HCA 615 Compare the two philosophies of governance
Grand Canyon University HCA 615 Compare the two philosophies of governance-Step-By-Step Guide
This guide will demonstrate how to complete the Grand Canyon University HCA 615 Compare the two philosophies of governance assignment based on general principles of academic writing. Here, we will show you the A, B, Cs of completing an academic paper, irrespective of the instructions. After guiding you through what to do, the guide will leave one or two sample essays at the end to highlight the various sections discussed below.
How to Research and Prepare for HCA 615 Compare the two philosophies of governance
Whether one passes or fails an academic assignment such as the Grand Canyon University HCA 615 Compare the two philosophies of governance depends on the preparation done beforehand. The first thing to do once you receive an assignment is to quickly skim through the requirements. Once that is done, start going through the instructions one by one to clearly understand what the instructor wants. The most important thing here is to understand the required format—whether it is APA, MLA, Chicago, etc.
After understanding the requirements of the paper, the next phase is to gather relevant materials. The first place to start the research process is the weekly resources. Go through the resources provided in the instructions to determine which ones fit the assignment. After reviewing the provided resources, use the university library to search for additional resources. After gathering sufficient and necessary resources, you are now ready to start drafting your paper.
How to Write the Introduction for HCA 615 Compare the two philosophies of governance
The introduction for the Grand Canyon University HCA 615 Compare the two philosophies of governance is where you tell the instructor what your paper will encompass. In three to four statements, highlight the important points that will form the basis of your paper. Here, you can include statistics to show the importance of the topic you will be discussing. At the end of the introduction, write a clear purpose statement outlining what exactly will be contained in the paper. This statement will start with “The purpose of this paper…” and then proceed to outline the various sections of the instructions.
Need a high-quality paper urgently?
We can deliver within hours.
How to Write the Body for HCA 615 Compare the two philosophies of governance
After the introduction, move into the main part of the HCA 615 Compare the two philosophies of governance assignment, which is the body. Given that the paper you will be writing is not experimental, the way you organize the headings and subheadings of your paper is critically important. In some cases, you might have to use more subheadings to properly organize the assignment. The organization will depend on the rubric provided. Carefully examine the rubric, as it will contain all the detailed requirements of the assignment. Sometimes, the rubric will have information that the normal instructions lack.
Another important factor to consider at this point is how to do citations. In-text citations are fundamental as they support the arguments and points you make in the paper. At this point, the resources gathered at the beginning will come in handy. Integrating the ideas of the authors with your own will ensure that you produce a comprehensive paper. Also, follow the given citation format. In most cases, APA 7 is the preferred format for nursing assignments.
How to Write the Conclusion for HCA 615 Compare the two philosophies of governance
After completing the main sections, write the conclusion of your paper. The conclusion is a summary of the main points you made in your paper. However, you need to rewrite the points and not simply copy and paste them. By restating the points from each subheading, you will provide a nuanced overview of the assignment to the reader.
How to Format the References List for HCA 615 Compare the two philosophies of governance
The very last part of your paper involves listing the sources used in your paper. These sources should be listed in alphabetical order and double-spaced. Additionally, use a hanging indent for each source that appears in this list. Lastly, only the sources cited within the body of the paper should appear here.
Stuck? Let Us Help You
Completing assignments can sometimes be overwhelming, especially with the multitude of academic and personal responsibilities you may have. If you find yourself stuck or unsure at any point in the process, don’t hesitate to reach out for professional assistance. Our assignment writing services are designed to help you achieve your academic goals with ease.
Our team of experienced writers is well-versed in academic writing and familiar with the specific requirements of the HCA 615 Compare the two philosophies of governance assignment. We can provide you with personalized support, ensuring your assignment is well-researched, properly formatted, and thoroughly edited. Get a feel of the quality we guarantee – ORDER NOW.
Sample Answer for HCA 615 Compare the two philosophies of governance
Re: Module 2 DQ 2
Good morning professor and class
This article is a good read and should be allowed to circulate to all companies if they are in need of expanding their business or combining two or more businesses as well. There were two groups who had differing philosophies of how the company should operate. The stronger faction comprised staff and members who have been there a while and who have witnesses first hand the right way a company should be run if it wants to be successful. On the other hand the other faction comprised workers who had no working knowledge of how to govern or what it takes for a company to run. It makes me think that these workers were either part-time or didn’t have any interest in the company just there to collect a paycheck. I believe the C.E.O started with the mission statement to eliminate the divide between both boards of directors is because as with any acquisition there will be differing sets of ideas and you don’t want to ignore any person’s idealogy so the best way to respect everyone’s wishes is to get them in a room and have activities where we all can narrow it down and come up with one universal mission statement that represents us all as staff and management and the community as a whole. The job of the process consultant was very important because it took the responsibility of making any rash decisions out of the C.E.O’s hand and placed it with the board that went on the retreat. The retreat was put together so everyone can have their idea heard and get to know one another as two companies will become one. This is similar when two people are getting married, before the marriage both people go on dates and get to know one another and bounce ideas off each other and uplift each other in the good and bad times. One method of communication that the CEO used which helped facilitate accomplishment of the goals was verbal communication in that each member of th eboard voiced their concern or approval of the governance methods and it was narrowed down to one where all the board members agreed upon should be the universal policy of the hospital. This was a very effective way in that all interested parties during the merging of the hospitals had a voice in how the hospital should be run. This also brought them closer together as they bounced ideas off each other and came to an understanding that each member signed off on and implemented that information to the C.E.O who then shared with the rest of the hospital and community.
“From a business standpoint, merging companies in the same sector with competing strengths is a no brainer. And it’s technically not difficult to do. But be prepared to bump up against a lot of cultural challenges during the integration process.
Here’s what you need to know:
- A merger will take longer than you expect. You can’t put former competitors together and expect them to get along from day one. They’re used to thinking of each other as the enemy, sometimes over the course of many years. You need to carefully manage reporting lines and watch for signs of tension so you can nip them in the bud before they blow up.
- Leaderswill come and go. Don’t assume managers who say they’re committed to the new company truly are. Loyalty is hard to come by, and you may find people will jump ship as soon as a better offer comes along. Your remaining competitors will try to use your merger to their advantage. Be prepared to deal with upheaval.
- Make sure your staff is consistently thinking about the future, both near- and long-term. You also need to lay out a road map to success. A nimble, innovative company doesn’t just happen, it needs to be nurtured. The person at the top sets the tone.
- Competitorswon’t be the only ones who’ll try to kick you when you’re down. When you’re ironing out the merger kinks, customers might try to squeeze you for better deals and threaten to bolt to the competition. That’s why you need to engage with them early. Convince them you’ll always be the best option, no matter what.” (Hennessey, et al 2014)
Hennessey, Billy (2014, 30 Apr) Merging Two Companies is Hard, Here’s how to do it. Retrieved from https://www.forbes.com/sites/billyhennessey/2014/04/30/merging-companies-is-hard-heres-how/#725e23b71fcc
Sample Answer 2 for HCA 615 Compare the two philosophies of governance
This article is a good read and should be allowed to circulate to all companies if they are in need of expanding their business or combining two or more businesses as well. There were two groups who had differing philosophies of how the company should operate. The stronger faction comprised staff and members who have been there a while and who have witnesses first hand the right way a company should be run if it wants to be successful. On the other hand the other faction comprised workers who had no working knowledge of how to govern or what it takes for a company to run. It makes me think that these workers were either part-time or didn’t have any interest in the company just there to collect a paycheck. I believe the C.E.O started with the mission statement to eliminate the divide between both boards of directors is because as with any acquisition there will be differing sets of ideas and you don’t want to ignore any person’s idealogy so the best way to respect everyone’s wishes is to get them in a room and have activities where we all can narrow it down and come up with one universal mission statement that represents us all as staff and management and the community as a whole. The job of the process consultant was very important because it took the responsibility of making any rash decisions out of the C.E.O’s hand and placed it with the board that went on the retreat. The retreat was put together so everyone can have their idea heard and get to know one another as two companies will become one. This is similar when two people are getting married, before the marriage both people go on dates and get to know one another and bounce ideas off each other and uplift each other in the good and bad times. One method of communication that the CEO used which helped facilitate accomplishment of the goals was verbal communication in that each member of th eboard voiced their concern or approval of the governance methods and it was narrowed down to one where all the board members agreed upon should be the universal policy of the hospital. This was a very effective way in that all interested parties during the merging of the hospitals had a voice in how the hospital should be run. This also brought them closer together as they bounced ideas off each other and came to an understanding that each member signed off on and implemented that information to the C.E.O who then shared with the rest of the hospital and community.
“From a business standpoint, merging companies in the same sector with competing strengths is a no brainer. And it’s technically not difficult to do. But be prepared to bump up against a lot of cultural challenges during the integration process.
Here’s what you need to know:
- A merger will take longer than you expect. You can’t put former competitors together and expect them to get along from day one. They’re used to thinking of each other as the enemy, sometimes over the course of many years. You need to carefully manage reporting lines and watch for signs of tension so you can nip them in the bud before they blow up.
- Leaderswill come and go. Don’t assume managers who say they’re committed to the new company truly are. Loyalty is hard to come by, and you may find people will jump ship as soon as a better offer comes along. Your remaining competitors will try to use your merger to their advantage. Be prepared to deal with upheaval.
- Make sure your staff is consistently thinking about the future, both near- and long-term. You also need to lay out a road map to success. A nimble, innovative company doesn’t just happen, it needs to be nurtured. The person at the top sets the tone.
- Competitorswon’t be the only ones who’ll try to kick you when you’re down. When you’re ironing out the merger kinks, customers might try to squeeze you for better deals and threaten to bolt to the competition. That’s why you need to engage with them early. Convince them you’ll always be the best option, no matter what.” (Hennessey, et al 2014)
Hennessey, Billy (2014, 30 Apr) Merging Two Companies is Hard, Here’s how to do it. Retrieved from https://www.forbes.com/sites/billyhennessey/2014/04/30/merging-companies-is-hard-heres-how/#725e23b71fcc