DNP 815 Discuss the differences in approach based on inductive versus deductive reasoning
Grand Canyon University DNP 815 Discuss the differences in approach based on inductive versus deductive reasoning-Step-By-Step Guide
This guide will demonstrate how to complete the Grand Canyon University DNP 815 Discuss the differences in approach based on inductive versus deductive reasoning assignment based on general principles of academic writing. Here, we will show you the A, B, Cs of completing an academic paper, irrespective of the instructions. After guiding you through what to do, the guide will leave one or two sample essays at the end to highlight the various sections discussed below.
How to Research and Prepare for DNP 815 Discuss the differences in approach based on inductive versus deductive reasoning
Whether one passes or fails an academic assignment such as the Grand Canyon University DNP 815 Discuss the differences in approach based on inductive versus deductive reasoning depends on the preparation done beforehand. The first thing to do once you receive an assignment is to quickly skim through the requirements. Once that is done, start going through the instructions one by one to clearly understand what the instructor wants. The most important thing here is to understand the required format—whether it is APA, MLA, Chicago, etc.
After understanding the requirements of the paper, the next phase is to gather relevant materials. The first place to start the research process is the weekly resources. Go through the resources provided in the instructions to determine which ones fit the assignment. After reviewing the provided resources, use the university library to search for additional resources. After gathering sufficient and necessary resources, you are now ready to start drafting your paper.
How to Write the Introduction for DNP 815 Discuss the differences in approach based on inductive versus deductive reasoning
The introduction for the Grand Canyon University DNP 815 Discuss the differences in approach based on inductive versus deductive reasoning is where you tell the instructor what your paper will encompass. In three to four statements, highlight the important points that will form the basis of your paper. Here, you can include statistics to show the importance of the topic you will be discussing. At the end of the introduction, write a clear purpose statement outlining what exactly will be contained in the paper. This statement will start with “The purpose of this paper…” and then proceed to outline the various sections of the instructions.
Need a high-quality paper urgently?
We can deliver within hours.
How to Write the Body for DNP 815 Discuss the differences in approach based on inductive versus deductive reasoning
After the introduction, move into the main part of the DNP 815 Discuss the differences in approach based on inductive versus deductive reasoning assignment, which is the body. Given that the paper you will be writing is not experimental, the way you organize the headings and subheadings of your paper is critically important. In some cases, you might have to use more subheadings to properly organize the assignment. The organization will depend on the rubric provided. Carefully examine the rubric, as it will contain all the detailed requirements of the assignment. Sometimes, the rubric will have information that the normal instructions lack.
Another important factor to consider at this point is how to do citations. In-text citations are fundamental as they support the arguments and points you make in the paper. At this point, the resources gathered at the beginning will come in handy. Integrating the ideas of the authors with your own will ensure that you produce a comprehensive paper. Also, follow the given citation format. In most cases, APA 7 is the preferred format for nursing assignments.
How to Write the Conclusion for DNP 815 Discuss the differences in approach based on inductive versus deductive reasoning
After completing the main sections, write the conclusion of your paper. The conclusion is a summary of the main points you made in your paper. However, you need to rewrite the points and not simply copy and paste them. By restating the points from each subheading, you will provide a nuanced overview of the assignment to the reader.
How to Format the References List for DNP 815 Discuss the differences in approach based on inductive versus deductive reasoning
The very last part of your paper involves listing the sources used in your paper. These sources should be listed in alphabetical order and double-spaced. Additionally, use a hanging indent for each source that appears in this list. Lastly, only the sources cited within the body of the paper should appear here.
Stuck? Let Us Help You
Completing assignments can sometimes be overwhelming, especially with the multitude of academic and personal responsibilities you may have. If you find yourself stuck or unsure at any point in the process, don’t hesitate to reach out for professional assistance. Our assignment writing services are designed to help you achieve your academic goals with ease.
Our team of experienced writers is well-versed in academic writing and familiar with the specific requirements of the DNP 815 Discuss the differences in approach based on inductive versus deductive reasoning assignment. We can provide you with personalized support, ensuring your assignment is well-researched, properly formatted, and thoroughly edited. Get a feel of the quality we guarantee – ORDER NOW.
Sample Answer for DNP 815 Discuss the differences in approach based on inductive versus deductive reasoning
Re: Topic 2 DQ 1
The reasoning is categorized into two types which are inductive or forward and deductive or backward wherein each has different features and plays different roles in providing solutions to complex problems. The inductive reasoning process is that individual facts are observed first before making a conclusion on a principle, however, the deductive reasoning process is solving given problems based on consideration of general principles and knowledge of a solid foundation. In order to achieve the major goal, inductive reasoning or means-ends analysis is considered a data-driven approach and more useful in finding a solution quickly, whereas deductive reasoning or moving backward gradually gets rids of things that are not necessary and spends more time deleting wrong answers or inferences to look for the root causes of a problem (Shin, 2019).
Middle-range theories serve as frameworks for evidence-based projects and research studies in guiding the interpretation and application of the findings where it illuminates research and structure knowledge to build nursing science and nursing practice (Valentine & Sekula, 2020). PICOT is one way to streamline the process of research literature and by using it as a format, it focuses the search for evidence. Concentrating on evidence of effective interventions is a good way of improving clinical judgment and prevents one’s practice of falling into traditional care without any advancements (Black, 2019).
The concepts of inductive and deductive reasoning in clinical reasoning apply to gathering appropriate information and making a clinical diagnosis by providing scientific evidence on the outcomes of good quality nursing care.
References
Black, B, P. (2019). The science of nursing and evidence-based practice. Professional Nursing E-Book: Concepts and Challenges, 217.
Professional Nursing E-Book – Google Books
Shin, H.S. (2019). Reasoning processes in clinical reasoning: from the perspective of cognitive psychology. Korean Journal of Medical Education, 31 (4), 299-308.
https://doi.org/10.3946/kjme.2019.140
Valentine, J.L., Sekula, K., Lynch (2020) Evolution of forensic theory- introduction of the constructed theory of forensic nursing care: A Middle-Range Theory. Journal of Forensic Nursing
Valentine_May2020_Evolution_of_Forensic_Nursing_Theory.pdf (researchgate.net)
Sample Answer 2 for DNP 815 Discuss the differences in approach based on inductive versus deductive reasoning
Inductive reasoning, as said by Streefkerk in 2022, is the act of developing an idea or theory and works by making specific observations and then moving toward broad speculation or generalizations (Streefkerk, 2022). This goes with watching and compiling research on observations found in the field. As said by Hayes et al. in 2018, induction is assessing and inferring the plausibility of an outcome based on an action (Hayes et al., 2018).
Deductive reasoning, as said by Streefkerk in 2022, is where a theory or idea is tested. This ideology goes from making broad speculation or generalizations to specific observations (Streefkerk, 2022). This is where an idea is tested and an outcome is determined. As said by Hayes et al. in 2018, deductive reasoning is the opposite of induction in which an inference is tested and then observed (Hayes et al., 2018).
The main difference between the two is that one implies just research and knowledge whereas one requires research, knowledge, and action.
When it comes to my project, deductive reasoning is more the process of the project versus inductive. The project focuses on implementing a standardized approach toward giving patient handoff and then observing the outcomes. The goal is to determine if the standardized handoff is a better approach than the current practice in order to improve client care and safety. I am still figuring out all of the kinks in my project, but this is the gist, which falls under deductive reasoning.
References
Hayes, B. K., Stephens, R. G., Ngo, J., & Dunn, J. C. (2018). The dimensionality of reasoning: Inductive and deductive inference can be explained by a single process. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 44(9), 1333–1351. https://doi-org.lopes.idm.oclc.org/10.1037/xlm0000527.supp (Supplemental)
Streefkerk, R. (2022). Inductive vs. deductive reasoning. Scribbr. Retrieved July 16, 2022, from https://www.scribbr.com/methodology/inductive-deductivereasoning/#:~:text=The%20main%20difference%20between%20inductive,reasoning%20the%20other%20way%20around.
Sample Answer 3 for DNP 815 Discuss the differences in approach based on inductive versus deductive reasoning
Understanding deductive and inductive reasoning is essential in research as it assists in making inferences and drawing conclusions. In inductive reasoning conclusions are drawn from observations. The greater the data, the higher the probability that the conclusion will be true. Observations will not always lead to the correct generalized conclusion. Stephens et al. (2020) guided participants in a study on this type of reasoning by asking them to judge if the conclusion was plausible based on the premises. It is described as the bottom-up approach, also known as the specific to general approach. Steps in inductive reasoning include1. Observation 2. Analysis 3. Theory. Compared to deductive reasoning, this uses facts and theories to arrive to the conclusion. It is a method of verification and, in some cases does not often give new knowledge, but the results can be seen as beneficial. It is identified as the top-down approach. Simple steps to this process are 1. Idea or theory 2. Observation 3. Conclusion. In this case, the premise is known to be true, and we make a conclusion about something specific.
The chosen theory to guide the DNP project in week one was the Theory of Comfort by Kolcaba. It is specific to the comfort needs of individuals and their families which creates an experience. The three concepts it is based on are relief, ease, and transcendence (Barreto et al., 2020). This model of care is a resource for engaging in comforting interventions. The inductive approach, compared to deductive reasoning, is used in this theory as it uses data to draw conclusions. It is a tool used to analyze patients in a particular setting. After observations are made the goal is to increase patient comfort, which is done with the inclusion of four domains which include physical, psychospiritual, environment, and sociocultural aspects (Barreto et al., 2020). Barreto et al. (2020) study provided an example of inductive reasoning. It observed elderly patients in the intensive care unit. It identified that nursing diagnoses corresponded to the patients but concluded that it did not guarantee comfort care. Therefore, the study made further recommendations that this is a theory that can be implemented to meet the needs.
Reference:
Barreto Cardoso, R., Alfradique de Souza, P., Pereira Caldas, C., & Ribeiro Bitencourt, G. (2020). Nursing diagnoses in hospitalized elderly patients based on Kolcaba’s Comfort Theory. Revista de Enfermagem Referência, 4, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.12707/RV20066
Stephens, R. G., Dunn, J. C., Hayes, B. K., & Kalish, M. L. (2020). A test of two processes: The effect of training on deductive and inductive reasoning. Cognition, 199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2020.104223