NRS 465 Week 7 Benchmark – Professional Capstone and Practicum Reflective Journal – Topic 7

Grand Canyon University NRS 465 Week 7 Benchmark – Professional Capstone and Practicum Reflective Journal – Topic 7-Step-By-Step Guide

This guide will demonstrate how to complete the Grand Canyon University NRS 465 Week 7 Benchmark – Professional Capstone and Practicum Reflective Journal – Topic 7  assignment based on general principles of academic writing. Here, we will show you the A, B, Cs of completing an academic paper, irrespective of the instructions. After guiding you through what to do, the guide will leave one or two sample essays at the end to highlight the various sections discussed below.

How to Research and Prepare for NRS 465 Week 7 Benchmark – Professional Capstone and Practicum Reflective Journal – Topic 7                                                                 

Whether one passes or fails an academic assignment such as the Grand Canyon University NRS 465 Week 7 Benchmark – Professional Capstone and Practicum Reflective Journal – Topic 7      depends on the preparation done beforehand. The first thing to do once you receive an assignment is to quickly skim through the requirements. Once that is done, start going through the instructions one by one to clearly understand what the instructor wants. The most important thing here is to understand the required format—whether it is APA, MLA, Chicago, etc.

After understanding the requirements of the paper, the next phase is to gather relevant materials. The first place to start the research process is the weekly resources. Go through the resources provided in the instructions to determine which ones fit the assignment. After reviewing the provided resources, use the university library to search for additional resources. After gathering sufficient and necessary resources, you are now ready to start drafting your paper.

How to Write the Introduction for NRS 465 Week 7 Benchmark – Professional Capstone and Practicum Reflective Journal – Topic 7                                                               

The introduction for the Grand Canyon University NRS 465 Week 7 Benchmark – Professional Capstone and Practicum Reflective Journal – Topic 7      is where you tell the instructor what your paper will encompass. In three to four statements, highlight the important points that will form the basis of your paper. Here, you can include statistics to show the importance of the topic you will be discussing. At the end of the introduction, write a clear purpose statement outlining what exactly will be contained in the paper. This statement will start with “The purpose of this paper…” and then proceed to outline the various sections of the instructions.

How to Write the Body for NRS 465 Week 7 Benchmark – Professional Capstone and Practicum Reflective Journal – Topic 7                                                               

After the introduction, move into the main part of the NRS 465 Week 7 Benchmark – Professional Capstone and Practicum Reflective Journal – Topic 7     assignment, which is the body. Given that the paper you will be writing is not experimental, the way you organize the headings and subheadings of your paper is critically important. In some cases, you might have to use more subheadings to properly organize the assignment. The organization will depend on the rubric provided. Carefully examine the rubric, as it will contain all the detailed requirements of the assignment. Sometimes, the rubric will have information that the normal instructions lack.

Another important factor to consider at this point is how to do citations. In-text citations are fundamental as they support the arguments and points you make in the paper. At this point, the resources gathered at the beginning will come in handy. Integrating the ideas of the authors with your own will ensure that you produce a comprehensive paper. Also, follow the given citation format. In most cases, APA 7 is the preferred format for nursing assignments.

How to Write the Conclusion for NRS 465 Week 7 Benchmark – Professional Capstone and Practicum Reflective Journal – Topic 7                                                               

After completing the main sections, write the conclusion of your paper. The conclusion is a summary of the main points you made in your paper. However, you need to rewrite the points and not simply copy and paste them. By restating the points from each subheading, you will provide a nuanced overview of the assignment to the reader.

How to Format the References List for NRS 465 Week 7 Benchmark – Professional Capstone and Practicum Reflective Journal – Topic 7                                                                 

The very last part of your paper involves listing the sources used in your paper. These sources should be listed in alphabetical order and double-spaced. Additionally, use a hanging indent for each source that appears in this list. Lastly, only the sources cited within the body of the paper should appear here.

Stuck? Let Us Help You

Completing assignments can sometimes be overwhelming, especially with the multitude of academic and personal responsibilities you may have. If you find yourself stuck or unsure at any point in the process, don’t hesitate to reach out for professional assistance. Our assignment writing services are designed to help you achieve your academic goals with ease. 

Our team of experienced writers is well-versed in academic writing and familiar with the specific requirements of the NRS 465 Week 7 Benchmark – Professional Capstone and Practicum Reflective Journal – Topic 7  assignment. We can provide you with personalized support, ensuring your assignment is well-researched, properly formatted, and thoroughly edited. Get a feel of the quality we guarantee – ORDER NOW. 

Sample Answer for NRS 465 Week 7 Benchmark – Professional Capstone and Practicum Reflective Journal – Topic 7

The proposed project is reducing and preventing patient falls among elderly inpatients. The project requires a list of resources and in the process of getting them, one must consider the relationship between policy, regulatory requirements, and economics on expected outcomes. Policy, either organizational or sectorial, plays a critical role in shaping care outcomes. Policies set standards and guidelines for care provision (Bellot et al., 2024). For instance, in this project, the government’s policy on value-based care reimbursement by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) considers patient falls as “never events” meaning that the practicum cannot access resources to attain the expected outcomes. Regulatory requirements also have substantial effects on my project as they ensure care offered meets set standards and principles. For instance, purposeful hourly rounding is effective when providers adhere to set boundaries in their interactions and evaluation of patients. Economics is another critical aspect that impacted the project. The available funds in the practicum site determine the extent of the project’s implementation. For instance, resource limitation meant that I had to prioritize certain interventions over others.

The interplay between policy, regulatory requirements, and economics has a significant effect on the project. The limitations emanating from these factors may influence and inform the care the practicum site can provide to patients, especially related to reducing falls using intentional hourly rounding (Lam et al., 2020). The interplay is also critical as it ensures that the proposed intervention leads to safe, effective, and high-quality care for patients to get better outcomes. The implication is that these aspects are critical to providing quality care and having expected patient outcomes.

Reflecting on my practicum site experience, I remember a meeting with the nurse floor manager in charge of geriatric patients who confided in me that the facility requires additional resources, especially nurses, to improve the frequency of doing purposeful or intentional rounding. The manager was also emphatic that reducing falls is critical to ensuring they optimally use resources since they do not get reimbursement from CMS for expenses related to the events. The nurse also asserted that implementing the intervention requires an approval process by the board of management (Ruppel et al., 2022). However, she was optimistic that based on the different aspects of the interventions, the probability of board approval was high. This experience demonstrates the challenges of implementing changes in healthcare settings and the importance of navigating the complex interplay of policy, regulatory requirements, and economics.

References

Bellot, J., Fennessey, A., Gerolamo, A., Kerr, M., & Wenner, T. (2024). Design and

Implementation of a Nursing Capstone Across a Multisite Health System. Journal of Nursing Education, 63(5): 292-297. DOI: 10.3928/01484834-20240305-03

Lam, C. K., Schubert, C. F., & Herron, E. K. (2020). Evidence‐based practice competence in

nursing students preparing to transition to practice. Worldviews on evidence‐based nursing, 17(6): 418-426. DOI: 10.1111/wvn.12479.

Ruppel, K. J., & Bone, B. A. (2022). Teaching evidence‐based practice: Knowledge to

implementation in a BSN program, part 2. Worldviews on evidence‐based nursing, 19(3): 251-253. DOI: 10.1111/wvn.12556.