NR 305 Week 3: Discussion: Debriefing of the Week 2 iHuman Wellness Assignment (Graded)

Chamberlain University NR 305 Week 3: Discussion: Debriefing of the Week 2 iHuman Wellness Assignment (Graded)– Step-By-Step Guide

This guide will demonstrate how to complete the Chamberlain University  NR 305 Week 3: Discussion: Debriefing of the Week 2 iHuman Wellness Assignment (Graded)  assignment based on general principles of academic writing. Here, we will show you the A, B, Cs of completing an academic paper, irrespective of the instructions. After guiding you through what to do, the guide will leave one or two sample essays at the end to highlight the various sections discussed below.

How to Research and Prepare for NR 305 Week 3: Discussion: Debriefing of the Week 2 iHuman Wellness Assignment (Graded)                        

Whether one passes or fails an academic assignment such as the Chamberlain University  NR 305 Week 3: Discussion: Debriefing of the Week 2 iHuman Wellness Assignment (Graded) depends on the preparation done beforehand. The first thing to do once you receive an assignment is to quickly skim through the requirements. Once that is done, start going through the instructions one by one to clearly understand what the instructor wants. The most important thing here is to understand the required format—whether it is APA, MLA, Chicago, etc.

After understanding the requirements of the paper, the next phase is to gather relevant materials. The first place to start the research process is the weekly resources. Go through the resources provided in the instructions to determine which ones fit the assignment. After reviewing the provided resources, use the university library to search for additional resources. After gathering sufficient and necessary resources, you are now ready to start drafting your paper.

How to Write the Introduction for NR 305 Week 3: Discussion: Debriefing of the Week 2 iHuman Wellness Assignment (Graded)                        

The introduction for the Chamberlain University  NR 305 Week 3: Discussion: Debriefing of the Week 2 iHuman Wellness Assignment (Graded) is where you tell the instructor what your paper will encompass. In three to four statements, highlight the important points that will form the basis of your paper. Here, you can include statistics to show the importance of the topic you will be discussing. At the end of the introduction, write a clear purpose statement outlining what exactly will be contained in the paper. This statement will start with “The purpose of this paper…” and then proceed to outline the various sections of the instructions.

How to Write the Body for NR 305 Week 3: Discussion: Debriefing of the Week 2 iHuman Wellness Assignment (Graded)                        

After the introduction, move into the main part of the NR 305 Week 3: Discussion: Debriefing of the Week 2 iHuman Wellness Assignment (Graded) assignment, which is the body. Given that the paper you will be writing is not experimental, the way you organize the headings and subheadings of your paper is critically important. In some cases, you might have to use more subheadings to properly organize the assignment. The organization will depend on the rubric provided. Carefully examine the rubric, as it will contain all the detailed requirements of the assignment. Sometimes, the rubric will have information that the normal instructions lack.

Another important factor to consider at this point is how to do citations. In-text citations are fundamental as they support the arguments and points you make in the paper. At this point, the resources gathered at the beginning will come in handy. Integrating the ideas of the authors with your own will ensure that you produce a comprehensive paper. Also, follow the given citation format. In most cases, APA 7 is the preferred format for nursing assignments.

How to Write the Conclusion for NR 305 Week 3: Discussion: Debriefing of the Week 2 iHuman Wellness Assignment (Graded)                        

After completing the main sections, write the conclusion of your paper. The conclusion is a summary of the main points you made in your paper. However, you need to rewrite the points and not simply copy and paste them. By restating the points from each subheading, you will provide a nuanced overview of the assignment to the reader.

How to Format the References List for NR 305 Week 3: Discussion: Debriefing of the Week 2 iHuman Wellness Assignment (Graded)                        

The very last part of your paper involves listing the sources used in your paper. These sources should be listed in alphabetical order and double-spaced. Additionally, use a hanging indent for each source that appears in this list. Lastly, only the sources cited within the body of the paper should appear here.

Stuck? Let Us Help You

Completing assignments can sometimes be overwhelming, especially with the multitude of academic and personal responsibilities you may have. If you find yourself stuck or unsure at any point in the process, don’t hesitate to reach out for professional assistance. Our assignment writing services are designed to help you achieve your academic goals with ease. 

Our team of experienced writers is well-versed in academic writing and familiar with the specific requirements of the NR 305 Week 3: Discussion: Debriefing of the Week 2 iHuman Wellness Assignment (Graded)  assignment. We can provide you with personalized support, ensuring your assignment is well-researched, properly formatted, and thoroughly edited. Get a feel of the quality we guarantee – ORDER NOW. 

Sample Answer for NR 305 Week 3: Discussion: Debriefing of the Week 2 iHuman Wellness Assignment (Graded)

Luciana Gonzalez and I did start off well until I started asking questions. Being an A type personality and being provided by the program all those questions, I assumed better to ask it all. So, as I am questioning my patient the answer I receive is “I’m not answering anymore”. Confused I thought I asked improperly so asked it again. Luciana in no uncertain terms said, ” I’m not answering that question, you ask too many questions and cut me right off”. How rude I thought. I even told all my coworkers that the computer yelled at me. We all got a chuckle. So, I started my second round, thinking to myself (only being allowed 120 questions), I have all the answers to these, so I’ll continue where I left off. Big mistake, at the end evaluation I was docked points, apparently, I missed pertinent questions with information as per the program I needed, but I had those necessary answers already, according to me. The computer did not answer me back. I will not make the same mistake again. I’ve learned from that experience to ask the major questions and expand according to answers provided by the patient. 

The only other issue was the constant breathing. I don’t know if that bothered anyone else, but it was quite interrupting to me. Quess I could have put the volume down but was afraid too just in case Luciana went into respiratory arrest. As a computer program it was far better than taking the NRP exam. That simulation scenario only gives you 2 minutes to drag everything over to assess a newborn baby. This program does allow you the time to count the heart rate, check BP’s, assess appropriately without a limited time frame. Which is critical and more to realism. But once you leave that page you cannot go back to it, so you must take the time to write all the information down before going forward or backward. In a non-emergent situation in real life, it can be done, and is a crucial part in a health care physical.

Realistically it does give the student a basic understanding as to what to look for in a full health assessment. And as to deviations like Luciana and UTI, the specific questions and possible findings you would obtain. Such as the bacterium E.coli, what is looks like, how you come by the germ, rationale, and treatment. The EHR was a challenge. If I missed a lab value, I was not able to go back to retrieve it. In real life situations labs are easily obtainable and can be printed and placed in a chart for a doctor to see. And any abnormal critical reading would also be called to the nurse from the laboratory department giving their name and obtaining yours to ensure immediate acknowledge so that a PCP can be notified, and treatments can be instituted immediately.

The SBAR part of the assessment was well done. I felt upon writing the assessment down you were able to point out the necessary elements such as labs, vital signs, pain. Analyze and recommend any treatments needed so the patient can reach their optimum state of well-being.  

ALSO READ:

NR 305 Week 3 Discussion: Exploring Popular Diet Trends (graded)

NR 305 Week 4 Discussion: Community Access to Mental Health Services (graded)

NR 305 Week 4: Discussion: Debriefing of Week 3 iHuman Cardiovascular Assessment (Graded)

NR 305 Week 5 Discussion: Assessing for Family Violence (graded)

NR 305 Week 5: Discussion: Debriefing of Week 4 iHuman Neurovascular Assessment (Graded)

NR 305 Week 6: Discussion: Reflection on Nursing Assessment for Violence (Graded)

NR 305 Week 6 Discussion: Providing Culturally Competent Nursing Care (graded)

NR 305 Week 7 Discussion: Assessment Techniques (graded)

NR 305 Mental Health Assessment Amka Oxendine (iHuman) (Graded)

NR 305 Week 7 Debriefing of Week 6 iHuman Mental Health Assessment (Graded)

NR 305 Week 8 Discussion: Case Study or Share an Experience (graded)

NR 305 Week 8: Discussion: Reflection on End of Life Care (Graded)

NR 305 Week 8 Discussion: AACN Essentials Informatics Self-Assessment (graded)

Sample Answer 2 for NR 305 Week 3: Discussion: Debriefing of the Week 2 iHuman Wellness Assignment (Graded)

When going through last week’s simulation experience, I think it was easy to navigate. I am thankful that we had the orientation simulation so that we could get familiar with the system though. I feel like I did a good job going through the history questions with Ms. Gonzalez. I’ve had a lot of practice doing hospital admission in my own practice, and I feel like the questions asked in this scenario were the same as what we ask in the hospital setting. This example shows how realistic the scenarios really are.

If I were to care for a patient like Ms. Gonzalez, I would ask more specific questions related to her concerns and get to the bottom of what was going on, which I voiced in my nurse note assignment. For example, I would ask questions on water intake since it is relatable to frequency along with dehydration relating to UTI. I think something I could improve would be to really imagine what it would be like in real life and take that into consideration when doing the actual assessment. I was selecting options that I wouldn’t really do in real life, not even thinking because it was just there. Something that iHuman gave me feedback on was pumping the blood pressure cuff too high, which surprised me. I didn’t expect the system to be so realistic and exact.

Something that I thought this simulation reinforced that is valuable is taking the full time to auscultate and make sure I am doing it in the correct pattern. When it comes to bowel sounds, if you didn’t listen for the appropriate amount of time, you got reminded of it in the feedback. Also with lung sounds, if you listened vertically instead of horizontally in the pattern, it reminded you, along with if you didn’t listen to the whole inhalation/exhalation. The same goes for auscultating the heart, it would remind you in the feedback to listen to the whole cycle. I think this is valuable because when you have 4-6 patients in the hospital setting, you feel rushed, and, sometimes, you forget or neglect the basics.

Sample Answer 3 for NR 305 Week 3: Discussion: Debriefing of the Week 2 iHuman Wellness Assignment (Graded)

In the simulation exercise of Ms. Gonzalez, I felt the ease of going through each tab of the EHR went well. I am a detail-oriented person and felt like I spent a lot of time going through the notes carefully. During my ASN education, it was engrained in my brain to look for clues that may lead to dangerous patient situations. Sometimes I feel like reading the reports more than once to ensure I am not overlooking important medical information. I felt confident that I knew basic facts about my patient before I started my physical assessment. I do feel like the scenario was realistic due to many of my real-life patients having a high BMI and needing education and referrals on how to best deal with medical concerns. It is also typical for many patients to not have an HCP, leaving much to be desired when it comes to medical records.

Next time, if I encounter a patient like Ms. Gonzalez, I will ensure her full birth date is on her armband. It was very difficult for me to accept just her birth month and date with no year given. I have had patients on the same floor before with the same name and same month of birth. The full date of birth and full name should be used to identify the patient even in a computer scenario. I would like to have more family information about chronic diseases and ailments. I feel there was an underlining reason for the recurrent UTI’s and wanted further workup. I was disappointed to find that my feedback was just the most important findings of the scenario but cut out all the problematic concerns I found. I was sure my findings were noteworthy, but not to the expert apparently. I am not bitter.

I am happy to report that I learned a lot while completing the simulation. I can apply the thoroughness of the history and physical review with subjective and objective assessments to provide the best possible care for the patient. This simulation reinforced the importance of patient education along with referrals. I appreciated the reminder to educate the patient on the next steps to be proactive while awaiting their next appointment. As nurses, we all know how long most patients must wait for simple appointments to continue their care. I do not have any questions about this scenario.

Sample Answer 4 for NR 305 Week 3: Discussion: Debriefing of the Week 2 iHuman Wellness Assignment (Graded)

    In last week’s assessment of Luciana Gonzalez, I felt like moving through the whole simulation was fairly easy and the system is set up to kind of help you out along the way. I felt most confident going through the labs and looking for abnormalities there and then later applying those findings to the physical assessment and past medical history findings. I feel that the scenario was as realistic as it could be. It is hard to really interact with a computer patient – the rapport building between caregiver and patient kind of goes out the window – but overall, it was not that bad. I still felt as if I was talking to and helping a real patient.

    One of the things that I struggled with the first time I tried the assessment was that I asked way too many assessment questions, and then got lost in the assignment in terms of trying to hit all the key areas. I should have just focused more on the patient and why she was there or what needed to be treated. When I have a patient like this, I will make sure to take the time to concentrate on the patient and their needs. It is easy for nurses to get bogged down in all the things we must do daily for our patients and then we miss the opportunity to connect with the people we are caring for. iHuman is a great program teaching us valuable assessment skills, but there were a couple of things that did not really surprise me in the feedback – they were just things that I did not think about, I guess is a good way to put it. For example, I was dinged a few times for not asking questions that I did not think applied to this assessment and for asking questions that I did think were relevant. I was also given feedback on how to properly take blood pressure and check for pulses, which made me giggle because these are things that I do daily. However, it is hard to translate some physical things into a simulation.

    I learned that I do not have to ask so many questions in order to figure out the information I need to treat a patient. When I hear that we must do a comprehensive assessment in my brain I think along the lines of okay I need to know everything that has ever transpired for them health-wise. When this is not the case at all. I need to learn to just step back and ask relevant questions that will focus on the health issues at hand. This will also help me in building rapport with my patients as well because I will not be taking up so much of their time and will be handling the issues they want to be treated in a timely manner.

    I do not have any questions about last week’s scenario. It was pretty straightforward.