DNP-820 Implementation Into Practice
Grand Canyon University DNP-820 Implementation Into Practice – Step-By-Step Guide
This guide will demonstrate how to complete the Grand Canyon University DNP-820 Implementation Into Practice assignment based on general principles of academic writing. Here, we will show you the A, B, Cs of completing an academic paper, irrespective of the instructions. After guiding you through what to do, the guide will leave one or two sample essays at the end to highlight the various sections discussed below.
How to Research and Prepare for DNP-820 Implementation Into Practice
Whether one passes or fails an academic assignment such as the Grand Canyon University NUR 550 Benchmark – Evidence-Based Practice Project: Literature Review depends on the preparation done beforehand. The first thing to do once you receive an assignment is to quickly skim through the requirements. Once that is done, start going through the instructions one by one to clearly understand what the instructor wants. The most important thing here is to understand the required format—whether it is APA, MLA, Chicago, etc.
After understanding the requirements of the paper, the next phase is to gather relevant materials. The first place to start the research process is the weekly resources. Go through the resources provided in the instructions to determine which ones fit the assignment. After reviewing the provided resources, use the university library to search for additional resources. After gathering sufficient and necessary resources, you are now ready to start drafting your paper.
How to Write the Introduction for DNP-820 Implementation Into Practice
The introduction for the Grand Canyon University DNP-820 Implementation Into Practice is where you tell the instructor what your paper will encompass. In three to four statements, highlight the important points that will form the basis of your paper. Here, you can include statistics to show the importance of the topic you will be discussing. At the end of the introduction, write a clear purpose statement outlining what exactly will be contained in the paper. This statement will start with “The purpose of this paper…” and then proceed to outline the various sections of the instructions.
Need a high-quality paper urgently?
We can deliver within hours.
How to Write the Body for DNP-820 Implementation Into Practice
After the introduction, move into the main part of the DNP-820 Implementation Into Practice assignment, which is the body. Given that the paper you will be writing is not experimental, the way you organize the headings and subheadings of your paper is critically important. In some cases, you might have to use more subheadings to properly organize the assignment. The organization will depend on the rubric provided. Carefully examine the rubric, as it will contain all the detailed requirements of the assignment. Sometimes, the rubric will have information that the normal instructions lack.
Another important factor to consider at this point is how to do citations. In-text citations are fundamental as they support the arguments and points you make in the paper. At this point, the resources gathered at the beginning will come in handy. Integrating the ideas of the authors with your own will ensure that you produce a comprehensive paper. Also, follow the given citation format. In most cases, APA 7 is the preferred format for nursing assignments.
How to Write the Conclusion for DNP-820 Implementation Into Practice
After completing the main sections, write the conclusion of your paper. The conclusion is a summary of the main points you made in your paper. However, you need to rewrite the points and not simply copy and paste them. By restating the points from each subheading, you will provide a nuanced overview of the assignment to the reader.
How to Format the References List for DNP-820 Implementation Into Practice
The very last part of your paper involves listing the sources used in your paper. These sources should be listed in alphabetical order and double-spaced. Additionally, use a hanging indent for each source that appears in this list. Lastly, only the sources cited within the body of the paper should appear here.
Stuck? Let Us Help You
Completing assignments can sometimes be overwhelming, especially with the multitude of academic and personal responsibilities you may have. If you find yourself stuck or unsure at any point in the process, don’t hesitate to reach out for professional assistance. Our assignment writing services are designed to help you achieve your academic goals with ease.
Our team of experienced writers is well-versed in academic writing and familiar with the specific requirements of the DNP-820 Implementation Into Practice assignment. We can provide you with personalized support, ensuring your assignment is well-researched, properly formatted, and thoroughly edited. Get a feel of the quality we guarantee – ORDER NOW.
Sample Answer for DNP-820 Implementation Into Practice
Regardless of their sizes, missions, and health care programs, health care facilities have a professional mandate to provide timely, safe, and quality care. The standard obligation requires health care facilities to apply multi-dimensional interventions to address patient needs. Research translation into clinical practice promotes evidence-based care and is instrumental in reducing adverse health outcomes through creative problem-solving (Wensing & Grol, 2019). Its significance obliges health care practitioners and organizational leaders to implement programs that reduce gaps between research findings and clinical practice. Accordingly, health care facilities should be open to change and support evidence-based practice (EBP) adequately. The purpose of this paper is to discuss a topic where a gap exists between research findings and their implementation into practice.
Topic, Supporting Research, and Desired Outcomes
The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) explores many health topics relevant to current nursing practice. A topic related to the direct practice improvement (DPI) project is hospital readmissions, represented as a priority for payers, providers, and policymakers striving to improve health outcomes and reduce costs (AHRQ, n.d.). Hospital readmissions connect with the DPI project since their occurrence hampers care quality in the practicum site. Besides, pressure ulcers are a leading cause of hospital readmissions, hospitalizations, and high costs (Wassel et al., 2020). Accordingly, any significant rise in pressure ulcers leads to a proportional increment in hospital readmissions, reducing care quality.
Hospital readmissions adversely affect health outcomes and require evidence-based, sustainable, and relevant solutions. Recent health data shows that over $52.4 billion is spent annually on readmitted patients (Beauvais et al., 2022). Unless health care organizations implement lasting programs, the cost will increase as time advances. Upadhyay et al. (2019) noted that readmission penalties exceed over half a billion dollars annually. Such penalties are detrimental to the growth of organizations and their ability to sustain safe and quality care. Furthermore, crucial aspects of quality sustainability, like organizational reputation and partnerships, become dysfunctional when readmission rates are high in hospitals. Patient-provider relationships are also broken due to reduced patients’ trust in health care professionals.
ALSO READ:
DNP-820 Literature Synthesis for Proposed Intervention
Pressure ulcers increase the risk of readmissions, and their prevention should be a priority for all hospitals. Research translation into practice implies implementing interventions supported by scientific evidence. Veith et al. (2019) emphasized high attention to wound care, patient education, and modifying risk factors to prevent pressure ulcers. Wound care strategies include preventive dressing, patient repositioning, and wound cleaning for the admitted patients. These strategies are among the core components of a preventive pressure bundle that is highly effective in reducing the incidence of pressure ulcers in critical care settings (Darvall et al., 2018; Hahnel et al., 2020). Implementing such a bundle would be pivotal in reducing readmission rates in the current setting.
Health care professionals implement research into clinical practice to improve health outcomes. The primary goal of implementing research on wound care is to reduce pressure ulcers which will lead to a proportional reduction in hospital readmissions. Reducing readmissions will reduce health care costs and improve the organization’s ability to invest in quality care programs. As Rasiah et al. (2020) mentioned, patients’ trust in health care professionals depends on the care quality and health care experiences. Consequently, implementing a care bundle and other wound care programs will improve patient-provider relationships and patients’ trust in health care professionals. High hospital readmissions hamper organizational reputation (Upadhyay et al., 2019). Implementing research will improve the organization’s reputation and accelerate its growth.
The Extent of Research Implementation
Organizations implement different wound care practices depending on the patients’ type and severity of health conditions. As an established health care institution, ProMedica Skilled Nursing and Rehabilitation (Wheaton) has invested in numerous programs to optimize patient outcomes. They include patient education, telehealth, follow-up care, and testing new treatments and care models (ProMedica, 2021). Despite these programs, the facility primarily relies on routine pressure ulcer prevention care. Overreliance on this care program depicts a huge gap between research findings and implementation into practice, and substantive improvement is essential. More evidence-based interventions should be implemented to reduce the incidence of pressure ulcers among high-risk groups such as the elderly and debilitated patients. Their implementation will reduce the incidence of pressure ulcers and associated adverse outcomes, including hospital readmissions, mortality, and hospitalization.
Possible Barriers to Implementation
Research translation faces multiple barriers depending on the intensity of work required, resources, and the project’s type. Potential barriers to implementing a preventive bundle to prevent pressure ulcers and hospital readmission in the facility include resource facilitation, availability of implementation team members, and patients’ reluctance to participate in the project. Resource inadequacy is a significant barrier since effective research implementation of a care bundle for pressure ulcers requires technologies like patient monitors and alert systems to optimize patient turns. Research also recommends silicone dressing as the most effective preventive dressing for wound care for pressure ulcers (Hahnel et al., 2020). Combining such resources makes the project expensive and inconvenient for timely implementation. The implementation requires teamwork, where the change leader works together with organizational leaders and support nursing staff. However, the intensity of nursing care in the facility would affect their availability and successful research implementation.
Possible Ways to Overcome the Barriers
Success in research translation depends on how change implementers overcome present and emerging barriers. A suitable strategy to overcome the identified barriers is stakeholder engagement. As Haynes et al. (2018) underlined, active stakeholder engagement is crucial to successful change since it influences them positively to support change. The engagement process involves providing stakeholders with adequate information about the research translation and its potential benefits while engaging them throughout the implementation. The other potential intervention is implementing the affordable components of a preventive bundle. For instance, patient repositioning and optimizing turns are affordable and would improve outcomes. Importantly, intensive patient education is crucial to improve health literacy, increase patients’ confidence in the project, and ensure participation and compliance.
Resources Available on the Site
As a modern facility and an affiliate of the extensive ProMedica Health System, ProMedica Skilled Nursing and Rehabilitation (Wheaton) has multiple resources vital in informing the transition from research into practice. They include an equipped health workforce, modality-based equipment, comfortable surroundings, and essentials like the internet (ProMedica Health System, 2022). An equipped and educated health workforce is open to change and readily supports research translation into practice to achieve positive change. Modern equipment and comfortable surroundings are also vital in successful research translation to ensure that research subjects are protected from harm and are comfortable with the process.
Conclusion
Health care facilities should be committed to continuous quality improvement. Such a commitment necessitates continuous research translation into practice and progressive outcomes assessment. Although ProMedica Skilled Nursing and Rehabilitation (Wheaton) has invested in massive programs to improve care quality, more interventions are needed to reduce hospital readmissions. Reducing pressure ulcers will be instrumental in achieving this goal hence implementing research on interventions for pressure ulcer prevention like wound care, patient education, and risk assessment.
References
AHRQ. (n.d.) Hospital readmissions. https://www.ahrq.gov/topics/hospital-readmissions.html
Beauvais, B., Whitaker, Z., Kim, F., & Anderson, B. (2022). Is the hospital value-based purchasing program associated with reduced hospital readmissions?. Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare, 15, 1089–1099. https://doi.org/10.2147/JMDH.S358733
Darvall, J. N., Mesfin, L., & Gorelik, A. (2018). Increasing frequency of critically ill patient turns is associated with a reduction in pressure injuries. Critical Care and Resuscitation, 20(3), 217-222. https://europepmc.org/article/med/30153784
Hahnel, E., El Genedy, M., Tomova‐Simitchieva, T., Hauß, A., Stroux, A., Lechner, A., … & Kottner, J. (2020). The effectiveness of two silicone dressings for sacral and heel pressure ulcer prevention compared with no dressings in high‐risk intensive care unit patients: A randomized controlled parallel‐group trial. British Journal of Dermatology, 183(2), 256-264. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjd.18621
Haynes, S. C., Rudov, L., Nauman, E., Hendryx, L., Angove, R. S., & Carton, T. (2018). Engaging stakeholders to develop a patient-centered research agenda: Lessons learned from the research action for health network (REACHnet). Medical Care, 56(10 Suppl 1), S27-S32. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000000785
ProMedica. (2021). Your health. Our mission. https://www.promedica.org/redefining-healthcare/#
ProMedica Health System. (2022). ProMedica Skilled Nursing and Rehabilitation. https://www.promedicaskillednursing.org/locations/promedica-skilled-nursing-and-rehabilitation-wheaton/?contentIdString=14063
Rasiah, S., Jaafar, S., Yusof, S., Ponnudurai, G., Chung, K. P. Y., & Amirthalingam, S. D. (2020). A study of the nature and level of trust between patients and healthcare providers, its dimensions and determinants: A scoping review protocol. BMJ Open, 10(1), e028061. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-028061
Upadhyay, S., Stephenson, A. L., & Smith, D. G. (2019). Readmission rates and their impact on hospital financial performance: A study of Washington Hospitals. Inquiry: A Journal of Medical Care Organization, Provision and Financing, 56, 46958019860386. https://doi.org/10.1177/0046958019860386
Veith, J. P., Collier, W., Kim, J., Agarwal, J., & Kwok, A. (2019). A national analysis of readmissions for wound healing complications following the repair of lower back, hip, and buttock pressure ulcers using the Nationwide Readmissions Database. The American Journal of Surgery, 217(4), 658-663. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2018.12.013
Wassel, C. L., Delhougne, G., Gayle, J. A., Dreyfus, J., & Larson, B. (2020). Risk of readmissions, mortality, and hospital‐acquired conditions across hospital‐acquired pressure injury (HAPI) stages in a US National Hospital Discharge database. International Wound Journal, 17(6), 1924-1934. https://doi.org/10.1111/iwj.13482
Wensing, M., & Grol, R. (2019). Knowledge translation in health: How implementation science could contribute more. BMC Medicine, 17(1), 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-019-1322-9