DNP 825 Which epidemiological study design would you use to evaluate an intervention in your current or future practice?

Grand Canyon University DNP 825 Which epidemiological study design would you use to evaluate an intervention in your current or future practice?-Step-By-Step Guide

This guide will demonstrate how to complete the Grand Canyon University DNP 825 Which epidemiological study design would you use to evaluate an intervention in your current or future practice?  assignment based on general principles of academic writing. Here, we will show you the A, B, Cs of completing an academic paper, irrespective of the instructions. After guiding you through what to do, the guide will leave one or two sample essays at the end to highlight the various sections discussed below.

How to Research and Prepare for DNP 825 Which epidemiological study design would you use to evaluate an intervention in your current or future practice?                            

Whether one passes or fails an academic assignment such as the Grand Canyon University DNP 825 Which epidemiological study design would you use to evaluate an intervention in your current or future practice?  depends on the preparation done beforehand. The first thing to do once you receive an assignment is to quickly skim through the requirements. Once that is done, start going through the instructions one by one to clearly understand what the instructor wants. The most important thing here is to understand the required format—whether it is APA, MLA, Chicago, etc.

After understanding the requirements of the paper, the next phase is to gather relevant materials. The first place to start the research process is the weekly resources. Go through the resources provided in the instructions to determine which ones fit the assignment. After reviewing the provided resources, use the university library to search for additional resources. After gathering sufficient and necessary resources, you are now ready to start drafting your paper.

How to Write the Introduction for DNP 825 Which epidemiological study design would you use to evaluate an intervention in your current or future practice?                          

The introduction for the Grand Canyon University DNP 825 Which epidemiological study design would you use to evaluate an intervention in your current or future practice?  is where you tell the instructor what your paper will encompass. In three to four statements, highlight the important points that will form the basis of your paper. Here, you can include statistics to show the importance of the topic you will be discussing. At the end of the introduction, write a clear purpose statement outlining what exactly will be contained in the paper. This statement will start with “The purpose of this paper…” and then proceed to outline the various sections of the instructions.

How to Write the Body for DNP 825 Which epidemiological study design would you use to evaluate an intervention in your current or future practice?                          

After the introduction, move into the main part of the DNP 825 Which epidemiological study design would you use to evaluate an intervention in your current or future practice?  assignment, which is the body. Given that the paper you will be writing is not experimental, the way you organize the headings and subheadings of your paper is critically important. In some cases, you might have to use more subheadings to properly organize the assignment. The organization will depend on the rubric provided. Carefully examine the rubric, as it will contain all the detailed requirements of the assignment. Sometimes, the rubric will have information that the normal instructions lack.

Another important factor to consider at this point is how to do citations. In-text citations are fundamental as they support the arguments and points you make in the paper. At this point, the resources gathered at the beginning will come in handy. Integrating the ideas of the authors with your own will ensure that you produce a comprehensive paper. Also, follow the given citation format. In most cases, APA 7 is the preferred format for nursing assignments.

How to Write the Conclusion for DNP 825 Which epidemiological study design would you use to evaluate an intervention in your current or future practice?                          

After completing the main sections, write the conclusion of your paper. The conclusion is a summary of the main points you made in your paper. However, you need to rewrite the points and not simply copy and paste them. By restating the points from each subheading, you will provide a nuanced overview of the assignment to the reader.

How to Format the References List for DNP 825 Which epidemiological study design would you use to evaluate an intervention in your current or future practice?                            

The very last part of your paper involves listing the sources used in your paper. These sources should be listed in alphabetical order and double-spaced. Additionally, use a hanging indent for each source that appears in this list. Lastly, only the sources cited within the body of the paper should appear here.

Stuck? Let Us Help You

Completing assignments can sometimes be overwhelming, especially with the multitude of academic and personal responsibilities you may have. If you find yourself stuck or unsure at any point in the process, don’t hesitate to reach out for professional assistance. Our assignment writing services are designed to help you achieve your academic goals with ease. 

Our team of experienced writers is well-versed in academic writing and familiar with the specific requirements of the DNP 825 Which epidemiological study design would you use to evaluate an intervention in your current or future practice? assignment. We can provide you with personalized support, ensuring your assignment is well-researched, properly formatted, and thoroughly edited. Get a feel of the quality we guarantee – ORDER NOW. 

Sample Answer for DNP 825 Which epidemiological study design would you use to evaluate an intervention in your current or future practice? 

Re: Topic 2 DQ 2

Randomized Clinical tirals epidemiology design is well-designed medical research, gives cause and risk. Belbasis et al (2018) agrees that this Clinical design is my choice due to its components of dealing with health event, involves persons, locttion, timelline , cause , risk factors ad modes of transmission. This design would be used to evaluate the prevelence of Humnan immunodeficiency virus ( HIV) and pregnant women population in my future practice. This design choice is in agreement with article from Atiiola et al ( 2018) . Pregnant women are most vulnerable high-risk population impacted by HIV. Mode of transmission is prevalent in population with history of intravenous drug use, multiple sexual partners, blodd transfusion history. HIV infection becomes an epidemic for this population when coinfected with other viral disease such as Tuberculosis, Hepatitis B, Hepatitis C.  The authors of this article assessed epidemiology of HIV among women in ten facilities in south-west Nigeria. The result revealed positve HIV pregnant women were 6 time more likely to require more post partum care, blood loss and complictions (Atilola et al 2018).

The clinical deisgn will help to understand earlier disease characteristics , offer educational interventions, initiate antiviral prohylaxis and monotr medication adherenae to privent mother-to child transmission This design is best option due to the fact that it will provide overview of epdemiology and cinical manifestations of HIV infection in pregnant women, provide therapeutic modlities which includes psychological care plan ( Atewogbola et al 2021).

Belbasis L, Bellou V. Introduction to Epidemiological Studies. Methods Mol Biol. 2018;1793:1-6. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4939-7868-7_1. PMID: 29876887.

Atewogbola, G. O., Olufemi, B. T., Babawale, A. A., Taiwo, M. A., Tadese, S. A., Olaniyan, A. A., Sule, W. F. (2021). Multiple sexual partners as major predictor of human immunodeficiency virus seropositivity among pregnant women, osun state, nigeria. Viral Immunology, 34, 632-638. https://dx.doi.org/10.1089/vim.2021.0029

Atilola, G., Randle, T., Obadara, T., Komolafe, I. O., Odutolu, G., Olomu, J., Adenuga, L. (2018). Epidemiology of hiv and tuberculosis in pregnant women, south west nigeria. Journal of Infection and Public Health, 11, 826-833. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jiph.2018.06.004

Sample Answer 2 for DNP 825 Which epidemiological study design would you use to evaluate an intervention in your current or future practice? 

Epidemiological studies are unified by their shared goals and basis in defined populations (Yoshida, K., 2015). The case series (or register-based study) examines trends in deaths, cancers, notifiable diseases, and hospitalizations (Yoshida, K., 2015). Cohort studies produce data on disease incidence and are especially good on associations between risk factors and disease outcomes. The design and interpretation should be in the context of traditional, systematic. Meta-analytic reviews (Bröckelmann, N., 2022). one of the basic requirements of a cohort-type study is that none of the subjects have the outcome of interest at the beginning of the follow-up period. Time must pass to determine the frequency of developing the outcome. The epidemiological study approach to be applied to my future clinical practice is an observational cohort study comparing the risk of developing uterine cancer between postmenopausal women receiving hormone replacement therapy and those not receiving hormones. There is consideration of specific eligibility criteria for the participants before the start of the study: 1) they should be female, 2) they should be post-menopausal, and 3) they should have a uterus. Among post-menopausal women, a number might already have had a hysterectomy, perhaps for persistent bleeding problems, endometriosis, or prior uterine cancer.  I chose this study because, in cohort studies, investigators enroll individuals who do not yet have the health outcomes of interest at the beginning of the observation period. I assess exposure status for a variety of potentially relevant exposures. The participants are then followed forward in time as longitudinal studies rather than cross-sectional, and health outcomes are recorded. With this data, I can sort the subjects according to their exposure status for one of the exposures of interest and compare the disease incidence among the exposure categories. Cohort and case-control studies are observational studies because investigators do not allocate exposure status. Some exposures are constituents (e.g., one’s genome), some are behaviors and lifestyle choices, and others are circumstantial, such as social, political, and economic determinants that affect health (Bröckelmann N. et al., 2022). According to Bröckelmann N. et al. (2022), cohort studies more clearly indicate the temporal sequence between exposure and outcome because, in a cohort study, subjects are known to be disease-free at the beginning of the observation period when their exposure status is established. In case-control studies, one begins with diseased and non-diseased people and then ascertains their prior exposures (Yoshida, K., 2015). This is a reasonable approach to establishing past directions, but subjects may have difficulty remembering them, and their recollection may be biased by having the outcome (recall bias). Some disadvantage of cohort study includes You may have to follow large numbers of subjects for a long time, and they can be costly and time-consuming, to name a few.

Yoshida, K., Solomon, D. & Kim, S. Active-comparator design and new-user design in observational studies. Nat Rev Rheumatol 11, 437–441 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1038/nrrheum.2015.30

Bröckelmann, N., Balduzzi, S., Harms, L. et al. Evaluating agreement between bodies of evidence from randomized controlled trials and cohort studies in medical research: a meta-epidemiological study. BMC Med 20, 174 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-022-02369-2

DNP-825 Topic 3 DQ 1 Sample Answer

Heathcare databases, also known as “big data”, aid in maximizing medical data sets to enhance research for clinical related and policy driven aspects. In order to improve research for population health, databases must be aggregated, interpreted and integrated into a population level and on an individual level (Machluf, Tal, Navon, & Chaiter, 2017). Currently, a mix of multiple respiratory illnesses are inundating the emergency department such as Influenza, rhinovirus, Respiratory Syncytial virus (RSV), and Coronavirus (all forms, including COVID-19). These respiratory illnesses are causing an overwhelming number of pediatric admissions amongst all the healthcare organizations within this count and neighboring counties. Recently, the California Department of Public Health (CDPH), approved healthcare institutes to admit pediatric patients to adult departments to aid in offloading emergency room admission boarders. Although seasonal, influenza is a respiratory illness that is commonly received from the community, especially within family households. According to the Centers for Disease and Prevention (CDC, 2021), influenza prevention strategies include vaccination, respiratory hygiene, cough etiquette, infection control precautions, and steps to minimize exposure. The data of the community population, healthcare workers, students, and parents of children distinguish vaccine compliance and vaccine hesitancy as it relates to respiratory illnesses and the need for admission. COVId-19 vaccine compliance is said to directly correlate to influenza vaccine compliance. Dror et.al., (2020) reports that medial doctors within internal medicine have the highest rate of vaccination. Furthermore, the acceptance rates for the seasonal influenza vaccine were discovered during a survey of doctors (92% vaccination rate), nurses (69% vaccination rate), and the general population (66% vaccination rate). The first step to integrating strategies to improve compliance in vaccination, is to collect data regarding the reasons for non-vaccination. The integration of vaccine strategies within an emergency department includes encouraging healthcare workers to be vaccinated, screening all patients for vaccination status and encouraging administration of the vaccine during their visit (if applicable based on providers medical screen). Within the community, the goal is to educate and encourage vaccines to those who are pregnant, have chronic illnesses, and children. A continued campaign on influenza and vaccines are needed to achieve higher rates (Harding, 2018).   

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2021, May 13). Prevention strategies for seasonal influenza in healthcare settings. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Retrieved December 10, 2022, from https://www.cdc.gov/flu/professionals/infectioncontrol/healthcaresettings.htm  

Dror, A. A., Eisenbach, N., Taiber, S., Morozov, N. G., Mizrachi, M., Zigron, A., Srouji, S., & Sela, E. (2020). Vaccine hesitancy: The next challenge in the fight against COVID-19. European Journal of Epidemiology, 35(8), 775–779. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10654-020-00671-y  

Harding, A., & Heaton, N. (2018). Efforts to improve the seasonal influenza vaccine. Vaccines, 6(2), 19. https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines6020019  

Machluf, Y., Tal, O., Navon, A., & Chaiter, Y. (2017). From population databases to research and informed health decisions and policy. Frontiers in Public Health, 5. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2017.00230