melnyk, B. M., & Fineout-Overhold, E. (2022). Evidence-Based Practice in Nursing & Healthcare: A Guide to Best Practice. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.

Sandbank, M., Chow, J., Bottema-Beutel, K., & Woynaroski, T. (2021). Evaluating evidence-based practice in light of the boundedness and proximity of outcomes: Capturing the scope of change. Autism Research, 14(8), 1536–1542.

Thank you for your work on this assessment. I think you did a very nice job of explaining a collaborative approach towards achieving the goal of your organizational issue of nurse burnout. I like that you included ideas about possible consequences, of not addressing these problems. I am so glad you included the consequence of reduced quality of patient care, increased errors, and staff turnover. This is so important and is often overlooked. Overall, this is a very good effort on this power-point presentation. I made a few recommendations on how some criteria might achieve a higher performance score. I hope you have an opportunity to give your presentation at a nursing conference. This would be a great way to share nursing knowledge. I look forward to reading more of your work.