DNP 815 Discuss the differences in approach based on inductive versus deductive reasoning

Grand Canyon University DNP 815 Discuss the differences in approach based on inductive versus deductive reasoning-Step-By-Step Guide

This guide will demonstrate how to complete the Grand Canyon University DNP 815 Discuss the differences in approach based on inductive versus deductive reasoning assignment based on general principles of academic writing. Here, we will show you the A, B, Cs of completing an academic paper, irrespective of the instructions. After guiding you through what to do, the guide will leave one or two sample essays at the end to highlight the various sections discussed below.

How to Research and Prepare for DNP 815 Discuss the differences in approach based on inductive versus deductive reasoning                           

Whether one passes or fails an academic assignment such as the Grand Canyon University DNP 815 Discuss the differences in approach based on inductive versus deductive reasoning depends on the preparation done beforehand. The first thing to do once you receive an assignment is to quickly skim through the requirements. Once that is done, start going through the instructions one by one to clearly understand what the instructor wants. The most important thing here is to understand the required format—whether it is APA, MLA, Chicago, etc.

After understanding the requirements of the paper, the next phase is to gather relevant materials. The first place to start the research process is the weekly resources. Go through the resources provided in the instructions to determine which ones fit the assignment. After reviewing the provided resources, use the university library to search for additional resources. After gathering sufficient and necessary resources, you are now ready to start drafting your paper.

How to Write the Introduction for DNP 815 Discuss the differences in approach based on inductive versus deductive reasoning                         

The introduction for the Grand Canyon University DNP 815 Discuss the differences in approach based on inductive versus deductive reasoning is where you tell the instructor what your paper will encompass. In three to four statements, highlight the important points that will form the basis of your paper. Here, you can include statistics to show the importance of the topic you will be discussing. At the end of the introduction, write a clear purpose statement outlining what exactly will be contained in the paper. This statement will start with “The purpose of this paper…” and then proceed to outline the various sections of the instructions.

How to Write the Body for DNP 815 Discuss the differences in approach based on inductive versus deductive reasoning                         

After the introduction, move into the main part of the DNP 815 Discuss the differences in approach based on inductive versus deductive reasoning assignment, which is the body. Given that the paper you will be writing is not experimental, the way you organize the headings and subheadings of your paper is critically important. In some cases, you might have to use more subheadings to properly organize the assignment. The organization will depend on the rubric provided. Carefully examine the rubric, as it will contain all the detailed requirements of the assignment. Sometimes, the rubric will have information that the normal instructions lack.

Another important factor to consider at this point is how to do citations. In-text citations are fundamental as they support the arguments and points you make in the paper. At this point, the resources gathered at the beginning will come in handy. Integrating the ideas of the authors with your own will ensure that you produce a comprehensive paper. Also, follow the given citation format. In most cases, APA 7 is the preferred format for nursing assignments.

How to Write the Conclusion for DNP 815 Discuss the differences in approach based on inductive versus deductive reasoning                         

After completing the main sections, write the conclusion of your paper. The conclusion is a summary of the main points you made in your paper. However, you need to rewrite the points and not simply copy and paste them. By restating the points from each subheading, you will provide a nuanced overview of the assignment to the reader.

How to Format the References List for DNP 815 Discuss the differences in approach based on inductive versus deductive reasoning                           

The very last part of your paper involves listing the sources used in your paper. These sources should be listed in alphabetical order and double-spaced. Additionally, use a hanging indent for each source that appears in this list. Lastly, only the sources cited within the body of the paper should appear here.

Stuck? Let Us Help You

Completing assignments can sometimes be overwhelming, especially with the multitude of academic and personal responsibilities you may have. If you find yourself stuck or unsure at any point in the process, don’t hesitate to reach out for professional assistance. Our assignment writing services are designed to help you achieve your academic goals with ease. 

Our team of experienced writers is well-versed in academic writing and familiar with the specific requirements of the DNP 815 Discuss the differences in approach based on inductive versus deductive reasoning assignment. We can provide you with personalized support, ensuring your assignment is well-researched, properly formatted, and thoroughly edited. Get a feel of the quality we guarantee – ORDER NOW. 

Sample Answer for DNP 815 Discuss the differences in approach based on inductive versus deductive reasoning

Re: Topic 2 DQ 1

The reasoning is categorized into two types which are inductive or forward and deductive or backward wherein each has different features and plays different roles in providing solutions to complex problems. The inductive reasoning process is that individual facts are observed first before making a conclusion on a principle, however, the deductive reasoning process is solving given problems based on consideration of general principles and knowledge of a solid foundation. In order to achieve the major goal, inductive reasoning or means-ends analysis is considered a data-driven approach and more useful in finding a solution quickly, whereas deductive reasoning or moving backward gradually gets rids of things that are not necessary and spends more time deleting wrong answers or inferences to look for the root causes of a problem (Shin, 2019).

Middle-range theories serve as frameworks for evidence-based projects and research studies in guiding the interpretation and application of the findings where it illuminates research and structure knowledge to build nursing science and nursing practice (Valentine & Sekula, 2020). PICOT is one way to streamline the process of research literature and by using it as a format, it focuses the search for evidence. Concentrating on evidence of effective interventions is a good way of improving clinical judgment and prevents one’s practice of falling into traditional care without any advancements (Black, 2019).

The concepts of inductive and deductive reasoning in clinical reasoning apply to gathering appropriate information and making a clinical diagnosis by providing scientific evidence on the outcomes of good quality nursing care.

References

Black, B, P. (2019). The science of nursing and evidence-based practice. Professional Nursing E-Book: Concepts and Challenges, 217.

Professional Nursing E-Book – Google Books

Shin, H.S. (2019). Reasoning processes in clinical reasoning: from the perspective of cognitive psychology. Korean Journal of Medical Education, 31 (4), 299-308.

https://doi.org/10.3946/kjme.2019.140

Valentine, J.L., Sekula, K., Lynch (2020) Evolution of forensic theory- introduction of the constructed theory of forensic nursing care: A Middle-Range Theory. Journal of Forensic Nursing

Valentine_May2020_Evolution_of_Forensic_Nursing_Theory.pdf (researchgate.net)

Sample Answer 2 for DNP 815 Discuss the differences in approach based on inductive versus deductive reasoning

Inductive reasoning, as said by Streefkerk in 2022, is the act of developing an idea or theory and works by making specific observations and then moving toward broad speculation or generalizations (Streefkerk, 2022). This goes with watching and compiling research on observations found in the field. As said by Hayes et al. in 2018, induction is assessing and inferring the plausibility of an outcome based on an action (Hayes et al., 2018).

Deductive reasoning, as said by Streefkerk in 2022, is where a theory or idea is tested. This ideology goes from making broad speculation or generalizations to specific observations (Streefkerk, 2022). This is where an idea is tested and an outcome is determined. As said by Hayes et al. in 2018, deductive reasoning is the opposite of induction in which an inference is tested and then observed (Hayes et al., 2018).

The main difference between the two is that one implies just research and knowledge whereas one requires research, knowledge, and action.

When it comes to my project, deductive reasoning is more the process of the project versus inductive. The project focuses on implementing a standardized approach toward giving patient handoff and then observing the outcomes. The goal is to determine if the standardized handoff is a better approach than the current practice in order to improve client care and safety. I am still figuring out all of the kinks in my project, but this is the gist, which falls under deductive reasoning.

References

Hayes, B. K., Stephens, R. G., Ngo, J., & Dunn, J. C. (2018). The dimensionality of reasoning: Inductive and deductive inference can be explained by a single process. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 44(9), 1333–1351. https://doi-org.lopes.idm.oclc.org/10.1037/xlm0000527.supp (Supplemental)

Streefkerk, R. (2022). Inductive vs. deductive reasoning. Scribbr. Retrieved July 16, 2022, from https://www.scribbr.com/methodology/inductive-deductivereasoning/#:~:text=The%20main%20difference%20between%20inductive,reasoning%20the%20other%20way%20around. 

DNP 815 Topic 2 DQ 2 Sample Answer

Kurt Lewin defined a change theory in the 1940’s. Lewin’s model for change includes three steps (1) unfreezing, (2) moving, and (3) refreezing. Lewin’s concept of change is focused on change as a dynamic force in opposing directions (Butts & Rich, 2018). The first stage of the change theory is unfreezing in which a person develops a method to assist in changing and redirecting an old process. This step may be challenging as individual resistance and conformity is difficult to attain. The second stage is change in which is a moving process that involves one’s feelings, behaviors, and thoughts. Lastly, the third stage is refreezing in which this change is now established as a new process and standard procedure. A person may be challenged to return to a past process if the refreezing stage is incomplete (Petiprin, 2020). This change theory enables support to nurses and guides discovery of both challenges and strengths of the change practice.  

Organizational and departmental change are critical to advocate for patient safety and improvements for quality of care. This DNP learner is initiating a DPI project that includes adding an additional tool in the “quick look” area of the emergency department to screen patients with head injuries upon arrival. This tool will aid a nurse to make quick decisions and provide hand-off communication for patients that require STAT CT scans based on the results of the tool. The application of this process change requires involvement from employees and leadership in order to change practice. The Lewins Change Model is used for organizational change by involving frontline staff, knowledge sharing, and involving leadership in order to gain adherence to properly implement that change. Hussain et.al (2018) discovered that change can be highly encouraged by rewards, recognitions and use of a transformational leadership approach along with the change model.  

Lewin’s Change Model has been used in many aspects of nursing within an emergency setting. Stahley et.al (2020) describe the process of using Lewin’s change theory to improve flow process. The change process focused on bed traffic control and flow in order to reduce door-to-provider, door-to-discharge, left without being seen, and patient satisfaction. All these goals were achieved by implementation of a pod system utilizing Lewin’s change theory. I look forward to addressing many of these issues with future DPI projects in the future.  

Butts, J. B., & Rich, K. L. (Eds.). (2018). Philosophies and theories for advanced nursing practice (3rd ed.). Jones & Bartlett. ISBN-13: 9781284112245  

Hussain, S. T., Lei, S., Akram, T., Haider, M. J., Hussain, S. H., & Ali, M. (2018). Kurt Lewin’s change model: A critical review of the role of leadership and employee involvement in organizational change. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 3(3), 123–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2016.07.002