ENGL 147N Week 5 Discussion 2: Source Incorporation & Academic Integrity

Chamberlain University ENGL 147N Week 5 Discussion 2: Source Incorporation & Academic Integrity– Step-By-Step Guide

This guide will demonstrate how to complete the Chamberlain University ENGL 147N Week 5 Discussion 2: Source Incorporation & Academic Integrity   assignment based on general principles of academic writing. Here, we will show you the A, B, Cs of completing an academic paper, irrespective of the instructions. After guiding you through what to do, the guide will leave one or two sample essays at the end to highlight the various sections discussed below.

How to Research and Prepare for ENGL 147N Week 5 Discussion 2: Source Incorporation & Academic Integrity              

Whether one passes or fails an academic assignment such as the Chamberlain University ENGL 147N Week 5 Discussion 2: Source Incorporation & Academic Integrity  depends on the preparation done beforehand. The first thing to do once you receive an assignment is to quickly skim through the requirements. Once that is done, start going through the instructions one by one to clearly understand what the instructor wants. The most important thing here is to understand the required format—whether it is APA, MLA, Chicago, etc.

After understanding the requirements of the paper, the next phase is to gather relevant materials. The first place to start the research process is the weekly resources. Go through the resources provided in the instructions to determine which ones fit the assignment. After reviewing the provided resources, use the university library to search for additional resources. After gathering sufficient and necessary resources, you are now ready to start drafting your paper.

How to Write the Introduction for ENGL 147N Week 5 Discussion 2: Source Incorporation & Academic Integrity              

The introduction for the Chamberlain University ENGL 147N Week 5 Discussion 2: Source Incorporation & Academic Integrity  is where you tell the instructor what your paper will encompass. In three to four statements, highlight the important points that will form the basis of your paper. Here, you can include statistics to show the importance of the topic you will be discussing. At the end of the introduction, write a clear purpose statement outlining what exactly will be contained in the paper. This statement will start with “The purpose of this paper…” and then proceed to outline the various sections of the instructions.

How to Write the Body for ENGL 147N Week 5 Discussion 2: Source Incorporation & Academic Integrity              

After the introduction, move into the main part of the ENGL 147N Week 5 Discussion 2: Source Incorporation & Academic Integrity assignment, which is the body. Given that the paper you will be writing is not experimental, the way you organize the headings and subheadings of your paper is critically important. In some cases, you might have to use more subheadings to properly organize the assignment. The organization will depend on the rubric provided. Carefully examine the rubric, as it will contain all the detailed requirements of the assignment. Sometimes, the rubric will have information that the normal instructions lack.

Another important factor to consider at this point is how to do citations. In-text citations are fundamental as they support the arguments and points you make in the paper. At this point, the resources gathered at the beginning will come in handy. Integrating the ideas of the authors with your own will ensure that you produce a comprehensive paper. Also, follow the given citation format. In most cases, APA 7 is the preferred format for nursing assignments.

How to Write the Conclusion for ENGL 147N Week 5 Discussion 2: Source Incorporation & Academic Integrity              

After completing the main sections, write the conclusion of your paper. The conclusion is a summary of the main points you made in your paper. However, you need to rewrite the points and not simply copy and paste them. By restating the points from each subheading, you will provide a nuanced overview of the assignment to the reader.

How to Format the References List for ENGL 147N Week 5 Discussion 2: Source Incorporation & Academic Integrity              

The very last part of your paper involves listing the sources used in your paper. These sources should be listed in alphabetical order and double-spaced. Additionally, use a hanging indent for each source that appears in this list. Lastly, only the sources cited within the body of the paper should appear here.

Stuck? Let Us Help You

Completing assignments can sometimes be overwhelming, especially with the multitude of academic and personal responsibilities you may have. If you find yourself stuck or unsure at any point in the process, don’t hesitate to reach out for professional assistance. Our assignment writing services are designed to help you achieve your academic goals with ease. 

Our team of experienced writers is well-versed in academic writing and familiar with the specific requirements of the ENGL 147N Week 5 Discussion 2: Source Incorporation & Academic Integrity  assignment. We can provide you with personalized support, ensuring your assignment is well-researched, properly formatted, and thoroughly edited. Get a feel of the quality we guarantee – ORDER NOW. 

Sample Answer for ENGL 147N Week 5 Discussion 2: Source Incorporation & Academic Integrity

It is a false belief that death penalty deters crime. In the book, Deterrence and Death Penalty, Pepper and Nagin (2012) observe that “deterrence is but one of the many considerations relevant to deciding whether the death penalty is a good public policy” (p.12) which means that deterrence is one of the important reasons why death penalty is considered legal and good for the society. Proponents of death penalty have been unable to prove that death penalty deters and prevents crime. Pepper and Nagin (2012) have concluded that the hypothesis of deterrence is based on the idea that the government imposed punishment will definitely be severe and quick which will prevent others from committing crimes (p.29). Various studies have been published about death penalty and its effects and none have been able to conclusively prove that death penalty increases or decreases crime and more research needs to done in this regard. Death penalty is a cruel and inhuman form of punishment which grossly violates human rights and should be abolished.

I used the quote at the beginning of the paragraph to generate interest. The quote stood out because it was about deterrence and death penalty which was the central idea of the book. I had reviewed Turnitin plagiarism information through the link provided before writing this post. While paraphrasing, I used my own words to describe the author’s thoughts and I made sure that that i did an in text citation where I mentioned both the authors and year at the beginning of the paraphrase and ended with the page number so that the reader knows that I am using someone’s work and where to find the information. While quoting, I did an in text citation and used quotation marks for the exact sentence I used from the book. The plagiarism link provided was very useful and I incorporated my resources carefully with proper quotation marks, in text citations, reference and by making sure that I paraphrase the author’s thoughts and ideas using my own words.  In my opinion I prefer quoting versus paraphrasing because paraphrasing is more difficult since you have to write the ideas of the author in your own words and that is not an easy task.  

Reference

Nagin, D. S., & Pepper, J. V. (2012). Deterrence and the death penalty. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press.

ALSO READ:

ENGL 147NWeek 6 Discussion 2: Deceptive Arguments

Sample Answer 2 for ENGL 147N Week 5 Discussion 2: Source Incorporation & Academic Integrity

This is my paragraph draft.

 “Gun control advocates often cite the 11,000-gun murders in this country each year as justification for stricter gun laws. However, cancer kills fifty times that many people in the U.S. every year”. (Perry, 2013, para. 1)  These are some of the statements and statics you will hear gun control advocates and pro-gun advocates. The argument is emotional and vague not offering facts to make logical decisions. Most people are very emotional about this topic and rarely look at the facts when voting. Perry (2013) stated that more regulations do not keep guns out of the hands of criminals. The media sensationalizes killings contributing to the hysteria. Social media circulates inaccurate and false information resulting in people making uninformed judgments. Choosing to focus on how many people are killed with firearms each year is ill-informed. Guns save many lives each year in the hands of legal gun owners.

This quote is significate because it reinforces the fact and research that shows how people come to decisions about gun control laws. I choose to quote and cite the passage with the statistical numbers because those can not be paraphrased. They were able to paraphrase other information but still give the author credit. I find paraphrasing much harder, re-wording something that has already been saying, and usually has been said well is difficult to summarize. Turnitin is helpful in addressing and improving paraphrasing and quoting skills.

References

Perry, C. (2013). Spring [Entire issue]. University of Main Farmington, 2. Retrieved from http://www2.umf.maine.edu/flyer/archives/2013-spring/issue-2-3-7-2013/why-gun-control-is-not-the-answer-and-what-we-can-do-to-stop-gun-violence/

Sample Answer 3 for ENGL 147N Week 5 Discussion 2: Source Incorporation & Academic Integrity

Even though a person may have a desire to donate their organs in a case of death, the procedure of doing it might be challenged with numerous obstacles and the perspectives of family members. David M. Shaw defines one of the obstacles as vagueness, which is present in the consent to organ donation. One of the examples of such vagueness is the pathways of the process of donation; the author claims that “there are two main donation pathways: donation after brain death (DBD) and donation after circulatory death (DCD)” (Shaw, 2017, p. 426). In other words, the process of donation can happen after the stop of heart function or after the stop of brain function – two types of deaths, which are different in time. The difference in timing is frequently omitted by the potential donors or their family members, who may refuse to consent. The other family perspectives were reviewed by Ralph and co-authors (2014), who identified such obstacles as suspicion and fear, reactions to the death of a close person, the motifs, decisional conflicts, donor’s will, and vulnerability. Thus, the process of donation is associated with numerous obstacles and family perspectives.

In the first sentence, I attracted the attention by highlighting the contradiction between the desires of a patient and the challenges of donation procedure. One such challenge, the donation pathway, is defined in the quote that was used (Shaw, 2017). The quote gives the definitions to the types of death, after which donation is possible; the quote is used as these definitions are challenging to paraphrase (Shaw, 2017). At the same time, the list of family members’ perspectives, which is a paraphrase from the second source, was a more manageable task (Ralph et al., 2014). Turnitin helped me paraphrase the sentence by finding synonyms and highlighting the information relevant to the paper. In my opinion, paraphrasing is a more flexible tool that allows the writers to smoothly incorporate the relevant information in the piece of academic text.

References

Ralph, A., Chapman, J. R., Gillis, J., Craig, J. C., Butow, P., Howard, K., … Tong, A. (2014). Family Perspectives on Deceased Organ Donation: Thematic Synthesis of Qualitative Studies. American Journal of Transplantation, 14(4), 923–935.

Shaw, D.M. (2017). The consequences of vagueness in consent to organ donation. Bioethics, 31(6), 424-443.

Sample Answer 4 for ENGL 147N Week 5 Discussion 2: Source Incorporation & Academic Integrity

Assisted Suicide has been a debate in healthcare for quite a while now. Many people believe if we allow assisted suicide in all states it could cause people to feel pressured to allow it if they are at the end of their life. “Many people who are disabled, elderly, or terminally ill are already made to feel that they are a burden to their families and society” (Pawlick,2016). According to Pawlick (2016) active euthanasia may affect these vulnerable groups. Causing a depressed or sick person feel they have no other choice at the end of their life or not being in the right emotional state to make that decision. Todays healthcare offers hospice and palliative care giving these patients another option therefore assisted suicide could be unnecessary.

My approach to paraphrasing vs quoting was to keep the quote the authors exact words and when it came to paraphrase, I changed the wording but kept the authors thought the same. The quote stood out because the quotation marks saying the words from the author were exact in the article. Using the Turnitin plagiarism link I ensured both the paraphrase and quote were properly cited to make it known the ideas and quote did not come from me, but I was using from the article. Reviewing the Turnitin plagiarism link made an impact on how I incorporated the resources because it explained how to replace the wording from the author to paraphrase. I prefer a paraphrase over a quote because I can add my own wording in the phrase.

Pawlick, P. (2016, September 30). Point: Active Euthanasia should be outlawed. Retrieved from https://web-b-ebscohost-com.chamberlainuniversity.idm.oclc.org/pov/detail/detail?vid=4&sid=fadf9168-b66c-474b-aade508b864b99ae%40pdcsessmgr01&bdata=JnNpdGU9cG92LWxpdmU%3d#AN=26608594&db=pwh