BHA-FPX4106 Assessment 3: Health Care Information Review Proposal

Capella University BHA-FPX4106 Assessment 3: Health Care Information Review Proposal– Step-By-Step Guide

This guide will demonstrate how to complete the Capella University  BHA-FPX4106 Assessment 3: Health Care Information Review Proposal? assignment based on general principles of academic writing. Here, we will show you the A, B, Cs of completing an academic paper, irrespective of the instructions. After guiding you through what to do, the guide will leave one or two sample essays at the end to highlight the various sections discussed below.

How to Research and Prepare for BHA-FPX4106 Assessment 3: Health Care Information Review Proposal? 

Whether one passes or fails an academic assignment such as the Capella University BHA-FPX4106 Assessment 3: Health Care Information Review Proposal?  depends on the preparation done beforehand. The first thing to do once you receive an assignment is to quickly skim through the requirements. Once that is done, start going through the instructions one by one to clearly understand what the instructor wants. The most important thing here is to understand the required format—whether it is APA, MLA, Chicago, etc.

After understanding the requirements of the paper, the next phase is to gather relevant materials. The first place to start the research process is the weekly resources. Go through the resources provided in the instructions to determine which ones fit the assignment. After reviewing the provided resources, use the university library to search for additional resources. After gathering sufficient and necessary resources, you are now ready to start drafting your paper.

How to Write the Introduction for  BHA-FPX4106 Assessment 3: Health Care Information Review Proposal?  

The introduction for the Capella University  BHA-FPX4106 Assessment 3: Health Care Information Review Proposal?   is where you tell the instructor what your paper will encompass. In three to four statements, highlight the important points that will form the basis of your paper. Here, you can include statistics to show the importance of the topic you will be discussing. At the end of the introduction, write a clear purpose statement outlining what exactly will be contained in the paper. This statement will start with “The purpose of this paper…” and then proceed to outline the various sections of the instructions.

How to Write the Body for  BHA-FPX4106 Assessment 3: Health Care Information Review Proposal? 

After the introduction, move into the main part of the  BHA-FPX4106 Assessment 3: Health Care Information Review Proposal?   assignment, which is the body. Given that the paper you will be writing is not experimental, the way you organize the headings and subheadings of your paper is critically important. In some cases, you might have to use more subheadings to properly organize the assignment. The organization will depend on the rubric provided. Carefully examine the rubric, as it will contain all the detailed requirements of the assignment. Sometimes, the rubric will have information that the normal instructions lack.

Another important factor to consider at this point is how to do citations. In-text citations are fundamental as they support the arguments and points you make in the paper. At this point, the resources gathered at the beginning will come in handy. Integrating the ideas of the authors with your own will ensure that you produce a comprehensive paper. Also, follow the given citation format. In most cases, APA 7 is the preferred format for nursing assignments.

How to Write the Conclusion for  BHA-FPX4106 Assessment 3: Health Care Information Review Proposal?  

After completing the main sections, write the conclusion of your paper. The conclusion is a summary of the main points you made in your paper. However, you need to rewrite the points and not simply copy and paste them. By restating the points from each subheading, you will provide a nuanced overview of the assignment to the reader.

How to Format the References List for  BHA-FPX4106 Assessment 3: Health Care Information Review Proposal?  

The very last part of your paper involves listing the sources used in your paper. These sources should be listed in alphabetical order and double-spaced. Additionally, use a hanging indent for each source that appears in this list. Lastly, only the sources cited within the body of the paper should appear here.

Stuck? Let Us Help You

Completing assignments can sometimes be overwhelming, especially with the multitude of academic and personal responsibilities you may have. If you find yourself stuck or unsure at any point in the process, don’t hesitate to reach out for professional assistance. Our assignment writing services are designed to help you achieve your academic goals with ease. 

Our team of experienced writers is well-versed in academic writing and familiar with the specific requirements of the  BHA-FPX4106 Assessment 3: Health Care Information Review Proposal?  assignment. We can provide you with personalized support, ensuring your assignment is well-researched, properly formatted, and thoroughly edited. Get a feel of the quality we guarantee – ORDER NOW. 

Sample Answer for BHA-FPX4106 Assessment 3: Health Care Information Review Proposal

Health care information review is key to improving the quality of care offered to a specific patient population. Therefore, it is important to know the correct information or data to be reviewed, the data sources, and the goals or standards. Such information is important in planning for better care outcomes. One group of patients that need improved care is the patients living with HIV (Villanueva Baselga, 2020). These patients usually face various challenges, such as stigmatization which can be solved through a proper review of the quality of care offered to them. Therefore, the purpose of this assignment is to formulate a proposal for the health care information review. The data to be collected is on patients living with HIV. Some of the information includes nutritionist notes, the notes from nurses providing care, the patient surveys, discharge data, the referral information, medication list, and the laboratory results. 

The highlighted data is to be collected to enable the care team to follow the nature of care the patients were offered within the specific period of interest in terms of quality and ascertain whether the patient’s health deteriorated or improved during this time. The labs will be particularly important in assessing the immunologic and virologic efficacy of antiretroviral therapy. In addition, these lab data will be key in monitoring any abnormalities connected with the antiretroviral drugs. The patient survey data will be key in knowing the patient’s opinions and attitudes as the care team continues to modify and align the care activities to suit the individual and community needs. 

Also Read

BHA-FPX4106 Assessment 4: Summary Report: Health Care information Review

The Data Collection Plan 

Successful data collection heavily depends on the plan. Therefore, it is important to timeously formulate a plan. As such, the process will commence from the particular benchmarks that the leadership has settled on as the key strategies for data collection and analysis. The individuals tasked with data collection will be offered a definite time frame to work with. A maximum period of two weeks would be appropriate. The data will be obtained from the electronic health record system and the national databases such as the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (“AHRQ,” 2019). For a better plan, the data on patients diagnosed with HIV in the last five years will be obtained. The data from the two sources will be collected and compared against each other to help come up with a better plan. The office manager and the organization’s manager will be given a duration of one week to draft and review the proposal. 

As earlier indicated, the data is to be obtained from the EHR system, implying that the individuals involved in the data collection process have better knowledge of computer use. Therefore, some of them may require training on the benchmarks and the key medical terms to be applied when searching for the data. The information in the EHR system is usually sensitive and confidential. Therefore, the individuals to retrieve such data need to be trusted and of high integrity. 

Data Security Plan 

The HIPAA rules require that patient data be secure. The implication is that the organization will have to perform a review of the HIPPA rules for the staff to help them understand and also enhance their understanding of the impacts that violations may bring on the facility and the individual culprits (“U.S. Department,” n.d.). For example, violating the HIPPA rules may lead to jailing and other penalties such as financial penalties for the healthcare staff involved. Therefore, as part of this proposal, patient privacy is at the center stage of the activities to be undertaken. As such, only in the cases of informed consent will the patient data be used. The signed consent forms will be proof that the patients have allowed their data to be used in the project. 

The protection of patient information is usually a top priority of healthcare organizations. Therefore, it is important to consider it as part of the data collection plans. As such, as part of the project, various strategies will be applied. As earlier indicated, written consent from the patients will be obtained to help enhance confidentiality and privacy (Cohen & Mello, 2018). Again, only a specific and selected number of staff will be allowed to access the patient data and records. Therefore, permission will have to be sought from the facility. This will also ensure that the data access rules and laws are not broken and that the patient data is only accessed and shared with the right and authorized persons. 

As part of the data security plan, the staff will only use the electronic medical records as information written on paper can easily be lost, damaged, or left at someplace unknowingly, leading to unauthorized access. The importance of using electronic medical records is that they are usually encrypted to help in patient information security, and the staff has to infeed passwords to enable them to access the data (Cohen & Mello, 2018). When the process of the proposal is complete, the individuals who were granted access to help in data collection retrieval and no longer require access to the facility’s electronic medical records will have their access deactivated to ensure further data protection and confidentiality. 

The Benchmarking Plans 

Benchmarking is key in making adequate comparisons to trigger relevant adjustments. As such, benchmarking with the information from the national database is key. This will help in the process of standardization. Specific benchmarks are key even though the number of patients attended to in the hospital is not as many as those captured in the national database. In drawing the national data, the plan is to use the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality database and look for the benchmarks connected to HIV (“AHRQ,” 2019). Specific patient data will be considered, including the sex, race, deaths, and diagnosis. As such, these data will be compared to the data obtained from the facility. 

Quality and Change Management Strategies  

The data outcomes can be key in performing quality improvement reviews and recommending evidence-based best practices for procedures and policies. The quality assessment reviews can be undertaken using the data collected. When performing the data review, the project team has a better chance of finding the evidence-based practice that can be used to improve patient care quality. The data review will also show if the patients living with HIV have been getting the appropriate and adequate care (“AHRQ,” 2019). Reviewing the national data is also appropriate in finding out the data trends, whether numbers are decreasing or increasing, and a possible reason for the same. The possible causes can be appropriate in coming up with better management strategies. The data comparison will also trigger sharing of the found information with the facility leadership to enable the formulation of necessary patient education strategies that can improve outcomes. 

Data from the sources will also be important in finding out where the facility is falling short when it comes to meeting the patient’s needs. Some of these barriers can be financial or material. Therefore the facility will be able to source funding that can be used to help the patients better manage their condition. The result will be an improvement in the quality of the current patient care practices used in managing the patients living with HIV. Workflow is key when it comes to implementing changes in the disease management strategies (Stime et al., 2019). Therefore, the project will need a proper workflow. As such, the senior leaders and the office manager will undertake the review and submission of the final plan. An adequate time will then be offered to staff to review the proposed changes. In addition, the senior leaders and office managers will provide reviews and the necessary training to further improve the chances of meeting the set goals and objectives. Follow-ups are also to be done so that if any of the team members did not get an aspect clearly, then one-on-one sessions are to be arranged. 

Implementation 

Implementation is one of the most important steps in a project, and therefore it is also key regarding the review study. Therefore, it is important to consider suitable timelines. After data collection, the implementation process may take up to four weeks. Training of the employees and review of the procedures and policy will be carried out within two weeks. The reviews and training will be performed by the senior leaders (Shuman et al., 2020). The training will be important to ensure that everyone has a considerable understanding of the review process. After training, the actual implementation will then be accomplished. This phase is expected to take a further two weeks.  

Conclusion 

The health care information review is one of the best strategies that can be applied in improving patient care outcomes. Therefore, this proposal is to assist HIV patients in obtaining care from our facility and the community at large. The patients living with HIV usually experience stigma, which negatively impacts the disease management process. Therefore, this review information proposal will use the obtained information to improve patient outcomes and reduce stigmatization. Therefore, the quality of care offered by my physician group will have an enhanced chance of improvement to ensure that every patient adheres to the antiretroviral therapy strategies, access care at affordable rates, and experience less stigma. 

References 

Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (2020) Nationwide HCUP Databases, Databases, U.S. Department of Health & Human Services, Rockville, MD Retrieved from: https://www.hcupus.ahrq.gov/databases.jsp. 

Cohen, I. G., & Mello, M. M. (2018). HIPAA and protecting health information in the 21st century. Jama, 320(3), 231-232. Doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.5630 

Stime, K. J., Garrett, N., Sookrajh, Y., Dorward, J., Dlamini, N., Olowolagba, A., … & Drain, P. K. (2018). Clinic flow for STI, HIV, and TB patients in an urban infectious disease clinic offering point-of-care testing services in Durban, South Africa. BMC Health Services Research, 18(1), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-018-3154-2 

Shuman, C. J., Ehrhart, M. G., Torres, E. M., Veliz, P., Kath, L. M., VanAntwerp, K., … & Aarons, G. A. (2020). EBP implementation leadership of frontline nurse managers: validation of the implementation leadership scale in acute care. Worldviews on Evidence‐Based Nursing, 17(1), 82-91. https://doi.org/10.1111/wvn.12402 

U.S. Department of Health & Human Services (n.d.) The HIPAA Privacy Rule, Office for Civil Rights Headquarters, Washington, D.C. HHS.gov Retrieved from: https://www.hhs.gov/hipaa/for-professionals/privacy/index.html. 

Villanueva Baselga, S. (2020). Interactive documentaries and health: Combating HIV-related stigma and cultural trauma. Catalan Journal of Communication & Cultural Studies, 12(2), 273-285. https://doi.org/10.1386/cjcs_00032_1