DNP-825 Clinical Site QI-IRB Report
Grand Canyon University DNP-825 Clinical Site QI-IRB Report – Step-By-Step Guide
This guide will demonstrate how to complete the Grand Canyon University DNP-825 Clinical Site QI-IRB Report assignment based on general principles of academic writing. Here, we will show you the A, B, Cs of completing an academic paper, irrespective of the instructions. After guiding you through what to do, the guide will leave one or two sample essays at the end to highlight the various sections discussed below.
How to Research and Prepare for DNP-825 Clinical Site QI-IRB Report
Whether one passes or fails an academic assignment such as the Grand Canyon University NUR 550 Benchmark – Evidence-Based Practice Project: Literature Review depends on the preparation done beforehand. The first thing to do once you receive an assignment is to quickly skim through the requirements. Once that is done, start going through the instructions one by one to clearly understand what the instructor wants. The most important thing here is to understand the required format—whether it is APA, MLA, Chicago, etc.
After understanding the requirements of the paper, the next phase is to gather relevant materials. The first place to start the research process is the weekly resources. Go through the resources provided in the instructions to determine which ones fit the assignment. After reviewing the provided resources, use the university library to search for additional resources. After gathering sufficient and necessary resources, you are now ready to start drafting your paper.
How to Write the Introduction for DNP-825 Clinical Site QI-IRB Report
The introduction for the Grand Canyon University DNP-825 Clinical Site QI-IRB Report is where you tell the instructor what your paper will encompass. In three to four statements, highlight the important points that will form the basis of your paper. Here, you can include statistics to show the importance of the topic you will be discussing. At the end of the introduction, write a clear purpose statement outlining what exactly will be contained in the paper. This statement will start with “The purpose of this paper…” and then proceed to outline the various sections of the instructions.
Need a high-quality paper urgently?
We can deliver within hours.
How to Write the Body for DNP-825 Clinical Site QI-IRB Report
After the introduction, move into the main part of the DNP-825 Clinical Site QI-IRB Report assignment, which is the body. Given that the paper you will be writing is not experimental, the way you organize the headings and subheadings of your paper is critically important. In some cases, you might have to use more subheadings to properly organize the assignment. The organization will depend on the rubric provided. Carefully examine the rubric, as it will contain all the detailed requirements of the assignment. Sometimes, the rubric will have information that the normal instructions lack.
Another important factor to consider at this point is how to do citations. In-text citations are fundamental as they support the arguments and points you make in the paper. At this point, the resources gathered at the beginning will come in handy. Integrating the ideas of the authors with your own will ensure that you produce a comprehensive paper. Also, follow the given citation format. In most cases, APA 7 is the preferred format for nursing assignments.
How to Write the Conclusion for DNP-825 Clinical Site QI-IRB Report
After completing the main sections, write the conclusion of your paper. The conclusion is a summary of the main points you made in your paper. However, you need to rewrite the points and not simply copy and paste them. By restating the points from each subheading, you will provide a nuanced overview of the assignment to the reader.
How to Format the References List for DNP-825 Clinical Site QI-IRB Report
The very last part of your paper involves listing the sources used in your paper. These sources should be listed in alphabetical order and double-spaced. Additionally, use a hanging indent for each source that appears in this list. Lastly, only the sources cited within the body of the paper should appear here.
Stuck? Let Us Help You
Completing assignments can sometimes be overwhelming, especially with the multitude of academic and personal responsibilities you may have. If you find yourself stuck or unsure at any point in the process, don’t hesitate to reach out for professional assistance. Our assignment writing services are designed to help you achieve your academic goals with ease.
Our team of experienced writers is well-versed in academic writing and familiar with the specific requirements of the DNP-825 Clinical Site QI-IRB Report assignment. We can provide you with personalized support, ensuring your assignment is well-researched, properly formatted, and thoroughly edited. Get a feel of the quality we guarantee – ORDER NOW.
Sample Answer for DNP-825 Clinical Site QI-IRB Report
Nurses conduct many studies seeking knowledge for improving treatments and other critical aspects of patient care. Mostly, such studies involve human subjects and should be conducted ethically and professionally. The Institutional Review Board (IRB) reviews research to ensure it contains all the essentials for protecting human participants’ rights and welfare (U.S. Food & Drug Administration, 2019). The process is intensive, and the approval time varies according to the type and scope of the research. Irrespective of the approval period, the IRB’s approval objective is to ensure that the research is ethically acceptable and that human subjects are free from harm (Alderson & Morrow, 2020; Florida Health, 2022). Accordingly, the researcher(s) should be adequately conversant with the approval process and adhere to IRB requirements in each step. The purpose of this report is to outline the steps for IRB and quality improvement projects at my practicum site (ProMedica Skilled Nursing and Rehabilitation- Wheaton).
Step 1: Determining if the Project Requires IRB Approval
The process is straightforward since it entails examining whether the research involves human subjects. The proposed quality improvement project for Direct Practice Improvement (DPI) will evaluate the effectiveness of a preventive care bundle in reducing pressure ulcers among elderly and debilitated patients. Therefore, it requires IRB approval since it involves human subjects.
Step 2: Complete IRB Research Project Application
This step involves preparing all the forms that will help the IRB review the proposed project in entirety. Here, the researcher(s) should submit details about several critical aspects of the study, including design, data collection procedures, and instruments.
Step 3: Prepare and Submit Informed Consent Documents
Research involving human participants requires them to consent before participation. From a research perspective, informed consent ensures that human subjects understand the research and participate willingly (Manti & Licari, 2018). The informed consent document should provide adequate details about the type of research, risks, benefits, and how the researcher(s) plan to protect the subject’s identity. Researchers must guarantee participants’ anonymity and embrace the ethical principle of confidentiality (Abadie et al., 2021; Hoft, 2021). Failure to demonstrate this part prompts research disapproval at ProMedica Skilled Nursing and Rehabilitation (Wheaton). Importantly, it is crucial to outline measures to exclude vulnerable populations such as minors from the study due to their inability to make sound decisions.
Step 4: Submit the Proposal Form
The form is submitted to the IRB chair.
Step 5: Adjustments
The IRB meets regularly to review proposals submitted within a period. Based on the feedback that it provides after initial submission, the proposal can be improved as advised and resubmitted.
Conclusion
The IRB approval process is intensive and requires an adequate understanding of the approval steps and the required documents. Generally, the IRB evaluates whether the research has adequate measures for subjects’ protection and outlines how to guarantee informed consent and participants’ anonymity. Part of the informed consent involves outlining measures to exclude vulnerable populations.
Also Read
DNP 825 Emergency Response Presentation
DNP-825 Population Health: Part I
DNP-825 Benchmark – Population Heath: Part II
DNP 825 Population Management Syllabus
References
Abadie, R., Fisher, C., & Dombrowski, K. (2021). Privacy, confidentiality and anonymity: Understandings from people who inject drugs enrolled in a study of social networks and HIV risk. Journal of empirical research on human research ethics: JERHRE, 16(3), 304-311. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F15562646211004411
Alderson, P., & Morrow, V. (2020). The ethics of research with children and young people: a practical handbook. Sage.
Florida Health. (2022). Human research protection program and Institutional Review Board (IRB). https://www.floridahealth.gov/provider-and-partner-resources/research/irb/index.html#:~:text=The%20purpose%20of%20the%20Institutional,46%20and%2021%20CFR%2056.
Manti, S., & Licari, A. (2018). How to obtain informed consent for research. Breathe (Sheffield, England), 14(2), 145–152. https://doi.org/10.1183/20734735.001918
Hoft, J. (2021). Anonymity and confidentiality. The Encyclopedia of Research Methods in Criminology and Criminal Justice, 1, 223-227. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119111931.ch41
U.S. Food & Drug Administration. (2019). Institutional Review Boards (IRBs) and protection of human subjects in clinical trials. https://www.fda.gov/about-fda/center-drug-evaluation-and-research-cder/institutional-review-boards-irbs-and-protection-human-subjects-clinical-trials#:~:text=Under%20FDA%20regulations%2C%20an%20Institutional,approval)%2C%20or%20disapprove%20research.
Sample Answer for DNP-825 Clinical Site QI-IRB Report
The promotion of evidence-based practice is important in nursing practice. Nurse practitioners and other nurses engage in research or quality improvement initiatives to identify new practices that can be adopted to enhance patient and nursing outcomes (Antonio et al., 2018). In doing so, they must obtain approvals from the institutional review boards relevant to their institutions and practice. The review boards ensure the adoption of ethical practices that safeguard the interests and rights of the participants in a research or quality improvement initiative. Some of the considerations in the review process includes determining if the researchers have adhered to protocols for ensuring safety, quality, confidentiality, and privacy of data (Hicks et al., 2021; Marzinsky & Smith-Miller, 2019). Therefore, this research paper examines the process of obtaining institutional review board approval for a research or quality improvement initiative in my practice site.
My practice site is a tertiary institution that provides both general and specialized care. It is also a training institution for nurses and doctors. As a result, it supports different forms of research or quality improvement initiatives with the aim of contributing to the use of best practice interventions in the patient care process. The hospital has an institutional review board tasked with the responsibility of approving any research or quality improvement initiatives being undertaken in the institution (Lapid et al., 2019). The process of the institutional review board to approval stage for a project has several steps.
The first step in the process is submitting the proposed research or quality improvement initiative to a lead supervisor in one’s specialty. The supervisor assesses the clarity, relevance, project’s alignment with the organization’s mission, and need in the organization. The supervisor also offers feedback on whether the project meets the threshold for its progress to the institutional review board or not and need for any revisions. Once cleared by the supervisor, the next step entails submitting the project proposal to the institutional review board. The submission must meet the requirements that have been set by the board. Practitioners can access the requirements and necessary forms to be filled online. The submission is also done online.
The third step entails the initial assessment of the project proposal by the institutional review board. The practitioner must ensure that specific areas of focus are contained in the submission. They include background, purpose/goal, design, procedures, population, risk, and results utilization. The board determines the ethics of the project, need, and potential issues that must be considered before its undertaking (Hicks et al., 2021; Resnik, 2021). The board members may contact the researcher to seek further clarification before making its decision. It then communicates its decisions to the researcher. The decisions are either the project is approved to be undertaken, to be revised, or declined. One is given specific deadlines to meet should they be required to revise the submission. They should submit the revised proposals with written explanations in a separate document detailing all the changes made. Once approved, the institutional review board provides a certification that acts as a permit to undertake research or a quality improvement initiative in the organization (Lapid et al., 2019; Marzinsky & Smith-Miller, 2019).
Conclusion
The approval of a quality improvement initiative or research in my practice site is a rigorous process. One must follow the developed procedures to be followed before undertaking the investigation. The institutional review board has the powers to approve or decline one’s submission. Therefore, I believe that the existence of these mechanisms safeguards the rights of those who will be affected by an initiative or research.
References
Antonio, S., Ana, F., & Elena, U. (2018). Ethics in Research Practice and Innovation. IGI Global.
Hicks, R. W., Hines, K., & Henson, B. (2021). Demystifying the institutional review board. AORN Journal, 114(4), 309–318.
Lapid, M. I., Clarke, B. L., & Wright, R. S. (2019). Institutional review boards: What clinician researchers need to know. Mayo Clinic Proceedings, 94(3), 515–525.
Marzinsky, A., & Smith-Miller, C. A. (2019). Nurse research and the institutional review board: Learn how the IRB process works to ensure participant safety and quality research. American Nurse Today, 14(10), 20–25.
Resnik, D. B. (2021). Standards of evidence for institutional review board decision-making. Accountability in Research, 28(7), 428–455.