NUR 590 Benchmark – Evidence-Based Practice Project Proposal: Organizational Culture and Readiness
Grand Canyon University NUR 590 Benchmark – Evidence-Based Practice Project Proposal: Organizational Culture and Readiness– Step-By-Step Guide
This guide will demonstrate how to complete the Grand Canyon University NUR 590 Benchmark – Evidence-Based Practice Project Proposal: Organizational Culture and Readiness assignment based on general principles of academic writing. Here, we will show you the A, B, Cs of completing an academic paper, irrespective of the instructions. After guiding you through what to do, the guide will leave one or two sample essays at the end to highlight the various sections discussed below.
How to Research and Prepare for NUR 590 Benchmark – Evidence-Based Practice Project Proposal: Organizational Culture and Readiness
Whether one passes or fails an academic assignment such as the Grand Canyon University NUR 550 Benchmark – Evidence-Based Practice Project: Literature Review depends on the preparation done beforehand. The first thing to do once you receive an assignment is to quickly skim through the requirements. Once that is done, start going through the instructions one by one to clearly understand what the instructor wants. The most important thing here is to understand the required format—whether it is APA, MLA, Chicago, etc.
After understanding the requirements of the paper, the next phase is to gather relevant materials. The first place to start the research process is the weekly resources. Go through the resources provided in the instructions to determine which ones fit the assignment. After reviewing the provided resources, use the university library to search for additional resources. After gathering sufficient and necessary resources, you are now ready to start drafting your paper.
How to Write the Introduction for NUR 590 Benchmark – Evidence-Based Practice Project Proposal: Organizational Culture and Readiness
The introduction for the Grand Canyon University NUR 590 Benchmark – Evidence-Based Practice Project Proposal: Organizational Culture and Readiness is where you tell the instructor what your paper will encompass. In three to four statements, highlight the important points that will form the basis of your paper. Here, you can include statistics to show the importance of the topic you will be discussing. At the end of the introduction, write a clear purpose statement outlining what exactly will be contained in the paper. This statement will start with “The purpose of this paper…” and then proceed to outline the various sections of the instructions.
Need a high-quality paper urgently?
We can deliver within hours.
How to Write the Body for NUR 590 Benchmark – Evidence-Based Practice Project Proposal: Organizational Culture and Readiness
After the introduction, move into the main part of the NUR 590 Benchmark – Evidence-Based Practice Project Proposal: Organizational Culture and Readiness assignment, which is the body. Given that the paper you will be writing is not experimental, the way you organize the headings and subheadings of your paper is critically important. In some cases, you might have to use more subheadings to properly organize the assignment. The organization will depend on the rubric provided. Carefully examine the rubric, as it will contain all the detailed requirements of the assignment. Sometimes, the rubric will have information that the normal instructions lack.
Another important factor to consider at this point is how to do citations. In-text citations are fundamental as they support the arguments and points you make in the paper. At this point, the resources gathered at the beginning will come in handy. Integrating the ideas of the authors with your own will ensure that you produce a comprehensive paper. Also, follow the given citation format. In most cases, APA 7 is the preferred format for nursing assignments.
How to Write the Conclusion for NUR 590 Benchmark – Evidence-Based Practice Project Proposal: Organizational Culture and Readiness
After completing the main sections, write the conclusion of your paper. The conclusion is a summary of the main points you made in your paper. However, you need to rewrite the points and not simply copy and paste them. By restating the points from each subheading, you will provide a nuanced overview of the assignment to the reader.
How to Format the References List for NUR 590 Benchmark – Evidence-Based Practice Project Proposal: Organizational Culture and Readiness
The very last part of your paper involves listing the sources used in your paper. These sources should be listed in alphabetical order and double-spaced. Additionally, use a hanging indent for each source that appears in this list. Lastly, only the sources cited within the body of the paper should appear here.
Stuck? Let Us Help You
Completing assignments can sometimes be overwhelming, especially with the multitude of academic and personal responsibilities you may have. If you find yourself stuck or unsure at any point in the process, don’t hesitate to reach out for professional assistance. Our assignment writing services are designed to help you achieve your academic goals with ease.
Our team of experienced writers is well-versed in academic writing and familiar with the specific requirements of the NUR 590 Benchmark – Evidence-Based Practice Project Proposal: Organizational Culture and Readiness assignment. We can provide you with personalized support, ensuring your assignment is well-researched, properly formatted, and thoroughly edited. Get a feel of the quality we guarantee – ORDER NOW.
Sample Answer for NUR 590 Benchmark – Evidence-Based Practice Project Proposal: Organizational Culture and Readiness
Nurses are responsible for improved health outcomes for patients and diverse population groups. Achieving this critical objective necessitates evidence-based practice (EBP), where nurses implement projects supported by scientific evidence. Before engaging in practice change, nurses should assess the organizational culture and readiness for change. This assessment is vital since leadership, attitude, resources, and other factors determine critical aspects, including stakeholder support, participation of nursing teams, and implementation timelines. The purpose of this paper is to analyze the culture and level of organizational readiness for change in the present organization where the evidence-based practice project is proposed.
Organizational Culture and Degree to Which Culture Supports Change
Organizational culture affects nurses’ behaviors and how they approach patient care. Ghiasi et al. (2022) described organizational culture as the shared norms or ideas that an organization develops in response to internal and external problems. These norms are institutionalized by teaching employees how the organization expects them to think and act. A critical analysis of the organization’s leadership, values, and internal relationships depicts a clan culture. Within nursing, a clan culture’s primary attributes include high internal focus and flexibility (Ghiasi et al., 2022). Such a culture supports change to a significant degree since it is people-centered and flexible, and the nursing environment management is characterized by employee participation and teamwork. Leaders are also friendly and encourage change. Although the structure is hierarchical, the present leadership promotes interprofessional collaboration to achieve patient-centered, high-quality care in safe environments. The primary mission is value-based care centered on high patient satisfaction and healthy patient-provider interactions. Open and respectful communication is highly encouraged, and the employees perceive the organization positively.
Organizational Readiness Tool and Readiness Assessment
Organizational readiness for change is a critical success factor in EBP implementation. Vax et al. (2021) described readiness as stakeholders’ willingness and perceived capacity to adopt a new practice in an organization. Therefore, high readiness implies a proportional adoption rate of evidence-based projects for improved health outcomes. The readiness assessment using the Organizational Readiness to Change Assessment (ORCA) tool revealed that the current setting is ready for change due to how leaders perceive and support change, facilitation, and the overall organizational context. The ORCA tool assesses readiness from three dimensions: evidence, context, and facilitation (Kononowech et al., 2021). A successful project should be supported by solid evidence, and the organizational culture and leadership should embrace new interventions. Facilitation is primarily about the organization’s capacity to help people change their behaviors to embrace innovation (Kononowech et al., 2021). The survey results (92.8%) indicate a high likelihood of a successful project (Appendix A).
ALSO READ:
NUR 590 Benchmark – Evidence-Based Practice Proposal Project: Framework/Model for Change
NUR 590 Evidence-Based Practice Project Proposal: Implementation Plan
NUR 590 Evidence-Based Practice Project Proposal: Evaluation Plan
NUR 590 Benchmark – Evidence-Based Practice Project Proposal Final Paper
Multiple strategies can be used independently or jointly to facilitate the organization’s readiness. They include fostering a culture of innovation and teamwork and addressing staff well-being concerns. O’Hara et al. (2022) found that a culture of innovation is essential to improving healthcare quality and safety through action plans that accelerate new methods. Teamwork encourages diverse nursing professionals to collaborate and address current issues through evidence-based interventions. According to Pomare et al. (2020), change readiness is proportional to staff well-being. Therefore, addressing it improves job satisfaction and the psychological impact of organizational change.
Organizational Culture in Evidence-Based Practice Change
The organization’s clan culture will fully support and sustain an evidence-based practice change. This culture encourages organizational change driven by teamwork and employee engagement (Ghiasi et al., 2022). Although it creates a sense of community, such a culture could slow decision-making since it values diverse opinions from team members. Potential barriers include the availability of nursing teams to offer human support due to their busy schedules. Stakeholder support is predicted to be high since the project is results-oriented regarding patient care. The timing is also appropriate and does not rely on considerable resource facilitation.
Health Care Process and Systems Recommended for Improving Quality, Safety, Cost-Effectiveness
Processes to improve quality, safety, and cost-effectiveness include scaling up knowledge translation, providing virtual care, and health education programs (Hill et al., 2020; Haleem et al., 2021). Such interventions help to reduce healthcare costs while improving access and health knowledge. Technological systems to support telehealth/telemedicine and data-driven practice are essential for better quality and safety (Haleem et al., 2021). Their role is to reduce medical errors, enhance efficiency, and ensure accurate, timely patient care.
Stakeholders and Team Members Needed
The proposed EBP project recommends weekly exercises for older adults with type 2 diabetes. Stakeholders include the organizational leadership, policymakers, nursing professionals, and patients since the project affects them directly (Triplett et al., 2022). Team members include colleagues and family members. The organizational leaders’ primary mandate is to support the project through approval, essential resources, and informed guidance. Nursing colleagues and family members will guide and support patients in implementing the weekly exercise program, evaluate outcomes, and report progress.
Information and Communication Technologies Needed for Implementation
Essential information and communication technologies for the proposed project include wearables, diabetes monitoring tools, and smartphones for recording and reporting health data. The internal stakeholders will integrate them into the setting through information and communication technology (ICT) infrastructure that remotely allows data/information exchange. In this case, the implementation team will observe patients remotely and guide them as health data necessitates. The recommended technologies seek to enable older adults with type 2 diabetes to improve functional fitness and independence. Therefore, they will improve nursing practice by preventing issues associated with functional decline at this critical age, mainly falls, increased clinical visits, and poor mental health (Cui et al., 2023). Such outcomes indicate improved care delivery for individuals and populations since they are associated with healthy and productive living and more independence.
Conclusion
Nurses improve health outcomes by identifying clinical issues and responding by implementing evidence-based interventions. A culture ready for EBP is crucial for successfully implementing evidence-based projects. The organization’s clan culture fosters teamwork and encourages innovation. Besides, the ORCA tool reveals substantial evidence backing the project, high facilitation, and an organizational context supporting change.
References
Cui, Y., Liu, B., Qin, M. Z., Liu, Q., Ye, H., & Zhou, J. (2023). Effects of early mental state changes on physical functions in elderly patients with a history of falls. BMC Geriatrics, 23(1), 564. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-023-04274-6
Ghiasi, A., Lord, J., Banaszak-Holl, J., Davlyatov, G., Hearld, L., & Weech-Maldonado, R. (2022). Organizational culture and high Medicaid nursing homes financial performance. Journal of Long-Term Care, (2022), 142–153. https://doi. org/10.31389/jltc.115
Haleem, A., Javaid, M., Singh, R. P., & Suman, R. (2021). Telemedicine for healthcare: Capabilities, features, barriers, and applications. Sensors International, 2, 100117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sintl.2021.100117
Hill, J. E., Stephani, A. M., Sapple, P., & Clegg, A. J. (2020). The effectiveness of continuous quality improvement for developing professional practice and improving health care outcomes: a systematic review. Implementation Science, 15, 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-020-0975-2
Kononowech, J., Hagedorn, H., Hall, C., Helfrich, C. D., Lambert-Kerzner, A. C., Miller, S. C., Sales, A. E., & Damschroder, L. (2021). Mapping the organizational readiness to change assessment to the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research. Implementation Science Communications, 2(1), 19. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43058-021-00121-0
O’Hara, S., Ackerman, M. H., Raderstorf, T., Kilbridge, J. F., & Melnyk, B. M. (2022). Building and sustaining a culture of innovation in nursing academics, research, policy, and practice: Outcomes of the National Innovation Summit. Journal of Professional Nursing, 43, 5-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.profnurs.2022.08.001
Pomare, C., Ellis, L. A., Long, J. C., Churruca, K., Tran, Y., & Braithwaite, J. (2020). “Are you ready?” Validation of the Hospital Change Readiness (HCR) Questionnaire. BMJ Open, 10(8), e037611. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-037611
Triplett, N. S., Woodard, G. S., Johnson, C., Nguyen, J. K., AlRasheed, R., Song, F., Stoddard, S., Mugisha, J. C., Sievert, K., & Dorsey, S. (2022). Stakeholder engagement to inform evidence-based treatment implementation for children’s mental health: a scoping review. Implementation Science Communications, 3(1), 82. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43058-022-00327-w
Vax, S., Farkas, M., Russinova, Z., Mueser, K. T., & Drainoni, M. L. (2021). Enhancing organizational readiness for implementation: Constructing a typology of readiness-development strategies using a modified Delphi process. Implementation Science: IS, 16(1), 61. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-021-01132-0
The cornerstone of evidence-based practice (EBP) is improved patient outcomes through interventions supported by scientific evidence. Despite the increased availability of evidence from multiple sources, only some can be used to support sustainable changes in healthcare. As a result, nursing professionals and EBP project proponents should understand the difference between statistically and clinically significant evidence and its implications for continuous improvements in patient care.
Statistically significant evidence focuses on testing the pre-stated hypothesis. As Di Leo and Sardanelli (2020) noted, statistically significant evidence shows the effect size resulting in p values but does not provide any information about the impact of the effect size in the trial. If differently stated, p values only indicate that the results are statistically significant but not clinically significant. Also, there is a likelihood for the results to occur due to chance (Carpenter et al., 2021). On the other hand, clinically significant evidence/findings improve medical care, resulting in valuable improvement in someone’s physical function, mental health, and social life engagement ability (Dahlberg et al., 2020). From this analysis, it can be established that a clinically relevant intervention has more health benefits than the costs, harms, and inconveniences the target individuals or populations experience.
When advancing an evidence-based practice project, change proponents should be guided by both statistically significant and clinically significant findings. The main reason for considering both findings is that outcomes can be statistically significant but not clinically relevant. Statistical significance reveals mathematical differences, while clinical significance reveals dissimilarity between two treatment modalities. When focusing on population health, EBP leaders should highly regard clinically significant evidence since it is associated with observable effect size in many parameters, such as life quality, safety, and treatment adherence (Dahlberg et al., 2020). Always, clinicians should ensure that interventions result in positive changes to current practice and not merely a mathematical difference.