DNP 801 Reflect on your different experiences in this course, from learning new tools to having to think critically to learning how to accept feedback
Grand Canyon University DNP 801 Reflect on your different experiences in this course, from learning new tools to having to think critically to learning how to accept feedback-Step-By-Step Guide
This guide will demonstrate how to complete the Grand Canyon University DNP 801 Reflect on your different experiences in this course, from learning new tools to having to think critically to learning how to accept feedback assignment based on general principles of academic writing. Here, we will show you the A, B, Cs of completing an academic paper, irrespective of the instructions. After guiding you through what to do, the guide will leave one or two sample essays at the end to highlight the various sections discussed below.
How to Research and Prepare for DNP 801 Reflect on your different experiences in this course, from learning new tools to having to think critically to learning how to accept feedback
Whether one passes or fails an academic assignment such as the Grand Canyon University DNP 801 Reflect on your different experiences in this course, from learning new tools to having to think critically to learning how to accept feedback depends on the preparation done beforehand. The first thing to do once you receive an assignment is to quickly skim through the requirements. Once that is done, start going through the instructions one by one to clearly understand what the instructor wants. The most important thing here is to understand the required format—whether it is APA, MLA, Chicago, etc.
After understanding the requirements of the paper, the next phase is to gather relevant materials. The first place to start the research process is the weekly resources. Go through the resources provided in the instructions to determine which ones fit the assignment. After reviewing the provided resources, use the university library to search for additional resources. After gathering sufficient and necessary resources, you are now ready to start drafting your paper.
How to Write the Introduction for DNP 801 Reflect on your different experiences in this course, from learning new tools to having to think critically to learning how to accept feedback
The introduction for the Grand Canyon University DNP 801 Reflect on your different experiences in this course, from learning new tools to having to think critically to learning how to accept feedback is where you tell the instructor what your paper will encompass. In three to four statements, highlight the important points that will form the basis of your paper. Here, you can include statistics to show the importance of the topic you will be discussing. At the end of the introduction, write a clear purpose statement outlining what exactly will be contained in the paper. This statement will start with “The purpose of this paper…” and then proceed to outline the various sections of the instructions.
Need a high-quality paper urgently?
We can deliver within hours.
How to Write the Body for DNP 801 Reflect on your different experiences in this course, from learning new tools to having to think critically to learning how to accept feedback
After the introduction, move into the main part of the DNP 801 Reflect on your different experiences in this course, from learning new tools to having to think critically to learning how to accept feedback assignment, which is the body. Given that the paper you will be writing is not experimental, the way you organize the headings and subheadings of your paper is critically important. In some cases, you might have to use more subheadings to properly organize the assignment. The organization will depend on the rubric provided. Carefully examine the rubric, as it will contain all the detailed requirements of the assignment. Sometimes, the rubric will have information that the normal instructions lack.
Another important factor to consider at this point is how to do citations. In-text citations are fundamental as they support the arguments and points you make in the paper. At this point, the resources gathered at the beginning will come in handy. Integrating the ideas of the authors with your own will ensure that you produce a comprehensive paper. Also, follow the given citation format. In most cases, APA 7 is the preferred format for nursing assignments.
How to Write the Conclusion for DNP 801 Reflect on your different experiences in this course, from learning new tools to having to think critically to learning how to accept feedback
After completing the main sections, write the conclusion of your paper. The conclusion is a summary of the main points you made in your paper. However, you need to rewrite the points and not simply copy and paste them. By restating the points from each subheading, you will provide a nuanced overview of the assignment to the reader.
How to Format the References List for DNP 801 Reflect on your different experiences in this course, from learning new tools to having to think critically to learning how to accept feedback
The very last part of your paper involves listing the sources used in your paper. These sources should be listed in alphabetical order and double-spaced. Additionally, use a hanging indent for each source that appears in this list. Lastly, only the sources cited within the body of the paper should appear here.
Stuck? Let Us Help You
Completing assignments can sometimes be overwhelming, especially with the multitude of academic and personal responsibilities you may have. If you find yourself stuck or unsure at any point in the process, don’t hesitate to reach out for professional assistance. Our assignment writing services are designed to help you achieve your academic goals with ease.
Our team of experienced writers is well-versed in academic writing and familiar with the specific requirements of the DNP 801 Reflect on your different experiences in this course, from learning new tools to having to think critically to learning how to accept feedback assignment. We can provide you with personalized support, ensuring your assignment is well-researched, properly formatted, and thoroughly edited. Get a feel of the quality we guarantee – ORDER NOW.
Sample Answer for DNP 801 Reflect on your different experiences in this course, from learning new tools to having to think critically to learning how to accept feedback
Re: Topic 8 DQ 1
Reflect on your different experiences in this course, from learning new tools to having to think critically to learning how to accept feedback. Discuss which aspects were most challenging and most rewarding. Based on your experience, what doctoral strategies helped you navigate these new experiences successfully (or could help you in the future)? How could you use these strategies as a leader at a local level or within the broader health care system to advocate for change?
Reflecting on my experience with this course is the fact that it appears that I have taken on too much in my plate. I am finishing up my school nursing certificate when I joined this program. I feel that I have wasted enough time in my life so that I need to start and just do it especially knowing that I am only taking one class at a time. Life and other things get in the way. I entered this program because it has always been my desire to reach the pinnacle of learning and knowledge of any career that I choose, not for title but for knowledge. It may not have been as stressful if I did not have life to contend with such as personal life, family life, spiritual life and work life.
One of the greatest challenges I have and still have with this course, is the challenge of understanding the navigations with technology. Go there, go here, click on this, click on that. I understand things but I learn slow, life is so fast paced and apparently learning that if you do not get it quickly, you are left behind so you are continuously struggling to catch up. I find that that has happened to me with learning computer technology. With this program, I believe that it was quite confusing and still is, the various information and sites that we had to click into and navigate to get to information and because of the pressure of lack of time and the due dates coupled with our other life plans, and our fear of starting something new, it made it difficult to understand. I hope that I will understand it better as I settle into this program. If and when I pass this class.
My second challenge with this course is the instructions given. No offense to Dr. Etheridge because it is not her fault, but the faculty that has set this program. The instructions are quite voluminous and not so easy to understand and there are several places you have to go to get information. Maybe that is the way it works with other school’s programs. I do not know, but must it be so confusing. I know that I wanted to drop out that first week and many of my classmates too, but we kept at it with a lot of stress. I wish that the faculty would make the instructions a little simpler especially since this is the first class. I was talking to a friend and she said that this is why she prefers in person classes. It appears that online students are inundated with so much information that we have to figure out for ourselves. Though, I tried to reach out to Dr. Etheridge and she explained them, thank you but because of my lack of time, I did not always reach out to her on time and I felt self-conscious to keep asking her questions which is the problem that students have. We do not want to keep asking for clarification because it makes us look, one stupid and two, we feel like we are bothering the professor.
My third challenge that is based on technology is my difficulty with finding articles especially recent articles. I could not find recent articles within the five years limit. Most times, when I find the best article, it is several years old. I was so frustrated one time that I finally called the Librarian and the young man that helped me also had difficulty finding recent articles on the topic I was using. The librarian taught me one or two things on how to find articles and I have used it but it does not always work but I need more training, to learn the proper skills needed on how to find articles. I don’t even mind paying for the training but the other issue is my lack of time. I cannot add another stressor to my plate at this time in my life.
All the new navigation tools that I have learned have been helpful but I need to understand how to maneuver them well. I am still learning how to think critically in terms of research and the DPI projects. How to pick the right topic that does not involve starting new research and how to pick the right question, learning PICOT-D is new to me. Also, finding the literature and learning to differentiate the levels of evidence of different articles is great but I still need to understand it better. This doctoral learning process is profitable because no knowledge is a waste. It will help me in future as a leader at a local level to be able to identify issues and work on finding evidence-based solutions for them and when they are implemented at a local level and it works, then it can be advocated for a broader level of change. As a student, knowing and understanding the seven steps for EBP- cultivation of a spirit of enquiry, asking questions, acquiring information, appraising the information, applying the knowledge and assessing the implementation of the knowledge will improve my ability to find solutions to issues in the health care profession. This requires a positive attitude, skills of research and support from health professionals and the organization (Mena-Tudela, González-Chordá, Cervera-Gasch, Maciá-Soler, & Orts-Cortés, 2018).
Also, as a doctoral student, it will be great to master the concepts that are specific to the research for one to be an independent researcher or nurse scientist. If these concepts are not mastered, the student may be ‘stuck’ in the learning process journey which would place the student in a state of liminality, a transition space of uncertainty. Therefore, there is a need for educational policies that support strategies with time to develop student writing, community building for the students and cultivates faculty-student relationships (Tyndall, Firnhaber, & Kistler, 2021).
References:
Mena-Tudela, D., González-Chordá, V. M., Cervera-Gasch, A., Maciá-Soler, M. L., & Orts-Cortés, M. I. (2018). Effectiveness of an evidence-based practice educational intervention with second-year nursing students. Revista Latino-Americana de Enfermagem, 26(0). https://doi.org/10.1590/1518-8345.2502.3026
Tyndall, D. E., Firnhaber, G. C., & Kistler, K. B. (2021). An integrative review of threshold concepts in doctoral education: Implications for PhD nursing programs. Nurse Education Today, 99, 104786. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2021.104786
Sample Answer 2 for DNP 801 Reflect on your different experiences in this course, from learning new tools to having to think critically to learning how to accept feedback
My most challenging aspect in this course was that of searching for literature. Literature forms an integral component of all evidence-based projects by; helping a researcher and the audience to comprehend the complexity surrounding a clinical issue, providing insights on the scope of a clinical issue, and the best, most recent, evidence-based intervention strategies for the issue (Bramer et al., 2018). Without proper literature, a learner’s evidence-based practice project cannot progress. However, since there is a lot of published literature in this digital age, it calls for good skills to search for the most relevant literature to a clinical issue. If not done in a stepwise approach, the process can be tiring, time consuming, and easily result in disinterest or abandonment of the search. When a learner successfully accomplishes the step on literature search, the step on analysis and integration is easy.
The most rewarding aspect was learning how to formulate clinical questions using the PICOT-D tool. According to Eriksen & Frandsen (2018), allowing nurses to formulate interventions based on the clinical issues they identify from their areas of practice provides a good foundation for evidence-based practice they can relate with. Another rewarding aspect was learning more about plagiarism, referencing, and citation that purpose to acknowledge one’s dependence on another researcher’s work and to differentiate it from that of sources used by a researcher (Kumar, 2021).
The doctoral strategy that helped navigate this experience was obtaining knowledge on how to conduct a successful literature search; developing the PICOT clinical question, identifying databases and criteria to search for literature, conducting the search, selecting relevant articles, and organizing the findings in a literature evaluation table. Advocating for change is one of the roles of nurse leaders in practice and encompasses processes such as identifying an issue to address, developing goals, and strategies to address the issue (Eriksen & Frandsen, 2018). I will utilize the knowledge obtained in this course in such instances to search for literature for potential evidence-based solutions to address issues at community and population level for health promotion and disease prevention.
References
Bramer, W. M., de Jonge, G. B., Rethlefsen, M. L., Mast, F., & Kleijnen, J. (2018). A systematic approach to searching: an efficient and complete method to develop literature searches. Journal of the Medical Library Association: JMLA, 106(4), 531.
Eriksen, M. B., & Frandsen, T. F. (2018). The impact of patient, intervention, comparison, outcome (PICO) as a search strategy tool on literature search quality: a systematic review. Journal of the Medical Library Association: JMLA, 106(4), 420. https://dx.doi.org/10.5195%2Fjmla.2018.345
Kumar, A. (2021). Plagiarism: Injurious to the academic health of the researcher and research!(Part-II). Journal of Indian Society of Periodontology, 25(3), 183. https://dx.doi.org/10.4103%2Fjisp.jisp_183_21
DNP 801 TOPIC 8 DQ 2 Sample Answer
Before I started my proposed DPI project there are a lot of ideas I have in mind that I can think of to use. I am so happy that the one I chose to do is feasible enough for my PICOT-D project. I was able to discuss my proposed DPI project first with my mentor and seek for her advice if this will be a better project that I should be concentrating and she agreed with me. At first, I wanted to concentrate on mortality rate of sepsis and septic shock and when I first placed it in my PICOT-D Dr. Etheridge suggested that it will be difficult to just concentrate with it and I agree with her feedback.Per Dr. Etheridge feedback it is important that I have correct data and I should include statistics to show. My proposed project is implementing sepsis bundle for early identification for severe sepsis and septic shock. Sepsis is a huge problem in our organization and we don’t have any protocol to follow and guide us when it comes to Sepsis. It is important to identify septic patients in ICU and optimal treatment should be performed immediately. The goal of my proposed project is better outcome and bundle compliance of patients with severe sepsis and septic shock. Early detection and early management in sepsis patients will improve and compliance should be included,
If my proposed DPI project is not feasible I would suggest if patient flow from ED to their respective unit will be acceptable. Delays in patient flow and a shortage of bed are common in a hospital. Improving patient flow in any organization is important for patient outcome and patient satisfaction. Crowding can negatively affect patient and staff performance and this leads to problems. Patient flow is a problem in our facility and I am a part of the patient flow committee and I see it everyday. I am very passion in making sure that patient needs to be boarded as soon as bed is available for patient comfort and for staff role as well. To improve patient flow it includes removing unnecessary testings, duplicate orders and identifying what the problem really is, I think that this will be a good project too if I will not be able to do my first proposed project.
References:
Levy, M. M., Rhodes, A., Phillips, G. S., Townsend, S. R., Schorr, C .A. Surviving sepsis campaign: Assocition between performance metrics and outcomes in a 7.5year study. Intensive Care Med. 2014; 40:1623-1633. doe: 10.1007/s00134-014-3496-0.
Rojas-Garcia, A., Turner, S., Pizzo, E., Hudson, E., Thomas, J., Raine, R.; Impact and experience of delayed pdischarge: A mixed studies systematic review; Health Expect, vol. 21, no. 1, pp41-56; 2018.