NUR 550 Evidence-Based Practice Project Proposal: PICOT
Grand Canyon University NUR 550 Evidence-Based Practice Project Proposal: PICOT – Step-By-Step Guide
This guide will demonstrate how to complete the Grand Canyon University NUR 550 Evidence-Based Practice Project Proposal: PICOT assignment based on general principles of academic writing. Here, we will show you the A, B, Cs of completing an academic paper, irrespective of the instructions. After guiding you through what to do, the guide will leave one or two sample essays at the end to highlight the various sections discussed below.
How to Research and Prepare for NUR 550 Evidence-Based Practice Project Proposal: PICOT
Whether one passes or fails an academic assignment such as the Grand Canyon University NUR 550 Evidence-Based Practice Project Proposal: PICOT depends on the preparation done beforehand. The first thing to do once you receive an assignment is to quickly skim through the requirements. Once that is done, start going through the instructions one by one to clearly understand what the instructor wants. The most important thing here is to understand the required format—whether it is APA, MLA, Chicago, etc.
After understanding the requirements of the paper, the next phase is to gather relevant materials. The first place to start the research process is the weekly resources. Go through the resources provided in the instructions to determine which ones fit the assignment. After reviewing the provided resources, use the university library to search for additional resources. After gathering sufficient and necessary resources, you are now ready to start drafting your paper.
How to Write the Introduction for NUR 550 Evidence-Based Practice Project Proposal: PICOT
The introduction for the Grand Canyon University NUR 550 Evidence-Based Practice Project Proposal: PICOT is where you tell the instructor what your paper will encompass. In three to four statements, highlight the important points that will form the basis of your paper. Here, you can include statistics to show the importance of the topic you will be discussing. At the end of the introduction, write a clear purpose statement outlining what exactly will be contained in the paper. This statement will start with “The purpose of this paper…” and then proceed to outline the various sections of the instructions.
Need a high-quality paper urgently?
We can deliver within hours.
How to Write the Body for NUR 550 Evidence-Based Practice Project Proposal: PICOT
After the introduction, move into the main part of the NUR 550 Evidence-Based Practice Project Proposal: PICOT assignment, which is the body. Given that the paper you will be writing is not experimental, the way you organize the headings and subheadings of your paper is critically important. In some cases, you might have to use more subheadings to properly organize the assignment. The organization will depend on the rubric provided. Carefully examine the rubric, as it will contain all the detailed requirements of the assignment. Sometimes, the rubric will have information that the normal instructions lack.
Another important factor to consider at this point is how to do citations. In-text citations are fundamental as they support the arguments and points you make in the paper. At this point, the resources gathered at the beginning will come in handy. Integrating the ideas of the authors with your own will ensure that you produce a comprehensive paper. Also, follow the given citation format. In most cases, APA 7 is the preferred format for nursing assignments.
How to Write the Conclusion for NUR 550 Evidence-Based Practice Project Proposal: PICOT
After completing the main sections, write the conclusion of your paper. The conclusion is a summary of the main points you made in your paper. However, you need to rewrite the points and not simply copy and paste them. By restating the points from each subheading, you will provide a nuanced overview of the assignment to the reader.
How to Format the References List for NUR 550 Evidence-Based Practice Project Proposal: PICOT
The very last part of your paper involves listing the sources used in your paper. These sources should be listed in alphabetical order and double-spaced. Additionally, use a hanging indent for each source that appears in this list. Lastly, only the sources cited within the body of the paper should appear here.
Stuck? Let Us Help You
Completing assignments can sometimes be overwhelming, especially with the multitude of academic and personal responsibilities you may have. If you find yourself stuck or unsure at any point in the process, don’t hesitate to reach out for professional assistance. Our assignment writing services are designed to help you achieve your academic goals with ease.
Our team of experienced writers is well-versed in academic writing and familiar with the specific requirements of the NUR 550 Evidence-Based Practice Project Proposal: PICOT assignment. We can provide you with personalized support, ensuring your assignment is well-researched, properly formatted, and thoroughly edited. Get a feel of the quality we guarantee – ORDER NOW.
Sample Answer for NUR 550 Evidence-Based Practice Project Proposal: PICOT
PICOT Final
PICOT Question | |||
P | Population | Older adults with type 2 diabetes | |
I | Intervention | Twice-weekly tailored physical exercise training | |
C | Comparison | No exercise interventions | |
O | Outcome | Improved functional fitness and independent living | |
T | Timeframe | 8 weeks | |
PICOT Create a complete PICOT statement. | In older adults with type 2 diabetes (P), does a twice-weekly tailored physical exercise training program (I), compared to no exercise interventions (C), improve functional fitness and independent living (O) in 8 weeks (T)? | ||
Problem Statement Create a problem statement for your PICOT. You will use this problem statement throughout your final written paper. | Older adults are a unique population with complex and highly demanding health problems. The prevalence of type 2 diabetes among older adults is a significant nursing practice problem since it increases hospitalizations, healthcare costs, and the risk for cardiovascular disease (Atak Tel et al., 2023; Evans et al., 2022). These outcomes denote a significant gap between the delivered and desired patient care. Nursing and healthcare research further shows that type 2 diabetes is associated with reduced functional performance and independence among older adults (Kirwan et al., 2021; Pfeifer et al., 2022). As a result, interventions tailored to improve functional capacity and independence among older adults with type 2 diabetes are crucial for improved health outcomes and reduced clinical visits. | ||
ALSO READ:
NUR 550 Benchmark – Evidence-Based Practice Project: PICOT Paper
NUR 550 Evidence-Based Practice Project: Evaluation of Literature Table
NUR 550 Benchmark – Evidence-Based Practice Project: Literature Review
NUR 550 Benchmark – Diverse Population Health Policy Analysis
NUR 550 Summary of Current Course Content Knowledge
Evidence-Based Practice Project Proposal: Identification of Nursing Practice Problem NUR 550
References
Atak Tel, B. M., Aktas, G., Bilgin, S., Baltaci, S. B., & Taslamacioglu Duman, T. (2023). Control level of type 2 diabetes mellitus in the elderly is associated with polypharmacy, accompanied comorbidities, and various increased risks according to the Beers Criteria. Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 13(22), 3433. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13223433
Evans, M., Chandramouli, A. S., Faurby, M., Matthiessen, K. S., Mogensen, P. B., & Verma, S. (2022). Healthcare costs and hospitalizations in US patients with type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease: a retrospective database study (OFFSET). Diabetes, Obesity & Metabolism, 24(7), 1300–1309. https://doi.org/10.1111/dom.14703
Kirwan, M., Chiu, C. L., Hay, M., & Laing, T. (2021). Community-based exercise and lifestyle program improves health outcomes in older adults with type 2 diabetes. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(11), 6147. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18116147
Pfeifer, L. O., De Nardi, A. T., da Silva, L. X. N., Botton, C. E., do Nascimento, D. M., Teodoro, J. L., … & Umpierre, D. (2022). Association between physical exercise interventions participation and functional capacity in individuals with type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of controlled trials. Sports Medicine-Open, 8(1), 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40798-022-00422-1
Research involving subjects may pose significant risks to participants, hence the need for adequate control. Besides, individuals may participate in unbeneficial studies, and their protection is among the cardinal roles of Institutional Review Boards (IRBs). In the research context, IRBs are federally mandated boards that review research with human participants to ensure it meets the appropriate ethical guidelines (White, 2020). Under the FDA’s authorization, an IRB can approve, request modifications, or disapprove research. The decisions are made after the IRB’s group process of reviewing research protocols and materials (U.S. Food & Drug Administration, 2019). Generally, the advance and periodic review of research ensures adequate protection of human subjects’ rights and welfare.
Before proposing or commencing population health research, researchers should understand and adhere to its ethical considerations. The basic ethical considerations include respect for persons, beneficence, and justice. Respect for persons obligates researchers to promote autonomy and protect individuals with diminished autonomy (Gordon, 2020; White, 2020). Informed consent ensures autonomous decision-making and voluntary participation in research. Beneficence involves not harming participants and maximizing potential benefits (Mondragón Barrios et al., 2022). Justice is accomplished by fair participation and distribution of research benefits and burdens.
Before commencing research, the researchers and participants should look forward to studies benefitting patients, populations, and the broader society. One way of accomplishing this objective is balancing respect for the persons, potential research benefits and burdens, and research. For instance, after obtaining informed consent from participants in a study on mHealth apps and diabetes self-care, researchers should carefully examine who should receive the research benefits and bear its burdens. To ensure justice, the National Commission proposes equal share and distribution of benefits according to individual needs, effort, and societal contribution (White, 2020). Merit should also be a critical consideration when distributing research benefits and burdens.