HCA 699 When reviewing the literature and different types of evidence, there are often gaps in the findings

Grand Canyon University HCA 699 When reviewing the literature and different types of evidence, there are often gaps in the findings-Step-By-Step Guide

This guide will demonstrate how to complete the Grand Canyon University HCA 699 When reviewing the literature and different types of evidence, there are often gaps in the findings assignment based on general principles of academic writing. Here, we will show you the A, B, Cs of completing an academic paper, irrespective of the instructions. After guiding you through what to do, the guide will leave one or two sample essays at the end to highlight the various sections discussed below.

How to Research and Prepare for HCA 699 When reviewing the literature and different types of evidence, there are often gaps in the findings                            

Whether one passes or fails an academic assignment such as the Grand Canyon University HCA 699 When reviewing the literature and different types of evidence, there are often gaps in the findings  depends on the preparation done beforehand. The first thing to do once you receive an assignment is to quickly skim through the requirements. Once that is done, start going through the instructions one by one to clearly understand what the instructor wants. The most important thing here is to understand the required format—whether it is APA, MLA, Chicago, etc.

After understanding the requirements of the paper, the next phase is to gather relevant materials. The first place to start the research process is the weekly resources. Go through the resources provided in the instructions to determine which ones fit the assignment. After reviewing the provided resources, use the university library to search for additional resources. After gathering sufficient and necessary resources, you are now ready to start drafting your paper.

How to Write the Introduction for HCA 699 When reviewing the literature and different types of evidence, there are often gaps in the findings                          

The introduction for the Grand Canyon University HCA 699 When reviewing the literature and different types of evidence, there are often gaps in the findings  is where you tell the instructor what your paper will encompass. In three to four statements, highlight the important points that will form the basis of your paper. Here, you can include statistics to show the importance of the topic you will be discussing. At the end of the introduction, write a clear purpose statement outlining what exactly will be contained in the paper. This statement will start with “The purpose of this paper…” and then proceed to outline the various sections of the instructions.

How to Write the Body for HCA 699 When reviewing the literature and different types of evidence, there are often gaps in the findings                          

After the introduction, move into the main part of the HCA 699 When reviewing the literature and different types of evidence, there are often gaps in the findings  assignment, which is the body. Given that the paper you will be writing is not experimental, the way you organize the headings and subheadings of your paper is critically important. In some cases, you might have to use more subheadings to properly organize the assignment. The organization will depend on the rubric provided. Carefully examine the rubric, as it will contain all the detailed requirements of the assignment. Sometimes, the rubric will have information that the normal instructions lack.

Another important factor to consider at this point is how to do citations. In-text citations are fundamental as they support the arguments and points you make in the paper. At this point, the resources gathered at the beginning will come in handy. Integrating the ideas of the authors with your own will ensure that you produce a comprehensive paper. Also, follow the given citation format. In most cases, APA 7 is the preferred format for nursing assignments.

How to Write the Conclusion for HCA 699 When reviewing the literature and different types of evidence, there are often gaps in the findings                          

After completing the main sections, write the conclusion of your paper. The conclusion is a summary of the main points you made in your paper. However, you need to rewrite the points and not simply copy and paste them. By restating the points from each subheading, you will provide a nuanced overview of the assignment to the reader.

How to Format the References List for HCA 699 When reviewing the literature and different types of evidence, there are often gaps in the findings                            

The very last part of your paper involves listing the sources used in your paper. These sources should be listed in alphabetical order and double-spaced. Additionally, use a hanging indent for each source that appears in this list. Lastly, only the sources cited within the body of the paper should appear here.

Stuck? Let Us Help You

Completing assignments can sometimes be overwhelming, especially with the multitude of academic and personal responsibilities you may have. If you find yourself stuck or unsure at any point in the process, don’t hesitate to reach out for professional assistance. Our assignment writing services are designed to help you achieve your academic goals with ease. 

Our team of experienced writers is well-versed in academic writing and familiar with the specific requirements of the HCA 699 When reviewing the literature and different types of evidence, there are often gaps in the findings assignment. We can provide you with personalized support, ensuring your assignment is well-researched, properly formatted, and thoroughly edited. Get a feel of the quality we guarantee – ORDER NOW. 

Sample Answer for HCA 699 When reviewing the literature and different types of evidence, there are often gaps in the findings

Re: Topic 6 DQ 1

Research for evidence-based practice is key in gathering information on a certain topic or in healthcare, a disease, prevention or intervention. The amount of data is immense, and finding the right data that is both qualitative and quantitative can be time consuming and daunting. Facilitating change in a clinical setting can be risky if there are gaps in the evidence. The criticality will vary depending on the situation and the evidence. Gaps in information can mean different things.

Gaps in knowledge can be helpful from the perspective of creating an opportunity for clinicians to reach out to others in the field to collaborate on the research to develop and compare how to disseminate the information into a working strategy. Gaps provide a means for leveraging the existing evidence and designing and evaluating newer clinical interventions to build on the current knowledge (Rahman, A., Applebaum, R., Schnelle, J. & Simmons, S. 2012).

Systematic reviews provide information to researchers that is both known and unknown, and as a result makes it difficult for researchers to efficiently gather gaps and research recommendations. This is a hindrance because of the time it takes to disseminate the information into a useful viable treatment. In situations where the gaps in the information is great, clinicians may need to make decisions with the information that is available, which may prove to be a hindrance on the overall benefit of the intervention, and therefore making it difficult to apply or change a policy or process (BMJ, 2015).

References:

BMJ Group blogs. (n.d.). Retrieved May 10, 2020, from https://blogs.bmj.com/ce/2015/04/09/addressing-gaps-in-evidence/

Rahman, A. N., Applebaum, R. A., Schnelle, J. F., & Simmons, S. F. (2012). Translating Research into Practice in Nursing Homes: Can We Close the Gap? The Gerontologist, 52(5), 597-606. doi:10.1093/geront/gnr157

Sample Answer 2 for HCA 699 When reviewing the literature and different types of evidence, there are often gaps in the findings

This a great discussion Audrey. It outlines gaps in literature review that purpose to influence outcomes in study research. Even though the article elaborates on the context of research gaps, it fails to state the origins of gaps in a literature material (Müller-Bloch & Kranz, 2015). Most often, gaps in literature materials emanate from insufficient or vague information and these are not explored in this discussion.

Despite the negative context of gaps in a literature material, discussion by Audrey unravels the myth and goes ahead to explain the benefits (Nunhes, Motta & de Oliveira, 2016). According to the article, gaps create an opportunity for researchers to delve more into the aspect of research to provide further insights into the context of the study. However, even though the merits of gaps exist, the demerits of the same outweigh the benefits (Müller-Bloch & Kranz, 2015). In essence, gaps in literature hinder dissemination of information required to optimize evidence in a clinical practice making stakeholders lack an implementation matrix.

References

Müller-Bloch, C., & Kranz, J. (2015). A framework for rigorously identifying research gaps in qualitative literature reviews. https://aisel.aisnet.org/icis2015/proceedings/ResearchMethods/2/

Nunhes, T. V., Motta, L. C. F., & de Oliveira, O. J. (2016). Evolution of integrated management systems research on the Journal of Cleaner Production: Identification of contributions and gaps in the literature. Journal of Cleaner Production, 139, 1234-1244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.08.159

HCA 699 Topic 6 DQ 2 Sample Answer

Difference between Statistically Significant Evidence and Clinically Significant Evidence  

In clinical practice, statistically significant evidence entirely depends on the sample size to conclude small effects related to therapy administered. The study involves the use of different domains of statistics to enable a researcher to interpret the relevant clinical evidence accurately (Ranganathan, Pramesh & Buyse, 2015). Mostly, hypothesis testing is undertaken in statistical evidence to provide an outcome for a study sample. However, as compared to clinical evidence, the researcher in statistical evidence must be able to interpret the outcomes carefully in order to obtain accurate evidence that can be implemented in clinical practice. On the other hand, clinically significant evidence depends on the effects of an existing practice in care and the extent of change realized based on the given treatment (Bartels et al., 2017). As opposed to statistically significant evidence, clinically significant evidence reflects the extent of change in terms of the time the effects will last, cost-effectiveness as well as its consumer acceptability.  

The findings from clinically significant research can be used to evaluate both the internal as well as the external validity of an evidence-based project. In this context, the evidence analyses the meaningfulness of a given research outcome to recommend its adoption in clinical practice. Physicians and other care providers evaluates the statistical evidence of a given evidence-based practice to ascertain that it has a good chance of improving health outcomes before adoption (Bartels et al., 2017). Basically, statistically significant evidences are used to analyze and test hypotheses on the value of a project. From this, improvements of clinical importance can be made to optimize the implementation of an evidence-based practice in a given project (Ranganathan, Pramesh & Buyse, 2015). Notably, findings from both the evidences can be used to advance the implementation practice in a project for an organization. 

References 

Bartels, R. H., Donk, R. D., Verhagen, W. I., Hosman, A. J., & Verbeek, A. L. (2017). Reporting the results of meta-analyses: a plea for incorporating clinical relevance referring to an example. The Spine Journal, 17(11), 1625-1632. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2017.05.019  

Ranganathan, P., Pramesh, C. S., & Buyse, M. (2015). Common pitfalls in statistical analysis: Clinical versus statistical significance. Perspectives in clinical research, 6(3), 169. doi: 10.4103/2229-3485.159943