DNP 835 Preconference Evaluation Individual Success Plan (ISP)

Grand Canyon University DNP 835 Preconference Evaluation Individual Success Plan (ISP)   – Step-By-Step Guide

This guide will demonstrate how to complete the Grand Canyon University DNP 835 Preconference Evaluation Individual Success Plan (ISP)     assignment based on general principles of academic writing. Here, we will show you the A, B, Cs of completing an academic paper, irrespective of the instructions. After guiding you through what to do, the guide will leave one or two sample essays at the end to highlight the various sections discussed below.

How to Research and Prepare for DNP 835 Preconference Evaluation Individual Success Plan (ISP)       

Whether one passes or fails an academic assignment such as the Grand Canyon University NUR 550 Benchmark – Evidence-Based Practice Project: Literature Review depends on the preparation done beforehand. The first thing to do once you receive an assignment is to quickly skim through the requirements. Once that is done, start going through the instructions one by one to clearly understand what the instructor wants. The most important thing here is to understand the required format—whether it is APA, MLA, Chicago, etc.

After understanding the requirements of the paper, the next phase is to gather relevant materials. The first place to start the research process is the weekly resources. Go through the resources provided in the instructions to determine which ones fit the assignment. After reviewing the provided resources, use the university library to search for additional resources. After gathering sufficient and necessary resources, you are now ready to start drafting your paper.

How to Write the Introduction for DNP 835 Preconference Evaluation Individual Success Plan (ISP)       

The introduction for the Grand Canyon University DNP 835 Preconference Evaluation Individual Success Plan (ISP)         is where you tell the instructor what your paper will encompass. In three to four statements, highlight the important points that will form the basis of your paper. Here, you can include statistics to show the importance of the topic you will be discussing. At the end of the introduction, write a clear purpose statement outlining what exactly will be contained in the paper. This statement will start with “The purpose of this paper…” and then proceed to outline the various sections of the instructions.

How to Write the Body for DNP 835 Preconference Evaluation Individual Success Plan (ISP)       

After the introduction, move into the main part of the DNP 835 Preconference Evaluation Individual Success Plan (ISP)        assignment, which is the body. Given that the paper you will be writing is not experimental, the way you organize the headings and subheadings of your paper is critically important. In some cases, you might have to use more subheadings to properly organize the assignment. The organization will depend on the rubric provided. Carefully examine the rubric, as it will contain all the detailed requirements of the assignment. Sometimes, the rubric will have information that the normal instructions lack.

Another important factor to consider at this point is how to do citations. In-text citations are fundamental as they support the arguments and points you make in the paper. At this point, the resources gathered at the beginning will come in handy. Integrating the ideas of the authors with your own will ensure that you produce a comprehensive paper. Also, follow the given citation format. In most cases, APA 7 is the preferred format for nursing assignments.

How to Write the Conclusion for DNP 835 Preconference Evaluation Individual Success Plan (ISP)       

After completing the main sections, write the conclusion of your paper. The conclusion is a summary of the main points you made in your paper. However, you need to rewrite the points and not simply copy and paste them. By restating the points from each subheading, you will provide a nuanced overview of the assignment to the reader.

How to Format the References List for DNP 835 Preconference Evaluation Individual Success Plan (ISP)       

The very last part of your paper involves listing the sources used in your paper. These sources should be listed in alphabetical order and double-spaced. Additionally, use a hanging indent for each source that appears in this list. Lastly, only the sources cited within the body of the paper should appear here.

Stuck? Let Us Help You

Completing assignments can sometimes be overwhelming, especially with the multitude of academic and personal responsibilities you may have. If you find yourself stuck or unsure at any point in the process, don’t hesitate to reach out for professional assistance. Our assignment writing services are designed to help you achieve your academic goals with ease. 

Our team of experienced writers is well-versed in academic writing and familiar with the specific requirements of the DNP 835 Preconference Evaluation Individual Success Plan (ISP) assignment. We can provide you with personalized support, ensuring your assignment is well-researched, properly formatted, and thoroughly edited. Get a feel of the quality we guarantee – ORDER NOW. 

Sample Answer for DNP 835 Preconference Evaluation Individual Success Plan (ISP)

Individual Success Plan (including Pre and Post Conference documentation) 

Course # __835A________ 

Updates and Modifications to this Individual Success Plan:  Always check the DC Network for updated versions of this plan for each course.  

Also Read

DNP-835 Quality and Sustainability Paper: Part 1 

DNP-835 Quality and Sustainability Paper: Part 2

DNP 835 Sustainability Worksheet 

DNP 835 DPI Project: Outline of 10 Strategic Points Revision Review

DNP 835 Sustainability Plan Presentation 

DNP-835 Summary of Current Course Content Knowledge

DNP 835 Topic 8 Reflective Journal 

DNP 835 DNP Reflective Journal

DNP 835 Patient Outcomes and Sustainable Change Syllabus

The table below should address the following programmatic requirements: (1) completion of required practice immersion hours, (2) completion of work associated with all DNP and GCU program competencies, (3) successful defense, and completion of your Direct Practice Improvement Project, if applicable to the current course.  

Description of Challenges And How To Overcome Them 

DNP-prepared nurses play critical roles in the healthcare system due to the vast knowledge obtained during DNP training. The implication is that the programs are rigorous and designed to help prepare the nurses. The Grand Canyon’s DNP 835 module has also been designed to offer the students the best training and equip them with skills. However, succeeding in the module can be hampered by various obstacles and challenges which an individual may face. Therefore, it is important to timeously explore mitigation strategies that can be used to ensure success. Among the potential challenges is a struggle with time management. The DNP modules have a lot of content to cover, and coupled with the fact that the student’s attention is also needed in other aspects of life, managing time can be a challenge. This can be solved by creating reasonable timetables and timelines to help in such. There could also be a potential loss of focus due to the overwhelming nature of the course. Therefore, it will be key to discuss with the mentors and fellow students how best the focus can be maintained throughout the course. 

Direct Practice Improvement Project Planning and Progression 

Elements of the design, development, and construction of the DPI project are integrated throughout the program curriculum. As you progress through the courses, use the following form to document your progress and preparation for the DPI project. 

Note: Learners should not recruit, implement, or collect data until after both site and GCU QI/IRB designations have been given. GCU QI/IRB occurs in DNP-960A. 

By typing in his/her signature below, the learner agrees to have read, understood, and be accountable for the instructions, assignments, and hours are shown above and that all questions have been satisfactorily answered by the faculty and/or program lead. Additionally, the learner agrees to provide the mentor, preceptor, or content expert (depending on the course) with a copy of the syllabus for the course at or before the time of signature Mentors, preceptors, or content experts will sign digitally or by wet ink upon initial receipt and at the end of the course to confirm that assignments have been complete with your guidance. 

Digital signatures with identifiers are accepted or wet ink.  

For the Mentor (Preceptor): By initialing below, I signify that I have received the following information from my student and/or through preceptor orientation training before the course: 

_____ Copy of or link to Graduate Field Experience Manual _____ I understand I must complete the course specific evaluations  

_____ Copy of or link to the University Policy Handbook ______ Instructions for GCU Practicum/Clinical Tracking System 

_____ Faculty Contact Information  

Direct and Indirect Hours 

APPENDIX A: 

GCU DNP Domains & Competencies 

1.  University’s Mission Critical Competencies  

How does this Individual Success Plan support the GCU Mission? 

MC1: Effective Communication:  Courses require students to engage in active discussion and expression of scholarly ideas in a variety of formats. Emphasis is placed on the dissemination of findings that impact health outcomes.  

MC2: Critical Thinking:  Courses require students to utilize and refine critical thinking skills by analyzing, synthesizing, integrating, and evaluating scientific evidence. Furthermore, students are expected to apply scientific evidence to practice improvement.  

MC3: Responsible Leadership:  Courses require students to develop and refine leadership skills. Students must demonstrate accountability to self and others.  Courses require collaboration, health care advocacy, and systems thinking. 

MC4: Global Citizenship: Global citizenship is incorporated into all courses when preparing responsible nursing leaders to appreciate the cultural, social, economic, and political trends affecting care delivery for disenfranchised or vulnerable populations. The focus is on reducing health disparities and fostering an environment of equitable health for all populations. 

MC5: Christian Worldview:  A Christian Worldview is expressed through weaving together values and ethics throughout the program. Students are encouraged to engage with populations from the foundation of a Christian worldview and to understand the effect of various worldviews and cultures on current healthcare systems. 

2. Domains and Competencies 

How does this Individual Success Plan support the DNP Domains and Competencies? 

Domain 1 – Scientific Underpinnings for Practice: Graduates of Grand Canyon University’s Doctor of Nursing Practice program will be able to: 

Competencies: 

1.1:  Integrate nursing science with knowledge from ethics, the biophysical, psychosocial, analytical, and organizational  

sciences as the basis for the highest level of nursing practice. 

1.2:  Apply science-based theories and concepts to determine the nature and significance of health and health care delivery phenomena. 

1.3:  Employ science-based theories and concepts to describe the actions and advanced strategies to enhance, alleviate, and ameliorate health and health care delivery phenomena as appropriate.  

1.4:  Develop and evaluate new practice approaches based on nursing theories and theories from other disciplines.   

Domain 2 – Leadership and Transformational Change: Graduates of Grand Canyon University’s Doctor of Nursing Practice program will be able to: 

Competencies: 

2.1:  Employ principles of business, finance, economics, and health policy to develop and implement effective plans for practice-level and/or system-wide practice initiatives that will improve the quality of health care delivery. 

2.2:  Demonstrate leadership, influence, and advocacy in the development and implementation of institutional, local, state, federal, and/or international health policy. 

2.3:  Employ consultative and leadership skills to lead intra-professional and interprofessional teams in the analysis and resolution of complex practice and organizational issues to create change in health care and complex healthcare delivery systems. 

2.4:  Provide leadership in the evaluation and resolution of policy, ethical, and legal issues within healthcare systems. 

Domain 3 – Systems Management: Graduates of Grand Canyon University’s Doctor of Nursing Practice program will be able to: 

Competencies: 

3.1:  Demonstrate the conceptual ability and technical skills to develop and execute an evaluation plan involving data extraction from practice information systems and databases. 

3.2:   Evaluate current consumer health information sources for accuracy, timeliness, and appropriateness. 

3.3:  Analyze and communicate critical elements necessary to the selection, use, and evaluation of health information systems and patient care technology. 

3.4: Design, select, use, and evaluate programs that monitor outcomes of care, care systems, and quality improvement, including consumer use of health care information systems. 

Domain 4 – Population Management: Graduates of Grand Canyon University’s Doctor of Nursing Practice program will be able to: 

Competencies: 

4.1:  Analyze epidemiological, biostatistical, environmental, and other appropriate scientific data related to individual, aggregate, and population health. 

4.2:  Synthesize concepts to develop, implement, and evaluate interventions to improve individual, aggregate, and population health management. 

4.3:  Cultivate a mindset that is sensitive to the cultural, legal, and ethical differences among stakeholders. 

4.4:  Advocate for social justice, equity, and ethical policies within all healthcare arenas. 

4.5:  Develop and evaluate care delivery models and/or strategies for improved individual, aggregate, and population health management. 

Domain 5 – Analytic Foundations for Practice: Graduates of Grand Canyon University’s Doctor of Nursing Practice program will be able to: 

Competencies: 

5.1: Apply analytic methods to critically appraise existing literature and other evidence to identify and implement health care best practices. 

5.2:  Design and implement processes/strategies that evaluate outcomes of practice, practice patterns, and systems of care for an individual, aggregate, and populations against national benchmarks. 

5.3:  Design, direct, and evaluate quality improvement methodologies to promote safe, timely, effective, efficient, equitable, and patient-centered care. 

5.4:  Disseminate and apply relevant findings from evidence-based practice and research to enhance practice guidelines and enrich practice leading to improved healthcare outcomes. 

5.5:  Employ information technology and research methods to appropriately manage data for the creation, evaluation, and application of evidence that leads to improved health care. 

DNP 835 Quality and Sustainability SAMPLE

Quality and Sustainability  

The primary role of patient safety is to reduce and prevent perils, errors, and maltreatment that may occur to patients during healthcare provision (Sherman et al., 2020). Quality in healthcare is paramount, and all the measures and new interventions in healthcare look forward to improving the quality of care. As such, quality can be defined as the ability to satisfy requirements, while sustainability is the ability to maintain high quality over time (Sherman et al., 2020). While sustainability focuses on the long-term health of an institution, it also involves understanding the survival of the healthcare institution in the future. Therefore, the purpose of this assignment is to discuss the role of quality or safety in nursing practice.  

Evaluation of Barriers and Facilitators 

One of the barriers that may be experienced is inadequate management support. The management has the role of ensuring the safety and sustainability of healthcare institutions by ensuring an effective decision process that allows the clinic to gain significance in the modern nursing and healthcare delivery trend (Braithwaite et al., 2020). The dynamic nature of the healthcare system has been increasing the rate of change to meet the safety and quality need in healthcare. The management and leadership of the organization may not provide the optimum support needed for a project or proposed change. Therefore, strategies such as aligning the aims of the proposed project with that of the organization and increasing the participation of employees in the proposed project can be adopted to address the barrier.  

The other barrier that may be experienced is the resistance to change among healthcare providers. Employees might be reluctant to change because any proposed change would require them to change their ways of operation. These changes also reduce the output of the employees as it comes with the required training to meet the new changes required in the healthcare system (Vergunst et al., 2020). Factors such as a low level of awareness may contribute to the barrier. Interventions such as open communication and active involvement of the healthcare providers can be adopted to address the barrier. The proposed project is highly feasible for implementation due to the absence of a similar project in the institution and its ability to address patient care safety and quality needs.  

Health Care Entity 

The healthcare clinic is a nonprofit American healthcare center focusing on integrated care, research, and education. It was started in 1915, and over the years, the clinic has been playing a major role in the US health sector. The unique approach to care in this facility has effectively met patient outcomes and provided patients with the desired quality of health care (Mortimer et al., 2018). The long years of operation in healthcare have allowed the institution to progress much in technology and care, giving it a higher rating in terms of healthcare quality. The virtue of surgical skills and effective management has made the institution financially stable and professional prominent among its peers. From 2016 to 2021, the clinic was ranked the top hospital in the US. The ranking included a total of 5,000 hospitals in the US. These higher ratings in quality and sustainability have been heightening the institutions’ financial stability, thus allowing them to invest in more complex healthcare research and equipment that improves the quality and effectiveness of healthcare delivery. 

Safety Issue 

Currently, the healthcare center has been focusing on reducing medication errors that have been affecting the effective diabetic treatment interventions. In the past, medication errors have been the major cause of poor healthcare quality and safety (Vergunst et al., 2020). The increase in the mortality rate experienced in the past years has negatively impacted healthcare delivery. These issues have been compelling the management to think of better options that would be important in reducing medication errors.  

Medication error refers to any preventable event that may result in the wrong use of medication while the medication is in the hands of health professionals, patients, or consumers. Some of the causes of medication errors include distraction of health care professionals in the course of administering a drug, working environment, lack of proper knowledge about the drug being dispensed, wrong patient information, and systemic problems within a hospital setting (Sherman et al., 2020). However, the elimination of all measures that affect the quality of healthcare delivery increases the value of services offered within healthcare institutions. Accreditation or approvals from known institutions increases the quality and establishes standards of health care delivery in a clinic.  

The effect of the medication error in the clinic is measured using the mortality and comorbidity rates taken each month at the clinic. The data collected on these rates show a reduction in the quality-of-care delivery in the clinic (Vergunst et al., 2020). Besides, the clinic also determines that medication errors are high when mortality and comorbidity rates are high at the clinic. These measures are important in the nursing practice as they inform the clinic on the required change that can effectively eliminate healthcare issues that affect the quality. Improvement in the healthcare system is determined by the quality of services offered to the patients. While the need to meet the quality depends in the employees in the nurse institutions, the management initiate these programs that drive the healthcare institutions towards meeting the desired patient outcome.  

Safety Program 

As evidenced earlier, the clinic has focused on integrated care that addresses healthcare problems such as diabetes. However, with the increased concern on medication errors, the clinic has been reducing its ability to meet the needs of the clinic and the patients. Addressing the above contemporary quality issue would positively impact the sustainability and quality of healthcare.  

The application of modern technology in the clinic has been the main safety program that the clinic has been using to meet the safety needs of patients. The use of clinical technological programs such as EHRs and CDSS has been important in automating the medical delivery process that limits errors in the healthcare system (Mortimer et al., 2018). These programs have been important in raising the quality of care at the clinic and ensuring that all healthcare workers have the required skills to solve the contemporary issue effectively.  

The use of technology has been significant in assessing the quality of an organization as it forms the basis of eliminating errors that affect the quality of health care delivery. Easy communication among the health care professionals in an organization has been achieved through the use of modern technology, thus enhancing proper coordination and collaboration during the whole process. Technology allows the organization to use automation which provides a uniform way of reporting the information and makes sorting and analysis of data much easier (Mortimer et al., 2018). This also enhanced reduction in data entry errors by those sorting out the medication error tracking forms, thus ensuring the accuracy of data collected. Technology also allowed easy spot checking of random data collected to determine discrepancies associated with the data to enable early detection. 

A reduction in the mortality rate among patients with infections such as diabetes is one of the improved quality measures. The increased quality of services would increase the number of parents visiting the organization, translating to increased income within the organization. The increased value would imply that the hospital will be receiving many patients that would pay for the services at the organization (Mortimer et al., 2018). The needed power to advance the organization financially would imply that there would be added value to the general services at the company. The success of the use of the modern practice in care provision will be determined by comparing the number of errors before and after the implementation of the initiative. Fewer error incidences mark success compared to before execution. 

Variables Used in Tracking Improvement 

Reduction in medication-related adverse events would be an important sign of tracking the performance at the clinic. The data taken from the clinic would be important in showing the progress that the clinic has been making toward meeting the required quality of the clinic (Mazzucco et al., 2019). This system eradicates handwritten orders and also helps to reduce errors in prescriptions. Besides, it ensures fullness and legibility of orders, thus helping to improve quality efficiency in the health system hence a vital tool in ensuring patient safety.  

Reduced hospital readmissions are also a positive patient outcome showing that the clinic is moving in the right direction on meeting the quality of healthcare (Mazzucco et al., 2019). While this variable is important in showing that the safety programs installed at the clinic are significant in meeting patient safety, it also shows an effective sign of an improving healthcare institution. This measure would work for the clinic as it reflects the outcome of safety and quality measures taken toward solving the contemporary issues affecting the clinic.  

Conclusion 

Quality and sustainability issues are a common phenomenon in most healthcare organizations. Poor quality threatens patient outcomes and healthcare organizations. Contemporary issues such as medication errors form part of the issues affecting the clinic despite the measures that had been taken to solve the problems. Healthcare providers should be informed about the ways of minimizing these errors to promote positive patient outcomes. Therefore, the clinic has been making important steps toward solving the problems that hinder it from meeting the required healthcare quality.  

References 

Braithwaite, J., Ludlow, K., Testa, L., Herkes, J., Augustsson, H., Lamprell, G., … & Zurynski, Y. (2020). Built to last? The sustainability of healthcare system improvements, programmes and interventions: a systematic integrative review. BMJ open, 10(6), e036453. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-036453 

Mazzucco, W., Silenzi, A., Gray, M., & Vettor, R. (2019). The accreditation system of Italian medical residency programs: fostering quality and sustainability of the National Health Service. Acta Bio Medica: Atenei Parmensis, 90(Suppl 9), 15. https://dx.doi.org/10.23750%2Fabm.v90i9-S.8696 

Mortimer, F., Isherwood, J., Wilkinson, A., & Vaux, E. (2018). Sustainability in quality improvement: redefining value. Future Healthcare Journal, 5(2), 88. https://dx.doi.org/10.7861%2Ffuturehosp.5-2-88 

Sherman, J. D., Thiel, C., MacNeill, A., Eckelman, M. J., Dubrow, R., Hopf, H., … & Bilec, M. M. (2020). The green print: advancement of environmental sustainability in healthcare. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 161, 104882. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.104882 

Vergunst, F., Berry, H. L., Rugkåsa, J., Burns, T., Molodynski, A., & Maughan, D. L. (2020). Applying the triple bottom line of sustainability to healthcare research—a feasibility study. International Journal for Quality in Health Care, 32(1), 48-53. https://doi.org/10.1093/intqhc/mzz049 

Appendix