HCA 615 Week 3 Embracing Missions Case Study
Grand Canyon University HCA 615 Week 3 Embracing Missions Case Study-Step-By-Step Guide
This guide will demonstrate how to complete the Grand Canyon University HCA 615 Week 3 Embracing Missions Case Study assignment based on general principles of academic writing. Here, we will show you the A, B, Cs of completing an academic paper, irrespective of the instructions. After guiding you through what to do, the guide will leave one or two sample essays at the end to highlight the various sections discussed below.
How to Research and Prepare for HCA 615 Week 3 Embracing Missions Case Study
Whether one passes or fails an academic assignment such as the Grand Canyon University HCA 615 Week 3 Embracing Missions Case Study depends on the preparation done beforehand. The first thing to do once you receive an assignment is to quickly skim through the requirements. Once that is done, start going through the instructions one by one to clearly understand what the instructor wants. The most important thing here is to understand the required format—whether it is APA, MLA, Chicago, etc.
After understanding the requirements of the paper, the next phase is to gather relevant materials. The first place to start the research process is the weekly resources. Go through the resources provided in the instructions to determine which ones fit the assignment. After reviewing the provided resources, use the university library to search for additional resources. After gathering sufficient and necessary resources, you are now ready to start drafting your paper.
How to Write the Introduction for HCA 615 Week 3 Embracing Missions Case Study
The introduction for the Grand Canyon University HCA 615 Week 3 Embracing Missions Case Study is where you tell the instructor what your paper will encompass. In three to four statements, highlight the important points that will form the basis of your paper. Here, you can include statistics to show the importance of the topic you will be discussing. At the end of the introduction, write a clear purpose statement outlining what exactly will be contained in the paper. This statement will start with “The purpose of this paper…” and then proceed to outline the various sections of the instructions.
Need a high-quality paper urgently?
We can deliver within hours.
How to Write the Body for HCA 615 Week 3 Embracing Missions Case Study
After the introduction, move into the main part of the HCA 615 Week 3 Embracing Missions Case Study assignment, which is the body. Given that the paper you will be writing is not experimental, the way you organize the headings and subheadings of your paper is critically important. In some cases, you might have to use more subheadings to properly organize the assignment. The organization will depend on the rubric provided. Carefully examine the rubric, as it will contain all the detailed requirements of the assignment. Sometimes, the rubric will have information that the normal instructions lack.
Another important factor to consider at this point is how to do citations. In-text citations are fundamental as they support the arguments and points you make in the paper. At this point, the resources gathered at the beginning will come in handy. Integrating the ideas of the authors with your own will ensure that you produce a comprehensive paper. Also, follow the given citation format. In most cases, APA 7 is the preferred format for nursing assignments.
How to Write the Conclusion for HCA 615 Week 3 Embracing Missions Case Study
After completing the main sections, write the conclusion of your paper. The conclusion is a summary of the main points you made in your paper. However, you need to rewrite the points and not simply copy and paste them. By restating the points from each subheading, you will provide a nuanced overview of the assignment to the reader.
How to Format the References List for HCA 615 Week 3 Embracing Missions Case Study
The very last part of your paper involves listing the sources used in your paper. These sources should be listed in alphabetical order and double-spaced. Additionally, use a hanging indent for each source that appears in this list. Lastly, only the sources cited within the body of the paper should appear here.
Stuck? Let Us Help You
Completing assignments can sometimes be overwhelming, especially with the multitude of academic and personal responsibilities you may have. If you find yourself stuck or unsure at any point in the process, don’t hesitate to reach out for professional assistance. Our assignment writing services are designed to help you achieve your academic goals with ease.
Our team of experienced writers is well-versed in academic writing and familiar with the specific requirements of the HCA 615 Week 3 Embracing Missions Case Study assignment. We can provide you with personalized support, ensuring your assignment is well-researched, properly formatted, and thoroughly edited. Get a feel of the quality we guarantee – ORDER NOW.
Sample Answer for HCA 615 Week 3 Embracing Missions Case Study
Attitudes and behaviors of health workers have a direct impact in predicting the level of satisfaction of these staff towards influencing the well-being of patients. Nurses and other care providers have a duty to protect patients but their biases especially towards those living in poverty, have profound implications on the experiences for those they serve (Haskins et al., 2014). Poor attitudes of care providers result in poor patient care. While lack of management support may contribute to negative attitude perception, there are a host of inherent factors including a misguided mindset among health worker which can hamper the provision of quality care (Wittenauer et al., 2015). The subsequent article provides a discussion based on the experiences among employees of Oakridge University Hospital. The structure is based on a response of questions raised about the negative employee mindset towards the economically disadvantaged patients seeking care at the facility.
Question 1
The mindset held by Bruce and Sherry can yield a negative ramification to the patient population seeking care at the facility. Given that most of these patients rely on the support of third party-payers, they should as well be treated with dignity. However, against the backdrop of structural factors attributed to poverty, Bruce and Sherry view the circumstances of patients as elements of personal deficiencies (Fortenberry, 2010). In other words, according to the duo, these patients should not receive the benefits related to aesthetic experiences. This is based on the premise that they do not deserve such services due to their low economic status and being that they do not contribute directly to the institution. With this mindset, the employees do not bestow dignity and respect to the patient fraternity at the Oakridge University Hospital (Haskins et al., 2014). Based on personal thought, such a negative employee mindset can result in tangible patient harm as it affects how the staff provides services to patients and in overall, compromise the quality of outcomes. Guided by this argument, Sherry should not be allowed to provide services to the facility since her responsibilities have a direct impact on patient care.
Question 2
As a supervisor of Sherry, receiving such information from Elizabeth would make one question the personal integrity of the care provider. This would bring the matter with Sherry to assess if she swore the oath on patient safety and ask her whether she demonstrates loyalty to such a declaration (Fortenberry, 2010). The information shared by Sherry affirms her discontent with the patient population seeking care at the facility. This means that she has no passion for providing services to this patient pool and therefore her score will be low on an aspect related to attitude. As a supervisor, her scores will be dismal to warrant her completion of the clinical practicum. This will mean that she will not pass the marks for placement meaning that she will have to redo the practicum but this time in a different clinical setting (Wittenauer et al., 2015). Based on this approach, it is anticipated that Sherry will learn the need to respect and value patients despite their economic or disease status.
Question 3
Negative perspectives among health workers stem from cultural permissiveness at the Oakridge University Hospital. The aspect implies that employees observe their practices from the top management. As from the context of argument from Elizabeth, it is apparent that the staff lack clear guidance on the prominence of patient care (Haskins et al., 2014). Besides, the negative sentiments of Sherry and Bruce could emanate from a poor relationship with the top management. Based on these premises, one may consider providing continuous education to sensitize the staff on the aspect of patient care including the need to value the dignity of these clients (Fortenberry, 2010). In other words, health workers should be informed that their primary role in the health facility remains to be the provision of care to patients to motivate their conduct towards this goal. However, the management should take a keen interest in responding to the concerns of staff related to challenges encountered. The complaints should be addressed promptly since they may contribute to negative resentment from these employees.
Question 4
From the encounter, it means that the executive shared the same thought with Sherry and Bruce about the negative mindset towards underprivileged patients. The executive also has a biased perception towards the economic status of the patients implying that the management at the hospital emphasized on monetary gains (Haskins et al., 2014). The issue raised by Elizabeth could have concerned the executive to address the negative perception but as per the response, the executive could be among the stakeholders championing for the patient bias based on class status (Wittenauer et al., 2015). The executive does not emulate servant leadership in demonstrating her respect and value to the poor patients which the followers such as Sherry and Bruce might have borrowed.
Question 5
The marketing manager’s perspective would be more intense than that of Elizabeth. This is premised on the argument that marketers give prominence and value to the satisfaction of the clients (Fortenberry, 2010). In this context, patients are considered the most important stakeholders being that the payment to services provided to them sustains the daily operation of the facility. As such, the health workers should develop the zeal and the passion to address the patient population regardless of their status (Haskins et al., 2014). Unlike Elizabeth, the marketing manager might recommend for the dismissal of Sherry and Bruce since the interest of the duo was vested on the economic status of the patients rather the need to serve them.
References
Fortenberry, J. L. (2010). Cases in health care marketing. Sudbury, MA: Jones & Bartlett Learning.
Haskins, J. L. M., Phakathi, S., Grant, M., & Horwood, C. M. (2014). Attitudes of nurses towards patient care at a rural district hospital in the KwaZulu-Natal province of South Africa. Africa Journal of Nursing and Midwifery, 16(1), 32-44. DOI: 10.25159/2520-5293/1485.
Wittenauer, J., Ludwick, R., Baughman, K., & Fishbein, R. (2015). Surveying the hidden attitudes of hospital nurses’ towards poverty. Journal of clinical nursing, 24(15-16), 2184-2191. DOI: 10.1111/jocn.12794.