DNP 830 Examining Methods and Designs 

Grand Canyon University DNP 830 Examining Methods and Designs  – Step-By-Step Guide

This guide will demonstrate how to complete the Grand Canyon University DNP 830 Examining Methods and Designs  assignment based on general principles of academic writing. Here, we will show you the A, B, Cs of completing an academic paper, irrespective of the instructions. After guiding you through what to do, the guide will leave one or two sample essays at the end to highlight the various sections discussed below.

How to Research and Prepare for DNP 830 Examining Methods and Designs     

Whether one passes or fails an academic assignment such as the Grand Canyon University NUR 550 Benchmark – Evidence-Based Practice Project: Literature Review depends on the preparation done beforehand. The first thing to do once you receive an assignment is to quickly skim through the requirements. Once that is done, start going through the instructions one by one to clearly understand what the instructor wants. The most important thing here is to understand the required format—whether it is APA, MLA, Chicago, etc.

After understanding the requirements of the paper, the next phase is to gather relevant materials. The first place to start the research process is the weekly resources. Go through the resources provided in the instructions to determine which ones fit the assignment. After reviewing the provided resources, use the university library to search for additional resources. After gathering sufficient and necessary resources, you are now ready to start drafting your paper.

How to Write the Introduction for DNP 830 Examining Methods and Designs     

The introduction for the Grand Canyon University DNP 830 Examining Methods and Designs is where you tell the instructor what your paper will encompass. In three to four statements, highlight the important points that will form the basis of your paper. Here, you can include statistics to show the importance of the topic you will be discussing. At the end of the introduction, write a clear purpose statement outlining what exactly will be contained in the paper. This statement will start with “The purpose of this paper…” and then proceed to outline the various sections of the instructions.

How to Write the Body for DNP 830 Examining Methods and Designs     

After the introduction, move into the main part of the DNP 830 Examining Methods and Designs      assignment, which is the body. Given that the paper you will be writing is not experimental, the way you organize the headings and subheadings of your paper is critically important. In some cases, you might have to use more subheadings to properly organize the assignment. The organization will depend on the rubric provided. Carefully examine the rubric, as it will contain all the detailed requirements of the assignment. Sometimes, the rubric will have information that the normal instructions lack.

Another important factor to consider at this point is how to do citations. In-text citations are fundamental as they support the arguments and points you make in the paper. At this point, the resources gathered at the beginning will come in handy. Integrating the ideas of the authors with your own will ensure that you produce a comprehensive paper. Also, follow the given citation format. In most cases, APA 7 is the preferred format for nursing assignments.

How to Write the Conclusion for DNP 830 Examining Methods and Designs     

After completing the main sections, write the conclusion of your paper. The conclusion is a summary of the main points you made in your paper. However, you need to rewrite the points and not simply copy and paste them. By restating the points from each subheading, you will provide a nuanced overview of the assignment to the reader.

How to Format the References List for DNP 830 Examining Methods and Designs     

The very last part of your paper involves listing the sources used in your paper. These sources should be listed in alphabetical order and double-spaced. Additionally, use a hanging indent for each source that appears in this list. Lastly, only the sources cited within the body of the paper should appear here.

Stuck? Let Us Help You

Completing assignments can sometimes be overwhelming, especially with the multitude of academic and personal responsibilities you may have. If you find yourself stuck or unsure at any point in the process, don’t hesitate to reach out for professional assistance. Our assignment writing services are designed to help you achieve your academic goals with ease. 

Our team of experienced writers is well-versed in academic writing and familiar with the specific requirements of the DNP 830 Examining Methods and Designs  assignment. We can provide you with personalized support, ensuring your assignment is well-researched, properly formatted, and thoroughly edited. Get a feel of the quality we guarantee – ORDER NOW. 

Sample Answer for DNP 830 Examining Methods and Designs 

Healthcare issues are extensive, and researchers focus on various items at different times. Broadly, research studies aim to explore a concept in-depth to advance knowledge through ideas and theories. Due to their critical role in advancing healthcare, nurses should actively engage in research to improve patient care and address practice problems and other goals. Successful research requires nurses to understand research essentials such as methods, designs, data collection, and statistical analyses. The three articles demonstrate how researchers use different methods and designs. The purpose of this paper is to examine the methods and designs to understand better what they entail and their significance.

Characteristics Associated with the Methods of Each Article

Research methods vary with the studied variables, the aim of the research, and other factors. In the research context, methods are primarily about the tools that researchers use in a study. They could be quantitative, qualitative, or mixed methods. In the first article, Cheng et al. (2018) conducted a quantitative study using observations and focused group interviews. The study’s aim was to explore the impact of a mental health home visit partnership on patient satisfaction. In a quantitative study, researchers examine numerical data and often use statistical tools in data analysis. The other key characteristic of the quantitative method is allowing researchers to measure variables and relationships.

ALSO READ:

DNP 830 Working With Descriptive Statistics 

DNP 830 Working With Inferential Statistics 

DNP 830 Working With Descriptive Statistics 

DNP 830 Benchmark What Are the Data Saying?

DNP 830 Topic 8 Reflective Journal 

DNP 830A Data Analysis

In the second article, Gilad et al. (2020) conducted qualitative research based on the grounded theory approach. The study examined patients’ and staff’s attitudes and feelings on medication use. Interviews are commonly used in qualitative research. When using the qualitative method, researchers collect non-numerical data and primarily focus on establishing patterns. In the third article, Zimmerman et al. (2020) conducted a mixed-methods study. As the name suggests, mixed-method research combines (mixes) quantitative and qualitative techniques in data collection and analysis. It also allows researchers to explain unexpected results.

Characteristics Associated with the Design of Each Article

Research designs vary with the methods. Generally, a research design is an overall strategy a researcher uses to investigate the research problem thoroughly. Cheng et al. (2018) used a quasi-experimental quantitative design. The main characteristic of this design is demonstrating a causal relationship between an intervention and outcome. Quasi-experiments do not use randomization. In this article, participants were classified into the experimental and control groups. Participants received the partnership intervention in the experimental group, while the control group continued with routine home visits. To examine the causality between intervention and outcomes, researchers measured patient satisfaction pre-intervention, after six months, and after one year. 

Research designs vary in the other articles, further demonstrating how research methods and designs vary depending on the type of study. Gilad et al. (2020) utilized a grounded theory approach using semi-structured interviews. Grounded theory represents the systematic collection and analysis of data to construct a hypothesis. As a result, researchers determine the relationship between the study variables through deductive reasoning. In the other article, Zimmerman et al. (2020) used the descriptive design. In this design, researchers obtain information systematically to describe a phenomenon. This is evident through the use of semi-structured interviews and multiple-choice questions to assess students’ perceptions.

Statistical Analysis Associated with the Method and Design of the Articles

Researchers collect massive amounts of data when analyzing the relationship between variables. Statistical analysis aims to make data meaningful, hence breathing life into it (Grove & Gray, 2022). The articles demonstrate how statistical analysis varies with research methods and designs. In the quasi-experimental quantitative study, Cheng et al. (2018) analyzed data using SPSS Version 20.0. This is a common statistical analysis tool for examining statistical significance. The p-value validates a hypothesis against the collected data. In the qualitative research based on the grounded theory approach, Gilad et al. (2020) analyzed the data using thematic analysis. This systematic approach is common in qualitative research, where researchers identify major themes and relationships between concepts. In the descriptive, mixed-methods study, Zimmerman et al. (2020) subjected the data to inferential and descriptive statistical analysis. Chi-square statistics identified the differences in students’ ability to answer questions correctly. Overall, the statistical analysis demonstrates how different data sets are analyzed to make them more meaningful.

Reliability and Validity Issues Associated with Each Method and Design

Research studies should be highly valid and reliable regardless of their aims and scope. Validity and reliability differentiate credible and bad research. The three articles demonstrate a high regard for internal reliability. A lack of internal reliability implies that procedures do not yield similar results on repeated trials (Grove & Gray, 2022). In the first article, Cheng et al. (2018) confirmed that the scale used was a reliable measurement by a Cronbach’s Alpha of 0.93. Gilad et al. (2020) ensured consistency between findings by conducting interviews using three interviewers. Zimmerman et al. (2020) ensured high reliability by using multiple-choice questions to achieve scores consistency. Studies that lack validity cannot be generalized since results deviate from the truth. To avoid this issue, researchers in the three articles ensured content validity through different techniques. Cheng et al. (2018) used questions with high content validity indexes, while Gilad et al. (2020) used questions with alternating topics. Zimmerman et al. (2020) promoted validity by exploring the study material more broadly (mixed methods) in terms of perceptions and feelings.

Summary of the Articles’ Methods and Designs

Different healthcare concepts are studied differently. Cheng et al. (2018) conducted a quasi-experimental quantitative design with an experimental and control group. The main characteristic of this approach is the lack of randomization. Gilad et al. (2020) conducted a qualitative study using the grounded theory approach. In such studies, data is collected to construct a hypothesis. In the third article, Zimmerman et al. (2020) conducted a descriptive, mixed-methods study. As a result, they combined quantitative and qualitative techniques to study the relationship between variables.

Conclusion

Nursing research is extensive due to the expansive nature of patients’ needs and healthcare issues. Methodologies also need continuous improvement, necessitating rigorous research. The DNP nurse should be aware of the differences between research methods and designs and their application. A comparative analysis of the three articles has demonstrated the differences in research techniques and their suitability. It has also shown how statistical analysis methods vary with the research design.

References

Cheng, J. F., Huang, X. Y., Lin, M. C., Wang, Y. H., & Yeh, T. P. (2018). A mental health home visit service partnership intervention on improving patients’ satisfaction. Archives of psychiatric nursing, 32(4), 610-616. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apnu.2018.03.010

Gilad, L., Haviv, Y. S., Cohen-Glickman, I., Chinitz, D., & Cohen, M. J. (2020). Chronic drug treatment among hemodialysis patients: a qualitative study of patients, nursing and medical staff attitudes and approaches. BMC Nephrology, 21(1), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12882-020-01900-y

Grove, S. K., & Gray, J. R. (2022). Understanding nursing research e-book: Building an evidence-based practice. Elsevier health sciences.

Zimmerman, P. A. P., Sladdin, I., Shaban, R. Z., Gilbert, J., & Brown, L. (2020). Factors influencing hand hygiene practice of nursing students: a descriptive, mixed-methods study. Nurse Education in Practice, 44, 102746. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2020.102746