DNP 801 Explain why research articles that fail to meet these criteria cannot be used to provide evidence for the DPI Project

Grand Canyon University DNP 801 Explain why research articles that fail to meet these criteria cannot be used to provide evidence for the DPI Project-Step-By-Step Guide

This guide will demonstrate how to complete the Grand Canyon University DNP 801 Explain why research articles that fail to meet these criteria cannot be used to provide evidence for the DPI Project assignment based on general principles of academic writing. Here, we will show you the A, B, Cs of completing an academic paper, irrespective of the instructions. After guiding you through what to do, the guide will leave one or two sample essays at the end to highlight the various sections discussed below.

How to Research and Prepare for DNP 801 Explain why research articles that fail to meet these criteria cannot be used to provide evidence for the DPI Project                           

Whether one passes or fails an academic assignment such as the Grand Canyon University DNP 801 Explain why research articles that fail to meet these criteria cannot be used to provide evidence for the DPI Project depends on the preparation done beforehand. The first thing to do once you receive an assignment is to quickly skim through the requirements. Once that is done, start going through the instructions one by one to clearly understand what the instructor wants. The most important thing here is to understand the required format—whether it is APA, MLA, Chicago, etc.

After understanding the requirements of the paper, the next phase is to gather relevant materials. The first place to start the research process is the weekly resources. Go through the resources provided in the instructions to determine which ones fit the assignment. After reviewing the provided resources, use the university library to search for additional resources. After gathering sufficient and necessary resources, you are now ready to start drafting your paper.

How to Write the Introduction for DNP 801 Explain why research articles that fail to meet these criteria cannot be used to provide evidence for the DPI Project                         

The introduction for the Grand Canyon University DNP 801 Explain why research articles that fail to meet these criteria cannot be used to provide evidence for the DPI Project is where you tell the instructor what your paper will encompass. In three to four statements, highlight the important points that will form the basis of your paper. Here, you can include statistics to show the importance of the topic you will be discussing. At the end of the introduction, write a clear purpose statement outlining what exactly will be contained in the paper. This statement will start with “The purpose of this paper…” and then proceed to outline the various sections of the instructions.

How to Write the Body for DNP 801 Explain why research articles that fail to meet these criteria cannot be used to provide evidence for the DPI Project                         

After the introduction, move into the main part of the DNP 801 Explain why research articles that fail to meet these criteria cannot be used to provide evidence for the DPI Project assignment, which is the body. Given that the paper you will be writing is not experimental, the way you organize the headings and subheadings of your paper is critically important. In some cases, you might have to use more subheadings to properly organize the assignment. The organization will depend on the rubric provided. Carefully examine the rubric, as it will contain all the detailed requirements of the assignment. Sometimes, the rubric will have information that the normal instructions lack.

Another important factor to consider at this point is how to do citations. In-text citations are fundamental as they support the arguments and points you make in the paper. At this point, the resources gathered at the beginning will come in handy. Integrating the ideas of the authors with your own will ensure that you produce a comprehensive paper. Also, follow the given citation format. In most cases, APA 7 is the preferred format for nursing assignments.

How to Write the Conclusion for DNP 801 Explain why research articles that fail to meet these criteria cannot be used to provide evidence for the DPI Project                         

After completing the main sections, write the conclusion of your paper. The conclusion is a summary of the main points you made in your paper. However, you need to rewrite the points and not simply copy and paste them. By restating the points from each subheading, you will provide a nuanced overview of the assignment to the reader.

How to Format the References List for DNP 801 Explain why research articles that fail to meet these criteria cannot be used to provide evidence for the DPI Project                           

The very last part of your paper involves listing the sources used in your paper. These sources should be listed in alphabetical order and double-spaced. Additionally, use a hanging indent for each source that appears in this list. Lastly, only the sources cited within the body of the paper should appear here.

Stuck? Let Us Help You

Completing assignments can sometimes be overwhelming, especially with the multitude of academic and personal responsibilities you may have. If you find yourself stuck or unsure at any point in the process, don’t hesitate to reach out for professional assistance. Our assignment writing services are designed to help you achieve your academic goals with ease. 

Our team of experienced writers is well-versed in academic writing and familiar with the specific requirements of the DNP 801 Explain why research articles that fail to meet these criteria cannot be used to provide evidence for the DPI Project assignment. We can provide you with personalized support, ensuring your assignment is well-researched, properly formatted, and thoroughly edited. Get a feel of the quality we guarantee – ORDER NOW. 

Sample Answer for DNP 801 Explain why research articles that fail to meet these criteria cannot be used to provide evidence for the DPI Project

Re: Topic 3 DQ 1

The collection of facts that are true, through intense research is called evidence. Therefore, there are different levels of evidence in the form of a pyramid to determine the validity of any research from the lowest being the weakest to the highest being the most authentic. However, as much as there is a level of evidence, there is not one standardized way of interpreting evidence. The level of evidence also known as the hierarchy of evidence is used as a guide to the various types of research that could be performed and helps to place them in categories, so that if the research is conducted properly, the answers will be most reliable (Melnyk, & Fineout-Overholt, 2018).

The highest-ranking level of evidence is the quantitative research which is the systematic review of the randomized control trials (RCT). It gives the best answer for what caused a situation and the effect of the situation because it synthesizes several studies compared with the lower levels of evidence which is based on descriptive and case studies, expert opinions. It is the strongest research method that produces the same results from multiple studies to produce the same outcome results (Melnyk, & Fineout-Overholt, 2018).

The DPI project that I have chosen is about finding out what is causing the reoccurrence of stroke and how it can be prevented. In my facility, there are many patients who are readmitted for stroke reoccurrence. So, the first article is a prospective study that is attempting to discover the clinical and the neuro imaging aspects that may be contributing the reoccurrence of stroke in these patients after they had been treated and are on medications (Hervella, et al., 2021). They conducted a retrospective study with a large number of people and it is primary research because there was ongoing observation and participation by the researchers and the participants (GCU, 2022).

The second article is also primary research because it is a summary of the study data that was conducted by others (GCU, 2022). Though the method used was the RCT method that was taken from a multiple center randomized double blind controlled trial. The purpose of the article was to asses the effect of the medication aspirin to prevent the reoccurrence of stroke compared to the other medicine nicametate and to identify the cause of stroke recurrence (Wang, et al., 2021).

These articles demonstrate support for my DPI project to find what is causing stroke reoccurrence and what interventions that needs to be taken to prevent the stroke reoccurrence.

References:

Grand Canyon University (GCU), (2022). Levels of evidence in research. https://halo.gcu.edu/resource/50bda08b-ad2f-466b-b9af-18b5bf0aa44a?nestedResourceId=1f2faeb8-d0c0-48f8-9bfb-dae23486e673

Hervella, P., Pérez-Mato, M., Rodríguez-Yáñez, M., López-Dequidt, I., Pumar, J. M., Sobrino, T., Campos, F., Castillo, J., Da Silva-Candal, A., & Iglesias-Rey, R. (2021). STWEAK as predictor of stroke recurrence in ischemic stroke patients treated with Reperfusion therapies. Frontiers in Neurology, 12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2021.652867

Melnyk, B. M., & Fineout-Overholt, E. (2018). Evidence-based practice in nursing & healthcare: A guide to best practice. LWW.

Wang, T., Wu, T., Pan, S., Chen, H., & Chiu, S. Y. (2021). Impacts of treatments on recurrence and 28-year survival of ischemic stroke patients. Scientific Reports, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-94757-6

Sample Answer 2 for DNP 801 Explain why research articles that fail to meet these criteria cannot be used to provide evidence for the DPI Project

Evidence is key for a successful evidence-based implementation project such as the Direct Practice Improve (DPI) project. The different levels of evidence in research are based on the methodology of the study (Dang & Dearhold, 2018). For instance, level one includes randomized-controlled trials, systematic reviews, and meta-analyses while level two includes cohort studies. Such levels are important as they determine the grade and strength of the study (Dang & Dearhold, 2018). In addition to the levels of evidence, research can be divided into primary and secondary research. Primary research refers to studies that include active participation by the research, while secondary research are summaries or synthesis of data. Research articles that fail to meet the required level of evidence cannot be used as the lack of strength may lead to issues and ultimately lead to poor outcomes.

The DNP project that I would like to focus on revolves around the skill of inserting intravenous (IV) catheter skills and the confidence levels of nurses in an acute medical-surgical unit.

The first article by Ramer et al. (2016) qualifies as a primary research article because it utilized a randomized controlled trial to determine the effectiveness of using intravenous assistive devices (such as the VeinViewer) when inserting IV catheters. In the study, 53 patients were randomly assigned to either the standard methods group or the VeinViewer group. After each IV insertion, nurses filled out a questionnaire that evaluated their confidence level and competency assessment (Ramer et al., 2016).

The second article by Marsh et al. (2018) also qualifies as a primary research article because a randomized control trial was performed to determine which insertion method was more effective in eliminating complications (such as phlebitis and infiltration) while increasing dwell time, insertion attempts, and insertion success (March et al., 2018).

References:

Dang, D., & Dearholt, S.L. (2018). Johns Hopkins nursing evidence-based practice : Model & guidelines (3rd ed). Sigma Theta Tau International

Marsh, N., Webster, J., Larsen, E., Genzel, J., Cooke, M., Mihala, G., Cadigan, S., & Rickard, C. (2018). Expert versus generalist inserters for peripheral intravenous catheter insertion: a pilot randomised controlled trial. Trials,

19(1), 1–10. https://doiorg.lopes.idm.oclc.org/10.1186/s13063-018-2946-3

Ramer, L., Hunt, P., Ortega, E., Knowlton, J., Briggs, R., & Hirokawa, S. (2016). Effect of intravenous (IV) assistive device (VeinViewer) on IV access attempts, procedural time, and patient and nurse satisfaction. Journal of Pediatric Oncology Nursing, 33(4), 273–281. https://doi.org/10.1177/1043454215600425

DNP 801 Topic 3 DQ 2 Sample Answer

Part of academic integrity is giving proper credit to another writer’s research or work, this is accomplished through proper citation and referencing (Dawe et al., 2021). Paraphrasing or summarizing an author’s content helps the writer to synthesize material and form. Scholarly writing can be challenging in nature, especially as students begin a graduate-level program. Through paraphrasing, articles are read and analyzed. A robust and cohesive argument can be made when scholarly articles are compiled together (Badenhorst, 2018). In doing so, the writer’s discussion has a solid base of previous scientific support and can pose new information. 

Citations are used in the body of the text. Citations provide credit to the original source and author for thoughts, context, and ideas (Gudi, 2021). Proper citing is a method to communicate amongst other scholars (Gullbekk & Byström, 2019). Accurate citing is necessary to avoid potential plagiarism (Badenhorst, 2018). Additionally, citations provide the readers with the context from which ideas were synthesized and conceptualized. References are used at the end of the text so readers can find the original source. A vigorous literature review can include the reference list at the end of scholarly articles. Researchers can use the reference list to branch or diversify their initial literature review and expand the scope of their search. 

 LopesWrite is a resource available from Grand Canyon University. By submitting assignments with more than 500 words, it ensures academic integrity is being met and helps to prevent plagiarism. It is a useful screening tool that could identify possible issues prior to the assignment submission. Plagiarism is a sign of academic dishonesty. By using LopesWrite, students can proactively ensure plagiarism is not present in their assignments.  

A critical illness adds stress not only to the patient but also to family members. White et al. (2018) examined if a family support intervention would reduce stress on families associated with a critical care hospitalization. A PARTNER (Pairing Re-engineered ICU Teams with Nurse-Driven Emotional Support) was utilized as the communication liaison and offered family support. This intervention improved the quality-of-care rating and patient/family-centered care perception and decreased the length of ICU and hospital stay. 

References 

Badenhorst, C. (2018). Citation practices of postgraduate students writing literature reviews. London Review of Education, 16(1), 121–135. https://doi-org.lopes.idm.oclc.org/10.18546/LRE.16.1.11 

Dawe, L., Stevens, J., Hoffman, B., & Quilty, M. (2021). Citation and Referencing Support at an Academic Library: Exploring Student and Faculty Perspectives on Authority and Effectiveness. College & Research Libraries, 82(7), 991–1003. https://doi-org.lopes.idm.oclc.org/10.5860/crl.82.7.991 

Gudi, S. K. (2021). References and citations: Are we doing it right? Retrieved on March 5th, 2021 from https://ecrcommunity.plos.org/2021/07/02/references-and-citations-are-we-doing-it-right/ 

Gullbekk, E., & Byström, K. (2019). Becoming a scholar by publication – PhD students citing in interdisciplinary argumentation. Journal of Documentation, 75(2), 247–269. https://doi-org.lopes.idm.oclc.org/10.1108/JD-06-2018-0101