DNP 825 How could you better implement descriptive

Grand Canyon University DNP 825 How could you better implement descriptive epidemiological methods in your current or future practice?-Step-By-Step Guide

This guide will demonstrate how to complete the Grand Canyon University DNP 825 How could you better implement descriptive epidemiological methods in your current or future practice? assignment based on general principles of academic writing. Here, we will show you the A, B, Cs of completing an academic paper, irrespective of the instructions. After guiding you through what to do, the guide will leave one or two sample essays at the end to highlight the various sections discussed below.

How to Research and Prepare for DNP 825 How could you better implement descriptive epidemiological methods in your current or future practice?

Whether one passes or fails an academic assignment such as the Grand Canyon University DNP 825 How could you better implement descriptive epidemiological methods in your current or future practice? depends on the preparation done beforehand. The first thing to do once you receive an assignment is to quickly skim through the requirements. Once that is done, start going through the instructions one by one to clearly understand what the instructor wants. The most important thing here is to understand the required format—whether it is APA, MLA, Chicago, etc.

After understanding the requirements of the paper, the next phase is to gather relevant materials. The first place to start the research process is the weekly resources. Go through the resources provided in the instructions to determine which ones fit the assignment. After reviewing the provided resources, use the university library to search for additional resources. After gathering sufficient and necessary resources, you are now ready to start drafting your paper.

How to Write the Introduction for DNP 825 How could you better implement descriptive epidemiological methods in your current or future practice?

The introduction for the Grand Canyon University DNP 825 How could you better implement descriptive epidemiological methods in your current or future practice? is where you tell the instructor what your paper will encompass. In three to four statements, highlight the important points that will form the basis of your paper. Here, you can include statistics to show the importance of the topic you will be discussing. At the end of the introduction, write a clear purpose statement outlining what exactly will be contained in the paper. This statement will start with “The purpose of this paper…” and then proceed to outline the various sections of the instructions.

Need a high-quality paper urgently?

We can deliver within hours.

PLACE AN ORDER

How to Write the Body for DNP 825 How could you better implement descriptive epidemiological methods in your current or future practice?

After the introduction, move into the main part of the DNP 825 How could you better implement descriptive epidemiological methods in your current or future practice? assignment, which is the body. Given that the paper you will be writing is not experimental, the way you organize the headings and subheadings of your paper is critically important. In some cases, you might have to use more subheadings to properly organize the assignment. The organization will depend on the rubric provided. Carefully examine the rubric, as it will contain all the detailed requirements of the assignment. Sometimes, the rubric will have information that the normal instructions lack.

Another important factor to consider at this point is how to do citations. In-text citations are fundamental as they support the arguments and points you make in the paper. At this point, the resources gathered at the beginning will come in handy. Integrating the ideas of the authors with your own will ensure that you produce a comprehensive paper. Also, follow the given citation format. In most cases, APA 7 is the preferred format for nursing assignments.

How to Write the Conclusion for DNP 825 How could you better implement descriptive epidemiological methods in your current or future practice?

After completing the main sections, write the conclusion of your paper. The conclusion is a summary of the main points you made in your paper. However, you need to rewrite the points and not simply copy and paste them. By restating the points from each subheading, you will provide a nuanced overview of the assignment to the reader.

How to Format the References List for DNP 825 How could you better implement descriptive epidemiological methods in your current or future practice?

The very last part of your paper involves listing the sources used in your paper. These sources should be listed in alphabetical order and double-spaced. Additionally, use a hanging indent for each source that appears in this list. Lastly, only the sources cited within the body of the paper should appear here.

Stuck? Let Us Help You

Completing assignments can sometimes be overwhelming, especially with the multitude of academic and personal responsibilities you may have. If you find yourself stuck or unsure at any point in the process, don’t hesitate to reach out for professional assistance. Our assignment writing services are designed to help you achieve your academic goals with ease.

Our team of experienced writers is well-versed in academic writing and familiar with the specific requirements of the DNP 825 How could you better implement descriptive epidemiological methods in your current or future practice? assignment. We can provide you with personalized support, ensuring your assignment is well-researched, properly formatted, and thoroughly edited. Get a feel of the quality we guarantee – ORDER NOW.

Sample Answer for DNP 825 How could you better implement descriptive epidemiological methods in your current or future practice?

Re: Topic 2 DQ 1

The field of epidemiology has been broadly defined as “the study of how disease spreads and can be controlled or the branch of medicine which deals with the incidence, distribution, and possible control of diseases and other factors relating to health. One may ask why a distinct field of research is needed in order to more effectively translate research into practice. Implementation science” is one of several terms that have been used to describe the science of putting knowledge or evidence into action and of understanding what, why, and how evidence or evidence-based practices work in the real world.

Implementing science is broken down into 2 components, dissemination research and implementation research, which are defined as follows:

Dissemination research is the scientific study of targeted distribution of information and intervention materials to a specific public health or clinical practice audience. The intent is to understand how best to spread and sustain knowledge and the associated evidence-based interventions.
Implementation research is the scientific study of the use of strategies to adopt and integrate evidence-based health interventions into clinical and community settings in order to improve patient outcomes and benefit population health.

Just as epidemiologists may rely on causal directed acyclic graphs to determine which variables should be included in a regression model as possible confounders and which should be considered as potential mediators or effect modifiers. While it has been widely asserted that epidemiologists’ core function is to observe and analyze the distribution and control of diseases, we may disproportionately focus on the etiological questions at the cost of addressing the solutions. Given the emerging trend in translational sciences and the call by leaders in the field to take a more consequentialist approach.

Reference

Friis, R.H., & Sellers, T.A.(2020). Epidemiology for public health practice(6th ed.).Lones &Bartlett Learning

Neta, G., Brownson, R. C., & Chambers, D. A. (2018). Opportunities for Epidemiologists in Implementation Science: A Primer. American journal of epidemiology, 187(5), 899–910. https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwx323

Sample Answer 2 for DNP 825 How could you better implement descriptive epidemiological methods in your current or future practice?

Epidemiology is widely perceived as a public health discipline within which methodology matters. Methods dominate educational curriculums and influential textbooks. Epidemiological societies regularly feature methods sessions at their national and international meetings and, at least informally, the discipline recognizes the methodologists who study the methods and the practitioners who use them. It follows those epidemiological methods, whether quantitative (for example, meta-analysis or logistic regression) or qualitative (for example, causal inference or narrative reviews), have a theoretical side and a more practical side. Inquiries into the relation between any method as a method and the practice of that method are relatively uncommon. According to Fox et al. (2022), Descriptive epidemiology suffer from lack of acknowledgement in academics and can make things more difficult. We need to utilize descriptive epidemiology as a goal to improve health populations and ensuring equity in health.

Falls are a common cause of injury and pose an increased risk of morbidity, mortality, and lifelong disability. Falls encompass a troublesome definition and can pose challenges in epidemiological studies. Data on fall-related hospital admissions in Portugal remain unpublished. Falls is a great example to use this method. Falls occur frequently and mostly unwitnessed among elderly adults, highlighting the need for more effective and individualized fall prevention. Fall efficacy enhancing programs for nursing home residents should take degree of self-care, chronic diseases, sensory loss, foot injuries, cognitive impairment, living environment, and gender into account.

Fox, M. P., Murray, E. J., Lesko, C. R., & Sealy-Jefferson, S. (2022). On the Need to Revitalize Descriptive Epidemiology. American journal of epidemiology, 191(7), 1174–1179. https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwac056

Zhang, L., Zeng, Y., Weng, C., Yan, J., & Fang, Y. (2019). Epidemiological characteristics and factors influencing falls among elderly adults in long-term care facilities in Xiamen, China. Medicine, 98(8), e14375. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000014375

DNP-825 Topic 2 DQ 2 Sample Answer

The epidemiological study design that this learner will use for the DPI project is quasi-experimental. In quasi-experimental studies, the intervention is expected to impact the outcome (Melnyk & Fineout-Overholt, 2019). This study can only be nonrandomized because the participants will be put into two groups: preintervention and postintervention (Melnyk & Fineout-Overholt, 2019).

The population for this project will be adult patients who have positive urine cultures and have been admitted to the hospital. The intervention will entail implementing the Infectious Disease Society of America’s (IDSA) clinical practice guidelines for the management of asymptomatic bacteriuria (ASB) in all patients on the medical floor in the clinical setting (Nicolle et al., 2019). The clinical practice guideline explains that patients with no signs and symptoms of a urinary tract infection (UTI) should not have a urine culture ordered or antibiotics given (Nicolle et al., 2019). In other words, unless the patient presents with fever, burning with urination, suprapubic or flank pain, acute urinary retention, or new hematuria not related to catheter insertion, a urine culture should not be ordered, and antibiotics should not be given for the treatment of a suspected UTI (Nicolle et al., 2019). Nurses and providers for this unit will be educated on using IDSA’s clinical practice guideline. An algorithm will be developed to assist the providers in deciding whether to order a urine culture and antibiotics (Nicolle et al., 2019). Preintervention and postintervention charts will be reviewed for the presence of signs and symptoms of a UTI or not. Urine culture ordering and antibiotic use will be measured preintervention and postintervention.

A quasi-experimental design is a good design for this study because of the ability to measure the impact of implementing the IDSA clinical practice guidelines for the management of ASB on urine culture ordering and antibiotic use. Anticipated strengths of this study include the low chance of selection bias because the study will include all patients admitted to the medical unit. A limitation would be the portability of these results to another type of unit with a different population. The inability to control the number of patients’ comorbidities and the inclusion of participants with recurrent UTIs are other anticipated limitations of this study. Lastly, patients’ inclusion in this study will primarily rely on provider documentation of their symptoms in the electronic medical record.

Melnyk, B. & Fineout-Overholt, E. (2019). Evidence-based practice in nursing and healthcare. Wolters Kluwer. https://bibliu.com/app/#/view/books/9781496386892/epub/OEBPS/xhtml/17_chapter05.html#page_134

Nicolle, L., Gupta, K., Bradley, S., Colgan, R., DeMuri, G,. Drekonja, D., Eckert, L., Geerlings, S., Koves, B., Hooton, T., Juthani-Mehta, M., Knight, S., Saint, S., Schaeffer, A., Trautner, B., Wullt, B., & Siemieniuk, R. (2019). Clinical practice guideline for the management of asymptomatic bacteriuria: 2019 update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clinical Infectious Diseases, 68. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30895288/  