NHS FPX 4000 Assessment 3 Applying Ethical Principles

Capella University NHS FPX 4000 Assessment 3 Applying Ethical Principles– Step-By-Step Guide

This guide will demonstrate how to complete the Capella University NHS FPX 4000 Assessment 3 Applying Ethical Principles assignment based on general principles of academic writing. Here, we will show you the A, B, Cs of completing an academic paper, irrespective of the instructions. After guiding you through what to do, the guide will leave one or two sample essays at the end to highlight the various sections discussed below.

How to Research and Prepare for NHS FPX 4000 Assessment 3 Applying Ethical Principles

Whether one passes or fails an academic assignment such as the Capella University NHS FPX 4000 Assessment 3 Applying Ethical Principles depends on the preparation done beforehand. The first thing to do once you receive an assignment is to quickly skim through the requirements. Once that is done, start going through the instructions one by one to clearly understand what the instructor wants. The most important thing here is to understand the required format—whether it is APA, MLA, Chicago, etc.

After understanding the requirements of the paper, the next phase is to gather relevant materials. The first place to start the research process is the weekly resources. Go through the resources provided in the instructions to determine which ones fit the assignment. After reviewing the provided resources, use the university library to search for additional resources. After gathering sufficient and necessary resources, you are now ready to start drafting your paper.

How to Write the Introduction for NHS FPX 4000 Assessment 3 Applying Ethical Principles

The introduction for the Capella University NHS FPX 4000 Assessment 3 Applying Ethical Principles is where you tell the instructor what your paper will encompass. In three to four statements, highlight the important points that will form the basis of your paper. Here, you can include statistics to show the importance of the topic you will be discussing. At the end of the introduction, write a clear purpose statement outlining what exactly will be contained in the paper. This statement will start with “The purpose of this paper…” and then proceed to outline the various sections of the instructions.

How to Write the Body for NHS FPX 4000 Assessment 3 Applying Ethical Principles

After the introduction, move into the main part of the NHS FPX 4000 Assessment 3 Applying Ethical Principles assignment, which is the body. Given that the paper you will be writing is not experimental, the way you organize the headings and subheadings of your paper is critically important. In some cases, you might have to use more subheadings to properly organize the assignment. The organization will depend on the rubric provided. Carefully examine the rubric, as it will contain all the detailed requirements of the assignment. Sometimes, the rubric will have information that the normal instructions lack.

Another important factor to consider at this point is how to do citations. In-text citations are fundamental as they support the arguments and points you make in the paper. At this point, the resources gathered at the beginning will come in handy. Integrating the ideas of the authors with your own will ensure that you produce a comprehensive paper. Also, follow the given citation format. In most cases, APA 7 is the preferred format for nursing assignments.

How to Write the Conclusion for NHS FPX 4000 Assessment 3 Applying Ethical Principles

After completing the main sections, write the conclusion of your paper. The conclusion is a summary of the main points you made in your paper. However, you need to rewrite the points and not simply copy and paste them. By restating the points from each subheading, you will provide a nuanced overview of the assignment to the reader.

How to Format the References List for NHS FPX 4000 Assessment 3 Applying Ethical Principles

The very last part of your paper involves listing the sources used in your paper. These sources should be listed in alphabetical order and double-spaced. Additionally, use a hanging indent for each source that appears in this list. Lastly, only the sources cited within the body of the paper should appear here.

Stuck? Let Us Help You

Completing assignments can sometimes be overwhelming, especially with the multitude of academic and personal responsibilities you may have. If you find yourself stuck or unsure at any point in the process, don’t hesitate to reach out for professional assistance. Our assignment writing services are designed to help you achieve your academic goals with ease. 

Our team of experienced writers is well-versed in academic writing and familiar with the specific requirements of the NHS FPX 4000 Assessment 3 Applying Ethical Principles assignment. We can provide you with personalized support, ensuring your assignment is well-researched, properly formatted, and thoroughly edited. Get a feel of the quality we guarantee – ORDER NOW. 

Sample Answer for NHS FPX 4000 Assessment 3 Applying Ethical Principles

Healthcare providers work in environments that predispose them to significant ethical dilemmas. Often, they have to adopt ethical decision-making approaches in coming up with sound decisions that promote professionalism and the rights of their clients. Practice issues such as the refusal of parents for their children to be vaccinated increases the need for healthcare providers to make moral and ethical decisions (Leask et al., 2012). Ethical principles that inform the decisions of healthcare providers in such situations include justice, benevolence, non-maleficence, confidentiality, and autonomy among others (Halstead et al., 2020). Therefore, the purpose of this paper is to explore ethical principles that would be applied to address the selected case study involving parents who do not want their children to be vaccinated. The explored areas in the analysis include an overview of the selected case study, ethical issue, ethical decision-making, communication approaches, and the application of ethical principles to resolve the issue.

Overview of Case Study

The selected case for this analysis is incident 10 case study, which involves parents that have refused their child’s vaccination. Jenna and Chris Smith are the parents of a 5-day old baby girl, Ana. The parents have refused vaccination of their child because of the harm that the vaccines might have on Ana. Accordingly, they express that vaccinating their child will predispose her to autism due to the effect of vaccines. Jenna and Chris consider that the best alternative to raising their child will involve exclusively breastfeeding, using organic foods, and not vaccinating her to promote her health and wellbeing. After listening to their concerns, Dr. Angela Kerr, a pediatrician, takes her time to provide the parents scientific information about the safety of vaccines. She educates them that vaccines have saved lives of millions of children over the past century. Dr. Kerr also educates them about the manner in which the government updates information about vaccine safety through databases that include the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting (VAERS). The database is open to the public for it to be updated on the safety of vaccines. The pediatrician also informs them about the importance of immunization in minimizing the predisposition of the unvaccinated populations to diseases (Ethical Case Study, 2020).  Despite this information on the benefits of vaccination, the Smith’s family does not accept Ana’s vaccination.

Analysis of the Ethical Issues in the Case Study

The ethical dilemma in the case study is refusal of the Smith’s family for their daughter to be vaccinated. Dr. Kerr feels that Ana’s family should be educated about the scientific benefits of vaccination and risks of not having their daughter vaccinated. This is after she finds out about their misinformed perceptions towards vaccines. Dr. Kerr experiences the ethical dilemma of beneficence and autonomy. Autonomy entails respect the decisions that patients make while beneficence entails doing good to others (Gesser-Edelsburg et al., 2018; Healy et al., 2022). Dr. Kerr has the professional and ethical responsibility of ensuring Ana’s safety and health is protected through vaccinations. She also has the ethical responsibility of respecting the decisions of the patients. As a result, she experiences ethical dilemma on the best decision to adopt. Laws on the individuals that should make decisions on the care to be given to a patient vary across countries. Most countries recognize that parents or guardians have the responsibility of making decisions for children aged below eighteen years (Navin et al., 2020). Dr. Kerr considers the legal requirements of ethical practice, hence, facing dilemma of protecting the child’s health and respecting the autonomy right of the parents.

Using Ethical Decision-Making Model to Analyze the Case Study

The ethical decision-making applicable in analyzing this case study has three components that include moral awareness, moral judgment and ethical behavior. Moral awareness is the situation where one recognizes and acknowledges the presence of an ethical dilemma in an encounter or situation. Individual’s sensitivity to professional and personal values and principles makes one be aware of ethical dilemmas (Zorzato et al., 2022). Dr. Kerr’s moral awareness can be seen from her immediate understanding of the parents’ misinformed perception towards vaccination. Moral judgment refers to a situation where one makes a decision to choose between right and wrong choices or actions. Factors such as organizational culture and cognitive biases influence moral judgment (Adewale et al., 2019; Zorzato et al., 2022). Dr. Kerr’s moral judgment can be seen from her decision to educate the parents about the benefits of vaccination to their daughter. Ethical behavior entails the best decision that one adopts to address an ethical dilemma. Dr. Kerr’s ethical behavior can be seen in her decision to educate the parents about the benefits of vaccination using scientific evidence.

Effectiveness of Communication Approaches in the Case Study

Effective communication is important in addressing ethical dilemmas in practice. Dr. Kerr demonstrated effective communication approaches in helping Ana’s parents understand her views towards vaccination. Accordingly, Dr. Kerr utilized active listening and adopted a non-judgmental approach in communicating with the parents. Dr. Kerr took her time to listen to the reasons the parents had towards decline vaccination of their daughter. Active listening helped her to understand the attitude, beliefs, and knowledge the parents had towards vaccination. Active listening also provided her an effective basis for responding to them (Bester, 2022). Dr. Kerr also demonstrated open-mindedness by not making conclusions without considering their views. As a result, she was non-judgmental in expressing her views towards vaccination, which made the parents comfortable in the process. Therefore, healthcare providers should demonstrate openness, transparency, and practice effective communication approaches to build trust with their patients. Family or patient-centered education should also be adopted to facilitate informed decision-making. Patient or family-centered education contributes to optimum outcomes such as safety, quality, and efficiency in the treatment process (Adewale et al., 2019).

Resolving the Ethical Dilemma by Applying Ethical Principles

Ethical Principles are guidelines to help healthcare professional to work and decide through difficult situation and to provide them with better direction on their decision. In this case, study, Dr. Kerr must use the ethical principle of beneficence, autonomy and non-maleficence. Autonomy is the ethical principle that recognizes that patients have the right to make independent decisions. The healthcare providers should not attribute the decisions made to actions such as coercion. Healthcare providers can only make decisions for patients if they do not have the capacity to do so (Bester, 2022). Dr. Kerr recognizes the role of parents’ decision on whether their child should be vaccinated or not. Ana is also below 18 years, implying that the decisions of the parents should be respected. Dr. Kerr respects the autonomy of the parents by not imposing on them the decision they need to adopt.

Dr. Kerr also has to consider the ethical principle of non-maleficence. Non-maleficence entails do no harm to the patient. Dr. Kerr advocates Ana’s vaccination since she believes that it will protect her from diseases. However, she has no influence in the decisions made since the parents have the right to decide for their daughter (Bester, 2022). Therefore, it is important that Dr. Kerr requests the parents to provide her the source of their information and educate them about the credible sources of information they should use in the future. Educating parents will enhance their awareness about the health needs of their daughter, hence, the promotion of beneficence principle of doing good to others.

Conclusion

In conclusion, Dr. Kerr should continue to advocate for the patient by educating the parents gradually to an evidence base topic regarding vaccination, rather than opinion base. Healthcare Professionals play crucial roles in maintaining the public trust in vaccination, including addressing the parent’s concern. Dr. Kerr should also consider the parents feelings toward vaccination but must present data and documentation to contradict their beliefs. Through it, Ana’s parents will make informed decisions about the best decision that they should adopt to promote their daughters’ optimum health and wellbeing.

References

Adewale, O., Cooper, C., Felix, P., Mitchell, A., Savage, J., & Mase, W. (2019). The Ethics of Parental Refusal to Vaccinate: Costs, Community Safety, and Individual Rights. Journal of the Georgia Public Health Association, 7(2), 98–103. https://doi.org/10.20429/jgpha.2019.070215

Bester, J. C. (2022). Vaccine Ethics: Ethical Considerations in Childhood Vaccination. In N. Nortjé & J. C. Bester (Eds.), Pediatric Ethics: Theory and Practice (pp. 437–451). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-86182-7_27

Ethical Case Studies. (2020). Capella.Edu.

Gesser-Edelsburg, A., Diamant, A., Hijazi, R., & Mesch, G. S. (2018). Correcting misinformation by health organizations during measles outbreaks: A controlled experiment. PLOS ONE, 13(12), e0209505. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0209505

Halstead, S. B., Katzelnick, L. C., Russell, P. K., Markoff, L., Aguiar, M., Dans, L. R., & Dans, A. L. (2020). Ethics of a partially effective dengue vaccine: Lessons from the Philippines. Vaccine, 38(35), 5572–5576. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2020.06.079

Healy, C. M., Savas, L. S., Shegog, R., Lunstroth, R., & Vernon, S. W. (2022). Medical ethics principles underscore advocating for human papillomavirus vaccine. Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics, 0(0), 1–3. https://doi.org/10.1080/21645515.2021.1989926

Leask, J., Kinnersley, P., Jackson, C., Cheater, F., Bedford, H., & Rowles, G. (2012). Communicating with parents about vaccination: A framework for health professionals. BMC Pediatrics, 12, 154. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2431-12-154

Navin, M. C., Kozak, A. T., & Deem, M. J. (2020). Perspectives of public health nurses on the ethics of mandated vaccine education. Nursing Outlook, 68(1), 62–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.outlook.2019.06.014

Zorzato, D., Pook, C. J., & Bekhor, J. (2022). Response to ‘The moral and religious obligation to vaccinate children in Jewish ethics.’ Acta Paediatrica, 111(1), 191–191. https://doi.org/10.1111/apa.16154

Sample Answer 2 for NHS FPX 4000 Assessment 3 Applying Ethical Principles

Healthcare workers, including nurses, encounter ethical quandaries that need them to navigate while considering their convictions and moral principles. In addition, healthcare professionals need to consider and respect the patient’s ethical convictions while prioritizing their overall welfare. Nurses and healthcare workers adhere to four fundamental concepts in patient care: autonomy, beneficence, nonmaleficence, and justice (Hasselbacher et al., 2020). By using these concepts, healthcare professionals may effectively navigate ethical dilemmas and make informed judgments. This paper’s purpose is to summarize the chosen case study, examine ethical concerns, use the ethical decision-making model, assess the efficacy of communication strategies, and apply ethical principles to the case study.

Case Study

Nurse Amelia Brooks is faced with a complex situation in health care ethics. Doctor Rebecca Martin, the chief obstetrician at Riverside Medical Centre, requests her assistance in performing an elective abortion on a 24-year-old graduate student named Sophie Turner. Amelia, renowned for her steadfast dedication to providing quality treatment to patients, is faced with a significant moral quandary as a result of her deeply held personal convictions against abortion, which are deeply based on her religious background (Hasselbacher et al., 2020). As the patient, Sophie Turner is positioned at the core of this ethical controversy, asserting her autonomy and prerogative to make choices about her physical well-being. Amelia’s ethical need to provide treatment without prejudice and maintain the benchmarks of her occupation introduces an additional level of intricacy to the predicament. Nurse Amelia Brooks struggles with balancing the ethical principles of autonomy, professional responsibility, and non-maleficence (Carvajal et al., 2022).

Ethical Issues

The primary people involved in this ethical dilemma are Nurse Amelia Brooks, Dr. Rebecca Martin, and the patient, Sophie Turner. By opting for a selective abortion, Dr. Martin highlights the significance of the patient’s autonomy, aligning with women’s reproductive rights and the safeguarding of bodily autonomy. Autonomy is crucial for maintaining women’s societal standing. As a patient, Sophie asserts that she should have the authority to make choices about her body, emphasizing autonomy. However, Nurse Amelia is facing a moral quandary due to her religious convictions. Amelia has a problem as she must navigate between delivering treatment and upholding her values despite the Conscience Protection Act allowing healthcare practitioners to avoid some operations that go against their religion (Apay et al., 2020).

Ethical Decision-Making Model

The Ethical Decision-Making Model, comprising of three elements: moral awareness, moral judgment, and ethical behavior, is essential for comprehending the ethical predicament encountered by Nurse Amelia. Moral awareness encompasses grasping the ethical dimensions of a situation or topic, which is crucial for recognizing the consequences of one’s actions. Nurse Amelia and Dr. Martin possess moral consciousness, understanding the potential consequences that may arise if an elective abortion request is approved. Moral judgment entails meticulously examining the rationales and ethical factors related to the situation using ethical frameworks or theories (McCarthy & McGuinness, 2020). In this scenario, Nurse Amelia faces a delicate balance between her personal beliefs and her duty to provide unbiased treatment, which calls for a morally nuanced judgment. Ethical behavior is making decisions based on ethical awareness and judgment. For instance, Nurse Amelia’s choice to participate in the elective abortion process will be evaluated according to established ethical principles of autonomy, non-maleficence, and professional responsibility.

Factors Contributing to the Ethical Problem

The ethical dilemma in healthcare arises from the clash between scientific treatments and religious perspectives. The example of Nurse Amelia exemplifies the conflicting emotions she experiences due to the contrast between her religious upbringing and her capacity to make choices influenced by her convictions. She must reconcile the requirements of her institution with her autonomy, which contradicts her religious background. The organizational connection also influences the ethical problem in the healthcare industry. Effective resolution of moral dilemmas necessitates the establishment of transparent communication and mutual comprehension among Nurse Amelia, Dr. Martin, and the institution. Nevertheless, the absence of transparent communication and information dissemination, coupled with the failure of the ethical issue administrator to provide clarity, intensifies the dilemma (Tillman et al., 2023). The presence of these variables has resulted in a significant increase in ethical tension.

Assessing Communication Effectiveness

Nurse Amelia Brooks successfully resolved an intricate ethical problem using proficient and deficient communication strategies. She freely voiced her opposition to an elective abortion procedure due to her views, acknowledging the conflict between personal principles and societal norms. Her strong and forceful communication was apparent when she freely conveyed her moral perspective to Dr. Rebecca Martin, displaying introspection and improving her effectiveness as a communicator. There was a lack of effective communication when she failed to address the ethical question with the patient openly, Sophie Turner. Healthcare practitioners should prioritize direct verbal communication, actively listen, and maintain a confident and clear voice to improve communication efficacy (Hasselbacher et al., 2020). Efficient communication can increase productivity, improve interpersonal connections, and enhance patient results. Poor communication may lead to tense professional relationships, diminished quality of patient treatment, and ethical issues.

Assessing the Effectiveness of Ethical Problem Resolution

Assessing the healthcare professional’s answer to the ethical challenge involves analyzing their reactions to the scenario. In this case study, the nurse faced an ethical dilemma when personal beliefs conflicted with professional responsibilities. However, the nurse demonstrated effectiveness by comprehending the situation’s nature and acknowledging their refusal to participate in the abortion (Carvajal et al., 2022). The professional successfully addressed the obligations by effectively managing the patient’s autonomy and personal beliefs. However, this instance highlights healthcare workers’ challenges when confronted with ethical dilemmas. This emphasizes the need for transparent communication, moral contemplation, and the imperative for healthcare organizations to provide guidelines for professionals to address ethical challenges while maintaining patient-focused treatment.

Applying Ethical Principles to a Possible Solution

The suggested resolution to a healthcare predicament is transparent communication among Nurse Amelia Brooks, Dr. Rebecca Martin, and patient Sophie Turner. This conversation upholds the principle of patients’ autonomy and acknowledges Amelia’s dissent over elective abortion. All parties involved articulate their viewpoints, principles, and apprehensions. Amelia would articulate her moral ideas and worries, while Dr. Martin would participate in polite dialogues, considering ethical values and her colleague’s worldview. Sophie Turner would actively engage in decision-making, ensuring that her autonomy and preferences are considered. This strategy enhances Amelia’s productivity, promotes ethical dialogue, and cultivates a diverse and welcoming workplace (Tillman et al., 2023). It reconciles divergent perspectives, cultivates positive interpersonal connections, and upholds healthcare ethics.

Conclusion

Nurse Amelia Brooks is confronted with an ethical predicament involving conscientious objection and professional duty. This intricate matter encompasses conflicting notions of self-governance, professional accountability, and avoiding harm. The Ethical Decision-Making Model facilitates comprehension of the situation. Effective communication, cooperation, and comprehension are essential in navigating this ethical domain. By acknowledging and valuing diverse belief systems and promoting open and honest communication, healthcare practitioners may discover ethical resolutions that uphold the well-being of patients and the self-governing rights of all individuals involved. Healthcare practitioners must possess effective communication, teamwork, and commitment to ethical standards to manage ethical challenges successfully.

References

Apay, S. E., Gürol, A., Gür, E. Y., & Church, S. (2020). Midwifery students’ reactions to ethical dilemmas encountered in outpatient clinics. Nursing Ethics, 27(7), 1542–1555. https://doi.org/10.1177/0969733020922875

Carvajal, B., White, H., Brooks, J., Thomson, A. M., & Cooke, A. (2022). Experiences of midwives and nurses when implementing abortion policies: A systematic integrative review. Midwifery, p. 111, 103363. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2022.103363

Hasselbacher, L. A., Hebert, L. E., Liu, Y., & Stulberg, D. B. (2020). “My hands are tied”: Abortion restrictions and providers’ experiences in religious and nonreligious health care systems. Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health, 52(2), 107–115. https://doi.org/10.1363/psrh.12148

McCarthy, J., & McGuinness, S. (2020). Conscience, conscientious objection, and commitment: midwives, nurses, and abortion care. In Springer eBooks (pp. 149–169). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-49104-8_10

Tillman, S., Eagen‐Torkko, M., & Levi, A. (2023). Ethics, abortion access, and Emergency Care Post‐Dobbs: the gray Areas. Journal of Midwifery & Women S Health, 68(6), 774–779. https://doi.org/10.1111/jmwh.13598