PHI 413 Moral Status: Case Analysis
Grand Canyon University PHI 413 Moral Status: Case Analysis– Step-By-Step Guide
This guide will demonstrate how to complete the Grand Canyon University PHI 413 Moral Status: Case Analysis assignment based on general principles of academic writing. Here, we will show you the A, B, Cs of completing an academic paper, irrespective of the instructions. After guiding you through what to do, the guide will leave one or two sample essays at the end to highlight the various sections discussed below.
How to Research and Prepare for PHI 413 Moral Status: Case Analysis
Whether one passes or fails an academic assignment such as the Grand Canyon University PHI 413 Moral Status: Case Analysis depends on the preparation done beforehand. The first thing to do once you receive an assignment is to quickly skim through the requirements. Once that is done, start going through the instructions one by one to clearly understand what the instructor wants. The most important thing here is to understand the required format—whether it is APA, MLA, Chicago, etc.
After understanding the requirements of the paper, the next phase is to gather relevant materials. The first place to start the research process is the weekly resources. Go through the resources provided in the instructions to determine which ones fit the assignment. After reviewing the provided resources, use the university library to search for additional resources. After gathering sufficient and necessary resources, you are now ready to start drafting your paper.
How to Write the Introduction for PHI 413 Moral Status: Case Analysis
The introduction for the Grand Canyon University PHI 413 Moral Status: Case Analysis is where you tell the instructor what your paper will encompass. In three to four statements, highlight the important points that will form the basis of your paper. Here, you can include statistics to show the importance of the topic you will be discussing. At the end of the introduction, write a clear purpose statement outlining what exactly will be contained in the paper. This statement will start with “The purpose of this paper…” and then proceed to outline the various sections of the instructions.
Need a high-quality paper urgently?
We can deliver within hours.
How to Write the Body for PHI 413 Moral Status: Case Analysis
After the introduction, move into the main part of the PHI 413 Moral Status: Case Analysis assignment, which is the body. Given that the paper you will be writing is not experimental, the way you organize the headings and subheadings of your paper is critically important. In some cases, you might have to use more subheadings to properly organize the assignment. The organization will depend on the rubric provided. Carefully examine the rubric, as it will contain all the detailed requirements of the assignment. Sometimes, the rubric will have information that the normal instructions lack.
Another important factor to consider at this point is how to do citations. In-text citations are fundamental as they support the arguments and points you make in the paper. At this point, the resources gathered at the beginning will come in handy. Integrating the ideas of the authors with your own will ensure that you produce a comprehensive paper. Also, follow the given citation format. In most cases, APA 7 is the preferred format for nursing assignments.
How to Write the Conclusion for PHI 413 Moral Status: Case Analysis
After completing the main sections, write the conclusion of your paper. The conclusion is a summary of the main points you made in your paper. However, you need to rewrite the points and not simply copy and paste them. By restating the points from each subheading, you will provide a nuanced overview of the assignment to the reader.
How to Format the References List for PHI 413 Moral Status: Case Analysis
The very last part of your paper involves listing the sources used in your paper. These sources should be listed in alphabetical order and double-spaced. Additionally, use a hanging indent for each source that appears in this list. Lastly, only the sources cited within the body of the paper should appear here.
Stuck? Let Us Help You
Completing assignments can sometimes be overwhelming, especially with the multitude of academic and personal responsibilities you may have. If you find yourself stuck or unsure at any point in the process, don’t hesitate to reach out for professional assistance. Our assignment writing services are designed to help you achieve your academic goals with ease.
Our team of experienced writers is well-versed in academic writing and familiar with the specific requirements of the PHI 413 Moral Status: Case Analysis assignment. We can provide you with personalized support, ensuring your assignment is well-researched, properly formatted, and thoroughly edited. Get a feel of the quality we guarantee – ORDER NOW.
Sample Answer for PHI 413 Moral Status: Case Analysis
Nurses and other healthcare providers often experience complex issues that require ethical decision-making. Assisting families to make decisions on issues related to fetal abnormalities is one of the experiences. In such cases, healthcare providers provide accurate information that would help families make rational decisions on whether to keep or terminate a pregnancy. The Christian worldview might inform the decisions that families make to address complex situations. Therefore, this essay examines the fetal abnormality case study to identify the moral theories used and their influence on the decisions made.
Christian Worldview of the Nature of Human Persons, Theory of Moral Status, Intrinsic Value, and Dignity
The Christian worldview of human persons is based on the belief that God created human beings in his image. God requires human beings to protect his creations. The worldview also recognizes the need for the protection of human life and, hence, dignity. Accordingly, human beings do not have any right to take a life, as it is God’s decision. The worldview also has the aspects of inherent dignity, moral status, and intrinsic value. Inherent dignity refers to the equal nature of human beings irrespective of their characteristics such as race, abilities, gender, and social status. Every human being has a social worth that should be protected since they are God’s image. Human beings are moral beings. They can make decisions and choices, implying that they are responsible for the decisions or actions they make. God expects human beings to show moral responsibility in their actions. Human beings are also relational beings. They are expected to create relationships among themselves and with their God. The Christian worldview also holds the existence of eternal life (Clarke & Parris, 2019; Evans et al., 2022). Christians believe in the existence of eternal life after death and hell for sinners.
Theories Used by Individuals in the Case Study
Each of the persons in the case study used different theories to determine moral status. Dr. Wilson explained the challenges of having a child with deformities and recommended abortion to the family. He considers abortion a medically appropriate intervention that would save the parents from suffering due to caring for a child with poor congenital malformations. As a result, Dr. Wilson applies theories of consequentialism and utilitarianism. The theory of utilitarianism asserts that actions are moral if they maximize the good and minimize the bad. An abortion would minimize any suffering and financial hardships for the family, hence, their financial security. The theory of consequentialism holds the importance of the consequences of actions to be drivers of moral actions (Card & Smith, 2020; Mathiesen, 2022). A decision should have favorable consequences, which minimize the challenges encountered in caring for the disabled child in the case study.
Marco reports that he believes the pregnancy should be terminated because of the challenges of caring for a disabled child. He considers it a hindrance to their financial security. He also reports that he would support Jessica’s decision. As a result, he uses the utilitarianism theory (Mathiesen, 2022). The use of the theory is evident from his belief that the child will be a burden and at the same time consider his wife’s happiness based on the decision she adopts.
ALSO READ:
PHI 413 Biomedical Ethics in the Christian Narrative: Case Analysis
PHI 413 Benchmark – Patient’s Spiritual Needs: Case Analysis
PHI 413 Death and Dying: Case Analysis
Maria uses the intrinsic value theory. The intrinsic value theory asserts that every human being has an inherent value based on his or her human nature. Actions taken should aim at preserving a person’s dignity. One’s value should not be based on factors such as age, appearance, or abilities. As a result, Maria urges Jessica to proceed with her pregnancy. Jessica uses both utilitarianism and the theory of intrinsic value (Bradford, 2023; Lemos, 2021). Utilitarianism is evident from her considering the socioeconomic impacts of caring for a child with congenital malformations. She uses the theory of intrinsic value when she asserts that all life is sacred. However, she is undecided on the decision to take.
Influence of the Theories on Recommended Actions
The utilitarianism theory influence Dr. Wilson, Marco, and Jessica’s actions. Dr. Wilson recommended the family to consider abortion because of the likelihood of Down syndrome and lack of the fetus developing extremities. The developmental issues would have negative effects on the baby and family’s quality of life. Marco and Jessica also hold similar opinions. However, Jessica is undecided on the action to take. The consequentialism theory also makes Marco weigh the benefits and risks of having the child. In his view, an abortion is an appropriate decision but he respects his wife’s decision. The intrinsic value theory influences Maria and Jessica’s actions. They consider the inherent value and dignity of human life (Bradford, 2023). They also consider the sacredness of human life. As a result, they are persuaded not to terminate the pregnancy.
Moral Status Theory Personal Response
In my view, the utilitarianism theory is the most appropriate theory in the case study. The decisions made in the case study should weigh the benefits and risks of terminating the pregnancy. Dr. Wilson’s view relies on evidence-based data. The diagnostic results support medical and rational termination of the pregnancy. Therefore, terminating the pregnancy is appropriate for better quality of life for the family.
Conclusion
In summary, the individuals in the case study used different theories to make decisions. The theories affected the actions taken on whether to keep the pregnancy or not. The Christian worldview considers the inherent dignity of human life and that human beings are created in God’s image. The utilitarianism theory is the most appropriate to guide actions in the case study.
References
Bradford, G. (2023). Uniqueness, Intrinsic Value, and Reasons. Journal of Philosophy, 120(8), 421–440. https://doi.org/10.5840/jphil2023120825
Card, D., & Smith, N. A. (2020). On Consequentialism and Fairness. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence, 3. https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/frai.2020.00034
Clarke, M., & Parris, B. W. (2019). Understanding disasters: Managing and accommodating different worldviews in humanitarian response. Journal of International Humanitarian Action, 4(1), 19. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41018-019-0066-7
Evans, C., Brown, D., & Davis, J. (2022). Professional counseling from a Christian worldview. Journal of Spirituality in Mental Health, 24(3), 309–326. https://doi.org/10.1080/19349637.2021.1885004
Lemos, N. (2021). What Is Basic Intrinsic Value? Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, 24(1), 33–43. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10677-021-10167-7
Mathiesen, T. (2022). Utilitarianism and Consequentialism in Learning. In A. Ammar (Ed.), Learning and Career Development in Neurosurgery: Values-Based Medical Education (pp. 95–100). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-02078-0_10