HCA 615 Topic 5 Quality and Performance Improvement Analysis Paper (Bench Mark)

Grand Canyon University HCA 615 Topic 5 Quality and Performance Improvement Analysis Paper (Bench Mark)-Step-By-Step Guide

This guide will demonstrate how to complete the Grand Canyon University HCA 615 Topic 5 Quality and Performance Improvement Analysis Paper (Bench Mark)  assignment based on general principles of academic writing. Here, we will show you the A, B, Cs of completing an academic paper, irrespective of the instructions. After guiding you through what to do, the guide will leave one or two sample essays at the end to highlight the various sections discussed below.

How to Research and Prepare for HCA 615 Topic 5 Quality and Performance Improvement Analysis Paper (Bench Mark)                                                                   

Whether one passes or fails an academic assignment such as the Grand Canyon University HCA 615 Topic 5 Quality and Performance Improvement Analysis Paper (Bench Mark)  depends on the preparation done beforehand. The first thing to do once you receive an assignment is to quickly skim through the requirements. Once that is done, start going through the instructions one by one to clearly understand what the instructor wants. The most important thing here is to understand the required format—whether it is APA, MLA, Chicago, etc.

After understanding the requirements of the paper, the next phase is to gather relevant materials. The first place to start the research process is the weekly resources. Go through the resources provided in the instructions to determine which ones fit the assignment. After reviewing the provided resources, use the university library to search for additional resources. After gathering sufficient and necessary resources, you are now ready to start drafting your paper.

How to Write the Introduction for HCA 615 Topic 5 Quality and Performance Improvement Analysis Paper (Bench Mark)                                                                 

The introduction for the Grand Canyon University HCA 615 Topic 5 Quality and Performance Improvement Analysis Paper (Bench Mark) is where you tell the instructor what your paper will encompass. In three to four statements, highlight the important points that will form the basis of your paper. Here, you can include statistics to show the importance of the topic you will be discussing. At the end of the introduction, write a clear purpose statement outlining what exactly will be contained in the paper. This statement will start with “The purpose of this paper…” and then proceed to outline the various sections of the instructions.

How to Write the Body for HCA 615 Topic 5 Quality and Performance Improvement Analysis Paper (Bench Mark)                                                                 

After the introduction, move into the main part of the HCA 615 Topic 5 Quality and Performance Improvement Analysis Paper (Bench Mark)  assignment, which is the body. Given that the paper you will be writing is not experimental, the way you organize the headings and subheadings of your paper is critically important. In some cases, you might have to use more subheadings to properly organize the assignment. The organization will depend on the rubric provided. Carefully examine the rubric, as it will contain all the detailed requirements of the assignment. Sometimes, the rubric will have information that the normal instructions lack.

Another important factor to consider at this point is how to do citations. In-text citations are fundamental as they support the arguments and points you make in the paper. At this point, the resources gathered at the beginning will come in handy. Integrating the ideas of the authors with your own will ensure that you produce a comprehensive paper. Also, follow the given citation format. In most cases, APA 7 is the preferred format for nursing assignments.

How to Write the Conclusion for HCA 615 Topic 5 Quality and Performance Improvement Analysis Paper (Bench Mark)                                                                 

After completing the main sections, write the conclusion of your paper. The conclusion is a summary of the main points you made in your paper. However, you need to rewrite the points and not simply copy and paste them. By restating the points from each subheading, you will provide a nuanced overview of the assignment to the reader.

How to Format the References List for HCA 615 Topic 5 Quality and Performance Improvement Analysis Paper (Bench Mark)                                                                   

The very last part of your paper involves listing the sources used in your paper. These sources should be listed in alphabetical order and double-spaced. Additionally, use a hanging indent for each source that appears in this list. Lastly, only the sources cited within the body of the paper should appear here.

Stuck? Let Us Help You

Completing assignments can sometimes be overwhelming, especially with the multitude of academic and personal responsibilities you may have. If you find yourself stuck or unsure at any point in the process, don’t hesitate to reach out for professional assistance. Our assignment writing services are designed to help you achieve your academic goals with ease. 

Our team of experienced writers is well-versed in academic writing and familiar with the specific requirements of the HCA 615 Topic 5 Quality and Performance Improvement Analysis Paper (Bench Mark) assignment. We can provide you with personalized support, ensuring your assignment is well-researched, properly formatted, and thoroughly edited. Get a feel of the quality we guarantee – ORDER NOW. 

Sample Answer for HCA 615 Topic 5 Quality and Performance Improvement Analysis Paper (Bench Mark)

HCA 615 Topic 5Quality improvement (QI) entails precise as well as persistent activities undertaken in a care facility that lead to changes in the operations of the organization. The need for quality improvement in a care facility leads to the introduction of systematic approaches that focus on the assessment and prioritization of the actions related to health service delivery (Buchbinder & Shanks, 2012). Stakeholders in a hospital formulate strategies that guarantee effective, safe, and efficient ways to provide services to patients. One of the ways for quality and performance improvement in a health facility is based on increasing nurse staffing to conform to the recommended nurse-to-patient ratio of 1:4 (Berg et al., 2011). Notably, nurses play vital roles in patient care as the professionals spend the longest time with the clients when compared with other care providers. Besides, nurse staffing serves as one of the crucial aspects in the provision of quality care to patients.

Performance measures to assess patient safety entails an evaluation of staffing by acuity indicators in a care facility. This relates to the number of nurses required to provide services to patient population in a given health institution. Acuity in a care setting is rated based on the severity of illness ranging from minor to major and extreme conditions. Basically, a nurse-to-patient ratio of 1:4 is considered as the required bare minimum number of staff necessary to solve severe complications of patient illnesses (Lee et al., 2017). This ratio is the recommended number required for individualized medical attention that nurses can render in cases of critical care. Besides, the quality measures on safe staffing ensures that the nursing professionals have the most significant amounts of flexibility within the hospitals to handle thrilling severe scenarios regarding their patients.

An illustration from the Harvard School of Public Health Human Subjects Committee, related to medical errors indicate the premise can be prevented in a scenario when there is adequate nursing professionals in hospital (Lee et al., 2017). The report also affirms that the average rate based on medication errors correlate with the number of hours that nursing staff spend with patients. Supposedly, a lower score of nurse-to-patient ratios reduce the incidences of urinary tract infections, hospital-acquired pneumonia, and the overall length of stay in a hospital. With this, senior stakeholders in a health facility need to work on quality checks as a way of ensuring that adequate professionals avail quality care to the patient population. Often, efforts in bridging the gaps of the unsafe large patient-to-nurse ratios focus on identification of skills and nursing expertise required in a given care facility. Besides, acuity of patients being cared for is also a vital factor of concern in the need to lower the patient staff ratio (Berg et al., 2011). This approach provides a framework to determine the number of care providers needed to respond to the complex cases in a hospital setting. Conversely, important consideration need to be made by assessing the number of unlicensed assistive staff in the specific facility in order to link them to duties in the institution that can reduce the overall work of nurses.

The internal perspective of a given care facility stems from measures developed to improve patient satisfaction with respect to services provided. These are analyzed based on improved access to quality care in addition to the availability of referral systems. Moreover, the approach incorporates the provision of teaching and research services to ensure that the health service delivery conforms to the current evidence-based practices on care. However, quality care to patients depends on the skills of nursing staff and the time cycle for nurses (Fendya, Snow & Weik, 2010). With this, productivity in a health facility is measured based on the level of experience of nurses as well as number of shift hours allocated by the institution.

Nursing shift hours is one of the quality improvement addressed in staffing. This entails the adjustment to duties in a care facility based on task allocation as per the capacity of a given facility. Often, 6 hours is the recommended time that nurses need to adhere to in a bid to optimize quality outcomes. However, a majority of health facilities use the 8 hours shift for nursing staff due to a shortage of the professionals. To make it worse, some facilities use the 12 hour shifts for their staff. The shift hours beyond 8 means that the professionals will be overwhelmed by the amount of tasks allocated (Lee et al., 2017; Weaver, Stutzman, Supnet, & Olson, 2016). In most cases, the staff will experience burnout related to the duties assigned. Based on this premise, the quality of health services provided to patients will be compromised as evidenced by missed diagnosis and untimely provision of medication to patients. However, safe nurse staffing bridges the gap of inefficiency as it ensures that there are adequate number of professions to respond to quality care needed by patients.

On the other hand, measures that indicate unsafe larger nurse to patient ratios are related to the analysis of diagnosis-related groups (DRGs). This describes the number of doctors, registered nurses as well as the available medical products that are used to perform a given health procedure (Fendya, Snow & Weik, 2010). The premise provides feasible ideas related to the number of nursing professionals that can support prompt as well as quality care.

Therefore, quality improvement in health care is paramount. Using strategies such as nursing shifting hours’ reduction that target the personnel play an important role in ensuring that care facilities maintain quality. By doing so, the various stakeholders of these facilities, especially the patients, become happier, which impacts the rating of a hospital.

References

Berg, G. M., Acuna, D., Lee, F., Clark, D., & Lippoldt, D. (2011). Trauma performance improvement and patient safety committee: fostering an effective team. Journal of Trauma Nursing, 18(4), 213-220.

Buchbinder, S. B., & Shanks, N. H. (2012). Introduction to health care management. Burlington, MA: Jones & Bartlett Learning.

Fendya, D. G., Snow, S. K., & Weik, T. S. (2010). Using system change as a method of performance/quality improvement for emergency and trauma care of severely injured children: pediatric system performance improvement. Journal of trauma nursing, 17(1), 28-33.

Lee, A., Cheung, Y. S. L., Joynt, G. M., Leung, C. C. H., Wong, W. T., & Gomersall, C. D. (2017). Are high nurse workload/staffing ratios associated with decreased survival in critically ill patients? A cohort study. Annals of intensive care, 7(1), 46.

Weaver, A. L., Stutzman, S. E., Supnet, C., & Olson, D. M. (2016). Sleep quality, but not quantity, is associated with self-perceived minor error rates among emergency department nurses. International emergency nursing, 25, 48-52.