NRS 465 Define the role of the Institutional Review Board (IRB) when conducting research
Grand Canyon University NRS 465 Define the role of the Institutional Review Board (IRB) when conducting research-Step-By-Step Guide
This guide will demonstrate how to complete the Grand Canyon University NRS 465 Define the role of the Institutional Review Board (IRB) when conducting research assignment based on general principles of academic writing. Here, we will show you the A, B, Cs of completing an academic paper, irrespective of the instructions. After guiding you through what to do, the guide will leave one or two sample essays at the end to highlight the various sections discussed below.
How to Research and Prepare for NRS 465 Define the role of the Institutional Review Board (IRB) when conducting research
Whether one passes or fails an academic assignment such as the Grand Canyon University NRS 465 Define the role of the Institutional Review Board (IRB) when conducting research depends on the preparation done beforehand. The first thing to do once you receive an assignment is to quickly skim through the requirements. Once that is done, start going through the instructions one by one to clearly understand what the instructor wants. The most important thing here is to understand the required format—whether it is APA, MLA, Chicago, etc.
After understanding the requirements of the paper, the next phase is to gather relevant materials. The first place to start the research process is the weekly resources. Go through the resources provided in the instructions to determine which ones fit the assignment. After reviewing the provided resources, use the university library to search for additional resources. After gathering sufficient and necessary resources, you are now ready to start drafting your paper.
How to Write the Introduction for NRS 465 Define the role of the Institutional Review Board (IRB) when conducting research
The introduction for the Grand Canyon University NRS 465 Define the role of the Institutional Review Board (IRB) when conducting research is where you tell the instructor what your paper will encompass. In three to four statements, highlight the important points that will form the basis of your paper. Here, you can include statistics to show the importance of the topic you will be discussing. At the end of the introduction, write a clear purpose statement outlining what exactly will be contained in the paper. This statement will start with “The purpose of this paper…” and then proceed to outline the various sections of the instructions.
Need a high-quality paper urgently?
We can deliver within hours.
How to Write the Body for NRS 465 Define the role of the Institutional Review Board (IRB) when conducting research
After the introduction, move into the main part of the NRS 465 Define the role of the Institutional Review Board (IRB) when conducting research assignment, which is the body. Given that the paper you will be writing is not experimental, the way you organize the headings and subheadings of your paper is critically important. In some cases, you might have to use more subheadings to properly organize the assignment. The organization will depend on the rubric provided. Carefully examine the rubric, as it will contain all the detailed requirements of the assignment. Sometimes, the rubric will have information that the normal instructions lack.
Another important factor to consider at this point is how to do citations. In-text citations are fundamental as they support the arguments and points you make in the paper. At this point, the resources gathered at the beginning will come in handy. Integrating the ideas of the authors with your own will ensure that you produce a comprehensive paper. Also, follow the given citation format. In most cases, APA 7 is the preferred format for nursing assignments.
How to Write the Conclusion for NRS 465 Define the role of the Institutional Review Board (IRB) when conducting research
After completing the main sections, write the conclusion of your paper. The conclusion is a summary of the main points you made in your paper. However, you need to rewrite the points and not simply copy and paste them. By restating the points from each subheading, you will provide a nuanced overview of the assignment to the reader.
How to Format the References List for NRS 465 Define the role of the Institutional Review Board (IRB) when conducting research
The very last part of your paper involves listing the sources used in your paper. These sources should be listed in alphabetical order and double-spaced. Additionally, use a hanging indent for each source that appears in this list. Lastly, only the sources cited within the body of the paper should appear here.
Stuck? Let Us Help You
Completing assignments can sometimes be overwhelming, especially with the multitude of academic and personal responsibilities you may have. If you find yourself stuck or unsure at any point in the process, don’t hesitate to reach out for professional assistance. Our assignment writing services are designed to help you achieve your academic goals with ease.
Our team of experienced writers is well-versed in academic writing and familiar with the specific requirements of the NRS 465 Define the role of the Institutional Review Board (IRB) when conducting research assignment. We can provide you with personalized support, ensuring your assignment is well-researched, properly formatted, and thoroughly edited. Get a feel of the quality we guarantee – ORDER NOW.
Sample Answer for NRS 465 Define the role of the Institutional Review Board (IRB) when conducting research
Topic 3 DQ 2
The institutional review board (IRB) plays a critical role in research that involves human subjects or participants. The Institutional Review Board is an administrative entity created to protect the rights and welfare of human research subjects recruited to participate in research activities carried out based on the rules of the institution with which it is associated (Serpico et al., 2022). The IRB process is aimed at ensuring that study participants are safe and the research leads to high-quality evidence for application in clinical settings and health populations. The primary role of IRB is to review, before its initiation, all research involving human participants. The IRB protects the welfare, rights, and privacy of human subjects. For instance, it ensures that research subjects have informed consent (Lynch et al., 2020). The IRB has the authority to approve, exempt, disapprove, monitor and evaluate, and demand changes in all research activities that fall within its jurisdictions based on set regulations at state and federal levels and institutional policy. The IRB reviews research proposals to ensure ethical considerations are upheld, ascertain possible benefits outweigh the potential risks to participants, and ascertain informed consent procedures are sufficient.
An example of a peer-reviewed research article involving human participants and discussing a nursing issue is by O’Brien (2020) titled, “Decreasing Falls Amongst Elderly.” In the study, the researcher involved 26 nurses’ aides who were trained for over 10 weeks to perform an evidence-based intervention: purposeful hourly rounding based on 4 Ps. The researcher prioritized ethical considerations are required by IRB. These included getting informed consent from the nurses, confidentiality, minimizing harm, and ensuring that they benefited from the EBP intervention. For instance, the researcher did not reveal the identity of the participants while the essence of the training was to equip nurses with four interventions to reduce and prevent patient falls. These included assessing pain, personal needs, appropriate positioning, and placement.
References
Lynch, H. F., & Rosenfeld, S. (2020). Institutional review board quality, private equity, and
promoting ethical human subjects research. Annals of Internal Medicine, 173(7), 558-562. DOI: 10.7326/M20-1674.
O’Brien, J. (2020). Decreasing Falls Amongst Elderly. International Journal of
Nursing and Health Care Research, 3:1201. DOI: 10.29011/2688-9501.101201
Serpico, K., Rahimzadeh, V., Gelinas, L., Hartsmith, L., Lynch, H. F., & Anderson, E. E. (2022).
Institutional review board use of outside experts: A national survey. AJOB empirical bioethics, 13(4), 251-262. DOI: 10.1080/23294515.2022.2090459.