DNP 825 Emergency Response Presentation

Grand Canyon University DNP 825 Emergency Response Presentation– Step-By-Step Guide

This guide will demonstrate how to complete the Grand Canyon University DNP 825 Emergency Response Presentation    assignment based on general principles of academic writing. Here, we will show you the A, B, Cs of completing an academic paper, irrespective of the instructions. After guiding you through what to do, the guide will leave one or two sample essays at the end to highlight the various sections discussed below.

How to Research and Prepare for DNP 825 Emergency Response Presentation  

Whether one passes or fails an academic assignment such as the Grand Canyon University NUR 550 Benchmark – Evidence-Based Practice Project: Literature Review depends on the preparation done beforehand. The first thing to do once you receive an assignment is to quickly skim through the requirements. Once that is done, start going through the instructions one by one to clearly understand what the instructor wants. The most important thing here is to understand the required format—whether it is APA, MLA, Chicago, etc.

After understanding the requirements of the paper, the next phase is to gather relevant materials. The first place to start the research process is the weekly resources. Go through the resources provided in the instructions to determine which ones fit the assignment. After reviewing the provided resources, use the university library to search for additional resources. After gathering sufficient and necessary resources, you are now ready to start drafting your paper.

How to Write the Introduction for DNP 825 Emergency Response Presentation  

The introduction for the Grand Canyon University DNP 825 Emergency Response Presentation    is where you tell the instructor what your paper will encompass. In three to four statements, highlight the important points that will form the basis of your paper. Here, you can include statistics to show the importance of the topic you will be discussing. At the end of the introduction, write a clear purpose statement outlining what exactly will be contained in the paper. This statement will start with “The purpose of this paper…” and then proceed to outline the various sections of the instructions.

How to Write the Body for DNP 825 Emergency Response Presentation  

After the introduction, move into the main part of the DNP 825 Emergency Response Presentation   assignment, which is the body. Given that the paper you will be writing is not experimental, the way you organize the headings and subheadings of your paper is critically important. In some cases, you might have to use more subheadings to properly organize the assignment. The organization will depend on the rubric provided. Carefully examine the rubric, as it will contain all the detailed requirements of the assignment. Sometimes, the rubric will have information that the normal instructions lack.

Another important factor to consider at this point is how to do citations. In-text citations are fundamental as they support the arguments and points you make in the paper. At this point, the resources gathered at the beginning will come in handy. Integrating the ideas of the authors with your own will ensure that you produce a comprehensive paper. Also, follow the given citation format. In most cases, APA 7 is the preferred format for nursing assignments.

How to Write the Conclusion for DNP 825 Emergency Response Presentation  

After completing the main sections, write the conclusion of your paper. The conclusion is a summary of the main points you made in your paper. However, you need to rewrite the points and not simply copy and paste them. By restating the points from each subheading, you will provide a nuanced overview of the assignment to the reader.

How to Format the References List for DNP 825 Emergency Response Presentation  

The very last part of your paper involves listing the sources used in your paper. These sources should be listed in alphabetical order and double-spaced. Additionally, use a hanging indent for each source that appears in this list. Lastly, only the sources cited within the body of the paper should appear here.

Stuck? Let Us Help You

Completing assignments can sometimes be overwhelming, especially with the multitude of academic and personal responsibilities you may have. If you find yourself stuck or unsure at any point in the process, don’t hesitate to reach out for professional assistance. Our assignment writing services are designed to help you achieve your academic goals with ease. 

Our team of experienced writers is well-versed in academic writing and familiar with the specific requirements of the DNP 825 Emergency Response Presentation   assignment. We can provide you with personalized support, ensuring your assignment is well-researched, properly formatted, and thoroughly edited. Get a feel of the quality we guarantee – ORDER NOW. 

Sample Answer for DNP 825 Emergency Response Presentation

Introduction

Disasters are common occurrences that affect communities at local and national levels. Disasters can occur over a short or long period to cause significant harm to human beings, environment, infrastructure, and animals. Often, the affected communities experience challenges in coping with the disaster impacts. Nurses and other healthcare providers play crucial roles in promoting the recovery of the affected communities. They also collaborate with other stakeholders to assess, plan, implement, monitor, and evaluate disaster response and management interventions. Effective disaster response and management are essential to minimize further loss of lives, property, and animals during a disaster. Therefore, this presentation examines the 2021 Kansas Wildfire Outbreak, disaster response strategies and the roles of a DNP-prepared nurse in its mitigation, response, and management.

Description of the Event: 2021 Kansas Wildfire Outbreak 

The selected disaster for focus in this presentation is the 2020 Kansas Wildfire Outbreak. On December 15, 2021, Kansas suffered the largest wildfire to have been witnessed over the recent past. The wildfire affected the Midwestern state of Kansas. The wildfire arose due to tornado and Midwest derecho outbreak that produced multiple wildfires and dust storms (US Department of Commerce, n.d.). The wildfire spread to vast regions due to favorable weather conditions during this period. Accordingly, the air was dry with gusty winds and warmer temperatures that increased the spread of the wildfires. The largest wildfire was seen in Four County, which burnt more than 121000 acres of land. Overall, it is estimated that more than 163000 acres were burnt, with a loss of animals, lives, property, and infrastructure  (Nutt et al., 2021).

Impact on the Community

The 2021 Kansas Wildfire Outbreak had significant environmental effects. One of them is that the wildfire led to loss of livestock and wild animals. The largest wildfire witnessed in Four County killed hundred of cattle alongside destroying buildings on its way. The fire also led to deaths of thousands of wild animals. It also led to the loss of natural biodiversity due to the loss of the natural forest habitat in the county. The wildfire also destroyed infrastructure such as power lines and roads. The wildfire toppled more than 700 power poles. More than 42 structures were burnt down in the cities of Waldo and Paradise. The fires burnt more than 163000 acres of land. It also disrupted normal agricultural activities in the affected regions. For example, it halted agricultural operations in Kansa regions, as evidenced by crops growing slim and reduced livestock production. The wildfire is reported to have killed two people and a few people injured from burns  (Nutt et al., 2021).

Emergency Response Measures

The emergency response measures by Kansas state government were timely, appropriate and effective. First, Kansas governor Laura Kelly declared a state of emergency on the wildfires that were likely to hit the different parts of the state. The declaration paved a way for the activation of emergency response measures that would minimize potential loss of lives, property, and animals from the wildfires. The Kansas state government also collaborated with other emergency providers to have more than 50 drops in each of the hotspots for the wildfires in the state. The wildfires were anticipated to affect farmers in the state. As a result, the state government gave agricultural tankers to be dropped in hotspot areas as well as potential areas that were likely to suffer from the disaster. The Kansas Department of Emergency Management also collaborated with counties to perform damage assessment and plan initiatives needed to minimize disaster’s impact on the population. The affected counties also suffered water shortages. Consequently, Kansas state government worked with the counties to assist in water supply to the affected livestock and populations (Staff, 2021).

Inclusion of Marginalized Communities and Decision-Making

The emergency responses adopted during the 2021 Kansa Wildfire Outbreak prioritized the needs of the marginalized populations. The governor and stakeholders involved in containing the wildfires did not consider the backgrounds of those in the different hotspots. Instead, the initiated universal disaster management interventions such as helicopter drop to minimize the disaster harm on the entire population and not specific individuals. The governor and disaster response teams also involved the marginalized communities in different countries in assessing the nature of damages and support that was needed to facilitate recovery. The assessment informed the prioritization of disaster recovery resources for the affected populations in the state. The decision-making was also not biased. It incorporated the perspectives of different stakeholders involved in disaster response. As a result, the decisions made were inclusive, diverse, and equitable (Staff, 2021; Nutt et al., 2021).

Application of Principles of Christian Worldview 

The principles of Christian worldview can be applied to ensure inclusion of marginalized communities in emergency preparation and response. One of the ways of achieving this is respecting diversity. Respecting diversity entails the consideration of the unique needs, values, and preferences that the marginalized have towards disaster preparedness and response. Considering diversity empowers the marginalized communities to be proactively involved in embracing disaster mitigation strategies. It also ensures the relevance of the adopted strategies, hence, sustainability in disaster management. The other way of applying principles of Christian worldviews is by promoting safety in emergency response. The stakeholders involved should ensure that the emergency response initiatives does not cause any form of harm to the marginalized communities. The other strategy is by advocating the protection of their rights. Advocacy ensures the adoption of disaster management strategies that align with the needs, values, and preferences of the marginalized. Lastly, the DNP-prepared nurses can apply the Christian worldview by being dedicated to promoting good for all. They should ensure the adopted disaster management approaches do not benefit few in the population. Instead, they should address the needs of the majority and facilitate their recovery from the disaster (Brereton, 2022; Strachan, 2021).

What Could have been Done or what Could be Done Differently in the Future?

There are a number of things that could have been done and should be done differently in future incidences of wildfires in America. One of them is ensuring the presence of resources that states allocate for unforeseen disasters. The resources should be able to be mobilized for effective response to any disaster in each state. Resource availability will prevent potential delays and laxities in the implementation of disaster response initiatives. The other aspect that should be done in the future is public education on fire precautions and management (Staff, 2021; Nutt et al., 2021). The public should be educated about the importance of not starting fires in the open, putting them off before sleeping, and having fire extinguishers at homes. They should also be educated about the importance of clearing bushes around homes to minimize any potential of fires destroying buildings and homes. The state should have evacuated livestock and populations in hotspot areas. Evacuation would have minimized any potentials of livestock and lives being lost in the hotspot areas. Lastly, the state and the population should be aware of their current and upcoming weather conditions. This will aid in the adoption of effective disaster management interventions against wildfires (Miranda et al., 2020).

Role of DNP-Prepared Nurse

The DNP-prepared nurse plays several roles when responding to wildfires, as that seen in 2021 in Kansas state. One of the roles is evacuation. The DNP-prepared nurse works with other healthcare providers to provide emergency evacuation to the populations affected by wildfires. The evacuation aims at minimizing further loss of lives among the affected populations. The DNP-prepared nurse also uses their knowledge and skills in nursing to offer first-aid to victims of wildfires. This includes patient assessment, planning, implementing, monitoring, and evaluating the care needs and that given to the victims of wildfires. The other role is coordinating emergency response initiatives. The DNP-prepared nurse can use their leadership knowledge and skills to ensure the disaster response initiatives offered by the different interdisciplinary teams. Coordination also encompasses the use of resources in facilitating effective response during a disaster. Lastly, the DNP-prepared nurse implements interventions that promote recovery and coping among the affected populations. This includes offering services such as counseling and aids such as food, shelter, water, and clothing to the affected. They also link them with potential social support services that helps the victims in their recovery journey  (Al Harthi et al., 2020; Loke et al., 2021; Martono et al., 2019). Therefore, the DNP-prepared nurse has crucial roles to play in responding to wildfires.

Leading with Moral Courage, Prioritizing, and Targeting Resources

A DNP-prepared nurse can embrace several strategies for them to lead with moral courage in the emergency response. One of the strategies is embracing clear communication with the stakeholders involved in disaster response. The nurse should communicate clear the aims, objectives, and responsibilities of the team members in responding to the disaster. Clear communication increases coordination of roles, resource utilization, and eliminates potential inefficiencies in the process. The other strategy to lead with moral courage is considering views of those involved in disaster response. Disaster response activities often change based on the needs of the affected populations. The DNP-prepared nurse should be open to views on how to achieve optimum outcomes in the response initiatives. Being open contributes to flexibility and adoption of more appropriate disaster response and management initiatives by the response team. The other way is being aware of the potentials of resistance from disaster response team. A leader should be aware that not all the change initiatives during disaster response are received and embraced well by the team involved. This awareness contributes to the adoption of innovative strategies to increase interprofessional collaboration during a disaster (Pajakoski et al., 2021). The resources available for the disaster should be prioritized and targeted appropriately. This can be achieved by ensuring resource allocation to the population according to their needs. Needs assessment conducted on the population provides insights into the amount of resources that should be availed to meet the population’s needs. The other strategy is by ensuring accountability in resource allocation and utilization. The DNP nurse may consider strategies such as documenting any resource allocated and used to facilitate tracking and linking them to outcomes. 

Also Read

DNP-825 Population Health: Part I 

DNP-825 Benchmark – Population Heath: Part II

DNP 825A Reflective Journal

DNP 825 Population Management Syllabus

References

Al Harthi, M., Al Thobaity, A., Al Ahmari, W., & Almalki, M. (2020). Challenges for Nurses in Disaster Management: A Scoping Review. Risk Management and Healthcare Policy, 13, 2627–2634. https://doi.org/10.2147/RMHP.S279513

Brereton, G. (2022). Principles of Tragedy: A Rational Examination of the Tragic Concept in Life and Literature. Taylor & Francis.

Loke, A. Y., Guo, C., & Molassiotis, A. (2021). Development of disaster nursing education and training programs in the past 20 years (2000–2019): A systematic review. Nurse Education Today, 99, 104809. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2021.104809

Martono, M., Satino, S., Nursalam, N., Efendi, F., & Bushy, A. (2019). Indonesian nurses’ perception of disaster management preparedness. Chinese Journal of Traumatology, 22(01), 41–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cjtee.2018.09.002

Miranda, A., Carrasco, J., González, M., Pais, C., Lara, A., Altamirano, A., Weintraub, A., & Syphard, A. D. (2020). Evidence-based mapping of the wildland-urban interface to better identify human communities threatened by wildfires. Environmental Research Letters, 15(9), 094069. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ab9be5

Nutt, S., McMillan, L., & Newton, R. (2021). Wildfires fueled by high wind destroy homes, kill cattle in Kansas | KSNT 27 News. https://www.ksnt.com/news/kansas/wildfires-fueled-by-high-wind-destroy-homes-in-kansas/

Pajakoski, E., Rannikko, S., Leino-Kilpi, H., & Numminen, O. (2021). Moral courage in nursing – An integrative literature review. Nursing & Health Sciences, 23(3), 570–585. https://doi.org/10.1111/nhs.12805

Staff, K. (2021). Kansas governor’s office details response to recent storms, wildfires. Https://Www.Kwch.Com. https://www.kwch.com/2021/12/17/kansas-governors-office-details-response-recent-storms-wildfires/

Strachan, O. (2021). Christianity and Wokeness: How the Social Justice Movement Is Hijacking the Gospel – and the Way to Stop It. Simon and Schuster.

US Department of Commerce, N. (n.d.). December 15, 2021 Historic Wind and Fire Event. NOAA’s National Weather Service. Retrieved November 27, 2022, from https://www.weather.gov/ict/event_2021Dec15thWindFireSVR

DNP-825 Population Health Part I Sample

DNP-825 Population Health: Part I 

Lung cancer is one of the most common cancers worldwide (Thai et al., 2021). Cigarette smoking has been identified as a major risk factor for lung cancer (Tindle et al., 2018). The purpose of this paper is to highlight lung cancer prevalence in smokers, describe disparities in at-risk individuals, define evidence-based interventions that have been aimed to improve health outcomes in at-risk individuals and elaborate on the sources of health information available for at-risk individuals. 

Lung Cancer in Cigarette Smokers 

Lung cancer is a major cause of mortality worldwide. It can be classified as adenocarcinomas, squamous cell carcinomas, mixed carcinomas, neuroendocrine carcinoma, large cell carcinoma and other unusual morphological variants. The incidence of lung cancer in women has shown a steady increase while in males there is a steady decrease. More than 50% of individuals with lung cancer at diagnosis usually have advanced metastatic disease (Kumar et al., 2018). Adenocarcinoma is the commonest while small-cell and squamous-cell carcinomas have a strong correlation with cigarette smoking.  

Cigarette smokers are at an increased risk of lung cancer due to the carcinogens present. Cigarette smoking has been attributed to 90% of lung cancers and this includes individuals who ceased smoking. Cigarette smokers are 60 times more likely to develop lung cancer than non-smokers (Kumar et al., 2018). Other carcinogens may be implicated in lung cancer and these include asbestos, nickel, arsenic, uranium and chromium. Environmental carcinogens may lead to lung cancer in non-smokers and can also act as a predisposing factor for lung cancers in cigarette smokers (Zhu et al., 2020). Passive smokers are also at risk of developing lung cancer. 

Prevalence Rates of Lung Cancer 

The prevalence of lung cancer in Pennsylvania varies by state. The counties in Pennsylvania can be clustered into 5 clusters whereby cluster 1 has the highest incidences and prevalence while cluster 5 has the lowest incidences and prevalence (Camiña et al., 2022). The metropolitan areas of Pennsylvania have higher lung cancer incidence rates. Cluster 1 counties include Philadelphia, Montgomery and Delaware counties. Cluster 5 counties include York, Cumberland and Dauphin counties. The prevalence of lung cancer in cigarette smokers in Philadelphia is higher than the prevalence of lung cancer in cigarette smokers in Dauphin County (Zhu et al., 2020). The national average of lung cancer incidence rates is lower than the incidence rates for lung cancer in Pennsylvania. 

Social Determinants that Lead to Disparities and Health Outcomes 

The areas in Philadelphia with a high prevalence and incidence of lung cancer among cigarette smokers have been densely populated. The impacts of environmental pollution therefore can affect large populations. These areas have also been shown to have high poverty rates. This may deny access to screening and preventive services therefore at-risk individuals may only seek care when they are at advanced stages with poor prognosis (Zhu et al., 2020). Moreover, the level of education in such areas is low. Individuals may be unaware of the health impacts of cigarette smoking and therefore they may not have access to health promotion information and preventive strategies. They may therefore be unaware that cigarette smoking and other air pollutants are risk factors for lung cancer. The unemployment rates in such areas are also high (Zhu et al., 2020). This may deny access to health care and preventive programs. Air pollution has been identified as a group 1 carcinogen. Factories are sources of air pollution. Moreover, there is occupational exposure to various carcinogens within these factories (Camiña et al., 2022). These can predispose cigarette smokers to lung cancer. Carcinogens and cigarette smoking may be synergistic in lung cancer development. An example is a synergistic relationship between asbestos and cigarette smoking. Cigarette smokers exposed to asbestos have a 55-fold increased risk of developing lung cancer while non-smokers exposed to asbestos have a 5-fold risk of developing lung cancer (Kumar et al., 2018). Cigarette smokers may therefore have many disparities. 

Evidence-Based Interventions for Cigarette Smokers 

Cigarette smokers have been introduced to cigarette cessation programs to help addicts quit. Awareness has also been created of the dangers of cigarette smoking (Coughlin et al., 2020). This has included providing warnings on cigarette packets, public campaigns against cigarette smoking and media education programs. Additionally, screening programs for cigarette smokers have been introduced to screen for lung cancers and offer timely management (Akanbi et al., 2019). Factories have also been encouraged to use renewable sources of energy and avoid toxic raw materials as a measure to curb air pollution. Incentives have been provided to protect factory workers from occupational exposure to carcinogens.  

The government has also raised taxes on tobacco products and imposition of ‘no smoking’ policies as a means of reducing cigarette smoking (Hersi et al., 2019). Bans have also been imposed on advertisements and promotions that encourage cigarette smoking. These interventions have been effective as they have been able to reduce the rate of cigarette consumption. Early stages of lung cancers have also been identified in cigarette smokers and appropriate treatments have been administered (Coughlin et al., 2020). The number of addicts in cessation programs has also increased. A lot still needs to be done to reduce the proportion of cigarette smokers but these incentives have been shown to work.  

Availability of Consumer Health Information 

Information about lung cancer, its risks and prevention are readily available from health information websites, health articles and health books (Demner-Fushman et al., 2019). Cigarette smokers can access this information and this can guide their behavior and provide them with relevant information. They may also find healthcare options for their illnesses. They may find health facilities and rehabilitation centers that can help them with their addiction and treat any causes of morbidity. Moreover, they may find published research articles that relate cigarette smoking and lung cancer or other cancers and this may motivate them to quit. Cigarette smokers may also find health promotional information that may improve their health.  

Conclusion 

Lung cancer is a common cause of morbidity and mortality in both men and women. The risk factors include cigarette smoking and other environmental carcinogens such as air pollution and occupational exposure to nickel, chromium and asbestos. Cigarette smoking is a proven and major risk factor for lung cancer.  

References 

Akanbi, M. O., Carroll, A. J., Achenbach, C., O’Dwyer, L. C., Jordan, N., Hitsman, B., Bilaver, L. A., McHugh, M. C., & Murphy, R. (2019). The efficacy of smoking cessation interventions in low‐ and middle‐income countries: A systematic review and meta‐analysis. Addiction, 114(4), 620–635. https://doi.org/10.1111/add.14518 

Camiña, N., McWilliams, T. L., McKeon, T. P., Penning, T. M., & Hwang, W.-T. (2022). Identification of spatio-temporal clusters of lung cancer cases in Pennsylvania, USA: 2010–2017. BMC Cancer, 22, 555. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-022-09652-8 

Coughlin, S. S., Vernon, M., Majeed, B., Clary, C., Moore, J., Islam, K. M., & Tingen, M. S. (2020). Tobacco cessation, rural residence, and lung cancer. Journal of Environment and Health Sciences, 6(1), 1–4. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7644114/ 

Demner-Fushman, D., Mrabet, Y., & Ben Abacha, A. (2019). Consumer health information and question answering: helping consumers find answers to their health-related information needs. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association. https://doi.org/10.1093/jamia/ocz152 

Hersi, M., Traversy, G., Thombs, B. D., Beck, A., Skidmore, B., Groulx, S., Lang, E., Reynolds, D. L., Wilson, B., Bernstein, S. L., Selby, P., Johnson-Obaseki, S., Manuel, D., Pakhale, S., Presseau, J., Courage, S., Hutton, B., Shea, B. J., Welch, V., & Morrow, M. (2019). Effectiveness of stop smoking interventions among adults: protocol for an overview of systematic reviews and an updated systematic review. Systematic Reviews, 8(28). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-018-0928-x 

Kumar, V., Abbas, A. K., Aster, J. C., & Perkins, J. A. (2018). Robbins Basic Pathology (10th ed.). Pennsylvania Elsevier. 

Thai, A. A., Solomon, B. J., Sequist, L. V., Gainor, J. F., & Heist, R. S. (2021). Lung cancer. The Lancet, 398(10299), 535–554. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(21)00312-3 

Tindle, H. A., Stevenson Duncan, M., Greevy, R. A., Vasan, R. S., Kundu, S., Massion, P. P., & Freiberg, M. S. (2018). Lifetime Smoking History and Risk of Lung Cancer: Results From the Framingham Heart Study. JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 110(11), 1201–1207. https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djy041 

Zhu, Y., McKeon, T. P., Tam, V., Vachani, A., Penning, T. M., & Hwang, W.-T. (2020). Geographic Differences in Lung Cancer Incidence: A Study of a Major Metropolitan Area within Southeastern Pennsylvania. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(24), 9498. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17249498