DNP 810 Case Study: Part 3 Huntington’s Disease
Grand Canyon University DNP 810 Case Study: Part 3 Huntington’s Disease– Step-By-Step Guide
This guide will demonstrate how to complete the Grand Canyon University DNP 810 Case Study: Part 3 Huntington’s Disease assignment based on general principles of academic writing. Here, we will show you the A, B, Cs of completing an academic paper, irrespective of the instructions. After guiding you through what to do, the guide will leave one or two sample essays at the end to highlight the various sections discussed below.
How to Research and Prepare for DNP 810 Case Study: Part 3 Huntington’s Disease
Whether one passes or fails an academic assignment such as the Grand Canyon University NUR 550 Benchmark – Evidence-Based Practice Project: Literature Review depends on the preparation done beforehand. The first thing to do once you receive an assignment is to quickly skim through the requirements. Once that is done, start going through the instructions one by one to clearly understand what the instructor wants. The most important thing here is to understand the required format—whether it is APA, MLA, Chicago, etc.
After understanding the requirements of the paper, the next phase is to gather relevant materials. The first place to start the research process is the weekly resources. Go through the resources provided in the instructions to determine which ones fit the assignment. After reviewing the provided resources, use the university library to search for additional resources. After gathering sufficient and necessary resources, you are now ready to start drafting your paper.
How to Write the Introduction for DNP 810 Case Study: Part 3 Huntington’s Disease
The introduction for the Grand Canyon University DNP 810 Case Study: Part 3 Huntington’s Disease is where you tell the instructor what your paper will encompass. In three to four statements, highlight the important points that will form the basis of your paper. Here, you can include statistics to show the importance of the topic you will be discussing. At the end of the introduction, write a clear purpose statement outlining what exactly will be contained in the paper. This statement will start with “The purpose of this paper…” and then proceed to outline the various sections of the instructions.
Need a high-quality paper urgently?
We can deliver within hours.
How to Write the Body for DNP 810 Case Study: Part 3 Huntington’s Disease
After the introduction, move into the main part of the DNP 810 Case Study: Part 3 Huntington’s Disease assignment, which is the body. Given that the paper you will be writing is not experimental, the way you organize the headings and subheadings of your paper is critically important. In some cases, you might have to use more subheadings to properly organize the assignment. The organization will depend on the rubric provided. Carefully examine the rubric, as it will contain all the detailed requirements of the assignment. Sometimes, the rubric will have information that the normal instructions lack.
Another important factor to consider at this point is how to do citations. In-text citations are fundamental as they support the arguments and points you make in the paper. At this point, the resources gathered at the beginning will come in handy. Integrating the ideas of the authors with your own will ensure that you produce a comprehensive paper. Also, follow the given citation format. In most cases, APA 7 is the preferred format for nursing assignments.
How to Write the Conclusion for DNP 810 Case Study: Part 3 Huntington’s Disease
After completing the main sections, write the conclusion of your paper. The conclusion is a summary of the main points you made in your paper. However, you need to rewrite the points and not simply copy and paste them. By restating the points from each subheading, you will provide a nuanced overview of the assignment to the reader.
How to Format the References List for DNP 810 Case Study: Part 3 Huntington’s Disease
The very last part of your paper involves listing the sources used in your paper. These sources should be listed in alphabetical order and double-spaced. Additionally, use a hanging indent for each source that appears in this list. Lastly, only the sources cited within the body of the paper should appear here.
Stuck? Let Us Help You
Completing assignments can sometimes be overwhelming, especially with the multitude of academic and personal responsibilities you may have. If you find yourself stuck or unsure at any point in the process, don’t hesitate to reach out for professional assistance. Our assignment writing services are designed to help you achieve your academic goals with ease.
Our team of experienced writers is well-versed in academic writing and familiar with the specific requirements of the DNP 810 Case Study: Part 3 Huntington’s Disease assignment. We can provide you with personalized support, ensuring your assignment is well-researched, properly formatted, and thoroughly edited. Get a feel of the quality we guarantee – ORDER NOW.
Sample Answer for DNP 810 Case Study: Part 3 Huntington’s Disease
Most diseases have a genetic component, including common chronic diseases like heart disease, cancer, and diabetes. Various genetic and environmental factors influence these conditions. Huntington’s disease (HD) is a genetic disorder passed on as an autosomal dominant trait during conception. HD manifests as a movement disorder characterized by neurologic and behavioral clinical manifestations that usually become apparent from 30 to 50 years and worsen in the next one to two decades of a person’s life (McColgan & Tabrizi, 2018). The purpose of this paper is to discuss the influence of genetics on policy, nutritional influences in HD, and the nutritional assessment and counseling process.
How Genetics Can Influence Policy Issues
The genetic composition of a single disease and a person’s genetic makeup guide clinical decision-making. We are currently in a period where specific genetic knowledge has become crucial to effective health care delivery. When no therapies are available, genetic tests are used to prevent an affected child’s conception or birth (Chapman et al., 2020). However, genetic tests have led to various policy issues and advocacies on the need for policies to regulate genetic testing. The current genetic policies do not guarantee that adequate data on the predictability of genetic tests will be obtained before they get into clinical practice (Ruhl et al., 2020). They do not also assure that high laboratory quality will be maintained once tests are utilized clinically, and that genetic test results will benefit individuals who are tested.
Genetic tests have been associated with adverse social consequences like discrimination and breaches of confidentiality, which are barriers to testing. This has influenced the development of policies to minimize these consequences to promote a wide acceptance of genetic tests. Besides, there has been a demand for the enactment of government policies to promote the safe and effective implementation of genetic tests (Ruhl et al., 2020). Furthermore, genetics has influenced policy with laws being developed requiring laboratories conducting genetic tests to have special quality assurance procedures. The US Task Force on Genetic Testing advocates for a policy that requires health organizations to invent new genetic tests to present to institutional review boards, protocols for determining the clinical validity, including sensitivity and positive predictive value, and utility of the test (Chapman et al., 2020). Genetic testing has also led to policies issues on the need to have healthcare providers being mandated to provide quality pretest and post-test education and counseling to patients
Nutritional Influences For Huntington’s disease
HD is an autosomal dominant hereditary disorder, and no nutritional causes have been identified as causes of the disease. Nonetheless, patients with HD develop motor, cognitive, psychiatric, and communication problems, necessitating consideration of nutritional factors. Christodoulou et al. (2020) explain that micronutrients like vitamin C, D, and E, are vital elements usually needed in small amounts. They are essential in maintaining physiological function, promoting good health, and the growth and development of a person. Studies have established the importance of micronutrients like vitamin C, vitamin E, flavonoids, and carotenoids as exogenous antioxidants that can eliminate free radicals that cause neurodegeneration.
Macronutrients, including carbohydrates, proteins, and fats, are essential for maintaining normal human body functions, including neuronal health. For instance, fatty acids curb the risk of developing cognitive impairment and dementia. Studies have shown the positive impact of the Mediterranean Diet (MD) on neurodegenerative disorders (Christodoulou et al., 2020). Persons who adhere to the diet have a lower incidence of dementia and Alzheimer’s since MD has beneficial effects in decreasing cognitive decline. Poor nutrition significantly affects functioning in patients with neurological conditions (Christodoulou et al., 2020). Thus, it is crucial to ensure optimal nutrition in patients with HD so that these difficulties are not worsened by poor diet.
ALSO READ:
DNP 810 Case Study – Cumulative: Part 4
DNP 810 10 Strategic Points Document for a Quality Improvement Project
DNP 810 Health Issues for the Aging
DNP 810 Professionalism and Social Media
DNP 810 Emerging Areas of Human Health Syllabus
Nutritional assessment is a vital initial step in enhancing and maintaining nutritional status. It helps identify medical complications affecting the nutritional status and monitor individuals’ growth and weight trends. Besides, it is used to identify dietary habits that hinder improving health or increase the risk of disease and informs nutrition education and counseling (Ferrie, 2020). On the other hand, nutrition counseling is a participative process between a patient and a counselor that utilizes findings from the nutrition assessments to prioritize interventions to enhance nutritional status (Ferrie, 2020). Nutritional counseling helps to establish patient preferences, barriers to behavior change, and probable interventions to overcome the barriers.
The first step in nutritional assessment is interviewing the patient and examining pertinent medical records, diagnostic tests, and patient surveys. This helps to establish whether the patient has a dietary problem, and interpreting the data helps develop a nutritional diagnosis. This step should be thorough to prevent the whole process from breaking down and the patient from failing to obtain the desired results (Ferrie, 2020). The next step is formulating a nutritional diagnosis, which defines the problems that the nutritional counselor has identified in the assessment stage. The diagnosis is used to determine the appropriate course of action, including nutritional supplements and dietary interventions to recommend as well as exercise programs.
The third step is nutrition intervention, which involves the nutritional counselor providing recommendations and interventions to address each patient’s unique nutritional problems. This is the action phase whereby the patient and counselor execute the care plan and has four basic steps: Food and lifestyle recommendations, nutritional education, nutritional counseling, and coordination of nutritional care (Ferrie, 2020). The last stage is the monitoring and evaluation phase, whereby the counselor monitors the client’s progress and adjusts interventions per health changes. The counselor reviews the effective nutrition interventions and those that need retooling.
Prevalence Rates, Testing, Treatment, and Prognosis As They Relate To Human Nutrition
Obesity is a major concern related to human nutrition. It occurs when there is an imbalance between energy expenditure and energy intake due to a sedentary lifestyle and excessive calorie intake. CDC statistics show that the US had an obesity prevalence rate of 41.9% from 2017 to March 2020, a significant increase from 30.5%. The highest prevalence was among non-Hispanic Blacks (49.9%), seconded by Hispanics (45.6%), non-Hispanic whites (41.4%), and non-Hispanic Asians (16.1%) (Stierman et al., 2021). The testing measures for obesity include the body mass index (BMI), which compares weight against height. Obesity treatment includes lifestyle modification and bariatric surgery for persons with comorbidities. Lifestyle modification includes dietary changes and increasing physical exercise (Wharton et al., 2020). Obesity has a poor prognosis in individuals with comorbid chronic illnesses. It increases the cardiovascular mortality rate by 4-fold and the cancer mortality rate by 2-fold.
Conclusion
Genetic tests are increasingly being developed and conducted on individuals to prevent future diseases, which has led to the need for policies to regulate genetic testing. There is a demand for policies that require quality tests, confidentiality, and patient education. Poor nutrition impacts HD patients significantly due to physical and cognition difficulties. The \process of nutrition assessment and counseling involves assessment (interviewing and diagnostic tests), diagnosis, nutrition intervention, and monitoring and evaluation.
References
Chapman, C. R., Mehta, K. S., Parent, B., & Caplan, A. L. (2020). Genetic discrimination: emerging ethical challenges in the context of advancing technology. Journal of Law and the Biosciences, 7(1), lsz016. https://doi.org/10.1093/jlb/lsz016
Christodoulou, C. C., Demetriou, C. A., & Zamba-Papanicolaou, E. (2020). Dietary Intake, Mediterranean Diet Adherence and Caloric Intake in Huntington’s Disease: A Review. Nutrients, 12(10), 2946. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu12102946
Ferrie, S. (2020). What is nutritional assessment? A quick guide for critical care clinicians. Australian critical care: official journal of the Confederation of Australian Critical Care Nurses, 33(3), 295–299. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aucc.2020.02.005
McColgan, P., & Tabrizi, S. J. (2018). Huntington’s disease: a clinical review. European journal of neurology, 25(1), 24–34. https://doi.org/10.1111/ene.13413
Ruhl, G. L., Hazel, J. W., Clayton, E. W., & Malin, B. A. (2020). Public Attitudes Toward Direct to Consumer Genetic Testing. AMIA … Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium, 2019, 774–783.
Stierman, B., Afful, J., Carroll, M. D., Chen, T. C., Davy, O., Fink, S., … & Akinbami, L. J. (2021). National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2017–March 2020 Prepandemic Data Files Development of Files and Prevalence Estimates for Selected Health Outcomes.
Wharton, S., Lau, D. C., Vallis, M., Sharma, A. M., Biertho, L., Campbell-Scherer, D., … & Wicklum, S. (2020). Obesity in adults: a clinical practice guideline. Cmaj, 192(31), E875-E891.https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.191707