NURS FPX 4030 Assessment 2 Determining the Credibility of

Capella University NURS FPX 4030 Assessment 2 Determining the Credibility of Evidence and Resources– Step-By-Step Guide

This guide will demonstrate how to complete the Capella University NURS FPX 4030 Assessment 2 Determining the Credibility of Evidence and Resources assignment based on general principles of academic writing. Here, we will show you the A, B, Cs of completing an academic paper, irrespective of the instructions. After guiding you through what to do, the guide will leave one or two sample essays at the end to highlight the various sections discussed below.

How to Research and Prepare for NURS FPX 4030 Assessment 2 Determining the Credibility of Evidence and Resources

Whether one passes or fails an academic assignment such as the Capella University NURS FPX 4030 Assessment 2 Determining the Credibility of Evidence and Resources depends on the preparation done beforehand. The first thing to do once you receive an assignment is to quickly skim through the requirements. Once that is done, start going through the instructions one by one to clearly understand what the instructor wants. The most important thing here is to understand the required format—whether it is APA, MLA, Chicago, etc.

After understanding the requirements of the paper, the next phase is to gather relevant materials. The first place to start the research process is the weekly resources. Go through the resources provided in the instructions to determine which ones fit the assignment. After reviewing the provided resources, use the university library to search for additional resources. After gathering sufficient and necessary resources, you are now ready to start drafting your paper.

How to Write the Introduction for NURS FPX 4030 Assessment 2 Determining the Credibility of Evidence and Resources

The introduction for the Capella University NURS FPX 4030 Assessment 2 Determining the Credibility of Evidence and Resources is where you tell the instructor what your paper will encompass. In three to four statements, highlight the important points that will form the basis of your paper. Here, you can include statistics to show the importance of the topic you will be discussing. At the end of the introduction, write a clear purpose statement outlining what exactly will be contained in the paper. This statement will start with “The purpose of this paper…” and then proceed to outline the various sections of the instructions.

Need a high-quality paper urgently?

We can deliver within hours.

PLACE AN ORDER

How to Write the Body for NURS FPX 4030 Assessment 2 Determining the Credibility of Evidence and Resources

After the introduction, move into the main part of the NURS FPX 4030 Assessment 2 Determining the Credibility of Evidence and Resources assignment, which is the body. Given that the paper you will be writing is not experimental, the way you organize the headings and subheadings of your paper is critically important. In some cases, you might have to use more subheadings to properly organize the assignment. The organization will depend on the rubric provided. Carefully examine the rubric, as it will contain all the detailed requirements of the assignment. Sometimes, the rubric will have information that the normal instructions lack.

Another important factor to consider at this point is how to do citations. In-text citations are fundamental as they support the arguments and points you make in the paper. At this point, the resources gathered at the beginning will come in handy. Integrating the ideas of the authors with your own will ensure that you produce a comprehensive paper. Also, follow the given citation format. In most cases, APA 7 is the preferred format for nursing assignments.

How to Write the Conclusion for NURS FPX 4030 Assessment 2 Determining the Credibility of Evidence and Resources

After completing the main sections, write the conclusion of your paper. The conclusion is a summary of the main points you made in your paper. However, you need to rewrite the points and not simply copy and paste them. By restating the points from each subheading, you will provide a nuanced overview of the assignment to the reader.

How to Format the References List for NURS FPX 4030 Assessment 2 Determining the Credibility of Evidence and Resources

The very last part of your paper involves listing the sources used in your paper. These sources should be listed in alphabetical order and double-spaced. Additionally, use a hanging indent for each source that appears in this list. Lastly, only the sources cited within the body of the paper should appear here.

Stuck? Let Us Help You

Completing assignments can sometimes be overwhelming, especially with the multitude of academic and personal responsibilities you may have. If you find yourself stuck or unsure at any point in the process, don’t hesitate to reach out for professional assistance. Our assignment writing services are designed to help you achieve your academic goals with ease.

Our team of experienced writers is well-versed in academic writing and familiar with the specific requirements of the NURS FPX 4030 Assessment 2 Determining the Credibility of Evidence and Resources assignment. We can provide you with personalized support, ensuring your assignment is well-researched, properly formatted, and thoroughly edited. Get a feel of the quality we guarantee – ORDER NOW.

Sample Answer for NURS FPX 4030 Assessment 2 Determining the Credibility of Evidence and Resources

Ensuring the investigated information’s accuracy, currency, and reliability is essential in nursing research. The healthcare landscape undergoes continuous changes with the emergence of new research and evidence. When nurses encounter an unfamiliar diagnosis or condition, they must collect the requisite information to ensure the patient’s safe treatment (Nazanin Alipourfard et al., 2021). It is crucial to differentiate between reliable and unreliable sources to optimize patient outcomes. The provision of high-quality evidence is essential and can be achieved through the utilization of reliable information resources. A nurse at Vila Health encounters a patient with preeclampsia, a diagnosis that she is unfamiliar with. This paper aims to elucidate the criteria for assessing the credibility of journal articles and websites on preeclampsia.

Preeclampsia

The presence of established standards for the management of preeclampsia in hospitals is not universal. According to recent findings by the World Health Organization (WHO), preeclampsia is estimated to be responsible for around 70,000 maternal fatalities yearly worldwide (EL sebaey Soliman et al., 2021). Preeclampsia and high blood pressure are significant medical concerns that need prompt and proper intervention. Preeclampsia may be characterized by systolic blood pressure (SBP) equal to or more than 140 mmHg or diastolic blood pressure (DBP) equal to or greater than 90 mmHg, accompanied by proteinuria, with or without signs or symptoms. Alternatively, preeclampsia may also manifest via the appearance of signs, symptoms, or laboratory abnormalities, even in the absence of proteinuria. Blood pressure control measures are the most effective strategy in mitigating the risk of stroke-related mortality in women diagnosed with preeclampsia. The expeditious initiation of therapy to reduce blood pressure levels can significantly reduce maternal morbidity and fatality rates.

Criteria of Resources

When conducting research, it is essential to identify the most reliable sources of information. Selecting appropriate resources from the vast array of journals and scientific publications available online and in databases can be overwhelming. However, it is essential to prioritize peer-reviewed, relevant, and reliable sources.National organizations, government entities, and medical institutions publish the most reliable sources of evidence (Nazanin Alipourfard et al., 2021). When conducting research, it is crucial to prioritize articles that have undergone peer review in the past five years. Peer review is a widely used approach to guarantee and evaluate the excellence of academic research. When conducting research, it is crucial to utilize a database that facilitates the discovery of relevant articles. Capella University utilizes various search engines, including Summon, PubMed, and Medline.

Analysis of the Credibility and Relevance

Evidence-based practice strives to deliver safe and effective care by identifying hazards and providing current information on treatments and regimens. Numerous studies and research have been conducted to determine the optimal approach to managing patients with preeclampsia. Maternal mortality is the second leading cause of death among women, and implementing evidence-based treatments can reduce the risk or severity of health outcomes for both mothers and newborns (Portney, 2019). Credible and relevant sources will be identified based on the Nursing Research Pyramid. The Pyramid is a hierarchical representation of visual evidence, wherein the credibility of information increases as one moves up from the bottom to the top. Case-control studies, cohort studies, randomized controlled trials, critically appraised articles, critically assessed individuals, and systematic reviews positioned at the apex of the hierarchy represent the most dependable sources.

A study by Alnuaimi et al. (2020) discovered a reputable and relevant source that examined the effects of an interventional program on the knowledge of high-risk preeclampsia among Jordanian women and its impact on pregnancy outcomes. A randomized controlled study was conducted in a publicly funded healthcare facility in Jordan. The findings demonstrated a statistically significant disparity in average scores about knowledge of preeclampsia between the group that received the intervention and the control group after the educational program implementation. The researchers have concluded that implementing a Preeclampsia educational program has positive results in enhancing awareness of preeclampsia and improving specific outcomes related to pregnancy. Therefore, it is strongly recommended that educators in midwifery and nursing focus on providing comprehensive training to midwives and nurses to enhance their effectiveness as healthcare practitioners.

Evidence-Based Model

Numerous frameworks and models have been devised to augment nurses’ comprehension ofadopting evidence-based practice (EBP). Using frameworks and models is paramount in advancing secure and exemplary nursing practice. The Iowa model will guide the application process to facilitate the incorporation of preeclampsia management ideas into clinical practice (Portney, 2019). The model selection was based on its problem-solving technique, which emphasizesusing well-organized processes to facilitate the effective execution of evidence-based practice. The methodology comprises succinct and lucid stages that assist nurses in discerning concerns and choosing dependable sources to ascertain the suggested alteration. The objective of the approach is to effectively address preeclampsia byidentifying underlying causes, evaluating relevant sources, strategic planning for implementing necessary changes, and promoting long-term sustainability.

Conclusion

Nurses can enhance their support for pre-eclampsia patients by acquiring the skills to find and utilize peer-reviewed information from the past five years, using suitable search engines and databases. Using Evidence-Based Practice models, such as the Iowa Model of Evidence-Based Practice, can assist nurses in providing appropriate care for pre-eclampsia patients. A comprehensive care plan can be achieved for the patient by utilizing these tools for success.

References

Alnuaimi, K., Abuidhail, J., & Ismail, H. (2020). The effects of an educational program about preeclampsia on women’s awareness: a randomized control trial. International Nursing Review, 67(4), 501–511. https://doi.org/10.1111/inr.12626

EL sebaey Soliman, D., Abd El hakeem Hasneen, S., Ouda AbdElmoniem, S., & Kamal Ali, F. (2021). Assessment of Nurse’s Knowledge and Practices Regarding The Use of Evidence-based for Pregnant Women with Pre-eclampsia. Journal of Nursing Science Benha University, 2(2), 498–513. https://doi.org/10.21608/jnsbu.2021.194587

Nazanin Alipourfard, Arendt, B., Benjamin, D. J., Noam Benkler, Bishop, M., Burstein, M., Bush, M., Caverlee, J., Chen, Y.-L., & Clark, C. G. (2021). Systematizing Confidence in Open Research and Evidence (SCORE). SocArXiv (OSF Preprints). https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/46mnb

Portney, L. G. (2019). Foundations of Clinical Research: applications to practice. (4th ed.). F.A. Davis Company.

Faculty Comments:Great job! You explained the criteria to be considered when determining the credibility of resources such as journal articles and websites. As you mentioned, considering if the source has been peer-reviewed is very important. In addition, you noted ways the criteria could be applied to a specific resource.

Faculty Comments:Excellent work explaining the importance of incorporating credible evidence into the Johns Hopkins evidence-based practice model used to address COPD. You did a great job noting specific examples of how the model could help improve COPD, such as developing care guidelines. Well done!

Faculty Comments:APA formatting is sometimes a work in progress. There are a lot of areas that should contain in-text citations. Remember, you must always cite anything that is not common knowledge, or that is not common knowledge within the field being discussed. I have circled all of the areas in your paper that should have in-text citations. I am also including a few links to helpful resources for APA formatting. I strongly encourage you to take a look at them. https://academicwriter-apa-org.library.capella.edu/learn/browse/TUT-11 http://www.capella.edu/interactivemedia/apa_module/OuterWrapper.asp