NHS FPX 4000 Assessment 4 Analyzing a Current Health Care Problem or Issue
Capella University NHS FPX 4000 Assessment 4 Analyzing a Current Health Care Problem or Issue – Step-By-Step Guide
This guide will demonstrate how to complete the Capella University NHS FPX 4000 Assessment 4 Analyzing a Current Health Care Problem or Issue assignment based on general principles of academic writing. Here, we will show you the A, B, Cs of completing an academic paper, irrespective of the instructions. After guiding you through what to do, the guide will leave one or two sample essays at the end to highlight the various sections discussed below.
How to Research and Prepare for NHS FPX 4000 Assessment 4 Analyzing a Current Health Care Problem or Issue
Whether one passes or fails an academic assignment such as the Capella University NHS FPX 4000 Assessment 4 Analyzing a Current Health Care Problem or Issue depends on the preparation done beforehand. The first thing to do once you receive an assignment is to quickly skim through the requirements. Once that is done, start going through the instructions one by one to clearly understand what the instructor wants. The most important thing here is to understand the required format—whether it is APA, MLA, Chicago, etc.
After understanding the requirements of the paper, the next phase is to gather relevant materials. The first place to start the research process is the weekly resources. Go through the resources provided in the instructions to determine which ones fit the assignment. After reviewing the provided resources, use the university library to search for additional resources. After gathering sufficient and necessary resources, you are now ready to start drafting your paper.
How to Write the Introduction for NHS FPX 4000 Assessment 4 Analyzing a Current Health Care Problem or Issue
The introduction for the Capella University NHS FPX 4000 Assessment 4 Analyzing a Current Health Care Problem or Issue is where you tell the instructor what your paper will encompass. In three to four statements, highlight the important points that will form the basis of your paper. Here, you can include statistics to show the importance of the topic you will be discussing. At the end of the introduction, write a clear purpose statement outlining what exactly will be contained in the paper. This statement will start with “The purpose of this paper…” and then proceed to outline the various sections of the instructions.
Need a high-quality paper urgently?
We can deliver within hours.
How to Write the Body for NHS FPX 4000 Assessment 4 Analyzing a Current Health Care Problem or Issue
After the introduction, move into the main part of the NHS FPX 4000 Assessment 4 Analyzing a Current Health Care Problem or Issue assignment, which is the body. Given that the paper you will be writing is not experimental, the way you organize the headings and subheadings of your paper is critically important. In some cases, you might have to use more subheadings to properly organize the assignment. The organization will depend on the rubric provided. Carefully examine the rubric, as it will contain all the detailed requirements of the assignment. Sometimes, the rubric will have information that the normal instructions lack.
Another important factor to consider at this point is how to do citations. In-text citations are fundamental as they support the arguments and points you make in the paper. At this point, the resources gathered at the beginning will come in handy. Integrating the ideas of the authors with your own will ensure that you produce a comprehensive paper. Also, follow the given citation format. In most cases, APA 7 is the preferred format for nursing assignments.
How to Write the Conclusion for NHS FPX 4000 Assessment 4 Analyzing a Current Health Care Problem or Issue
After completing the main sections, write the conclusion of your paper. The conclusion is a summary of the main points you made in your paper. However, you need to rewrite the points and not simply copy and paste them. By restating the points from each subheading, you will provide a nuanced overview of the assignment to the reader.
How to Format the References List for NHS FPX 4000 Assessment 4 Analyzing a Current Health Care Problem or Issue
The very last part of your paper involves listing the sources used in your paper. These sources should be listed in alphabetical order and double-spaced. Additionally, use a hanging indent for each source that appears in this list. Lastly, only the sources cited within the body of the paper should appear here.
Stuck? Let Us Help You
Completing assignments can sometimes be overwhelming, especially with the multitude of academic and personal responsibilities you may have. If you find yourself stuck or unsure at any point in the process, don’t hesitate to reach out for professional assistance. Our assignment writing services are designed to help you achieve your academic goals with ease.
Our team of experienced writers is well-versed in academic writing and familiar with the specific requirements of the NHS FPX 4000 Assessment 4 Analyzing a Current Health Care Problem or Issue assignment. We can provide you with personalized support, ensuring your assignment is well-researched, properly formatted, and thoroughly edited. Get a feel of the quality we guarantee – ORDER NOW.
Sample Answer for NHS FPX 4000 Assessment 4 Analyzing a Current Health Care Problem or Issue
The health and wellbeing of the population depends largely on its access to and utilization of healthcare services. Access to healthcare refers mainly to the timely utilization of the available health services to promote the best possible outcomes of health. Access to healthcare is important because it enables patients as well as physicians to control acute episodes, prevent illness and exacerbations that would cause complications in health problems. Access to healthcare has dimensions that include availability, acceptability, approachability, affordability, appropriateness, and accommodation of health. Therefore, this essay paper examines the issue of limited access to healthcare and ways of addressing it in practice.
Description of the Problem
Limited access to healthcare is a healthcare issue that affects the health and wellbeing of the diverse populations. Limited access to healthcare refers to the untimely utilization of the available healthcare services by the population to promote their best possible outcomes of health (National Academies of Sciences et al., 2018). Limited access to health contributes to widen health disparities in a population alongside negative outcomes when compared with communities or populations with enhanced access to health (Dassah et al., 2018). Limited access to healthcare is a prevalent issue in the US. For example, the Center for Disease Control and Prevention reported in 2016 that 2% of the adolescents aged between 10 and 17 years did not access the usual preventive care, 21% did not receive their required well-child checkups, and 12% did not go for a dental visit over the past 12 months (Black, 2016).
Limited access to healthcare arises due to a number of reasons. According to Dassah et al., (2018) limited access to healthcare is attributed to health-related factors such as disability. People with disabilities experience factors that hinder their access to their needed healthcare such as acceptability, affordability, availability, and geography (Dassah et al., 2018). Socio-demographic characteristics such as income level and residents of rural areas also contribute to limited access to healthcare. For example, the majority of rural residents have been shown to have low incomes when compared to urban residents, which affect the access to and utilization of healthcare services. Similarly, urban residents often have more healthcare providers per capita when compared to rural residents, affecting the access and utilization of healthcare services. Language barriers due to ethnicity also contributes to limited access to healthcare services among the American populations. For example, individuals from ethnic minorities with low or no English proficiency affect access to care as well as quality healthcare in the state. Inadequate understanding by the patient contributes to poor compliance, patient satisfaction and underuse of healthcare services (National Academies of Sciences et al., 2018). The other causes of limited access to healthcare include race and ethnicity, health insurance coverage and literacy levels among the population. The most likely causes from the above include geographical location, income and poverty level, race and ethnicity, and health status such as disability status.
Context, Importance and Populations Affected by the Problem
Limited access to healthcare is a prevalent issue facing a significant proportion of the population in America. Accordingly, people from ethnic minorities, low socioeconomic background, with disabilities, and lack insurance coverage experience the problem of limited access to healthcare services (Collaborators* & del Pozo-Cruz, 2017). The issue of limited access to healthcare services is important to nursing and health in general due to a number of reasons. Firstly, limited access to healthcare often lead to unmet health-related needs in a population. The consequence of failing to meet the health needs of the affected or vulnerable populations include worsened health outcomes, health complications and increased spending in health (National Academies of Sciences et al., 2018). Limited access to healthcare also contributes to delays in the ability of a population to receive their needed care, which affect the realization of positive health outcomes. Enhanced access to healthcare lowers preventable illnesses, complications and hospitalizations. However, limited access implies that the population will be disproportionately affected by a disease increasing the risk of premature mortality, unnecessary hospitalizations and financial burden of disease management (Vecchio et al., 2018; Kominski et al., 2017; Alcalá et al., 2017). Due to these reasons, limited access to healthcare should be prioritized to promote positive health outcomes in the population. The populations that are commonly affected by the problem of limited access to healthcare are varied. They include low-income earners, the poor, people living with disabilities, those lacking medical insurance coverage, individuals from ethnic minorities, rural dwellers, and people with low literacy levels (Alcalá et al., 2017; Black, 2016; Dassah et al., 2018; National Academies of Sciences et al., 2018).
Potential Solutions, Requirements for Implementing Solution and Consequences of Ignoring the Problem
Addressing the issue of limited access to healthcare services in the US requires the adoption of responsive interventions by healthcare stakeholders. Several interventions can be embraced to address the issue of limited access to healthcare services. A number of interventions that apply to the issue can be seen in the study by Bright et al., (2017). Bright et al., (2017) categorized the interventions that can be used to address the issue of limited access to healthcare services into supply, non-monetary, demand, and financial interventions. According to them, supply side interventions include delivery of essential services such as immunization and referrals by qualified healthcare professionals closer to homes or communities experiencing limited access to health. The supply-related interventions also include service level improvements (service integration, scaling up services and provider training). The financial interventions that can be adopted include contracting in or out of essential services, fee exemptions, expanded health insurance coverage and the establishment of health education and promotion programs to raise awareness among the population on the need for improved service utilization (Bright et al., 2017). Health technologies can also be used to address the issue of limited access to healthcare services. For example, the use of telehealth could address the issue of limited access due to geographical issues or shortage of qualified healthcare providers in the rural settings. Telehalth services would enhance the access to healthcare services by reducing the cost-related barriers to healthcare (Lin et al., 2018). An effective solution to addressing the issue of limited access to healthcare would be the incorporation of telehealth services into service delivery. However, its successful implementation requires enhanced provider training of the providers and patients on technology use, provision of incentives to the providers and support to the patients to enhance its effectiveness (Slightam et al., 2020; Zulman et al., 2019). The consequences of ignoring the issue of limited access to healthcare services in the population include widening disproportionate access to care, health inequalities and poor health outcomes in the affected populations including increased mortality and hospitalization rate alongside the burden of the disease (National Academies of Sciences et al., 2018).
Pros and Cons and Ethical Implications
The solution that is proposed to address the issue of limited access to healthcare services is the incorporation of telehealth technologies into health. The use of telehealth technologies in addressing the issue is associated with a number of benefits. Firstly, telehealth is cost-effective. It reduces the costs that patients could have incurred in travelling to receive the care that they need. Telehealth also promotes patient-centeredness in care (Kayyali et al., 2017). Patients and providers can interact whenever in need to address their health issues, hence, patient-centeredness. The use of telehealth also improves health outcomes by facilitating early identification and management of health problems (Lillicrap et al., 2019). Telehealth is however associated with disadvantages that include being expensive to implement, requires provider and patient training and eliminates the physical interaction between patients and providers, which could address other health needs not possible through telehealth (Lin et al., 2018).
Addressing the issue of limited access to healthcare services using telehealth is associated with a number of ethical implications. Firstly, it promotes equity and equality in health. The use of telehealth promotes enhanced access to care by the vulnerable populations through the elimination of barriers such as costs, availability and geography. Addressing the issue also promotes the ethical aspects of benevolence and non-maleficence. Healthcare providers ensure that care that is safe, efficient and effective is delivered to the affected populations in a timely manner. Healthcare providers also utilize the technology to make decisions that are of best interest in meeting the actual and potential needs of the patients (Kuziemsky et al., 2020). The use of telehealth technology to address the issue of limited access to healthcare services however raises the ethical concern of data integrity. In specific, the use of health technologies threaten the privacy and confidentiality of the data of the patients. Data integrity issues such as breaches and ineffective use of the technology could lead to loss or access of data by third or unintended parties (Botrugno, 2019). Therefore, the use of telehealth health should prioritize the protection and promotion of data integrity.
Conclusion
Overall, limited access to healthcare services is a critical issue that affects the health outcomes of a population. Limited access to healthcare services is attributable to factors such as cost, geographical, race and ethnicity, and poverty-related barriers. Limited access to healthcare services affects populations that include individuals with disability, rural dwellers, the poor, insured, and those from ethnic minorities. Therefore, solutions such as the use of telehealth services should be incorporated to address the issue of limited access to healthcare services in the US.
References
Alcalá, H. E., Chen, J., Langellier, B. A., Roby, D. H., & Ortega, A. N. (2017). Impact of the Affordable Care Act on Health Care Access and Utilization Among Latinos. The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine, 30(1), 52–62. https://doi.org/10.3122/jabfm.2017.01.160208
Black, L. I. (2016). Access and Utilization of Selected Preventive Health Services Among Adolescents Aged 10–17. 246, 8.
Botrugno, C. (2019). Towards an ethics for telehealth. Nursing Ethics, 26(2), 357–367. https://doi.org/10.1177/0969733017705004
Bright, T., Felix, L., Kuper, H., & Polack, S. (2017). A systematic review of strategies to increase access to health services among children in low and middle income countries. BMC Health Services Research, 17(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-017-2180-9
Collaborators*, G. 2015 H. A. and Q., & del Pozo-Cruz, B. (2017). Healthcare access and quality index based on mortality from causes amenable to personal health care in 195 countries and territories, 1990-2015: A novel analysis from the global burden of disease study 2015. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(17)30818-8
Dassah, E., Aldersey, H., McColl, M. A., & Davison, C. (2018). Factors affecting access to primary health care services for persons with disabilities in rural areas: A “best-fit” framework synthesis. Global Health Research and Policy, 3(1), 36. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41256-018-0091-x
Kayyali, R., Hesso, I., Mahdi, A., Hamzat, O., Adu, A., & Gebara, S. N. (2017). Telehealth: Misconceptions and experiences of healthcare professionals in England. International Journal of Pharmacy Practice, 25(3), 203–209. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijpp.12340
Kominski, G. F., Nonzee, N. J., & Sorensen, A. (2017). The Affordable Care Act’s Impacts on Access to Insurance and Health Care for Low-Income Populations. Annual Review of Public Health, 38(1), 489–505. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-publhealth-031816-044555
Kuziemsky, C. E., Hunter, I., Gogia, S. B., lyenger, S., Kulatunga, G., Rajput, V., Subbian, V., John, O., Kleber, A., Mandirola, H. F., Florez-Arango, J., Al-Shorbaji, N., Meher, S., Udayasankaran, J. G., & Basu, A. (2020). Ethics in Telehealth: Comparison between Guidelines and Practice-based Experience -the Case for Learning Health Systems. Yearbook of Medical Informatics, 29(1), 44–50. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0040-1701976
Lillicrap, L., Hunter, C., & Goldswain, P. (2019). Improving geriatric care and reducing hospitalisations in regional and remote areas: The benefits of telehealth. Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare, 1357633X19881588. https://doi.org/10.1177/1357633X19881588
Lin, C.-C. C., Dievler, A., Robbins, C., Sripipatana, A., Quinn, M., & Nair, S. (2018). Telehealth In Health Centers: Key Adoption Factors, Barriers, And Opportunities. Health Affairs, 37(12), 1967–1974. https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2018.05125
National Academies of Sciences, E., Division, H. and M., Services, B. on H. C., & Disabilities, C. on H. C. U. and A. with. (2018). Factors That Affect Health-Care Utilization. In Health-Care Utilization as a Proxy in Disability Determination. National Academies Press (US). https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK500097/
Slightam, C., Gregory, A. J., Hu, J., Jacobs, J., Gurmessa, T., Kimerling, R., Blonigen, D., & Zulman, D. M. (2020). Patient Perceptions of Video Visits Using Veterans Affairs Telehealth Tablets: Survey Study. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 22(4), e15682. https://doi.org/10.2196/15682
Vecchio, N., Davies, D., & Rohde, N. (2018). The effect of inadequate access to healthcare services on emergency room visits. A comparison between physical and mental health conditions. PLoS ONE, 13(8). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0202559
Zulman, D. M., Wong, E. P., Slightam, C., Gregory, A., Jacobs, J. C., Kimerling, R., Blonigen, D. M., Peters, J., & Heyworth, L. (2019). Making connections: Nationwide implementation of video telehealth tablets to address access barriers in veterans. JAMIA Open, 2(3), 323–329. https://doi.org/10.1093/jamiaopen/ooz024
Individual patients and groups visit health care facilities looking forward to comprehensive care and continuous support from health professionals. A holistic assessment of health issues, appropriate treatment, and healthy patient-provider relationships characterize such care. Despite multiple efforts to achieve this goal, numerous issues that hamper patient safety and care quality occur at different care points. Accordingly, health care professionals and leaders should explore these issues and their implications and implement sustainable, evidence-based solutions. Evidence-based solutions are informed by current research to ensure they are valid (Alrabadi et al., 2021). The purpose of this paper is to analyze a current issue in health care, including a proposed solution and possible ethical implications.
Scholarly Information Explaining the Health Care Issue
Medication errors are a significant issue whose occurrence threatens patient safety immensely. Their prevalence should be a sincere concern for health professionals who envision safe workplaces for patients and care providers. According to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), approximately 100,000 cases of suspected medical errors are reported annually. The FDA (2019) further reported that medication errors have profound implications including disability, birth defects, and deaths. From personal experiences and observations, medication errors are preventable occurrences requiring multi-dimensional interventions to control effectively. They are preventable since they often occur due to human error, such as a lack of medication confirmation and failure to administer the correct dosage (Tariq et al., 2023). A multi-dimensional approach is necessary due to the differences in causes and the scope of the issue.
For effective outcomes, patients, health care professionals, and organizational leaders should play their individual roles effectively. For instance, leaders should provide appropriate education and technology for preventing medication errors as health professionals adopt them accordingly (Ahsani-Estahbanati et al., 2022; Rodziewicz et al., 2023). Patients should be adequately educated on the potential of medication errors, their prevention, and the importance of speaking up as members of the broader health care team. They should also provide health care professionals with adequate information about their health, current medications, and possible drug reactions to guide health professionals in the medication administration process.
The above information helps to explain medication errors from multiple perspectives, allowing the issue to be understood comprehensively. For instance, describing its prevalence underlines why it is a severe issue requiring maximum attention in health care settings. Besides, presenting it as a preventable health risk illustrates how human failure leads to its occurrence. The other information area is the need for a multifaceted approach involving different individuals and teams. Overall, this information can guide health care professionals and leaders to focus on the appropriate areas when formulating and implementing measures to prevent medication errors.
Analysis of the Issue
Definition
Although there is no standard definition of medication errors, various researchers, scholars, and organizations have provided several definitions to demonstrate what the issue entails. For instance, Rasool et al. (2020) defined a medication error as a failure in drug therapy, resulting in patient harm. Such harm includes health complications and disability. Tariq et al. (2023) expanded this definition by describing a medication error as a preventable event leading to inappropriate medication use. In any case, patient harm is inevitable, and its magnitude varies with the type of medication inappropriately used, the dosage, and the patient’s present health status.
Those Involved
Medication errors can occur in all settings where medication use is involved. Therefore, physicians, nurses, pharmacists could be involved in causing a medication error. Patients receiving inpatient or outpatient care can be victims of medication errors in varying magnitudes. Nursing research demonstrates that medication errors can occur at any stage of the medication process. These stages include medication prescription, transcription, dispensation, and administration (Schroers et al., 2021; Manias et al., 2020). Most errors are encountered during medication administration, hence increased attention in this area. Wondmieneh et al. (2020) reported that nurses are the most associated with medication errors since they spend over 40% of their time administering medications. Therefore, supporting them to execute their roles effectively is critical for medication error prevention.
Causes of Medication Errors
Understanding the causes of medication errors is the first step toward their effective control and management. Schroers et al. (2021) grouped the causes into knowledge-based, personal, and contextual factors. The most common knowledge-based cause is the lack of medication administration knowledge, particularly among new nurses. Personal factors include fatigue, while a heavy workload and interruptions dominate the contextual factors. Wondmieneh et al. (2020) reported that nurses’ failure to administer drugs at the scheduled time may cause patients to develop toxicities, hence, complications. Therefore, procedures to facilitate timely medication administration are vital for medication error prevention. Other causes include inappropriate prescribing and medication confirmation, a nursing shortage, and the absence of disease surveillance systems (Rasool et al., 2020). Several risk factors also increase the probability of medication error occurrence. They include old age, polypharmacy, and multiple comorbidities (Rasool et al., 2020). The impacts of medication errors vary with the cause, hence the need for an in-depth understanding of their origin and potential interventions.
Potential Solutions for the Issue
Medication errors solutions vary with the settings, causes, and manifestations. If the cause is errors in administrative procedures, interventions focused on improving medication administration should be prioritized. Reducing workload is crucial in settings where fatigue and high workloads cause medication errors (Schroers et al., 2021). The implication is that an in-depth understanding of the cause and potential interventions is crucial before implementing a solution. Common solutions include adopting technologies such as barcode scanning, education to prescribers, medication reconciliations, and appropriate use of electronic systems (Ahsani-Estahbanati et al., 2022; Schepel et al., 2019; Mulac et al., 2021). Each intervention has different outcomes, and effective implementation is essential to achieve the desired result. Barcode medication administration involves automating the verification process and helping nurses adhere to the five rights of medication administration (Mulac et al., 2021). Adopting this technology implies reducing medication administration errors, critical in reducing patient harm. However, barcode administration could be harmful if wrongly implemented due to the possibility of disrupting workflow and increasing workload (Mulac et al., 2021). Therefore, nurses should be appropriately educated on the technology use to optimize implementation results.
Ignoring the issue would have far-reaching implications since medication errors affect different groups of people directly and indirectly. The first group that experiences the adverse effects of medication errors is the patients. Rasool et al. (2020) reported that medication errors increase treatment costs, considering that they are the third leading cause of hospitalization after cardiovascular diseases and cancer. In the United States, medication errors are associated with more deaths than traffic accidents. Among nurses, medication errors intensify emotional and mental distress since they cause second-victim syndrome (Ozeke et al., 2019). The syndrome has similar effects to post-traumatic disorder and hampers nurses’ ability to concentrate on their work and offer patient-centered care. Organizational leaders are also affected due to the increased economic burden and workload and must adopt appropriate systems, policies, and cultures for medication error prevention.
Ethical Principles if Potential Solution was Implemented
Health care professionals should be innately committed to promoting ethical practice in their work settings. Achieving this role requires a commitment to addressing current and emerging issues hampering patient outcomes. To implement barcode medication administration, organizational leaders should be committed to change, supporting evidence-based interventions, and attaining a harmless workplace. For barcode scanning to work effectively, organizations should have functioning hardware to provide the appropriate preventive effect on errors (Mulac et al., 2021). As a result, acquiring the necessary infrastructure is essential for successful implementation. Organizational leaders should further ensure nursing professionals have acquired adequate skills for technology use to prevent user-centered risks. These interventions demonstrate a desire to benefit patients (beneficence) and prevent harm (nonmaleficence).
Ethical practice implies promoting a practice that adheres to the ethical principles of care. These include beneficence, nonmaleficence, autonomy, and justice (Medical Protection, 2023). Implementing barcode administration would align with the objectives of beneficence since it seeks to maximize good for others, particularly patients. Nonmaleficence would also be achieved since it focuses on preventing harm (Girdler et al., 2019). Autonomy involves respecting the patient’s right to self-determination, while justice involves treating patients equally and equitably. In this context, beneficence and nonmaleficence would be the dominant guiding principles when implementing barcode medication administration.
Conclusion
Nurses encounter many issues with profound implications for patient care and health processes. Medication errors are such issues due to their adverse impacts on patients, nurses, and health care systems. As explained in this paper, medication errors increase hospitalizations, treatment costs, and mortality rates. Nurses who commit errors could experience second-victim syndrome. Addressing this issue requires an in-depth understanding of causes and potential solutions. Barcode medication administration prevents errors through drug verification and can be implemented if a health care facility has the proper infrastructure to support it.
References
Ahsani-Estahbanati, E., Sergeevich Gordeev, V., & Doshmangir, L. (2022). Interventions to reduce the incidence of medical error and its financial burden in health care systems: a systematic review of systematic reviews. Frontiers in Medicine, 9, 875426. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2022.875426
Alrabadi, N., Shawagfeh, S., Haddad, R., Mukattash, T., Abuhammad, S., Al-rabadi, D., … & Al-Faouri, I. (2021). Medication errors: a focus on nursing practice. Journal of Pharmaceutical Health Services Research, 12(1), 78-86. https://doi.org/10.1093/jphsr/rmaa025
FDA. (2019). working to reduce medication errors. https://www.fda.gov/drugs/information-consumers-and-patients-drugs/working-reduce-medication-errors
Girdler, S. J., Girdler, J. E., Tarpada, S. P., & Morris, M. T. (2019). Nonmaleficence in medical training: Balancing patient care and efficient education. Indian Journal of Medical Ethics, 4(2), 129–133. https://doi.org/10.20529/IJME.2018.100
Manias, E., Kusljic, S., & Wu, A. (2020). Interventions to reduce medication errors in adult medical and surgical settings: a systematic review. Therapeutic Advances in Drug Safety, 11, 204209862096830. https://doi.org/10.1177/2042098620968309
Medical Protection. (2023). The four pillars of medical ethics. https://www.medicalprotection.org/uk/articles/essential-learning-law-and-ethics#:~:text=The%20four%20pillars%20of%20medical%20ethics%20are%20defined%20as%3A,all%20people%20equally%20and%20equitably.
Mulac, A., Mathiesen, L., Taxis, K., & Gerd Granås, A. (2021). Barcode medication administration technology use in hospital practice: a mixed-methods observational study of policy deviations. BMJ Quality & Safety, 30(12), 1021–1030. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2021-013223
Ozeke, O., Ozeke, V., Coskun, O., & Budakoglu, I. I. (2019). Second victims in health care: Current perspectives. Advances in Medical Education and Practice, 10, 593–603. https://doi.org/10.2147/AMEP.S185912
Rasool, M. F., Rehman, A. U., Imran, I., Abbas, S., Shah, S., Abbas, G., … & Hayat, K. (2020). Risk factors associated with medication errors among patients suffering from chronic disorders. Frontiers in Public Health, 8, 531038. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2020.531038
Rodziewicz, T. L., Houseman, B., & Hipskind, J. E. (2023). Medical error reduction and prevention. National Library of Medicine.
Schepel, L., Aronpuro, K., Kvarnström, K., Holmström, A., Lehtonen, L., Lapatto-Reiniluoto, O., Laaksonen, R., Carlsson, K., & Airaksinen, M. (2019). Strategies for improving medication safety in hospitals: Evolution of clinical pharmacy services. Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy, 15(7), 873-882. DOI: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2019.02.004.
Schroers, G., Ross, J. G., & Moriarty, H. (2021). Nurses’ perceived causes of medication administration errors: a qualitative systematic review. The Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Patient Safety, 47(1), 38-53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcjq.2020.09.010
Tariq, R. A., Vashisht, R., Sinha, A., & Scherbak, Y. (2023). Medication dispensing errors and prevention. National Library of Medicine.